Philip Selznick and the problems of organizational integrity and responsibility

Research in the Sociology of Organizations

Volumn 44, Issue , 2000, Pages 175-197

  Goodstein, Jerry ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Institutionalization; Opportunism; Organizational integrity; Organizational responsibility; Philip Selznick

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928732250     PISSN: 0733558X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X20150000044008     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Bauman, D. C. (2013). Leadership and the three faces of integrity. Leadership Quarterly, 24, 414-426.
2. Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 488-506.
3. Bertels, S., Cody, M., & Peck, s. (2014). A responsive approach to organizational misconduct: Rehabilitation, reintegration, and reduction of reoffense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(3), 343-370.
4. Choi, J., & Wang, H. (2009). Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 895-907.
5. Coleman, J. S. (1974). Power and the structure of society. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co., Inc.
6. Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Canella, A. A. Jr. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28, 371-382.
7. deVilliers, C., Naiken, V., & van Staden, C. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1636-1663.
8. Dirks, K. T., Lewicki, R. J., & Zaheer, A. (2009). Repairing relationships within and between organizations: Building a conceptual foundation. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 68-84.
9. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
10. Elms, H., & Phillips, R. A. (2009). Private security companies and institutional legitimacy: Corporate and stakeholder responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19, 403-432.
11. Finegold, D., Benson, G. S., & Hecht, D. (2007). Corporate boards and company performance: Review of research in light of recent reforms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15, 865-878.
12. Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. Jr. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing, Inc.
14. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15. Gallagher, J. A., & Goodstein, J. (2002). Fulfilling institutional responsibilities in health care: Organizational ethics and the role of mission discernment. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(4), 433-450.
16. Gehman, J., Trevino, L. K., & Garud, R. (2013). Values work: A process study of the emergence and performance of organizational values practices. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 84-112.
17. Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management and Learning, 21, 13-47.
18. Gillespie, N., & Dietz, G. (2009). Trust repair after an organization-level failure. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 127-145.
19. Gillespie, N., Dietz, G., & Lockey, S. (2014). Organizational reintegration and trust repair after an integrity violation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(3), 371-410.
20. Gittell, J. H. (2003). The southwest airlines way. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
21. Goodstein, J. (2004). Integrity-based governance: Responding to the call for corporate governance reform. In R. J. Burke & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Leading in turbulent times (pp. 167-181). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
22. Goodstein, J., Blair-Loy, M., & Wharton, A. S. (2008). Organization-based legitimacy: Core ideologies and moral action. In I. Reed & J. C. Alexander (Eds.), Meaning and method: The cultural approach of sociology (pp. 44-62). Boulder, MA: Paradigm Publishers.
23. Goodstein, J., & Carney, B. (1999). Actively engaging organizational ethics in health care: Four essential elements. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 10(3), 224-229.
24. Goodstein, J., & Potter, R. (1999). Beyond financial incentives: Organizational ethics and organizational integrity. HEC Forum, 11(4), 293-305.
25. Goodstein, J., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Corporate and stakeholder responsibility: Making business ethics a two-way conversation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17, 375-398.
26. Gruys, M. L., Stewart, S. M., Goodstein, J., Bing, M. N., & Wicks, A. C. (2008). Values enactment in organizations: A multi-level examination. Journal of Management, 34, 806-843.
27. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125-139.
28. Hinings, C. R., & Greenwood, R. (2015). Missing in action: The further contribution of Philip Selznick to contemporary institutional theory. In M. S. Kraatz (Ed.), Institutions and ideals: Philip Selznick's legacy for organizational studies (Vol. 44, pp. 121-148). Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
29. Jaeger, G., & Selznick, P. (1964). A normative theory of culture. American Sociological Review, 29, 650-670.
30. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92-117.
31. Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 206-221. (29: 653-669).
32. Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2002). Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 399-415.
