Family psychosocial risk screening guided by the Pediatric Psychosocial Preventative Health Model (PPPHM) using the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT)

Acta Oncologica

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 574-580

  Kazak, Anne E ^a   Schneider, Stephanie ^a   Didonato, Stephen ^a   Pai, Ahna L H ^b  

^a NEMOURS CHILDREN S CLINIC   (United States)

^b CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHILDHOOD CANCER; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; PEDIATRIC PSYCHOSOCIAL PREVENTATIVE HEALTH MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOSOCIAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCREENING; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ADOLESCENT; CHILD; COPING BEHAVIOR; DIAGNOSIS; FAMILY HEALTH; INFANT; MENTAL STRESS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; THERAPY;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FAMILY HEALTH; HUMANS; INFANT; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; RESILIENCE, PSYCHOLOGICAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 84928797605     PISSN: 0284186X     EISSN: 1651226X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.995774     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Institute of Medicine. Cancer care for the whole patient: Meeting psychosocial health needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.
2. Kazak AE, Rourke MT, Navsaria N. Families and other systems in pediatric psychology. In: Roberts MC, Steele RG, editors, Handbook of pediatric psychology, 4th ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2009.
3. Kazak A, Brier M, Alderfer M, Reilly A, Fooks-Parker S, Rogerwick S, et al. Review: Screening for psychosocial risk in pediatric cancer. Pediatric Blood Cancer 2012; 59: 822-7.
4. Haverman L, van Oers H, Limperg P, Houtzager B, Huisman J, Darlington A, et al. Development and validation of the distress thermometer for parents of a chronically ill child. J Pediatr 2013; 163: 1140-6.
5. Goldenring J, Rosen D. Getting into adolescent heads: An essential update. Contemp Pediatr 2004; 21: 64-90.
6. Kazak A. Pediatric Psychosocial Preventative Health Model (PPPHM): Research, practice and collaboration in pediatric family systems medicine. Families Systems Health 2006; 24: 381-95.
7. Kazak A, Prusak A, McSherry M, Simms S, Beele D, Rourke M, et al. The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT): Pilot data on a brief screening instrument for identifying high risk families in pediatric oncology. Families Systems Health 2001; 19: 303-15.
8. Kazak A, Cant K, Jensen M, McSherry M, Rourke M, Hwang WT, et al. Identifying psychosocial risk indicative of subsequent resource utilization in families of newly diagnosed pediatric oncology patients. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 3220-5.
9. Pai AL, Patino-Fernandez AM, McSherry M, Beele D, Alderfer M, Reilly A, et al. The psychosocial assessment tool (PAT2.0): Psychometric properties of a screener for psychosocial distress in families of children newly diagnosed with cancer. J Pediatr Psychol 2008; 33: 50-62.
10. McCarthy M, Clarke N, Vance A, Ashley D, Heath J, Anderson V. Measuring psychosocial risk in families caring for a child with cancer: The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT2.0). Pediatr Blood Cancer 2009; 53: 78-83.
11. Barrera M, Hancock K, Rokeach A, Catuadella D, Atenafu E, Johnston D, et al. External validity and reliability of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) among Canadian parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014; 61: 165-70.
12. Sint Nicolaas SM, Schepers SA, Grootenhuis MA, Verhaak CM. Reliability, validity, and utility of the Dutch translation of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool. 15th World Congress of the International Psycho-Oncology Society (IPOS); 2013, October; Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
13. Karlson CW, Smith ML, Haynes S, Faith MA, Pierce J, Elkin TD, et al. Risk for psychosocial problems in pediatric cancer: Impact on socioeconomics. Children's Health Care 2013; 42.
14. Gilleland J, Reed-Knight B, Brand S, Griffin A, Wasilewski-Masker K, Meacham L, et al. Assessment of psychosocial functioning in survivors of pediatric cancer using the PAT2.0. Psycho-Oncology 2013; 22: 2133-9.
15. Alderfer M, Mougianis I, Barakat L, Beele D, DiTaranto S, Hwang WT, et al. Family psychosocial risk, distress and service utilization in pediatric cancer: Predictive validity of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT). Cancer 2009; 115: 4339-49.
