Molecular surface representation using 3d zernike descriptors for protein shape comparison and docking

Current Protein and Peptide Science

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 520-530

  Kihara, Daisuke ^a,b   Sael, Lee ^b   Chikhi, Rayan ^c   Esquivel Rodriguez, Juan ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Purdue University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

3D zernike descriptor; Ligand binding site comparison; Protein docking prediction; Protein surface comparison

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

3D ZERNIKE DESCRIPTOR; ARTICLE; EVALUATION; LIGAND BINDING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; ROTATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 80052230202     PISSN: 13892037     EISSN: 18755550     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/138920311796957612     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Kihara, D.; Skolnick, J. The PDB is a covering set of small protein structures. J. Mol. Biol., 2003, 334, 793-802.
2. Shindyalov, I.N.; Bourne, P.E. Protein structure alignment by in-cremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Prot. Eng., 1998, 11, 739-747.
3. Holm, L.; Sander, C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J. Mol. Biol., 1993, 233, 123-38.
4. Mizuguchi, K.; Go, N. Comparison of spatial arrangements of secondary structural elements in proteins. Prot. Eng., 1995, 8, 353-362.
5. Kabsch, W. A discussion of the solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Cryst., 1978, A34, 827-828.
6. Mizuguchi, K.; Go, N. Seeking significance in three-dimensional protein structure comparisons. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 1995, 5, 377-382.
7. Kolodny, R.; Petrey, D.; Honig, B. Protein structure comparison,implications for the nature of 'fold space', and structure and function prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 2006, 16, 393-398.
8. Carugo, O. Recent progress in measuring structural similarity be-tween proteins. Curr. Prot. Pept. Sci., 2007, 8, 219-241.
9. Canterakis, N. 3D Zernike moments and Zernike affine invariants for 3D image analysis and recognition. Proc.11th Scandinavian Conf. on Image Analysis, 1999, 85-93.
10. Novotni, M.; Klein, R.; 3D Zernike descriptors for content based shape retrieval. ACM Symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling, Proceedings of the eighth ACM symposium on Solid modeling and applications, 2003, 216-225.
11. Shrake, A.; Rupley, J.A. Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin. J. Mol. Biol., 1973, 79, 351-371.
12. Lee, B.; Richards, F.M. The interpretation of protein structures, estimation of static accessibility. J. Mol. Biol., 1971, 55, 379-400.
13. Berman, H.M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T.N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I.N.; Bourne, P.E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res., 2000, 28, 235-242.
14. Connolly, M.L. Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. Science, 1983, 221, 709-713.
15. Mitchell, J.C.; Kerr, R.; Ten Eyck, L.F. Rapid atomic density methods for molecular shape characterization. J. Mol. Graph. Model., 2001, 19, 325-390.
16. Kinoshita, K.; Nakamura, H. Identification of the ligand binding sites on the molecular surface of proteins. Prot. Sci., 2005, 14, 711-718.
17. Identifying similar surface patches on proteins using a spin-image surface representation. Lecture Notes in Comp. Sci., 2005, 3537, 417-428.
18. Li, B.; Turuvekere, S.; Agrawal, M.; La, D.; Ramani, K.; Kihara, D. Characterization of local geometry of protein surfaces with the visibility criterion. Proteins, 2007, 71, 670-683.
19. Via, A.; Ferre, F.; Brannetti, B.; Helmer-Citterich, M. Protein surface similarities, a survey of methods to describe and compare protein surfaces. Cell Mol. Life Sci., 2000, 57, 1970-1977.
20. Sael L.; Kihara, D. Protein surface representation and comparison, New approaches in structural proteomics. In Biological Data Mining. Edited by Chen J, Lonardi S. Boca Raton, Florida, USA, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press; 2009, 89-109.
21. Venkatraman, V.; Sael, L.; Kihara, D. Potential for protein surface shape analysis using spherical harmonics and 3D Zernike descriptors. Cell Biochem. Biophys., 2009, 54, 23-32.
22. La, D.; Esquivel-Rodriguez, J.; Venkatraman, V.; Li, B.; Sael, L.; Ueng, S.; Ahrendt, S.; Kihara, D. 3D-SURFER, software for high-throughput protein surface comparison and analysis. Bioinformatics, 2009, 25, 2843-2844.
23. Sael, L.; Li, B.; La, D.; Fang, Y.; Ramani, K.; Rustamov, R.; Ki-hara, D. Fast protein tertiary structure retrieval based on global surface shape similarity. Proteins, 2008, 72, 1259-1273.
24. Sael, L.; La, D.; Li, B.; Rustamov, R.; Kihara, D. Rapid comparison of properties on protein surface. Protein, 2008, 73, 1-10.
25. Mak, L.; Grandison, S.; Morris, R.J. An extension of spherical harmonics to region-based rotationally invariant descriptors for molecular shape description and comparison. J. Mol. Graph. Model., 2007, 26, 1035-1045.
26. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol., 1990, 215, 403-410.
27. Holm, L.; Park, J. DaliLite workbench for protein structure comparison. Bioinformatics, 2000, 16, 566-567.
28. Kazhdan, M.; Funkhouser, T.; Rusinkiewicz, S. Rotation invariant spherical harmonic representation of 3D shape descriptors. Proc.of the 2003 Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Geometry processing, 2003, 43, 156-164.
29. Jiantao, P.; Ramani, K. A 3D Model Retrieval Method Using 2D Freehand Sketches. In Computational Science -- ICCS 2005. Berlin/Heidelberg, Springer; 2005, 343-346.
30. Kriegel, H.-P.; Kroger, P.; Mashael, Z.; Pfeifle, M.; Potke, M.; Seidl, S. Effective similarity search on voxelized CAD objects. Proc.of 8th international conference on database systems for advanced applications, 2003, 27-36.
31. Sael, L.; Kihara, D. Protein surface representation for application to comparing low-resolution protein structure data. BMC Bioinformatics, 2010, 11, S2.
32. Cuff, A.L.; Sillitoe, I.; Lewis, T.; Redfern, O.C.; Garratt, R.; Thornton, J.; Orengo, C.A. The CATH classification revisited--architectures reviewed and new ways to characterize structural divergence in superfamilies. Nucleic Acids Res., 2009, 37, D310-D314.
33. Topf, M.; Lasker, K.; Webb, B.; Wolfson, H.; Chiu, W.; Sali, A. Protein structure fitting and refinement guided by cryo-EM density. Structure, 2008, 16, 295-307.
34. Ceulemans, H.; Russell, R.B. Fast fitting of atomic structures to low-resolution electron density maps by surface overlap maximization. J. Mol. Biol., 2004, 338, 783-793.
35. Ludtke, S.J.; Baldwin, P.R.; Chiu, W. EMAN, semiautomated software for high-resolution single-particle reconstructions. J. Struct. Biol., 1999, 128, 82-97.
36. Grandison, S.; Roberts, C.; Morris, R.J. The application of 3D Zernike moments for the description of model-free molecular structure, functional motion, and structural reliability. J. Comput. Biol., 2009, 16, 487-500.
37. Chikhi, R.; Sael, L.; Kihara, D. Real-time ligand binding pocket database search using local surface descriptors. Proteins, 2010, 78, 2007-2028.
38. Liang, J.; Edelsbrunner, H.; Woodward, C. Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities, measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design. Prot. Sci., 1998, 7, 1884-1897.
39. Huang, B.; Schroeder, M. LIGSITEcsc, predicting ligand binding sites using the Connolly surface and degree of conservation. BMC Struct. Biol., 2006, 6, 19.
40. Kahraman, A.; Morris, R.J.; Laskowski, R.A.; Thornton, J.M. Shape variation in protein binding pockets and their ligands. J. Mol. Biol., 2007, 368, 283-301.
41. Bhatia, A.B.; Wolf, E. On the Circle Polynomials of Zernike and Related Orthogonal Sets. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1954, 50, 40-48.
42. Kinoshita, K.; Murakami, Y.; Nakamura, H. eF-seek, prediction of the functional sites of proteins by searching for similar electrostatic potential and molecular surface shape. Nucleic Acids Res., 2007, 35, W398-W402.
43. Gold, N.D.; Jackson, R.M. Fold independent structural comparisons of protein-ligand binding sites for exploring functional relationships. J. Mol. Biol., 2006, 355, 1112-1124.
44. Minai, R.; Matsuo, Y.; Onuki, H.; Hirota, H. Method for comparing the structures of protein ligand-binding sites and application for predicting protein-drug interactions. Proteins, 2008, 72, 367-381.
45. Xiong, B.; Wu, J.; Burk, D.; Xue, M.; Jiang, H.; Shen, J. BSSF, a fingerprint based ultrafast binding site similarity search and function analysis server. BMC Bioinformatics, 2010, 11, 47.
46. Sael, L.; Kihara, D. Characterization and classification of local protein surfaces using self-organizing map. Int. J. Knowl. Discovery Bioinform. (IJKDB), 2010, 1, 32-47.
47. Ultsch, A. ESOM-Maps, tools for clustering, visualization, and classification with Emergent SOM. Technical report. Dept.of Mathematics and Computer Sciece, Univeristy of Marburg. 2005.
48. Ultsch, A. Maps for the visualization of high-dimensional data spaces. Proc.WSOM'03, 2003, 225-230.
49. Venkatraman, V.; Yang, Y.D.; Sael, L.; Kihara, D. Protein-protein docking using region-based 3D Zernike descriptors. BMC Bioin-formatics, 2009, 10, 407.
50. Wolfson, H.; Rigoutsos, I. Geometric hashing, an overview. IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng., 1997, 4, 10-21.
51. Mintseris, J.; Wiehe, K.; Pierce, B.; Anderson, R.; Chen, R.; Janin, J.; Weng, Z. Protein-Protein Docking Benchmark 2.0, an update. Proteins, 2005, 60, 214-216.
52. Schneidman-Duhovny, D.; Inbar, Y.; Polak, V.; Shatsky, M.; Halperin, I.; Benyamini, H.; Barzilai, A.; Dror, O.; Haspel, N.; Nussinov, R.; Wolfson, H.J. Taking geometry to its edge, fast unbound rigid (and hinge-bent) docking. Proteins, 2003, 52, 107-112.
53. Shentu, Z.; Al, H.M.; Bystroff, C.; Zaki, M.J. Context shapes, Efficient complementary shape matching for protein-protein docking. Proteins, 2008, 70, 1056-1073.