From tools to toolkits in policy design studies: The new design orientation towards policy formulation research

Policy and Politics

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 291-311

  Howlett, Michael ^a,b   Mukherjee, Ishani ^b   Woo, Jun Jie ^c  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^c SINGAPORE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Governance; Policy design; Policy instruments; Policy tools; Public policy

Indexed keywords

GOVERNANCE APPROACH; PLANNING METHOD; POLICY MAKING; POLICY STRATEGY;

EID: 84928943365     PISSN: 03055736     EISSN: 14708442     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1332/147084414X13992869118596     Document Type: Article

References (189)

1. Anderson, JE, 1975, Public policymaking, New York: Praeger
2. Arts, B, Van Tatenhove, J, 2004, Policy and power: A conceptual framework between the 'old' and 'new' policy idioms, Policy Sciences 37, 339-56
3. Azuela, GE, Barroso, LA, 2012, Design and performance of policy instruments to promote the development of renewable energy: Emerging experience in selected developing countries, Washington, DC: World Bank Publications
4. Bardach, E, 1980, Implementation studies and the study of implements, Paper presented to the American Political Science Association
5. Barnett, CK, Shore, B, 2009, Reinventing program design: Challenges in leading sustainable institutional change, Leadership and Organization 30, 1, 16-35
6. Bendor, J, Sunil, K, Siegel, DA, 2009, Satisficing: A 'pretty good' heuristic, The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics 9, 1, doi:10.2202/1935-1704.1478
7. Bhatta, G, 2002, Evidence-based analysis and the work of policy shops, Australian Journal of Public Administration 61, 3, 98-105
8. Blonz, JA, Vajjhala, SP, Safirova, E, 2008, Growing complexities: A cross-sector review of us biofuels policies and their interactions, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future
9. Bobrow, D, 2006, Policy design: Ubiquitous, necessary and difficult, in BG Peters, J Pierre (eds) Handbook of public policy, pp 75-96, London: SAGE
10. Bobrow, DB, Dryzek, JS, 1987, Policy analysis by design, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press
11. Bode, I, 2006, Disorganized welfare mixes: Voluntary agencies and new governance regimes in Western Europe, Journal of European Social Policy 16, 4, 346-59
12. Boonekamp, PGM, 2006, Actual interaction effects between policy measures for energy efficiency: A qualitative matrix method and quantitative simulation results for households, Energy 31, 14, 2848-73
13. Braathen, NA, 2007a, Instrument mixes for environmental policy: How many stones should be used to kill a bird?, International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 1, 2, 185-235
14. Braathen, NA, 2007b, Instrument mixes addressing non-point sources of water pollution, Paris: OECD
15. Braathen, NA, Croci, E, 2005, Environmental agreements used in combination with other policy instruments, in The Handbook of Environmental Voluntary Agreements 43, 335-64, Dordrecht: Springer
16. Bressers, H, Honigh, M, 1986, A comparative approach to the explanation of policy effects, International Social Science Journal, 108, 267-88
17. Bressers, H, Klok, PJ, 1988, Fundamentals for a theory of policy instruments, International Journal of Social Economics 15, 3/4, 22-41
18. Bressers, HTA, O'Toole, LJ, 1998, The selection of policy instruments: A networkbased perspective, Journal of Public Policy 18, 3, 213-39
19. Bressers, HTA, O'Toole, LJ, 2005, Instrument selection and implementation in a networked context, in P Eliadis, M Hill, M Howlett (eds) Designing government: From instruments to governance, pp 132-53, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press
20. Briassoulis, H (ed), 2005, Policy integration for complex environmental problems: The example of Mediterranean desertification, Aldershot: Ashgate
21. Buckman, G, Diesendorf, M, 2010, Design limitations in Australian renewable electricity policies, Energy Policy 38, 7, 3365-76
22. Capano, G, 2011, Government continues to do its job: A comparative study of governance shifts in the higher education sector, Public Administration 89, 4, 1622-42
23. Christensen, T, Laegreid, P, Wise, LR, 2002, Transforming administrative policy, Public Administration 80, 1, 153-79
24. Clemens, ES, Cook, JM, 1999, Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change, Annual Review of Sociology 25, 441-66
