Examining factors predicting students' digital competence

Journal of Information Technology Education

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 123-137

  Hatlevik, Ove Edvard ^a   Gudmundsdóttir, Gréta Björk ^a   Loi, Massimo ^a  

^a Norwegian Centre for ICT in Education   (Norway)

Author keywords

Average grades; Digital competence; Family background; Lower secondary school; Mastery orientation; Structural equation modelling

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING; SURVEYS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STUDENTS;

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENTS; DIGITAL COMPETENCE; FAMILY BACKGROUND; LANGUAGE INTEGRATION; MULTIPLE CHOICE; SECONDARY SCHOOLS; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING;

STUDENTS; EDUCATION;

EID: 84928950853     PISSN: 15479714     EISSN: 15393585     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.28945/2126     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Avidov-Ungar, O., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2013). Empowerment patterns of leaders in ICT and school strengths following the implementation of national ICT reform. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 12, 141-158. Retrieved November 24, 2014, from http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol12/JITEv12ResearchP141-158Avidov1228.pdf
2. Aviram, A., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2006). Towards a theory of digital literacy: Three scenarios for the next steps. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Retrieved May 15, 2014, from http://www.eurodl.org//materials//contrib//2006//Aharon_Aviram.htm
3. Binkley, M., Erstad, E., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining 21st century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17-66). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5
4. Bourdieu, P., & Thompson, J. B. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
5. Boyd, D. (2014). It's complicated. London: Yale University Press.
6. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. London: The Guilford Press.
7. Calvani, A., Fini, A., Ranieri, M., & Picci, P. (2012). Are young generations in secondary school digitally competent? A study on Italian teenagers. Computers and Education, 58, 797-807.
8. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation & Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). Are the new millennium learners making the grade? Technology use and educational performance in PISA. Paris: CERI/OECD. Retrieved November, 24, 2014, from http://www.oecdilibrary. org/education/inspired-by-technology-driven-by-pedagogy_9789264094437-en
9. Claro, M., Preiss, D. D., San Martín, E., Jara, I., Hinostroza, J. E., Valenzuela, S., & Nussbaum M. (2012). Assessment of 21st century ICT skills in Chile: Test design and results from high school level students. Computers & Education, 59, 1042-1053.
10. Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (2006). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Florence, KY: Cengage Learning.
11. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 X 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
12. Erstad, O. (2010). Educating the digital generation: Exploring media literacy for the 21st century. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 5(1), 56-71.
13. Eshet, Y. (2012). Thinking in the digital area: A revised model for digital literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 9, 267-276. Retrieved November 24, 2014, from http://iisit.org/Vol9/IISITv9p267-276Eshet021.pdf
14. European Commission. (2013). Survey of schools: ICT in education. Luxembourg: The European Union.
15. Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks (Report EUR 25351 EN). Luxembourg: The European Union.
16. Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Luxembourg: The European Union. Retrieved February 6, 2015, from http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=6359
17. Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age: The IEA international computer and information literacy study international report. Melbourne: Springer.
18. Fraillon, J., Schulz.W., & Ainley, J. (2013). International computer and information literacy study: Assessment framework. Amsterdam: IEA
19. Frønes T. S., & Narvhus E. K. (2011). Elever på nett - Digital lesing i PISA 2009 [Students on the Internet: Digital reading in PISA 2009]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
20. Geiser, C. (2013). Data analysis with Mplus. London: The Guildford Press
21. Gui, M., & Argentin, G. (2011). Digital skills of internet natives: Different forms of internet literacy in a random sample of northern Italian high school students. New Media & Society, 13(6), 963-980.
22. Harackiewicz, J. M., Pintrich, P. R., Barron, K. E., Elliot, A. J., & Trash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638-645.
23. Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the 'Net Generation.' Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92-113.
24. Hatlevik, O. E. (2010). Examining 'Digital Divide' in upper secondary school: A multilevel analysis of factors with an influence on digital competence. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 6(3), 151-164.
