Significant dose reduction for pediatric digital subtraction angiography without impairing image quality: Preclinical study in a piglet model

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 203, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 904-908

  Racadio, John M ^a   Strauss, Keith ^a   Abruzzo, Todd ^a   Patel, Manish ^a   Kukreja, Kamlesh ^a   Johnson, Neil ^a   Den Hartog, Mark ^b   Hoornaert, Bart ^b   Nachabe, Rami ^a  

^a CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA); Dose reduction; Image quality; Pediatrics

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; AORTA; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; HEPATIC ARTERY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; KIDNEY ARTERY; NOISE REDUCTION; NONHUMAN; PIGLET; POPULATION SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIATION DOSE REDUCTION; RADIOLOGIST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SUPERIOR MESENTERIC ARTERY; ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY (DSA); DRUG DOSE REDUCTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PEDIATRICS; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION PROTECTION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SWINE;

DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY (DSA); DOSE REDUCTION; IMAGE QUALITY; PEDIATRICS;

ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ANIMALS; HUMANS; MODELS, ANIMAL; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SWINE;

EID: 84910137475     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.12170     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Miksys N, Gordon CL, Thomas K, Connolly BL. Estimating effective dose to pediatric patients undergoing interventional radiology procedures using anthropomorphic phantoms and MOSFET dosimeters. AJR 2010; 194:1315-1322
2. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 2001; 176:289-296
3. Sidhu M, Goske MJ, Connolly B, et al. Image Gently, Step Lightly: promoting radiation safety in pediatric interventional radiology. AJR 2010; 195:[web]W299-W301
4. Soderman M, Holmin S, Andersson T, Palmgren C, Babic D, Hoornaert B. Image noise reduction algorithm for digital subtraction angiography: clinical results. Radiology 2013; 269:553-560
5. Heffess CS, Wenig BM, Thompson LD. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma to the thyroid gland: a clinicopathologic study of 36 cases. Cancer 2002; 95:1869-1878
6. Racadio JM, Kashinkunti SR, Nachabe RA, et al. Clinically useful dilution factors for iodine and gadolinium contrast material: an animal model of pediatric digital subtraction angiography using state-of-the-art flat-panel detectors. Pediatr Radiol 2013; 43:1491-1501
7. Vogl TJ, Gruber-Rouh T, Eichler K, et al. Repetitive transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) of liver metastases from gastric cancer: local control and survival results. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82:258-263
8. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86:420-428
9. Marshalleck F. Pediatric arterial interventions. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2010; 13:238-243
10. Tullus K, Brennan E, Hamilton G, et al. Renovascular hypertension in children. Lancet 2008; 371:1453-1463
11. Racadio JM, Agha AK, Johnson ND, Warner BW. Imaging and radiological interventional techniques for gastrointestinal bleeding in children. Semin Pediatr Surg 1999; 8:181-192
12. Roebuck DJ, Barnacle AM. Haemoptysis and bronchial artery embolization in children. Paediatr Respir Rev 2008; 9:95-104
13. Gross JL, Woll NL, Hanson CA, et al. Embolization for pediatric blunt splenic injury is an alternative to splenectomy when observation fails. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013; 75:421-425
14. Wolfe TJ, Hussain SI, Lynch JR, Fitzsimmons BF, Zaidat OO. Pediatric cerebral angiography: analysis of utilization and findings. Pediatr Neurol 2009; 40:98-101
15. Lv X, Jiang C, Li Y, Yang X, Wu Z. Endovascular treatment for pediatric intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2009; 51:749-754
16. Cahill AM, Nijs EL. Pediatric vascular malformations: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and the role of interventional radiology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011; 34:691-704
17. Gkanatsios NA, Huda W, Peters KR. Adult patient doses in interventional neuroradiology. Med Phys 2002; 29:717-723
18. Juszkat R, Blaszak MA, Majewska N, Majewski W. Dose-area product of patients undergoing digital subtraction angiography (DSA): abdominal aorta and lower limb examinations. Health Phys 2009; 96:13-18