The lessons of failure: Learning and blame avoidance in public policy-making

International Political Science Review

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 539-555

  Howlett, Michael ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

blame avoidance; policy failure; policy learning; policy success; public policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869746540     PISSN: 01925121     EISSN: 1460373X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0192512112453603     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Allen CR,Gunderson LH.Pathology and failure in the design and implementation of adaptive management.Journal of Environmental Management. 2011;92 (5): 1379-84.
2. Anderson G.The new focus on the policy capacity of the federal government.Canadian Public Administration. 1996;39 (4): 469-88.
3. Andersson S,Heywood PM.The politics of perception: Use and abuse of Transparency International's approach to measuring corruption.Political Studies. 2009;57:746-67.
4. Anheier HK When Things Go Wrong: Organizational Failures and Breakdowns. 1999) When Things Go Wrong: Organizational Failures and Breakdowns, 1st edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999:.
5. Ascher WWhy Governments Waste Natural Resources: Policy Failures in Developing Countries. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1999:.
6. Baggott R.Policy success and public health: The case of public health in England.Journal of Social Policy. 2012;41 (2): 391-408.
7. Banks JSInstitutional Design. Weimer DL, ed. Boston, MA: Kluwer; 1995:17-36.
8. Baumgartner FR,Jones BDAgendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1993:.
9. Bennett CJ.The formation of a Canadian privacy policy: The art and craft of lesson-drawing.Canadian Public Administration. 1990;33 (4): 551-70.
10. Bennett CJ,Howlett M.The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change.Policy Sciences. 1992;25 (3): 275-94.
11. Brinkerhoff DW,Crosby BLManaging Policy Reform: Concepts and Tools for Decision-Makers in Developing and Transitional Countries. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press; 2002:.
12. Bovens M,t'Hart P.Frame multiplicity and policy fiascos: Limits to explanation.Knowledge and Policy. 1995;8 (4): 61-83.
13. Bovens M,t'Hart P Understanding Policy Fiascos. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books; 1996:.
14. Success and Failure in Public Governance: A Comparative Analysis. 2001) Success and Failure in Public Governance: A Comparative Analysis, new edn.Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Bovens Mt'Hart PPeters BG, ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2001:.
15. Brandstrom A,Kuipers S.From 'normal incidents' to political crises: Understanding the selective politicization of policy failures.Government and Opposition. 2003;38 (3): 279-305.
16. Caplan N.Factors associated with knowledge use among federal executives.Policy Studies Journal. 1976;4 (3): 229-34.
17. Churchman CW.Wicked problems.Management Science. 1967;14 (4): B141-2.
18. Cobb RW,Primo DMThe Plane Truth: Airline Crashes, the Media, and Transportation Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 2003:.
19. Connaughton B.'Glorified gofers, policy experts or good generalists': A classification of the roles of the Irish ministerial adviser.Irish Political Studies. 2010;25 (3): 347-69.
20. Corner A,Randall A.Selling climate change? The limitations of social marketing as a strategy for climate change public engagement.Global Environmental Change. 2011;21 (3): 1005-14.
21. DeLeon P.The contextual burdens of policy design.Policy Studies Journal. 1988;17 (2): 297-309.
22. Dror Y.The prediction of political feasibility.Futures. 1969;:282-8.
23. Dunleavy P.Policy disasters: Explaining the UK's record.Public Policy and Administration. 1995;10 (2): 52-70.
24. Eichbaum C,Shaw R.Revisiting politicization: Political advisers and public servants in Westminster systems.Governance. 2008;21 (3): 337-63.
25. Ellig J,Lavoie DEconomic Approaches to Organizations and Institutions: An Introduction. Foss P, ed. Aldershot: Dartmouth; 1995:.
26. Elliott D.The failure of organizational learning from crisis: A matter of life and death?.Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management. 2009;17 (3): 157-68.
27. Eriksen SS.'State failure' in theory and practice: The idea of the state and the contradictions of state formation.Review of International Studies. 2011;37 (1): 229-47.
28. Fawcett P,Marsh D.Policy transfer and policy success: The case of the gateway review process (2001-10).Government and Opposition. 2012;47 (2): 162-85.
29. Feldman MOrder Without Design: Information Production and Policy Making. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1989:.
30. Fischer F,Forester JConfronting Values in Policy Analysis: The Politics of Criteria. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1987:.
31. Fischer F,Forester JThe Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 1993:.
32. Flynn G.Rethinking policy capacity in Canada: The role of parties and election platforms in government policy-making.Canadian Public Administration. 2011;54 (2): 235-53.
33. Freudenberg WR.Can we learn from failure? Examining US experiences with nuclear repository siting.Journal of Risk Research. 2004;7 (2): 153-69.
34. Gleeson D,Legge D,O'Neill D, et al.Negotiating tensions in developing organizational policy capacity: Comparative lessons to be drawn.Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. 2011;13 (3): 237-63.
