In vivo analysis of insertional torque during pedicle screwing using cortical bone trajectory technique

Spine

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2014, Pages

  Matsukawa, Keitaro ^a   Yato, Yoshiyuki ^a   Kato, Takashi ^a   Imabayashi, Hideaki ^a   Asazuma, Takashi ^b   Nemoto, Koichi ^a  

^a NATIONAL DEFENSE MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL HOSPITAL ORGANIZATION MURAYAMA MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

bone mineral density; cortical bone trajectory; insertional torque; pedicle screw; screw stability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORTICAL BONE; CORTICAL BONE TRAJECTORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TORQUE; VERTEBRA BODY; VERY ELDERLY; BIOMECHANICS; BONE SCREW; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MATERIALS TESTING; PROCEDURES; SPINAL DISEASES; SPINE FUSION; SURGERY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BONE DENSITY; BONE SCREWS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MIDDLE AGED; SPINAL DISEASES; SPINAL FUSION; TORQUE;

EID: 84896723365     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000116     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Santoni BG, Hynes RA, McGilvary KC, et al. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. Spine J 2009; 9 : 366-73.
2. Perez-Orribo L, Kalb S, Reyes PM, et al. Biomechanics of lumbar cortical screw-rod fi xation versus pedicle screw-rod fi xation with and without interbody support. Spine 2013; 38 : 635-41.
3. Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Nemoto O, et al. Morphometric measurement of cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle insertion using computed tomography. J Spinal Disord Tech 2013; 26 : E248-53.
4. Cho W, Cho SK, Wu C. The biomechanics of pedicle screw-based instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg 2010; 92-B : 1061-5.
5. Yamagata M, Kitahara H, Minami S, et al. Mechanical stability of the pedicle screw fi xation systems for the lumbar spine. Spine 1992; 17 : S51-4.
6. Coe JD, Warden KE, Herzig MA, et al. Infl uence of bone mineral density on the fi xation of thoracolumbar implants: a comparative study of transpedicular screws, laminar hooks, and spinous process wires. Spine 1990; 15 : 902-7.
7. Soshi S, Shiba R, Kondo H, et al. An experimental study on transpedicular screw fi xation in relation to osteoporosis of the lumbar spine. Spine 1991; 16 : 1335-41.
8. Skinner R, Maybee J, Transfeldt E, et al. Experimental pullout testing and comparison of variables in transpedicular screw fi xation: a biomechanical study. Spine 1990; 15 : 195-201.
9. Chao CK, Hsu CC, Wang JL, et al. Increasing bending strength and pullout strength in conical pedicle screws: biomechanical tests and fi nite element analyses. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008; 21 : 130-8.
10. Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T, et al. Can insertional torque predict screw loosening and related failures? An in vivo study of pedicle screw fi xation augmenting posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 2000; 25 : 858-64.
11. Halvorson TL, Kelly LA, Thomas KA, et al. Effects of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fi xation. Spine 1994; 19 : 2415-20.
12. Myers BS, Belmont PJ, Richardson WJ, et al. The role of imaging and in situ biomechanical testing in assessing pedicle screw pull-out strength. Spine 1996; 21 : 1962-8.
13. Zdeblick TA, Kunz DN, Cooke ME, et al. Pedicle screw pullout strength: correlation with insertional torque. Spine 1993; 18 : 1673-6.
14. Bühler DW, Berlemann U, Oxland TR, et al. Moments and forces during pedicle screw insertion: in vitro and in vivo measurements. Spine 1998; 23 : 1220-8.
15. Kwok AWL, Finkelstein JA, Woodside T, et al. Insertional torque and pull-out strengths of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws in cadaveric bone. Spine 1996; 21 : 2429-34.
16. Misenheimer GR, Peek RD, Wiltse LL, et al. Anatomic analysis of pedicle cortical and cancellous diameter as related to screw size. Spine 1989; 14 : 367-72.
17. Krag MH, Beynnon BD, Pope MH, et al. Depth of insertion of transpedicular vertebral screws into human vertebrae: effect upon screw-vertebra interface strength. J Spinal Disord 1988; 1 : 287-94.
18. Chatzistergos PE, Sapkas G, Kourkoulis SK. The infl uence of the insertion technique on the pullout force of pedicle screws: an experimental study. Spine 2010; 35 : E332-7.
19. Steeves M, Stone C, Mogaard J, et al. How pilot-hole size affects bone-screw pullout strength in human cadaveric cancellous bone. Can J Surg 2005; 48 : 207-12.
20. Kuklo TR, Lehman RA. Effect of various tapping diameters on insertion of thoracic pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 2003; 28 : 2066-71.
21. Hirano T, Hasegawa K, Takahashi HE, et al. Structural characteristics of the pedicle and its role in screw stability. Spine 1997; 22 : 2504-10.
22. Ivanov AA, Faizan A, Ebraheim NA, et al. The effect of removing the lateral part of the pars interarticularis on stress distribution at the neural arch in lumbar foraminal microdecompression at L3-L4 and L4-L5. Spine 2007; 32 : 2462-6.
23. Li B, Jiang B, Fu Z, et al. Accurate determination of isthmus of lumbar pedicle: a morphometric study using reformatted computed tomographic imaging. Spine 2004; 29 : 2438-44.
24. Law M, Tencer AF, Anderson PA. Caudo-cephalad loading of pedicle screws: biomechanisms of loosening and methods of augmentation. Spine 1993; 18 : 2438-43.