25. Hatlevik, O. E., & Christophersen, K. S. (2013). Digital competence in the beginning of upper secondary school: Digital inclusion. Computers & Education, 63, 240-247.
26. Hatlevik, O. E., Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Loi, M. (2015). Digital diversity among upper secondary students: A multilevel analysis of the relationship between cultural capital, self-efficacy, strategic use of information and digital competence. Computers and Education, 81, 345-353.
27. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternative. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
28. Katz I. R., & Macklin A. S. (2007). Information and communication technology (ICT) literacy: Integration and assessment in higher education. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 5(4), 50-55.
29. Kjærnsli, M., & Olsen, R. V. (2013). Fortsatt en vei å gå. Norske elever i matematikk, naturfag og lesning i PISA 2012 [Still a way to go: Norwegian students in math, science and reading in PISA 2012]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
30. Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
31. Krumsvik, R. J., Egelandsdal, K., Sarastuen, N. K., Jones, L. Ø., & Eikeland, O. J. (2013). Sammenhengen mellom IKT-bruk og læringsutbytte i videregående opplæring. [The relationship between the use of ICT and learning outcome in upper secondary school]. Bergen: University of Bergen.
32. Krumsvik, R. J., Ludvigsen, K., & Urke, H. B. (2011). Klasseleiing og IKT i vidaregåande opplæring. DLC-rapport nr.1/ 2011. [Class management and ICT in upper secondary education. DLC report nr.1/2011.] Bergen, Norway: University of Bergen.
33. MacCallum, K., Jeffrey, L., & Kinshuk. (2014). Factors impacting teachers' adoption of mobile learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13, 141-162. Retrieved November 24, 2014, from http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol13/JITEv13ResearchP141-162MacCallum0455.pdf
34. Martin, R., McGill, T., & Sudweeks, F. (2013). Learning anywhere, anytime: Student motivators for Mlearning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 12, 51-67. Retrieved November 24, 2014, from http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol12/JITEv12ResearchP051-067MartinFT51.pdf
35. McAlpine, H. (2002). A summary of methods of item analysis. Bluepaper Number 2. Glasgow: University of Glasgow
36. Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77-86.
37. Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs. (2010). National Assessment Program. ICT literacy years 6 and 10 report 2008. Carlton South, VIC, Australia: Curriculum Corporation. Retrieved February 7, 2014, from http://www.nap.edu.au/verve/_resources/2008_nap_ictl_public_report.pdf
38. Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2012). Framework for basic skills. Retrieved July 15, 2014, from http://www.udir.no/Stottemeny/English/Curriculum-in-English/_english/Framework-for-Basic-Skills/
39. Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2014). The education mirror. Retrieved January 6, 2015, from http://utdanningsspeilet.udir.no/en/
40. NOU (2010). Mangfold og mestring. Flerspråklige barn, unge og voksne i opplæringssystemet [Diversity and mastery: Multilingual children, youth and adults in the education system]. NOU 2010:7. Oslo: Norway.
41. Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011). PISA 2009. results: Students on line digital technologies and performance (Vol VI). Paris, France: OECD.
42. Pedró, F. (2007). The new millennium learners: Challenging our views on digital technologies and learning. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 2(4), 43-60.
43. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2004). Nursing research. principles and methods (7th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
44. Schunk D. H., Pintrich P. R., & Meece J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
45. Selwyn, N. (2008). The digital native - Myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings, 61(4), 364-379.
46. Tondeur, J., Sinnaee, I., van Houtte, M., & van Braak, J. (2011). ICT as cultural capital: The relationship between socioeconomic status and the computer-use profile of young people. New Media & Society, 13, 1-18.
47. Urdan, T. (2004a). Can achievement goal theory guide school reform. In P. R. Pintrich, & M. L. Maehr (Eds.). Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol.13. Motivating students, improving schools: The legacy of Carol Midgley (pp. 361-392). London: Elsevier
48. Urdan, T. (2004b). Predictors of academic self-handicapping and achievement: Examining achievement goals, classroom goal structures, and culture. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 251-264.
49. van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2011). Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 13(6), 893-911.
50. Warschauer, M. (2002). Reconceptualizing the digital divide. First Monday, 7(7). Retrieved July 15, 2014, from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/967/888
51. Wiborg, Ø., Arnesen, C. Å., Grøgaard, J., Støren, L. A., & Opheim, V. (2011). Elevers prestasjonsutvikling - hvor mye betyr skolen og familien? Andre delrapport frå prosjektet "Ressurser og resultater" [The development of pupils performance - how much does the school and the family matter? Second report from the project "Resources and Results"]. Rapport 35. Oslo: NIFU