25. Cohen, MD, March, JG, Olsen, JP, 1979, People, problems, solutions and the ambiguity of relevance, in MD Cohen, JG March, JP Olsen (eds), Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations, pp 24-37, Bergen: Universitetsforlaget
26. Cohn, D, 2004, The best of intentions, potentially harmful policies: A comparative study of scholarly complexity and failure, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 6, 1, 39-56
27. Colebatch, HK, 1998, Policy, Minneapolis, MN: University Of Minnesota Press
28. Considine, M, 2012, Thinking outside the box? Applying design theory to public policy, Politics and Policy 40, 4, 704-24
29. Craft, J, Howlett, M, 2012, Policy formulation, governance shifts and policy influence: Location and content in policy advisory systems, Journal of Public Policy 32, 2, 79-98
30. Dahl, RA, Lindblom, CE, 1953, Politics, economics and welfare: Planning and politicoeconomic systems resolved into basic social processes, New York:
31. Harper and Row Davies, P, 2004, Is evidence-based government possible?, www.sfi.dk/graphics/campbell/dokumenter/artikler/is_evidence-based_government_possible.pdf
32. De Bruijn, H, ten Heuvelhof, E, 1997, Instruments for network management, in WJM Kickert, EH Klijn, JFM Koppenjan (eds) Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector, chapter 7, London: SAGE
33. deLeon, P, 1988, The contextual burdens of policy design, Policy Studies Journal 17, 2, 297-309
34. del Río, P, 2009, Interactions between climate and energy policies: The case of Spain, Climate Policy 9, 2, 119-38
35. del Río, P, 2010, Analysing the interactions between renewable energy promotion and energy efficiency support schemes: The impact of different instruments and design elements, Energy Policy 38, 9, 4978-89, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.003
36. del Río, P, Howlett, MP, 2013, Beyond the 'Tinbergen rule' in policy design: Matching tools and goals in policy portfolios, SSRN Scholarly Paper, Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2247238
37. del Río, P, Carrillo-Hermosilla, J, Könnölä, T, 2010, Policy strategies to promote ecoinnovation, Journal of Industrial Ecology, doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00259.x.
38. del Río, P, Calvo Silvosa, A, Gómez, GI, 2011, Policies and design elements for the repowering of wind farms: A qualitative analysis of different options, Energy Policy 39, 4, 1897-908
39. Donovan, MC, 2001, Taking aim: Target populations and the wars on AIDS and drugs, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press
40. Doremus, H, 2003, A policy portfolio approach to biodiversity protection on private lands, Environmental Science and Policy 6, 217-32
41. Dror, Y, 1964, Muddling through: 'Science' or inertia, Public Administration Review, 24, 3, 154-7
42. Dryzek, J, 1983, Don't toss coins in garbage cans: A prologue to policy design, Journal Of Public Policy, 3, 4, 345-67
43. Dryzek, JS, Ripley, B, 1988, The ambitions of policy design, Policy Studies Review 7, 4, 705-19
44. Dunlop, CA, 2009, The temporal dimension of knowledge and the limits of policy appraisal: Biofuels policy in the UK, Policy Sciences 43, 4, 343-63, doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9101-7
45. Eijlander, P, 2005, Possibilities and constraints in the use of self-regulation and coregulation in legislative policy. Experiences in the Netherlands: Lessons to be learned for the EU, Electronic Journal of Comparative Law 9, 1, 1-8
46. Eliadis, FP, Hill, MM, Howlett, M (eds), 2005, Designing government: from instruments to governance, Montreal, McGill Queens University Press
47. Feindt, PH, 2012, The politics of biopatents in food and agriculture, 1950-2010: Value conflict, competing paradigms and contested institutionalisation in multi-level governance, Policy and Society 31, 4, 281-93
48. Franchino, F, Hoyland, B, 2009, Legislative involvement in parliamentary systems: Opportunities, conflict and institutional constraints, American Political Science Review 103, 4, 607-21
49. Gero, JS, 1990, Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design, Text SerialJournal, http://text-serial.livejournal.com
50. Givoni, M, Macmillen, J, Banister, D, Feitelson, E, 2013, From policy measures to policy packages, Transport Reviews, 1-20
51. Goggin, ML, Bowman, AOM, Lester, JP, O'Toole, LJ, 1990, Implementation theory and practice: Toward a third generation, Glenview: Scott, Foresman/Little, Brown
52. Goldmann, K, 2005, Appropriateness and consequences: The logic of neoinstitutionalism, Governance 18, 1, 35-52
