Particle effective density and mass during steady-state operation of GDI, PFI, and diesel passenger cars

Journal of Aerosol Science

Volumn 83, Issue , 2015, Pages 39-54

  Quiros, David C ^a,b   Hu, Shaohua ^a   Hu, Shishan ^a   Lee, Eon S ^c   Sardar, Satya ^a   Wang, Xiaoliang ^d   Olfert, Jason S ^e   Jung, Heejung S ^f   Zhu, Yifang ^b,c   Huai, Tao ^a,c  

^a CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d DESERT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Centrifugal particle mass analyzer; Effective density; LEV III; Particle size distribution; Particulate matter

Indexed keywords

CENTRIFUGATION; CENTRIFUGES; DIESEL ENGINES; DIRECT INJECTION; EXHAUST SYSTEMS (ENGINE); FUEL PURIFICATION; LIGHT TRANSMISSION; PARTICLE SIZE; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS; POWERTRAINS; SHAPE MEMORY EFFECT; SIZE DISTRIBUTION;

AERODYNAMIC PARTICLE SIZER; CENTRIFUGAL PARTICLE MASS ANALYZERS; DIESEL PARTICULATE FILTERS; DIFFERENTIAL MOBILITY ANALYZERS; EFFECTIVE DENSITY; LEV III; PARTICULATE MATTER; SCANNING MOBILITY PARTICLE SIZER;

PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER);