35. Grant W.Intractable policy failure: The case of bovine TB and badgers.British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2009;11:557-73.
36. Gunningham N,Grabosky P,Sinclair DSmart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1998:.
37. Hall PA.Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: The case of economic policy making in Britain.Comparative Politics. 1993;25 (3): 275-96.
38. Hawke GRImproving Policy Advice. Wellington: Victoria University Institute of Policy Studies; 1993:.
39. Hibbing JR,Theiss-Morse EStealth Democracy: Americans' Beliefs about How Government Should Work. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2002:.
40. Hicklin A,Godwin E.Agents of change: The role of policy managers in public policy.Policy Studies Journal. 2009;37 (1): 13-20.
41. Hood C.The risk game and the blame game.Government and Opposition. 2002;37 (1): 15-54.
42. Hood C.What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance?.Public Management Review. 2007;9 (2): 191-210.
43. Hood CThe Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2010:.
44. Hood C,Baldwin R,Rothstein HPublic Law. summer:; 2000:282-305.
45. Howlett M.Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada.Canadian Public Administration. 2009;52 (2): 153-75.
46. Howlett MDesigning Public Policies: Principles and Instruments. New York: Routledge; 2011:.
47. Howlett M,Rayner J.(Not so) 'smart regulation'? Canadian shellfish aquaculture policy and the evolution of instrument choice for industrial development.Marine Policy. 2004;28 (2): 171-84.
48. Howlett M,Ramesh M,Perl AStudying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Toronto: Oxford University Press; 2009:.
49. Ingram HM,Mann DEWhy Policies Succeed or Fail. Ingram HMMann DE, ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1980:11-32.
50. Jones BDRe-conceiving Decision-making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice and Public Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1994:.
51. Kearns A,Lawson L.(De)constructing a policy 'failure': Housing stock transfer in Glasgow.Evidence and Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice. 2009;5:449-70.
52. Kerr DH.The logic of 'policy' and successful policies.Policy Sciences. 1976;7 (3): 351-63.
53. Kingdon JWAgendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little Brown; 1984:.
54. Landry R,Lamari M,Amara N.The extent and determinants of the utilization of university research in government agencies.Public Administration Review. 2003;63 (2): 192-205.
55. Lindblom CE.The science of muddling through.Public Administration Review. 1959;19 (2): 79-88.
56. McConnell A.Policy success, policy failure and grey areas in-between.Journal of Public Policy. 2010a;30 (3): 345-62.
57. McConnell AUnderstanding Policy Success: Rethinking Public Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010b:.
58. McConnell A,Stark A.Bureaucratic failure and the UK's lack of preparedness for foot and mouth disease.Public Policy and Administration. 2002;17 (4): 39-54.
59. McCubbins MD,Lupia A.Learning from oversight: Fire alarms and police patrols reconstructed.Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. 1994;10 (1): 96-125.
60. Majone G.On the notion of political feasibility.European Journal of Political Research. 1975;3 (3): 259-74.
61. Marsh D,McConnell A.Towards a framework for establishing policy success.Public Administration. 2010;88 (2): 564-83.
62. May PJ.Policy learning and failure.Journal of Public Policy. 1992;12 (4): 331-54.
63. Mayntz R.The conditions of effective public policy: A new challenge for policy analysis.Policy and Politics. 1983;11:123-43.
64. Meier KJ,Bohte J.Not with a bang, but a whimper: Explaining organizational failure.Administration and Society. 2003;35 (1): 104-21.
65. Meltsner AJ.Political feasibility and policy analysis.Public Administration Review. 1972;32:859-67.
66. Meltsner AJPolicy Analysts in the Bureaucracy. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1976:.
67. Meltsner AJImproving Policy Analysis. Nagel SS, ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1980:235-49.
68. Merton RK.The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action.American Sociological Review. 1936;6:1894-904.
69. Michael E,Plowman G.Mount Stirling: The politics of process failure.Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2002;10 (2): 154-69.
70. Moran M.Not steering but drowning: Policy catastrophes and the regulatory state.Political Quarterly. 2001;72:414-27.
71. Nutley SM,Walter I,Davies HTOUsing Evidence: How Research can Inform Public Services. Bristol: Policy Press; 2007:.
72. Oh CH,Rich RF.Explaining use of information in public policymaking.Knowledge and Policy. 1996;9 (1): 3-35.
73. Perrow CNormal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books; 1984:.
74. Peters BGThe Policy Capacity of Government. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Management Development; 1996:.
75. Peters BG,Hogwood BWThe Pathology of Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press; 1985:.
76. Radaelli CM.The role of knowledge in the policy process.Journal of European Public Policy. 1995;2 (2): 159-83.
77. Radaelli CM.Measuring policy learning: Regulatory impact assessment in Europe.Journal of European Public Policy. 2009;16 (8): 1145-64.