53. Grabosky, PN, 1994, Green markets: Environmental regulation by the private sector, Law and Policy 16, 4, 419-48
54. Grant, W, 2010, Policy instruments in the common agricultural policy, West European Politics 33, 1, 22-38
55. Gunningham, ND, Sinclair, D, 1999, Regulatory pluralism: Designing policy mixes for environmental protection, Law Policy 21, 1, 49-76
56. Gunningham, N, Grabosky, P, Sinclair, D, 1998, Smart regulation: Designing environmental policy, Oxford: Clarendon Press
57. Haasnoot, M, Kwakkel, JH, Walker, WE, ter Maat, J, 2013, Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world, Global Environmental Change, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006
58. Hacker, JS, 2005, Policy drift: The hidden politics of US welfare state retrenchment, in W Streek, K Thelen (eds) Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 40-82
59. Hamelin, F, 2010, Renewal of public policy via instrumental innovation: Implementing automated speed enforcement in France, Governance 23, 3, 509-30
60. Hay, C, Smith, NJ-A, 2010, How policy-makers (really) understand globalization: The internal architecture of anglophone globalization discourse in Europe, Public Administration 88, 4, 903-27
61. Hickle, GT, 2013, Moving beyond the 'patchwork': A review of strategies to promote consistency for extended producer responsibility policy in the US, Journal of Cleaner Production, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.013
62. Hillier, B, Leaman, A, 1974, How is design possible: A sketch for a theory, DMG-DRS Journal: Design Research and Methods 8, 1, 40-50
63. Hillier, B, Musgrave, J, O'Sullivan, P, 1972, Knowledge and design, in WJ Mitchell (ed) Environmental design: Research and practice, 29.3.1-29.3.14, Los Angeles, CA: University of California-Los Angeles
64. Hippes, G, 1988, New instruments for environmental policy: A perspective, International Journal of Social Economics 15, 3/4, 42-51
65. Hoffmann, MJ, 2011, Climate governance at the crossroads: Experimenting with a global response after Kyoto, Oxford: Oxford University Press
66. Hood, C, 1986, The tools of government, Chatham: Chatham House Publishers
67. Hood, C, 2007, Intellectual obsolescence and intellectual makeovers: Reflections on the tools of government after two decades, Governance 20, 1, 127-44
68. Hood, C, 2010, The blame game: Spin, bureaucracy, and self-preservation in government, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
69. Hood, C, Margetts, HZ, 2007, The tools of government in the digital age, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
70. Hou, Y, Brewer, G, 2010, Substitution and supplementation between co- functional policy instruments: Evidence from state budget stabilization practices, Public Administration Review 70, 6, 914-24
71. Howlett, M, 1991, Policy instruments, policy styles and policy implementation, Policy Studies Journal 19, 2, 1-21
72. Howlett, M, 2000, Managing the 'hollow state': Procedural policy instruments and modern governance, Canadian Public Administration 43, 4, 412-31
73. Howlett, M, 2004, Beyond good and evil in policy implementation: Instrument mixes, implementation styles and second generation theories of policy instrument choice, Policy and Society 23, 2, 1-17
74. Howlett, M, 2009, Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: lessons from Canada, Canadian Public Administration 52, 2, 153-75
75. Howlett, M, 2011, Designing public policies: Principles and instruments, New York: Routledge
76. Howlett, M, 2012, The Lessons of Failure: Learning and Blame Avoidance in Public Policy-making, International Political Science Review 33, 5, 539-55, doi:10.1177/0192512112453603
77. Howlett, M, 2014a, Policy design: What, who, how and why?, in C Halpern, P Lascoumes, P Le Gales (eds) L'instrumentation et Ses Effets, Paris: Presses de Sciences Po
78. Howlett, M, 2014b, From the 'old' to the 'new' policy design: Beyond globalization and collaborative governance, Policy Sciences, Special issue on Policy Design, forthcoming
79. Howlett, M, del Río, P, 2014, The parameters of policy portfolios: Verticality and horizontality in design spaces and their consequences for policy mix formulation, Environment and Planning C, forthcoming
80. Howlett, M, Lejano, R, 2013, Tales from the crypt: The Rise and fall (and re-birth?) of policy design studies, Administration and Society 45, 3, 356-80
81. Howlett, M, Ramesh, M, 1993, Patterns of policy instrument choice: Policy styles, policy learning and the privatization experience, Policy Studies Review, 12, 1, 3-24