16. Kazak A, Barakat L, Ditaranto S, Biros D, Hwang W, Beele D, et al. Screening for psychosocial risk at cancer diagnosis: The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT). J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2011; 33: 289-94.
17. Kazak A, Barakat L, Hwang W, Ditaranto S, Biros D, Beele D, et al. Association of psychosocial risk screening in pediatric cancer with psychosocial services provided. Psycho-Oncology 2011; 20: 715-23.
18. Barerra M, Hancock K, Rokeach A, Atenafu E, Cataudella D, Punnett A, et al. Does the use of the revised Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PATrev) result in improved quality of life and reduced psychosocial risk in Canadian families with a child newly diagnosed with cancer? Psycho-Oncology 2014; 23: 165-72.
19. Sampilo M, Lassen S, Belmont J, Parimi P. Development and validation of a psychosocial screening tool to identify highrisk families in the neonatal intensive care unit. National Child Health Psychology Conference; 2011, April; San Antonio, Texas, USA.
20. Triemstra K, Eisenman E, Woods K. The utility of the PATChronic Pain for use with children of different ages, gender and headache types. Poster presented at the Society of Pediatric Psychology Annual Conference; 2014, March; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
21. Norfolk J, McNamara K, Browne-Cooper K. Davis E, Mace J. The use of the psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT2.0): Can it predict outcomes in youth with newly diagnosed Type Idiabetes mellitus? World Diabetes Conference; 2013, December; Melbourne, Australia.
22. Karlson C, Leist-Haynes S, Smith M, Faith M, Elkin TD, Megason G. Examination of risk and resiliency in a pediatric sickle cell disease population using the Psychosocial Assessment Tool 2.0. J Pediatr Psychol 2012; 37: 1031-40.
23. Pai AL, Tackett A, Ittenbach RF, Goebel J. Psychosocial Assessment Tool 2.0 General: Validity of a psychosocial risk screener in a pediatric kidney transplant sample. Pediatr Transplant 2012; 16: 92-8.
24. Pai ALH, Tackett A, Hente EA, Ernst MM, Denson LA, Hommel KA. Assessing psychosocial risk in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: Validation of the PAT2.0-GEN. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2014; 58: 51-6.
25. Noll RB, Patel SK, Embry L, Hardy KK, Pelletier W, Annett RD, et al. Children's Oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: Behavioral science. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2013; 60: 1048-54.
26. McKay L, Gregory D. Exploring family centered care among pediatric oncology nurses. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 2011; 28: 43-52.
27. Kuo D, Houtrow A, Arango P, Kuhlthau K, Simmons J, Neff J. Family-centered care: Current applications and future directions in pediatric health care. Matern Child Health J 2012; 16: 297-305.
28. Blackall GF, Simms S, Green MJ. Breaking the cycle: How to turn conflict into collaboration when you and your patients disagree. Chapter 5. When all you know isn't enough: Dealing with chronic illness; Philadelphia: ACP Press; 2009. p. 59-70.
29. Selove R, Kroll T, Coppes M, Cheng Y. Psychosocial services in the first 30 days after diagnosis: Results of a web-based survey of Children's Oncology Group (COG) member institutions. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2012; 58: 435-40.
30. Weiner L, Viola A, Koretski J, Perper ED, Patenaude AF. Pediatric psycho-oncology care: Standards, guidelines, and consensus report. Psycho-Oncology Epub 2014 Jun 6.
31. Wiener L, Patenaude A, Noll R, Kazak A, Sardi-Brown V, Brown P. Establishing pediatric psychosocial standards of care. Poster presented at the Children's Oncology Group; 2013, October; Dallas, Texas, USA.
32. Bhatia, S. Disparities in cancer outcomes: Lessons learned from children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011; 56: 994-1002.
33. Hearps SJ, McCarthy MC, Muscara F, Hearps SJC, Burke K, Jones B, et al. Psychosocial risk in families of infants undergoing surgery for a serious congenital heart disease. Cardiol Young 2014; 24: 632-9.
34. Kazak A, Alderfer M. Hocking M, Schwartz L, Barakat L. Check-in About Recent Experiences and Strengths (CARES): A web-based table-administered caregiver-report assessment protocol. Poster presented at the Society of Pediatric Psychology Annual Conference; 2013, April; New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.