78. Rich RFSocial science information and public policy making. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1981:.
79. Rich RF.Measuring knowledge utilization: Processes and outcomes.Knowledge and Policy. 1997;10 (3): 11-24.
80. Ridder HG,Bruns HJ,Spier F.Managing implementation processes: The role of public managers in the implementation of accrual accounting - evidence from six case studies in Germany.Public Management Review. 2006;8 (1): 87-118.
81. Roots RI.When laws backfire: Unintended consequences of public policy.American Behavioral Scientist. 2004;47 (11): 1376-94.
82. Rose RLesson-Drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning across Time and Space. Chatham: Chatham House Publishing; 1993:.
83. Russel D,Jordan A.Gearing-up governance for sustainable development: Patterns of policy appraisal in UK central government.Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2007;50 (1): 1-21.
84. Scharpf FW.Policy failure and institutional reform: Why should form follow function?.International Social Science Journal. 1986;108:179-90.
85. Schneider A,Ingram H.Systematically pinching ideas: A comparative approach to policy design.Journal of Public Policy. 1988;8 (1): 61-80.
86. Schudson M.The trouble with experts - and why democracies need them.Theory and Society. 2006;35:491-506.
87. Schultz D.Stupid public policy ideas and other political myths. Paper presented to the American Political Science Association; 2007 Chicago, IL; 2007.
88. Sheingate AD.Promotion versus precaution: The evolution of biotechnology policy in the United States.British Journal of Political Science. 2006;36:243-68.
89. Shipman B,Stojanovic T.Facts, fictions and failures in integrated coastal zone management in Europe.Coastal Management. 2007;35:375-98.
90. Shulock N.The paradox of policy analysis: If it is not used, why do we produce so much of it?.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 1999;18 (2): 226-44.
91. Sulitzeanu-Kenan R,Hood C.Blame avoidance with adjectives? Motivation, opportunity, activity and outcome. Paper for the ECPR Joint Sessions, Blame Avoidance and Blame Management Workshop; 2005Granada, Spain; 2005.
92. Svara JH.Complexity in political-administrative relations and the limits of the dichotomy concept.Administrative Theory and Praxis. 2006;28 (1): 121-39.
93. Tenbensel T.Does more evidence lead to better policy? The implications of explicit priority-setting in New Zealand's health policy for evidence-based policy.Policy Studies. 2004;25 (3): 190-207.
94. Thompson VAModern Organization. New York: Knopf; 1965:.
95. Tommasi M.Latin America: How state capacity determines policy success.Governance. 2011;24 (2): 199-203.
96. Treisman D.What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research?.Annual Review of Political Science. 2007;10:211-44.
97. Turnpenny J,Radaelli CM,Jordan A, et al.The policy and politics of policy appraisal: Emerging trends and new directions.Journal of European Public Policy. 2009;16 (4): 640-53.
98. Vining AR,Weimer DL.Government supply and government production failure: A framework based on contestability.Journal of Public Policy. 1990;10 (1): 1-22.
99. Walsh JI.Policy failure and policy change.Comparative Political Studies. 2006;39 (4): 490-518.
100. Warwick PVPolicy Horizons and Parliamentary Government. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2006:.
101. Weaver RK.The politics of blame avoidance.Journal of Public Policy. 1986;6 (4): 371-98.
102. Webber DJ.Analyzing political feasibility: Political scientists' unique contribution to policy analysis.Policy Studies Journal. 1986;14 (4): 545-54.
103. Weiss CH.Research for policy's sake: The enlightenment function of social science research.Policy Analysis. 1977;3 (4): 531-45.
104. Weiss CH.The circuitry of enlightenment: Diffusion of social science research to policymakers.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization. 1986;8 (2): 274-81.
105. Weiss CHOrganizations for Policy Analysis: Helping Government Think. London: Sage Publications; 1992:.
106. Weiss CH,Bucuvalas MJSocial Science Research and Decision-Making. New York: Columbia University Press; 1980:.
107. Whiteman D.The fate of policy analysis in Congressional decision making: Three types of use in committees.Western Political Quarterly. 1985a;38 (2): 294-311.
108. Whiteman D.Reaffirming the importance of strategic use: A two-dimensional perspective on policy analysis in Congress.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization. 1985b;6 (3): 203-24.
109. Wildavsky ABSpeaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Boston, MA: Little Brown; 1979:.
110. Wolf C.A theory of nonmarket failure: Framework for implementation analysis.Journal of Law and Economics. 1979;22 (1): 107-39.
111. Wolf C.Markets and non-market failures: Comparison and assessment.Journal of Public Policy. 1987;7 (1): 43-70.
112. Wolman H.The determinants of program success and failure.Journal of Public Policy. 1981;1 (4): 433-64.
113. Wu X,Ramesh M,Howlett M, et al.The Public Policy Primer: Managing Public Policy. London: Routledge; 2010:.