82. Howlett, M, Rayner, J, 1995, Do ideas matter? Policy subsystem configurations and the continuing conflict over Canadian forest policy, Canadian Public Administration 38, 3, 382-410
83. Howlett, M, Rayner, J, 2007, Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in 'new governance arrangements', Policy and Society 26, 4, 1-18
84. Howlett, M, Rayner, J, 2013, Patching vs packaging in policy formulation: Assessing policy portfolio design, Politics and Governance 1, 2, 170-82
85. Ingram, H, Schneider, A, 1990, Improving implementation through framing smarter statutes, Journal of Public Policy 10, 1, 67-88
86. Jarvis, DSL, 2011, Infrastructure regulation what works, why and how do we know?: Lessons from Asia and beyond, Singapore: World Scientific
87. Jordan, A, Benson, D, Wurzel, R, Zito, A, 2011, Policy instruments in practice, in JS Dryzek, RB Norgaard, D Schlosberg (eds) Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, pp 536-49, Oxford: Oxford University Press
88. Jordan, A, Benson, D, Zito, A, Wurzel, R, 2012, Environmental policy: Governing by multiple policy instruments?, in JJ Richardson (ed) Constructing a policy state? Policy dynamics in the EU, Oxford: Oxford University Press
89. Jordan, A, Wurzel, R, Zito, A, 2013, Still the century of 'new' environmental Policy instruments? Exploring patterns of innovation and continuity, Environmental Politics 22, 1, 155-73
90. Junginger, S, 2012, Design and innovation in the public sector: Matters of design in policy-making and policy implementation, European Academy of Design Conference
91. Kay, A, 2007, Tense layering and synthetic policy paradigms: The politics of health insurance in Australia, Australian Journal of Political Science 42, 4, 579-91
92. Keyes, JM, 1996, Power tools: The form and function of legal instruments for government action, Canadian Journal of Administrative Law and Practice 10, 133-74
93. Kingdon, JW, 1984, Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, Boston: Little, Brown and Company
94. Kirschen, ES, Benard, J, Besters, H, Blackaby, F, Eckstein, O, Faaland, J, Hartog, F, Morissens, L, Tosco, E, 1964, Economic policy in our time, Chicago: Rand McNally
95. Kiss, B, Manchón, CG, Neij, L, 2012, The role of policy instruments in supporting the development of mineral wool insulation in Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom, Journal of Cleaner Production, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.016
96. Kiviniemi, M, 1986, Public policies and their targets: A typology of the concept of implementation, International Social Science Journal 38, 108, 251-66
97. Koch, P, 2013, Overestimating the shift from government to governance: Evidence from Swiss metropolitan areas, Governance 26, 3, 397-423
98. Kooiman, J, 2000, Societal governance: Levels, models, and orders of social-political interaction, in J Pierre (ed) Debating governance, pp 138-66, Oxford: Oxford University Press
99. Landry, R, Varone, F, Goggin, ML, 1998, The determinants of policy design: The state of the theoretical literature, paper presented to the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL
100. Lascoumes, P, Le Gales, P, 2007, Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments - from the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation, Governance 20, 1, 1-21
101. Lasswell, H, 1954, Key symbols, signs and icons, in L Bryson, L Finkelstein, R M. MacIver, R McKean (eds), Symbols and values: An initial study, pp 77-94, New York: Harper and Bros
102. Lasswell, H, 1958, Politics: Who gets what, when, how, New York: Meridian
103. Lasswell, HD, Lerner, D, 1951, The policy orientation, in Lerner, D, Lasswell, HD (eds), The policy sciences: Recent developments in scope and method, pp 3-15, Stanford: Stanford University Press
104. Lecuyer, O, Bibas, R, 2012, Combining climate and energy policies: Synergies or antagonism? Modeling interactions with energy efficiency instruments, SSRN Scholarly Paper, Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 26 January, http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1992324
105. Lecuyer, O, Quirion, P, 2013, Can uncertainty justify overlapping policy instruments to mitigate emissions?, Ecological Economics 93, September, 177-91, doi:10.1016/j. ecolecon.2013.05.009
106. Lejano, RP, Shankar, S, 2013, The contextualist turn and schematics of institutional fit: Theory and a case study from southern India, Policy Sciences 46, 1, 83-102