33. Khurana, R., Nohria, N., & Penrice, D. (2005). Management as a profession. In J. W. Lorsch, L. Berkowitz, & A. Zelleke (Eds.), Restoring trust in American business. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. King, B. G. (2015). Organizational actors, character, and Selznick's theory of organizations. In M. Kraatz (Ed.), Institutions and ideals: Philip Selznick's legacy for organizational studies (Vol. 44, pp. 149-174). Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
35. King, B. G., Felin, T., & Whetten, D. A. (2010). Finding the organization in organization theory: A meta-theory of the organization as a social actor. Organization Science, 21(1), 290-305.
36. Kolb, R. (2010). Lessons from the financial crisis: Causes, consequences, and our economic future. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
37. Kraatz, M. S. (2009). Leadership as institutional work: A bridge to the other side. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddbaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 59-91). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243-275). London: Sage.
39. Kraatz, M. S., Ventresca, M. J., & Deng, L. (2010). Precarious values and mundane innovations: Enrollment management in American liberal arts colleges. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1521-1545.
40. Krygier, M. (2012). Philip Selznick: Ideals in the world. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
41. Krygier, M. (2015). Selznick's Hobbesian idealism: Its nature and its origins. In M. S. Kraatz (Ed.), Institutions and ideals: Philip Selznick's legacy for organizational studies (Vol. 44, pp. 21-52). Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
42. Kulik, B. W. (2005). Agency theory, reasoning and culture at Enron: In search of a solution. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 347-360.
43. Love, G. E., & Kraatz, M. (2009). Character, conformity, or the bottom line? How and why downsizing is affected by corporate reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 314-335.
44. Luoma, P., & Goodstein, J. (1999). Stakeholders and corporate boards: Institutional influences on board composition and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 553-563.
45. Margolis, J. (2001). Responsibility in organizational context. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(3), 431-454.
46. Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268-305.
47. Michels, R. (1962). Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
48. Mishina, Y., Dykes, B. J., Block, E. S., & Pollock, T. G. (2010). Why 'good' firms do bad things: The effects of high expectations and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 701-722.
49. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403-441.
50. Orts, E. (1995). A reflexive model of environmental regulation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 5(4), 779-794.
51. Paine, L. S. (1997). Leadership, ethics, and organizational integrity. Chicago, IL: Irwin.
52. Pedersen, J. S., & Dobbin, F. (2006). In search of identity and legitimization: Bridging organizational culture and neoinstitutionalism. American Behavioral Sciences, 49, 897-907.
53. Pfarrer, M. D., DeCelles, K. A., Smith, K. G. & Taylor, M. S. (2008). After the fall: Reintegrating the corrupt organization. Academy of Management Review, 33, 730-749.
54. Pfeffer, J. (1998). The human equation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
55. Phillips, R. A. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco, CA: Berrett Koehler Publishers, Inc.
56. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89, 62-77.
57. Scott, W. R. (1987). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
58. Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
59. Selznick, P. (1952). The organizational weapon. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
60. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
61. Selznick, P. (1989). The idea of a communitarian morality. California Law Review, 75, 445-463.
62. Selznick, P. (1992). The moral commonwealth: Social theory and the promise of community. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
63. Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism "old" and "new". Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 270-277.
64. Selznick, P. (2000). On sustaining research agendas: Their moral and scientific basis: An address to the western academy of management. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9(3), 277-282.
65. Selznick, P. (2008). A humanist science, values and ideals in social inquiry. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
66. Simons, T. (2002). Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers' words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13, 18-35.
67. Teubner, G. (1983). Substantive and reflexive elements in modern law. Law and Society Review, 17(2), 239-286.
68. Thacher, D. (2015). Perils of value neutrality. In M. S. Kraatz (Ed.), Institutions and ideals: Philip Selznick's legacy for organizational studies (Vol. 44, pp. 317-352). Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
69. Waddock, S. (2002). Leading corporate citizens. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
70. Waddock, S., & Smith, N. (2000). Corporate responsibility audits: Doing well by doing good. Sloan Management Review, 41(2), 75-83.