Effects of mobile phone-based app learning compared to computer-based web learning on nursing students: Pilot randomized controlled trial

Healthcare Informatics Research

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 125-133

  Lee, Myung Kyung ^a  

^a Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Computers; Learning; Mobile applications; Randomized controlled trial; Web

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928942438     PISSN: 20933681     EISSN: 2093369X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4258/hir.2015.21.2.125     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Prince MJ, Felder RM. Inductive teaching and learning methods: definitions, comparisons, and research bases. J Eng Educ 2006;95(2):123-38.
2. Moule P, Ward R, Lockyer L. Nursing and healthcare students' experiences and use of e-learning in higher education. J Adv Nurs 2010;66(12):2785-95.
3. Du S, Liu Z, Liu S, Yin H, Xu G, Zhang H, et al. Webbased distance learning for nurse education: a systematic review. Int Nurs Rev 2013;60(2):167-77.
4. Lu DF, Lin ZC, Li YJ. Effects of a Web-based course on nursing skills and knowledge learning. J Nurs Educ 2009;48(2):70-7.
5. Thorne SL, Payne JS. Evolutionary trajectories, Internetmediated expression, and language education. CALICO J 2005;22(3):371-97.
6. An JY, Hayman LL, Panniers T, Carty B. Theory development in nursing and healthcare informatics: a model explaining and predicting information and communication technology acceptance by healthcare consumers. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 2007;30(3):E37-49.
7. Delisle C, Sandin S, Forsum E, Henriksson H, Trolle-Lagerros Y, Larsson C, et al. A web-and mobile phonebased intervention to prevent obesity in 4-year-olds (MINISTOP): a population-based randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2015;15:95.
8. Vallerand RJ, Pelletier LG, Blais MR, Briere NM, Senecal C, Vallieres EF. The academic motivation scale: a measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educ Psychol Meas 1992;52(4):1003-17.
9. Guglielmino LM. Reliability and validity of the selfdirected learning readiness scale and the learning preference assessment. In: HB Long, editor. Expanding horizons in self-directed learning. Norman (OK): University of Oklahoma;1997. p. 209-22.
10. Lim SY, Lee WI. Factor analysis & SDLRS assessment in science and engineering fields’ students: in case of KUT’s students. J Korean Inst Pract Eng Educ 2010;2(1):17-27.
11. Novak TP, Hoffman DL, Yung YF. Measuring the customer experience in online environments: a structural modeling approach. Mark Sci 2000;19(1):22-42.
12. Nakamura J, Csikszentmihalyi M. The concept of flow. In: Csikszentmihalyi M, editor. Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. Berlin: Springer; 2014. p. 239-63.
13. Sherry AC, Fulford CP, Zhang S. Assessing distance learners' satisfaction with instruction: a quantitative and a qualitative measure. Am J Distance Educ 1998;12(3):4-28.
14. Novak TP, Hoffman DL, Yung YF. Modeling the structure of the flow experience among web users. In: INFORMS Marketing Science and the Internet Mini-Conference; 1998 Mar; Boston, MA.
15. Jackson SA, Marsh HW. Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: the Flow State Scale. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1996;18(1):17-35.
16. Dede C. Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science 2009;323(5910):66-9.
17. Parhizkar B, Gebril ZM, Obeidy WK, Ngan MN, Chowdhury SA, Lashkari AH. Android mobile augmented reality application based on different learning theories for primary school children. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems; 2012 May 10-12; Tangier, Morocco. p. 404-8.
18. Larsen YC, Buchholz H, Brosda C, Bogner FX. Evaluation of a portable and interactive augmented reality learning system by teachers and students. In: Augmented reality in education: proceedings of the “Science Center To Go” workshop; 2011 Oct 27-29; Athens, Greece. p. 41-50.
19. Patten B, Sanchez IA, Tangney B. Designing collaborative, constructionist and contextual applications for handheld devices. Comput Educ 2006;46(3):294-308.
20. Barak M, Rafaeli S. On-line question-posing and peerassessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2004;61(1):84-103.
21. Junco R. The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Comput Educ 2012;58(1):162-71.
22. Kenny J. Managing innovation in educational institutions. Australas J Educ Technol 2002;18(3):359-76.
23. Nilsson KE, Stomberg MI. Nursing students motivation toward their studies: a survey study. BMC Nurs 2008;7:6.
24. Henri F. Computer conferencing and content analysis. In: Kaye AR, editor. Collaborative learning through computer conferencing. Berlin: Springer; 1992. p. 117-36.
25. VandeWalle D. A goal orientation model of feedback-seeking behavior. Hum Resour Manag Rev 2004;13(4):581-604.
26. Hillman DC, Willis DJ, Gunawardena CN. Learnerinterface interaction in distance education: an extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. Am J Distance Educ 1994;8(2):30-42.
27. Atack L, Rankin J. A descriptive study of registered nurses' experiences with web‐based learning. J Adv Nurs 2002;40(4):457-65.
28. Kenny A. Online learning: enhancing nurse education? J Adv Nurs 2002;38(2):127-35.
29. Faux TL, Black-Hughes C. A comparison of using the Internet versus lectures to teach social work history. Res Soc Work Pract 2000;10(4):454-66.
30. Daley BJ, Watkins K, Williams SW, Courtenay B, Davis M, Dymock D. Exploring learning in a technology-enhanced environment. Educ Technol Soc 2001;4(3):126-38.