107. Lindblom, CE, 1959, The science of muddling through, Public Administration Review 19, 2, 79-88
108. Linder, SH, Peters, BG, 1984, From social theory to policy design, Journal of Public Policy 4, 3, 237-59
109. Linder, SH, Peters, BG, 1988, The analysis of design or the design of analysis?, Policy Studies Review 7, 4, 738-50
110. Linder, SH, Peters, BG, 1990a, Policy formulation and the challenge of conscious design, Evaluation and Program Planning 13, 303-11
111. Linder, SH, Peters, BG, 1990b, Research perspectives on the design of public policy: Implementation, formulation, and design, in DJ Palumbo, DJ Calisto (eds) Implementation and the policy process: Opening up the black box, pp 51-66, New York: Greenwood Press
112. Linder, SH, Peters, BG, 1990c, The design of instruments for public policy, in SS Nagel (ed) Policy theory and policy evaluation: Concepts, knowledge, causes, norms, pp 103-19, New York: Greenwood Press
113. Linder, SH, Peters, BG, 1990d, An institutional approach to the theory of policymaking: The role of guidance mechanisms in policy formulation, Journal of Theoretical Politics 2, 1, 59-83
114. Linder, SH, Peters, BG, 1991, The logic of public policy design: Linking policy actors and plausible instruments, Knowledge, Technology and Policy 4, 1, 125-51
115. Locke, W, 2009, Reconnecting the research-policy-practice nexus in higher education: 'Evidence-based policy' in practice in national and international contexts, Higher Education Policy 22, 119-40
116. Lowi, TJ, 1966, Distribution, regulation, redistribution: The functions of government, in RB Ripley (ed), Public policies and their politics: Techniques of government control, pp 27-40, New York: WW Norton
117. Lowi, TJ, 1972, Four systems of policy, politics and choice, Public Administration Review 32, 4, 298-310
118. Lowi, TJ, 1985, The state in politics: The relation between policy and administration, in RG Noll (ed), Regulatory policy and the social sciences, pp 67-105, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
119. Macramé, D, Whittington, D, 1997, Expert advice for policy choice: Analysis and discourse, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press
120. Majone, G, 1975, On the notion of political feasibility, European Journal of Political Research 3, 2, 259-74
121. Majone, G, 1976, Choice among policy instruments for pollution control, Policy Analysis 2, 4, 589-613
122. March, JG, Olsen, JP, 2004, The logic of appropriateness, in M Rein, M Moran, RE Goodin (eds) Handbook of public policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press
123. May, P, 2003 Policy design and implementation, in BG Peters, J Pierre (eds) Handbook of public administration, pp 223-33, Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications
124. Mayntz, R, 1983, The conditions of effective public policy: A new challenge for policy analysis, Policy & Politics 11, 2, 123-43
125. Mayntz, R, 1979, Public bureaucracies and policy implementation, International Social Science Journal 31, 4, 633-45
126. Meuleman, L, 2009a, Metagoverning governance styles: Increasing the public manager's toolbox, Paper presented at the ECPR general conference, Potsdam
127. Meuleman, L, 2009b, The cultural dimension of metagovernance: Why governance doctrines may fail, Public Organization Review 10, 1, 49-70
128. Mintrom, M, 2007, The policy analysis movement, in L Dobuzinskis, M Howlett, D Laycock (eds) Policy analysis in Canada: The state of the art, pp 71-84, Toronto: University of Toronto Press
129. Mondou, M, Montpetit, E, 2010, Policy styles and degenerative politics: Poverty policy designs in Newfoundland and Quebec, Policy Studies Journal 38, 4, 703-22, doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00380.x
130. Montpetit, E, 2003, Misplaced distrust: Policy networks and the environment in France, the United States, and Canada, Vancouver: UBC Press
131. Moseley, A, Tierney, S, 2004, Evidence-based practice in the real world, Evidence and Policy 1, 1, 113-19
132. O'Toole, LJ, 2000, Research on policy implementation: Assessment and prospects, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10, 2, 263-88
133. Oikonomou, V, Jepma, CJ, 2007, A framework on interactions of climate and energy policy instruments, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 13, 2, 131-56
134. Oikonomou, V, Flamos, A, Grafakos, S, 2010, Is blending of energy and climate policy instruments always desirable?, Energy Policy 38, 8, 4186-95
