A Novel Concept for a Prosthetic Hand With a Bidirectional Interface: A Feasibility Study

IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 56, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 2739-2743

  Cipriani, Christian ^a   Antfolk, Christian ^b   Sebelius, Fredrik ^b   Balkenius, Christian ^c   Rosen, Birgitta ^d   Lundborg, Goran ^d   Carrozza, Maria Chiara ^a  

^a SCUOLA SUPERIORE SANT ANNA   (Italy)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY COGNITIVE SCIENCE   (Sweden)

^d LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Electromyographic (EMG) classification; mechatronic hand; prosthetics; rubber hand effect; tactile display

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HAND; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; PROSTHESIS; ROBOTICS; TOUCH;

ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEEDBACK; HAND; HUMANS; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; ROBOTICS; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOUCH; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 74049137978     PISSN: 00189294     EISSN: 15582531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2031242     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. P. Parker, K. Englehart, and B. Hudgins “Myoelectric signal processing for control of powered limb prostheses,” J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol., vol. 16, pp. 541–548, 2006.
2. K. A. Kaczmarek, J. G. Webster, P. Bach-y-Rita, and W. J. Tompkins, “Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–16, Jan. 1991.
3. P. J. Kyberd, O. E. Holland, P. H. Chappel, S. Smith, R. Tregidgo, P. J. Bagwell, and M. Snaith “MARCUS: A two degree of freedom hand prosthesis with hierarchical grip control,” IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 70–76, Mar. 1995.
4. D. J. Atkins, D. C. Y. Heard, and W. H. Donovan “Epidemiologic overview of individuals with upper limb loss and their reported research priorities,” J. Prosthet. Orthot., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 2–11, 1996.
5. G. S. Dhillon and K. W. Horch, “Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm,” IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 468–472, Dec. 2005.
6. X. Jia, M. A. Koenig, X. Zhang, J. Zhang, T. Chen, and Z. Chen, “Residual motor signal in long-term human severed peripheral nerves and feasibility of neural signal controlled artificial limb,” J. Hand Surg. Amer., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 657–666, 2007.
7. C. Pylatiuk, S. Mounier, A. Kargov, S. Schulz, and G. Bretthauer, “Progress in the development of a multifunctional hand prosthesis,” in Proc. 2004 IEEE EMBS Int. Conf., San Francisco, CA, vol. 2, pp. 4262–4263.
8. J. L. Pons, E. Rocon, R. Ceres, D. Reynaerts, B. Saro, S. Levin, and W. Van Moorleghem, “The MANUS-HAND dextrous robotics upper limb prosthesis: Mechanical and manipulation aspects,” Auton. Robots, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 143–163, 2004.
9. P. J. Kyberd, N. Mustapha, F. Carnegie, and P. H. Chappell, “Clinical experience with a hierarchically controlled myoelectric hand prosthesis with vibro-tactile feedback,” Prosthet. Orthot. Int., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 56–64, 1993.
10. M. C. Carrozza, G. Cappiello, S. Micera, B. B. Edin, L. Beccai, and C. Cipriani, “Design of a cybernetic hand for perception and action,” Biol. Cybern., vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 629–644, 2006.
11. C. Cipriani, F. Zaccone, S. Micera, and M. C. Carrozza, “On the shared control of an EMG controlled prosthetic hand: Analysis of user-prosthesis interaction,” IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 170–184, Feb. 2008.
12. A. H. Arieta, H. Yokoi, T. Arai, and W. Yu, “Study on the effects of electrical stimulation on the pattern recognition for an EMG prosthetic application,” in Proc. 2005 IEEE EMBS Int. Conf., Shanghai, China, pp. 6919–6912.
13. T. Kuiken, “Targeted reinnervation for improved prosthetic function,” Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. North Amer., vol. 17, pp. 1–13, 2006.
14. M. Botvinick and J. Cohen, “Rubber hands “feel” touch that eyes see,” Nature, vol. 391, p. 756, 1998.
15. C. G. Atkeson, A. W. Moore, and S. Schaal “Locally weighted learning,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 11, pp. 11–73, 1997.
16. F. Sebelius, M. Axelsson, N. Danielsen, J. Schouenborg, and T. Laurelll, “Real time control of a virtual hand,” Technol. Disabil., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 131–141, 2005.
17. C. Antfolk, C. Balkenius, B. N. Rosen, G. Lundborg, and F. Sebelius, “The SmartHand tactile display: A new concept for providing sensory feedback in hand prostheses,” Scand. J. Plastic Reconstr. Surg. Hand Surg., to be published.
18. L. Nikolajsen and T. S. Jensen, “Phantom limb pain,” Br. J. Anaesth., vol. 87, pp. 107–116, 2001.
19. B. Rosen et al., Referral of sensation to an advanced humanoid robotic hand prosthesis. Scand. J. Plastic Reconstr. [Online]. Available: http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/02844310903113107 (DOI: 10.1080/02844310903113107).
20. V. S. Ramachadran and W. Hirstein “The perception of phantom limbs—The D.O. Hebb Lecture,” Brain, vol. 121, pp. 1603–1630, 1998.
21. S. Weinstein, “Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex, and laterality,” in The Skin Senses, D. R. Ken-shalo, Ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, pp. 195–218, 1969.
22. C. Cipriani, M. Controzzi, and M. C. Carrozza, “Progress towards the development of the smarthand transradial prosthesis,” in Proc. 2009 IEEE RAS/EMBS Intl. Conf. on Rehabil. Robot., Kioto, Japan, pp. 682–687.