Reinfusing values

Research in the Sociology of Organizations

Volumn 44, Issue , 2015, Pages 353-381

  Kraatz, Matthew S ^a   Flores, Ricardo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Humanist science; Institutional theory; Normative theory; Philip Selznick; Values

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928709097     PISSN: 0733558X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X20150000044013     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Ansell, C., Boin, A., & Farjoun, M. (2015). Dynamic conservatism: How institutions change to remain the same. In M. S. Kraatz (Ed.), Institutions and ideals: Philip Selznick's Legacy for Organizational Studies (Vol. 44, pp. 89-119). Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
2. Berlin, I. (2013). The power of ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Berson, Y., Oreg, S., & Dvir, T. (2008). CEO values, organizational culture and firm outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(5), 615-633.
4. Besharov, M. L., & Khurana, R. (2015). Leading amidst competing technical and institutional demands: Revisiting Selznick's conception of leadership. In M. S. Kraatz (Ed.), Institutions and ideals: Philip Selznick's Legacy for Organizational Studies (Vol. 44, pp. 53-88). Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
5. Bruton, G., Faems, D., & Harley, B. (2013). Opening up new vistas in categorization research. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1097-1099.
6. Chandler, D. (2015). Why institutions matter: Stakeholder attention to organizational ethics commitments. In M. S. Kraatz (Ed.), Institutions and ideals: Philip Selznick's Legacy for Organizational Studies (Vol. 44, pp. 199-233). Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
7. Clark, B. R. (1956). Organizational adaptation and precarious values: A case study. American Sociological Review, 327-336.
8. Davidov, E., & Meuleman, B. (2012). Explaining attitudes towards immigration policies in European countries: The role of human values. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(5), 757-775.
9. Dewey, J. (1939). Theory of valuation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 48, 147-160.
11. Eastwood, C. (1992). Unforgiven [motion picture]. Burbank, CA: Warner Bros.
12. Fassin, D. (2012). A companion to moral anthropology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
13. Frankfurt, H. G. (1971). Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. Journal of Philosophy, 68(1), 5-20.
14. Friedland, R. (2013). God, love, and other good reasons for practice: Thinking through institutional logics. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, part A. (Vol. 39, pp. 25-50). Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
15. Glynn, M. A., & Navis, C. (2013). Categories, identities, and cultural classification: Moving beyond a model of categorical constraint. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1124-1137.
16. Goodstein, J. (2015). Philip Selznick and the problems of organizational integrity and responsibility. In M. S. Kraatz (Ed.), Institutions and ideals: Philip Selznick's Legacy for Organizational Studies (Vol. 44, pp. 175-197). Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
17. Greenberg, J. (2014). What you value or what you know? Which mechanism explains the intergenerational transmission of business ownership expectations? Research in the Sociology of Work, 25, 85-126.
18. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022-1054.
19. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317-371.
20. Hechter, M., Nadel, L., & Michod, R. E. (Eds.). (1993). The origins of values. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
21. Heclo, H. (2002). The statesman: Revisiting leadership in administration. In P. Selznick, R. A. Kagan, M. Krygier, & K. I. Winston (Eds.), Legality and community: On the intellectual legacy of Philip Selznick (pp. 295-310). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
22. Hinings, C., & Greenwood, R. (2015). Missing in action: The further contribution of Philip Selznick to contemporary institutional theory. In M. S. Kraatz (Ed.), Institutions and ideals: Philip Selznick's Legacy for Organizational Studies (Vol. 44, pp. 121-148). Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
23. Hirsch, P. M., & Lounsbury, M. (1997). Ending the family quarrel toward a reconciliation of "old" and "new" institutionalisms. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 406-418.
24. Hitlin, S., & Piliavin, J. A. (2004). Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 359-393.
25. Hitlin, S., & Vaisey, S. (2013). The new sociology of morality. Sociology, 39(1), 51.
26. Jaeger, G., & Selznick, P. (1964). A normative theory of culture. American Sociological Review, 29, 653-669.
27. Joas, H. (2000). The genesis of values. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28. Kekes, J. (1993). The morality of pluralism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29. King, B. G. (2015). Organizational actors, character and Selznick's theory of organizations. In M. S. Kraatz (Ed.), Institutions and ideals: Philip Selznick's Legacy for Organizational Studies (Vol. 44, pp. 149-174). Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
30. King, B. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2008). Rethinking the relationship between reputation and legitimacy: A social actor conceptualization. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(3), 192-207.
