An algorithm for combining electrical mobility and aerodynamic size distributions data when measuring ambient aerosol

Aerosol Science and Technology

Volumn 38, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2004, Pages 229-238

  Khlystov, A ^a   Stanier, C ^a   Pandis, S N ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; ALGORITHMS; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS;

AEROSOL DENSITY; ELECTRICAL MOBILITY;

AEROSOLS;

WATER;

AEROSOL; ALGORITHM; INSTRUMENTATION; SIZE DISTRIBUTION;

AERODYNAMIC PARTICLE SIZER; AERODYNAMICS; AEROSOL; AIR QUALITY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DENSITY; DYNAMICS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRICAL MOBILITY; GEOMETRY; INSTRUMENTATION; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RURAL AREA; SCANNING MOBILITY PARTICLE SIZER; URBAN AREA;

EID: 2442427214     PISSN: 02786826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02786820390229543     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Armendariz, A. J., and Leith, D. (2002). Concentration Measurement and Counting. Efficiency for the Aerodynamic Particle Sizer 3320, J. Aerosol Sci. 33:133-148.
2. Cabada, J. C., Rees, S., Takahama, S., Khlystov, A., Pandis, S. N., Davidson, C., and Robinson, A. L. (2004). Mass Size Distributions and Size Resolved Chemical Composition of Fine Particulate Matter at the Pittsburgh Supersite, Atmos. Environ. in print.
3. Dockery, D. W., Pope, C. A., Xu, X., Splengler, J. D., Ware, J. H., Ferris, B. G., and Speizer, F. E. (1993). Mortality Risks of Air Pollution: A Prospective Cohort Study, N. Engl. J. Med. 329:1753-1759.
4. Hinds, W. C. (1999). Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior and Measurements of Airborne Particles, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
5. Hand, J. L., and Kreidenweis, S. M. (2002). A New Method for Retrieving Particle Refractive Index and Effective Density from Aerosol Size Distribution Data, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 36:1012-1026.
6. Pak, S. S., Liu, B. Y. H., and Rubuw, K. L. (1992). Effect of Coating Thickness on Particle Bounce in Inertial Impactor, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 16:141-150.
7. 2.5 in Pittsburgh, PA, Atmos. Environ. in print.
8. Seinfeld, J. H., and Pandis, S. N. (1998). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
9. Schwartz, J., and Dockery, D. W. (1992). Increased Mortality in Philadelphia Associated with Daily Air Pollution Concentration, Am. J. Epidimeol. 135:12-19.
10. 2.5-10, Atmos. Environ. 36:3939-3950.
11. Shi, J. P., Harrison, R. M., and Evans, D. (2001). Comparison of Ambient Particle Surface Area Measurement by Epiphaniometer and SMPS/APS, Atmos. Environ. 35:6193-6200.
12. Stanier, C. O., Khlystov, A., Chan, W. R., Mandiro, M., and Pandis, S. N. (2004). A Method for the in-situ Measurement of Aerosol Water Content of Ambient Aerosols: The Dry-Ambient Aerosol Size Spectrometer (DAASS), Aerosol Sci. Technol. 38:215-228.
13. Stein, S. W., Gabrio, B. J., Oberreit, D., Hairston, P., Myrdal, P. B., and Beck, T. J. (2002). An Evaluation of Mass-Weighted Size Distribution Measured with the Model 3320 Aerodynamic Particle Sizer, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 36:845-854.
14. Tuch, Th., Brand, P., Wichmann, H. E., and Heyder, J. (1997). Variation of Particle Number and Mass Concentration in Various Size Ranges of Ambient Aerosols in Eastern Germany, Atmos. Environ. 31:4193-4197.
15. Wang, S. C., and Flagan, R. C. (1989). Scanning Electrical Monbility Spectrometer, J. Aerosol Sci. 20:1485-1489.
16. Willeke, K., and Baron, P. A. (1992). Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
17. Wittig, B., Anderson, N., Khlystov, A. Y., Pandis, S. N., Davidson C., and Robinson A. L. (2004). Pittsburgh Air Quality Study Overview and Preliminary Scientific Findings, Atmos. Environ. in print.
18. Wolfenbarger, J. K., and Seinfeld, J. H. (1991). Regularized Solutions to the Aerosol Data Inversion Problem, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 12:342-361.