Erratum: Image Noise Reduction Algorithm for Digital Subtraction Angiography: Clinical Results (Radiology (2013) 269:2 (553-560) DOI 10.1148/radiol.13121262);Image noise reduction algorithm for digital subtraction angiography: Clinical results

Radiology

Volumn 269, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 553-560

  Söderman, Michael ^a   Holmin, Staffan ^a   Andersson, Tommy ^a   Palmgren, Charlotta ^a   Babiæ, Draženko ^b   Hoornaert, Bart ^b  

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BRAIN ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DURAL ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA; FEMALE; GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; NOISE REDUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIATION DOSE REDUCTION; RADIATION EXPOSURE;

EID: 84886651043     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016164004     Document Type: Erratum

References (34)

1. Helyar V, Söderman M, Andersson T, Holmin S. Vertebrobasilar dissection with pseudoaneurysm or subarachnoid hemorrhage: intracranial stenting as the only treatment-a report of three cases. Interv Neuroradiol 2009;15(1):87-91.
2. Brinjikji W, Rabinstein AA, Nasr DM, Lanzino G, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ. Better outcomes with treatment by coiling relative to clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 2001-2008. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32(6):1071-1075.
3. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360(9342):1267-1274. (Pubitemid 35284616)
4. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366(9488):809-817. (Pubitemid 41557380)
5. Klein LW, Miller DL, Balter S, et al. Occupational health hazards in the interventional laboratory: time for a safer environment. Radiology 2009;250(2):538-544.
6. Marx MV, Niklason L, Mauger EA. Occupational radiation exposure to interventional radiologists: a prospective study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1992;3(4):597-606.
7. Söderman M, Hansson B, Axelsson B. Radiation dose and image quality in neuroangiography: effects of increased tube voltage, added x-ray filtration and antiscatter grid removal. Interv Neuroradiol 1998;4(3):199-207. (Pubitemid 28474167)
8. Balter S, Hopewell JW, Miller DL, Wagner LK, Zelefsky MJ. Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients' skin and hair. Radiology 2010;254(2):326-341.
9. Koenig TR, Wolff D, Mettler FA, Wagner LK. Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures. I. Characteristics of radiation injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177(1):3-11. (Pubitemid 32578043)
10. Miller DL, Balter S, Noonan PT, Georgia JD. Minimizing radiation-induced skin injury in interventional radiology procedures. Radiology 2002;225(2):329-336. (Pubitemid 35239230)
11. Geleijns J, Wondergem J. X-ray imaging and the skin: radiation biology, patient dosimetry and observed effects. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;114(1-3):121-125. (Pubitemid 40883665)
12. Pflugbeil S, Pflugbeil C, Schmitz-Feuerhake I. Risk estimates for meningiomas and other late effects after diagnostic x-ray exposure of the skull. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2011;147(1-2):305-309.
13. Schneider AB, Lubin J, Ron E, et al. Salivary gland tumors after childhood radiation treatment for benign conditions of the head and neck: dose-response relationships. Radiat Res 1998;149(6):625-630. (Pubitemid 28247216)
14. Schneider AB, Ron E, Lubin J, et al. Acoustic neuromas following childhood radiation treatment for benign conditions of the head and neck. Neuro-oncol 2008;10(1):73-78. (Pubitemid 351250902)
15. Umansky F, Shoshan Y, Rosenthal G, Fraifeld S, Spektor S. Radiation-induced meningioma. Neurosurg Focus 2008;24(5):E7.
16. Vano E, Gonzalez L, Fernández JM, Haskal ZJ. Eye lens exposure to radiation in interventional suites: caution is warranted. Radiology 2008;248(3):945-953.
17. Ainsbury EA, Bouffler SD, Dörr W, et al. Radiation cataractogenesis: a review of recent studies. Radiat Res 2009;172(1):1-9.
18. Miller DL, Kwon D, Bonavia GH. Reference levels for patient radiation doses in interventional radiology: proposed initial values for U. S. practice. Radiology 2009;253(3):753-764.
19. Thierry-Chef I, Simon SL, Land CE, Miller DL. Radiation dose to the brain and subsequent risk of developing brain tumors in pediatric patients undergoing interventional neuroradiology procedures. Radiat Res 2008;170(5):553-565.
20. Thierry-Chef I, Simon SL, Miller DL. Radiation dose and cancer risk among pediatric patients undergoing interventional neuroradiology procedures. Pediatr Radiol 2006;36(Suppl 2):159-162.
21. Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources-1950-2007. Radiology 2009;253(2):520-531.
22. Gkanatsios NA, Huda W, Peters KR. Adult patient doses in interventional neuroradiology. Med Phys 2002;29(5):717-723. (Pubitemid 34525900)
23. Bergeron P, Carrier R, Roy D, Blais N, Raymond J. Radiation doses to patients in neurointerventional procedures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15(10):1809-1812.
24. O'Dea TJ, Geise RA, Ritenour ER. The potential for radiation-induced skin damage in interventional neuroradiological procedures: a review of 522 cases using automated dosimetry. Med Phys 1999;26(9):2027-2033. (Pubitemid 29442288)
25. Vano E, Fernandez JM, Sanchez RM, et al. Patient radiation dose management in the follow-up of potential skin injuries in neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34(2):277-282.
26. Miller DL, Balter S, Cole PE, et al. Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study. II. Skin dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14(8):977-990. (Pubitemid 36959515)
27. D'Ercole L, Thyrion FZ, Bocchiola M, Mantovani L, Klersy C. Proposed local diagnostic reference levels in angiography and interventional neuroradiology and a preliminary analysis according to the complexity of the procedures. Phys Med 2012;28(1):61-70.
28. Buades A, Coll B, Morel JM. A review of image denoising algorithms, with a new one. Multiscale Model Simul 2005;4(2):490-530. (Pubitemid 43890582)
29. Donoho DL. De-noising by soft thresholding. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 1995;41(3):613-627.
30. Portilla J, Strela V, Wainwright MJ, Simoncelli EP. Image denoising using scale mixtures of Gaussians in the wavelet domain. IEEE Trans Image Process 2003;12(11):1338-1351.
31. Tomasi C, Manduchi R. Bilateral filtering for gray and color images. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'98); Bombay, India; January 4-7, 1998. doi: 10.1109/ICCV.1998.710815. Accessed December 5, 2012.
32. Jago J, Collet-Billon A, Chenal C, Jong JM, Makram-Ebeid S. XRES: adaptive enhancement of ultrasound images. Medicamundi 2002;46(3). http://www.healthcare.philips. com/pwc-hc/main/about/assets/Docs/medicamundi/mm- vol46-no3/09-Jago.pdf. Accessed December 5, 2012.
33. Meuwly JY, Thiran JP, Gudinchet F. Application of adaptive image processing technique to real-time spatial compound ultrasound imaging improves image quality. Invest Radiol 2003;38(5):257-262. (Pubitemid 36535031)
34. International Electrotechnical Commission. Medical electrical equipment part 2-43: particular requirements for the safety of x-ray equipment for interventional procedures. Report P-IEC 60601-2-43 ed1.0. Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission, 2010.