31. Kraatz, M. S. (2009). Leadership as institutional work: A bridge to the other side. Institutional work: Actors and Agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 59-91). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (p. 840). SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA.
33. Kraatz, M. S., & Moore, J. H. (2002). Executive migration and institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 120-143.
34. Kraatz, M. S., Ventresca, M. J., & Deng, L. (2010). Precarious values and mundane innovations: Enrollment management in American liberal arts colleges. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1521-1545.
35. Krygier, M. (2002). Philip Selznick, normative theory, and the rule of law. In P. Selznick, R. A. Kagan, M. Krygier, & K. I. Winston (Eds.), Legality and community: On the intellectual legacy of Philip Selznick (pp. 19-48). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
36. Krygier, M. (2012). Philip Selznick: Ideals in the world. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
37. Krygier, M. (2015). Selznick's Hobbessian idealism: Its nature and its origins. In M. S. Kraatz (Ed.), Institutions and ideals: Philip Selznick's Legacy for Organizational Studies (Vol. 44, pp. 21-52). Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
38. March, J. G. (2003). A scholar's quest. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(3), 205-207.
39. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.
40. Moore, J. H., & Kraatz, M. S. (2011). Governance form and organizational adaptation: Lessons from the savings and loan industry in the 1980s. Organization Science, 22(4), 850-868.
41. Nagel, T. (1979). The fragmentation of value. Mortal questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Peart, N., & Talbot, P. (1977). Closer to the heart. A farewell to kings. South Wales: Rockfield Studios.
43. Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations: A critical essay (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Random House.
44. Pratt, M. G., & Kraatz, M. S. (2009). E pluribus unum: Multiple identities and the organizational self. Exploring Positive Identities and Organizations: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation, 377-402. New York, NY: Routledge.
45. Raffaelli, R., & Glynn, M. A. (2015). What's so institutional about leadership? Theorizing mechanisms of value infusion. In M. S. Kraatz (Ed.), Institutions and ideals: Philip Selznick's Legacy for Organizational Studies (Vol. 44, pp. 283-316). Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
46. Schafer, M. H. (2011). Ambiguity, religion, and relational context: Competing influences on moral attitudes? Sociological Perspectives, 54(1), 59-82.
47. Schwartz, S. H., & Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(3), 230-255.
48. Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests and identities. SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA.
49. Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organization. American Sociological Review, 13, 25-35.
50. Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study of politics and organization. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
51. Selznick, P. (1952). The organizational weapon. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
52. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New York, NY: Harper & Row, Publishers.
53. Selznick, P. (1961). Sociology and natural law. The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 6(1), 84-108.
54. Selznick, P. (1966). TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
55. Selznick, P. (1969). Law, society and industrial justice. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
56. Selznick, P. (1984). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
57. Selznick, P. (1992). The moral commonwealth: Social theory and the promise of community. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
58. Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism "old" and "new". Administrative Science Quarterly, 270-277.
59. Selznick, P. (2003). 'Law in context' revisited. Journal of Law and Society, 30(2), 177-186.
60. Selznick, P. (2008). A humanist science: Values and ideals in social inquiry. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
61. Selznick, P. (with an Introduction from Paul Hirsch) (2015). On sustaining research agendas: Their moral and scientific basis. In M. S. Kraatz (Ed.), Institutions and ideals: Philip Selznick's Legacy for Organizational Studies (Vol. 44, pp. 9-19). Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
62. Stinchcombe, A. L. (1997). On the virtues of the old institutionalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 1-18.
63. Swanton, C. (2003). Virtue ethics: A pluralistic view. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64. Tavory, I. (2011). The question of moral action: A formalist position. Sociological Theory, 29(4), 272-293.
65. Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. Thacher, D. (2015). Perils of value neutrality. In M. S. Kraatz (Ed.), Institutions and ideals: Philip Selznick's Legacy for Organizational Studies (Vol. 44, pp. 317-352). Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
67. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68. Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69. Williams, B. (2011). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
70. Zuckerman, E. W. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1398-1438.