Early detection of systematic defects by endoprostheses registries;Frühzeitige Detektion systematischer Schadensfälle durch Endoprothesenregister

Orthopade

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 549-554

  Liebs, T R ^a   Melsheimer, O ^b   Hassenpflug, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^b BQS Institut für Qualität and Patientensicherheit   (Germany)

Author keywords

Early warning system; Hip; Joint revision; Knee; Validity of results

Indexed keywords

DEVICE FAILURE ANALYSIS; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GERMANY; HEALTH SURVEY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; KNEE PROSTHESIS; POSTMARKETING SURVEILLANCE; PROCEDURES; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTER; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; GERMANY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; KNEE PROSTHESIS; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PRODUCT SURVEILLANCE, POSTMARKETING; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTRIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84903595005     PISSN: 00854530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00132-014-2293-3     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. o A (2012) Qualitätsreport 2011: AQUA - Institut für angewandte Qualitätsförderung und Forschung im Gesundheitswesen GmbH, Göttingen
2. Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K et al (2005) Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 87:1487-1497
3. Herberts P, Malchau H (2000) Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 71:111-121
4. Herberts P, Malchau H (1997) How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden. Clin Orthop Relat Res 344:44-60
5. Maloney WJ (2001) National Joint Replacement Registries: has the time come? J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 83-A:1582-1585
6. Riehmann M (2005) Regulatory measures for implementing new medical devices. Recalling Boneloc. Dan Med Bull 52:11-17
7. o A (2005) McMinn Centre. Northern Lights Debate ASR vs BHR. Helsinki
8. MHRA. Minutes of the Committee on the Safety of Devices Meeting: 23 March 2006. 2006 Jun 23. Report No.: PS 19.4.06-02
9. Cohen D (2011) Out of joint: the story of the ASR. BMJ 342:d2905
10. Macpherson GJ, Brenkel IJ, Smith R, Howie CR (2011) Outlier analysis in orthopaedics: use of CUSUM: the Scottish Arthroplasty Project: shouldering the burden of improvement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 93(Suppl 3):81-88
11. Hardoon SL, Lewsey JD, Meulen JH van der (2007) Continuous monitoring of long-term outcomes with application to hip prostheses. Stat Med 26:5081-5099
12. Havelin LI, Espehaug B, Vollset SE, Engesæter LB (1995) The effect of the type of cement on early revision of cement total hip of Charnley total hip prostheses: a review of eight thousand five hundred and seventy-nine primary arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 77:1543-1550