EID: 84928918828     PISSN: 00218502     EISSN: 18791964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2014.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ahlvik P., Ntziachristos L., Keskinen J., Virtanen A. Real-time measurements of diesel particle size distribution with an electrical low-pressure impactor, SAE 98-0410. SAE Transactions 1998, 107:95-113.
2. Asbach C., Kaminski H., Fissan H., Monz C., Dahmann D., Mülhopt S., et al. Comparison of four mobility particle sizers with different time resolution for stationary exposure measurements. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2009, 11:1593-1609.
3. Barone T.L., Lall A.A., Storey J.M.E., Mulholland G.W., Prikhodko V.Y., Frankland J.H., et al. Size-resolved density measurements of particle emissions from an advanced combustion diesel engine: Effect of aggregate morphology. Energy & Fuels 2011, 25:1978-1988.
4. Biswas S., Hu S., Verma V., Herner J.D., Robertson W.H., Ayala A., et al. Physical properties of particulate matter (PM) from late model heavy-duty diesel vehicles operating with advanced PM and NOx emission control technologies. Atmospheric Environment 2008, 42:5622-5634.
5. Bullock D.S., Olfert J.S. Size, volatility, and effective density of particulate emissions from a homogeneous charge compression ignition engine using compressed natural gas. Journal of Aerosol Science 2014, 75:1-8.
6. CARB (2012a). Development of particulate matter mass standards for future light-duty vehicles. Technical support document (Vol. Appendix P, 165 pp.).
7. CARB Procedure for preparation and handling of aerosol sampling media 2012, California Air Resources Board, Monitoring and Laboratory Division.
8. Ehara K., Hagwood C., Coakley K.J. Novel method to classify aerosol particles according to their mass-to-charge ratio-Aerosol particle mass analyser. Journal of Aerosol Science 1996, 27:217-234.
9. EPA, U.S. (2002). Health assessment document for diesel engine exhaust. EPA/600/8-90/057F. United States Environmental Protection Agency.
10. Herner J.D., Hu S., Robertson W.H., Huai T., Chang M.C.O., Rieger P., et al. Effect of advanced aftertreatment for PM and NOx reduction on heavy-duty diesel engine ultrafine particle emissions. Environmental Science & Technology 2011, 45:2413-2419.
11. Hill J., Polasky S., Nelson E., Tilman D., Huo H., Ludwig L., et al. Climate change and health costs of air emissions from biofuels and gasoline. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106:2077-2082.
12. Hinds, W. C. (1999). Aerosol technology, properties behavior and measurement of airborne particles (2nd ed.).
13. Hu, S., Zhang, S., Sardar, S., Chen, S., Dzhema, I., Huang, S.-M., et al. (2014). Evaluation of gravimetric method to measure light-duty vehicle particulate matter emissions at levels below one milligram per mile (1mg/mile). Paper 2014-01-1571. SAE Technical Paper.
14. Johnson T.J., Symonds J.P.R., Olfert J.S. Mass-mobility measurements using a centrifugal particle mass analyzer and differential mobility spectrometer. Aerosol Science and Technology 2013, 47:1215-1225.
15. Kaminski H., Kuhlbusch T.A.J., Rath S., Götz U., Sprenger M., Wels D., et al. Comparability of mobility particle sizers and diffusion chargers. Journal of Aerosol Science 2013, 57:156-178.
16. Kelly W.P., McMurry P.H. Measurement of particle density by inertial classification of differential mobility analyzer-generated monodisperse aerosols. Aerosol Science and Technology 1992, 17:199-212.
17. Keskinen J., Pietarinen K., Lehtimäki M. Electrical low pressure impactor. Journal of Aerosol Science 1992, 23:353-360.
18. Khlystov A., Stanier C., Pandis S.N. An algorithm for combining electrical mobility and aerodynamic size distributions data when measuring ambient aerosol. Aerosol Science and Technology 2004, 38:229-238. (Special issue of aerosol science and technology on findings from the fine particulate matter supersites program).
19. Kittelson D.B., Watts W.F., Johnson J.P., Rowntree C., Payne M., Goodier S., et al. On-road evaluation of two diesel exhaust aftertreatment devices. Journal of Aerosol Science 2006, 37:1140-1151.
20. Lall A.A., Friedlander S.K. On-line measurement of ultrafine aggregate surface area and volume distributions by electrical mobility analysis: I. Theoretical analysis. Journal of Aerosol Science 2006, 37:260-271.
21. Lehmann U., Niemelä V., Mohr M. New method for time-resolved diesel engine exhaust particle mass measurement. Environmental Science & Technology 2004, 38:5704-5711.
22. Li, Y., Xue, J., Johnson, K., Durbin, T., Villela, M., Pham, L., et al. (2014). Determination of suspended exhaust PM mass for light-duty vehicles, 2014-01-1594. SAE technical paper.
23. Liu Z., Swanson J., Kittelson D.B., Pui D.Y.H. Comparison of methods for online measurement of diesel particulate matter. Environmental Science & Technology 2012, 46:6127-6133.
24. Liu Z.G., Vasys V.N., Dettmann M.E., Schauer J.J., Kittelson D.B., Swanson J. Comparison of strategies for the measurement of mass emissions from diesel engines emitting ultra-low levels of particulate matter. Aerosol Science and Technology 2009, 43:1142-1152.
25. Lloyd A.C., Cackette T.A. Diesel engines: Environmental impact and control. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 2001, 51:809-847.
26. Mamakos A., Ntziachristos L., Samaras Z. Evaluation of the Dekati mass monitor for the measurement of exhaust particle mass emissions. Environmental Science & Technology 2006, 40:4739-4745.
27. Maricq M.M. Bipolar diffusion charging of soot aggregates. Aerosol Science and Technology 2008, 42:247-254.