135. Oikonomou, V, Flamos, A, Zeugolis, D, Grafakos, S, 2011, A qualitative assessment of eu energy policy interactions, Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy 7, 2, 177-87
136. Oliphant, S, Howlett, M, 2010, Assessing policy analytical capacity: Comparative insights from a study of the Canadian environmental policy advice system, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 12, 4, 439
137. Orren, K, Skowronek, S, 1998, Regimes and regime building in American government: A review of literature on the 1940s, Political Science Quarterly 113, 4, 689-702
138. Parsons, W, 1995, Public policy: An introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis, Aldershot, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
139. Parsons, W, 2001, Modernising policy-making for the twenty-first century: The professional model, Public Policy and Administration 16, 3, 93-110
140. Peters, BG, Pierre, J, 1998, Governance without government? Rethinking public administration, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8, 2, 223-44
141. Peters, BG, 2005, Conclusion: The future of instruments research, in P Eliadis, M Hill, M Howlett (eds), Designing government: From instruments to governance, pp 353-63, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press
142. Radaelli, CM, Dunlop, CA, 2013, Learning in the European Union: Theoretical lenses and meta-theory, Journal of European Public Policy 20, 6, 923-40, doi:10.1080/13501763.2013.781832
143. Ramesh, M, Fritzen, S (eds) 2009, Transforming Asian governance: Rethinking assumptions, challenging practices, New York: Routledge
144. Ramesh, M, Howlett, M (eds) 2006, Deregulation and its discontents: Rewriting the rules in Asia, Aldershot: Edward Elgar
145. Rayner, J, 2013, On smart layering as policy design: Tackling the biofuels policy mess in Canada and the United Kingdom, Policy Sciences, Special issue on Policy Design, forthcoming
146. Rayner, J, Howlett, M, Wilson, J, Cashore, B, Hoberg, G, 2001, Privileging the subsector: Critical sub-sectors and sectoral relationships in forest policy-making, Forest Policy and Economics 2, 3, 319-32
147. Rhodes, RAW, 1996, The new governance: Governing without government, Political Studies 44, 652-67
148. Roch, C, Pitts, D, Navarro, I, 2010, Representative bureaucracy and policy tools: Ethnicity, student discipline, and representation in public schools, Administration and Society 42, 1, 38-65
149. Sager, F, Rielle, Y, 2013, Sorting through the garbage can: Under what conditions do governments adopt policy programs?, Policy Sciences 46, 1, 1-21, doi:10.1007/s11077-012-9165-7
150. Salamon, L, 1981, Rethinking public management: Third party government and the changing forms of government action, Public Policy 29, 3, 255-75
151. Salamon, LM, 1989, The tools approach: Basic analytics, in LS Salamon, MS Lund (eds) Beyond privatization: The tools of government action, pp 23-50, Washington, DC: Urban Institute
152. Salamon, LM, 2002a, The new governance and the tools of public action, in LM Salamon (ed) The tools of government: A guide to the new governance, pp 1-47, New York: Oxford University Press
153. Salamon, LM, 2002b, The tools of government: A guide to the new governance, New York: Oxford University Press
154. Schneider, AL, Ingram, H, 1990a, Policy design: Elements, premises and strategies, in SS Nagel (ed) Policy theory and policy evaluation: Concepts, knowledge, causes and norms, pp 77-102, New York: Greenwood
155. Schneider, AL, Ingram, H, 1990b, Behavioural assumptions of policy tools, Journal of Politics 52, 2, 511-29
156. Schneider, A, Ingram, H, 1994, Social constructions and policy design: Implications for public administration, Research in Public Administration 3, 137-73
157. Schneider, AL, Ingram, H, 1997, Policy design for democracy, Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas
158. Schön, DA, 1988, Designing: Rules, types and words. Design Studies 9, 3, 181-90
159. Schön, DA, 1992, Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation, Knowledge-Based Systems 5, 1, 3-14
160. Sidney, MS, 2007, Policy formulation: design and tools, in F Fischer, GJ Miller, MS Sidney (eds) Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics and methods, pp 79-87, New Brunswick, NJ: CRC, Taylor and Francis
161. Skodvin, T, Gullberg, AT, Aakre, S, 2010, Target-group influence and political feasibility: The case of climate policy design in Europe, Journal of European Public Policy 17, 6, 854, doi:10.1080/13501763.2010.486991
162. Stavins, RN, 1996, Correlated uncertainty and policy instrument choice, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30, 2, 218-32, doi:10.1006/jeem.1996.0015
163. Sterner, T, 2003, Policy instruments for environmental and natural resource management, Washington, DC: Resource for the Future Press
164. Stokey, E, Zeckhauser, R, 1978, A primer for policy analysis, New York: Norton
165. Stone, DA, 1988, Policy paradox and political reason, Glenview, IL.: Scott, Foresman
166. Swanson, D, Barg, S, Tyler, S, Venema, H, Tomar, S, Bhadwal, S, Nair, S, Roy, D, Drexhage, J, 2010, Seven tools for creating adaptive policies, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77, 6, 924-39
167. Taeihagh, A, Bañares-Alcántara, R, Givoni, M, 2013, A virtual environment for the formulation of policy packages, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, doi:10.1016/j.tra.2013.10.017
168. Thelen, Kathleen, 2004, How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States and Japan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
169. Thelen, K, Mahoney, J, Rueschemeyer, D, 2003, How institutions evolve: Insights from comparative historical analysis, in J Mahoney, D Rueschemeyer (eds), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, pp 208-40, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
170. Timmermans, A, Rothmayr, C, Serduelt, U, Varone, F, 1998, The design of policy instruments: Perspectives and concepts, paper presented to the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL
171. Tinbergen, J, 1952, On the theory of economic policy, Amsterdam: North-Holland
172. Tollefson, C, Zito, AR, Gale, F, 2012, Symposium overview: Conceptualizing new governance arrangements, Public Administration 90, 1, 3-18
173. Torenvlied, R, Akkerman, A, 2004, Theory of 'soft' policy implementation in multilevel systems with an application to social partnership in the Netherlands, Acta Politica 39, 31-58
174. Torgerson, D, 1985, Contextual orientation in policy analysis: The contribution of Harold D Lasswell, Policy Sciences 18, 240-52
175. Torgerson, D, 1990, Origins of the policy orientation: The aesthetic dimension in Lasswells political vision, History of Political Thought 11, Summer, 340-4
176. Trebilcock, M, Hartle, DG, 1982, The choice of governing instrument, International Review of Law and Economics 2, 29-46
177. Trebilcock, MJ, Prichard, JRS, 1983, Crown corporations: The calculus of instrument choice, in JRS Prichard (ed) Crown corporations in Canada: The calculus of instrument choice, pp 1-50, Toronto: Butterworths
178. Tribe, LH, 1972, Policy science: Analysis or ideology?, Philosophy and Public Affairs 2, 1, 66-110
179. Tupper, A, Doern, GB, 1981, Public corporations and public policy in Canada, in A Tupper, GB Doern (eds) Public corporations and public policy in Canada, pp 1-50, Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy
180. Van der Heijden, J, 2011, Institutional layering: A review of the use of the concept, Politics 31, 1, 9-18
181. Vedung, E, Bemelmans-Videc, ML, Rist, RC, 1997, Policy instruments: Typologies and theories, in E Vedung, ML Bemelmans-Videc, RC Rist (eds) Carrots, sticks and sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation, pp 21-58, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers
182. Walker, WE, Marchau, VAWJ, Swanson, D, 2010, Addressing deep uncertainty using adaptive policies: Introduction to section 2, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77, 6, 917-23
183. Weaver, K, 2009, Target compliance: The final frontier of policy implementation, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2009/09/30-compliance-weaver
184. Weaver, K, 2010, But will it work?: Implementation analysis to improve government performance, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2010/02/implementation-analysis-weaver
185. Wildavsky, AB, 1979, Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis, Boston, MA: Little-Brown
186. Williams, RA, 2012, The limits of policy analytical capacity: Canadian financial regulatory reform, International Journal of Public Sector Management 25, 6/7, 455-63
187. Wintjes, R, 2007, Monitoring and analysis of policies and public financing instruments conducive to higher levels of R&D investments: The 'policy mix' project. Case study: The Netherlands. Maastricht: UNU-MERIT
188. Woodside, K, 1986, Policy instruments and the study of public policy, Canadian Journal of Political Science 19, 4, 775-93
189. Yi, H, Feiock, RC, 2012, Policy tool interactions and the adoption of state renewable portfolio standards, Review of Policy Research 29, 2, 193-206