28. Maricq M.M., Podsiadlik D.H., Chase R.E. Size distributions of motor vehicle exhaust PM: A comparison between ELPI and SMPS measurements. Aerosol Science and Technology 2000, 33:239-260.
29. Maricq M.M., Xu N. The effective density and fractal dimension of soot particles from premixed flames and motor vehicle exhaust. Journal of Aerosol Science 2004, 35:1251-1274.
30. McMurry P.H., Wang X., Park K., Ehara K. The Relationship between mass and mobility for atmospheric particles: A new technique for measuring particle density. Aerosol Science and Technology 2002, 36:227-238.
31. Oh H., Park H., Kim S. Effects of particle shape on the unipolar diffusion charging of nonspherical particles. Aerosol Science and Technology 2004, 38:1045-1053.
32. Olfert J.S., Collings N. New method for particle mass classification-The Couette centrifugal particle mass analyzer. Journal of Aerosol Science 2005, 36:1338-1352.
33. Olfert J.S., Reavell K.S., Rushton M.G., Collings N. The experimental transfer function of the Couette centrifugal particle mass analyzer. Journal of Aerosol Science 2006, 37:1840-1852.
34. Olfert J.S., Symonds J.P.R., Collings N. The effective density and fractal dimension of particles emitted from a light-duty diesel vehicle with a diesel oxidation catalyst. Journal of Aerosol Science 2007, 38:69-82.
35. Park K., Cao F., Kittelson D.B., McMurry P.H. Relationship between particle mass and mobility for diesel exhaust particles. Environmental Science & Technology 2003, 37:577-583.
36. Pope C.A., Dockery D.W. Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: Lines that connect. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 2006, 56:709-742.
37. Quiros D.C., Yoon S., Dwyer H.A., Collins J.F., Zhu Y., Huai T. Measuring particulate matter emissions during parked active diesel particulate filter regeneration of heavy-duty diesel trucks. Journal of Aerosol Science 2014, 73:48-62.
38. Ristimäki J., Virtanen A., Marjamäki M., Rostedt A., Keskinen J. On-line measurement of size distribution and effective density of submicron aerosol particles. Journal of Aerosol Science 2002, 33:1541-1557.
39. Russell L.M., Flagan R.C., Seinfeld J.H. Asymmetric instrument response resulting from mixing effects in accelerated DMA-CPC measurements. Aerosol Science and Technology 1995, 23:491-509.
40. Schmidt-Ott A., Baltensperger U., Gäggeler H.W., Jost D.T. Scaling behaviour of physical parameters describing agglomerates. Journal of Aerosol Science 1990, 21:711-717.
41. Skillas G., Künzel S., Burtscher H., Baltensperger U., Siegmann K. High fractal-like dimension of diesel soot agglomerates. Journal of Aerosol Science 1998, 29:411-419.
42. Sorensen C.M. The mobility of fractal aggregates: A review. Aerosol Science and Technology 2011, 45:765-779.
43. Swanson J.J., Kittelson D.B., Watts W.F., Gladis D.D., Twigg M.V. Influence of storage and release on particle emissions from new and used CRTs. Atmospheric Environment 2009, 43:3998-4004.
44. Symonds J.P.R., Reavell K.S.J., Olfert J.S. The CPMA-electrometer system-A suspended particle mass concentration standard. Aerosol Science and Technology 2013, 47. (i-iv).
45. U.S. EPA (2001). Control of air pollution from new motor vehicles: Heavy-duty engine and vehicle standards and highway diesel fuel sulfur control requirements. 40 CFR Part 69, 80, 86. Federal Register.
46. U.S. EPA (2012). Vehicle-testing procedures. 40 CFR 1066. Fedreal Register.
47. Van Gulijk C., Marijnissen J.C.M., Makkee M., Moulijn J.A., Schmidt-Ott A. Measuring diesel soot with a scanning mobility particle sizer and an electrical low-pressure impactor: Performance assessment with a model for fractal-like agglomerates. Journal of Aerosol Science 2004, 35:633-655.
48. Virtanen A., Ristimäki J., Keskinen J. Method for measuring effective density and fractal dimension of aerosol agglomerates. Aerosol Science and Technology 2004, 38:437-446.
49. Virtanen, A., Ristimäki, J., Marjamäki, M., Vaaraslahti, K., Keskinen, J., & Lappi, M. (2002). Effective density of diesel exhaust particles as a function of size, 2002-01-0056. SAE technical paper.
50. Virtanen A.K.K., Ristimäki J.M., Vaaraslahti K.M., Keskinen J. Effect of engine load on diesel soot particles. Environmental Science & Technology 2004, 38:2551-2556.
51. Wang S.C., Flagan R.C. Scanning electrical mobility spectrometer. Aerosol Science and Technology 1990, 13:230-240.
52. Wang X., Caldow R., Sem G.J., Hama N., Sakurai H. Evaluation of a condensation particle counter for vehicle emission measurement: Experimental procedure and effects of calibration aerosol material. Journal of Aerosol Science 2010, 41:306-318.
53. Wentzel M., Gorzawski H., Naumann K.-H., Saathoff H., Weinbruch S. Transmission electron microscopical and aerosol dynamical characterization of soot aerosols. Journal of Aerosol Science 2003, 34:1347-1370.
54. Zelenyuk A., Cai Y., Chieffo L., Imre D. High precision density measurements of single particles: The density of metastable phases. Aerosol Science and Technology 2005, 39:972-986.
55. Zelenyuk A., Yang J., Choi E., Imre D. SPLAT II: An aircraft compatible, ultra-sensitive, high precision instrument for in-situ characterization of the size and composition of fine and ultrafine particles. Aerosol Science and Technology 2009, 43:411-424.
56. Zheng Z., Johnson K.C., Liu Z., Durbin T.D., Hu S., Huai T., et al. Investigation of solid particle number measurement: Existence and nature of sub-23nm particles under PMP methodology. Journal of Aerosol Science 2011, 42:883-897.
57. Zimmerman N., Godri Pollitt K.J., Jeong C.-H., Wang J.M., Jung T., Cooper J.M., et al. Comparison of three nanoparticle sizing instruments: The influence of particle morphology. Atmospheric Environment 2014, 86:140-147.