Tactile remapping: From coordinate transformation to integration in sensorimotor processing

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 251-258

  Heed, Tobias ^a   Buchholz, Verena N ^b   Engel, Andreas K ^b   Röder, Brigitte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Oscillatory activity; Parietal cortex; Reference frame; Tactile localization; Tactile remapping; Top down control

Indexed keywords

NEUROPHYSIOLOGY;

PARIETAL CORTICES; REFERENCE FRAME; REMAPPING; TACTILE LOCALIZATION; TOP-DOWN CONTROL;

INTEGRATION;

BODY POSTURE; COGNITION; HUMAN; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; RECEPTIVE FIELD; REVIEW; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TACTILE FEEDBACK; TACTILE REMAPPING; TUNING CURVE; BRAIN MAPPING; INNERVATION; NERVE TRACT; PARIETAL LOBE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SKIN; STIMULATION; TOUCH;

BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; NEURAL PATHWAYS; PARIETAL LOBE; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SKIN; TOUCH;

EID: 84928589780     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.03.001     Document Type: Review

References (88)

1. Driver J., Spence C. Attention and the crossmodal construction of space. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1998, 2:254-262.
2. Heed T., Azañón E. Using time to investigate space: a review of tactile temporal order judgments as a window onto spatial processing in touch. Front. Psychol. 2014, 5:76.
3. Crawford J.D., et al. Three-dimensional transformations for goal-directed action. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2011, 34:309-331.
4. Medendorp W.P., et al. Parietofrontal circuits in goal-oriented behaviour. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2011, 33:2017-2027.
5. Yamamoto S., Kitazawa S. Reversal of subjective temporal order due to arm crossing. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:759-765.
6. Buneo C.A., et al. Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching. Nature 2002, 416:632-636.
7. Batista A.P., et al. Reach plans in eye-centered coordinates. Science 1999, 285:257-260.
8. Cohen Y.E., Andersen R.A. A common reference frame for movement plans in the posterior parietal cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3:553-562.
9. Bernier P-M., Grafton S.T. Human posterior parietal cortex flexibly determines reference frames for reaching based on sensory context. Neuron 2010, 68:776-788.
10. Heed T., Röder B. Common anatomical and external coding for hands and feet in tactile attention: evidence from event-related potentials. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 22:184-202.
11. Buchholz V.N., et al. Multiple reference frames in cortical oscillatory activity during tactile remapping for saccades. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:16864-16871.
12. Badde S., et al. Multiple spatial representations determine touch localization on the fingers. J. Exp. Psychol. 2014, 40:784-801.
13. Seilheimer R.L., et al. Models and processes of multisensory cue combination. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2014, 25:38-46.
14. Badde S., et al. Processing load impairs coordinate integration for the localization of touch. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2014, 76:1136-1150.
15. Chen X., et al. Eye-centered visual receptive fields in the ventral intraparietal area. J. Neurophysiol. 2014, 112:353-361.
16. Azañón E., Soto-Faraco S. Changing reference frames during the encoding of tactile events. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:1044-1049.
17. Groh J.M., Sparks D.L. Saccades to somatosensory targets. I. Behavioral characteristics. J. Neurophysiol. 1996, 75:412-427.
18. Buchholz V.N., et al. Greater benefits of multisensory integration during complex sensorimotor transformations. J. Neurophysiol. 2012, 107:3135-3143.
19. Overvliet K.E., et al. Somatosensory saccades reveal the timing of tactile spatial remapping. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:3046-3052.
20. Shore D.I., et al. Confusing the mind by crossing the hands. Cogn. Brain Res. 2002, 14:153-163.
21. Heed T., et al. Integration of hand and finger location in external spatial coordinates for tactile localization. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2012, 38:386-401.
22. Gallace A., et al. Response requirements modulate tactile spatial congruency effects. Exp. Brain Res. 2008, 191:171-186.
23. Soto-Faraco S., Azañón E. Electrophysiological correlates of tactile remapping. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51:1584-1594.
24. Rigato S., et al. The electrophysiological time course of somatosensory spatial remapping: vision of the hands modulates effects of posture on somatosensory evoked potentials. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2013, 38:2884-2892.
25. Rigato S., et al. The neural basis of somatosensory remapping develops in human infancy. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24:1222-1226.
26. Stein B.E., Stanford T.R. Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9:255-266.
27. Badde S., et al. Flexibly weighted integration of tactile reference frames. Neuropsychologia 2014, Published online October 19, 2014. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.001.
28. Pritchett L.M., et al. Reference frames for coding touch location depend on the task. Exp. Brain Res. 2012, 222:437-445.
29. Yamamoto S., Kitazawa S. Sensation at the tips of invisible tools. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:979-980.
30. Ernst M.O., Banks M.S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 2002, 415:429-433.
31. Alais D., Burr D. The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:257-262.
32. Ernst M.O., Bülthoff H.H. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:162-169.
33. Angelaki D.E., et al. Multisensory integration: psychophysics, neurophysiology, and computation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2009, 19:452-458.
34. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands "feel" touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391:756.
35. Ehrsson H.H., et al. Neural substrate of body size: illusory feeling of shrinking of the waist. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3:e412.
36. Mueller S., Fiehler K. Gaze-dependent spatial updating of tactile targets in a localization task. Front. Psychol. 2014, 5:66.
37. Harrar V., Harris L.R. Touch used to guide action is partially coded in a visual reference frame. Exp. Brain Res. 2010, 203:615-620.
38. Mueller S., Fiehler K. Effector movement triggers gaze-dependent spatial coding of tactile and proprioceptive-tactile reach targets. Neuropsychologia 2014, 62:184-193.
39. Crespi S., et al. Spatiotopic coding of BOLD signal in human visual cortex depends on spatial attention. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e21661.
40. Avillac M., et al. Reference frames for representing visual and tactile locations in parietal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8:941-949.
41. Schlack A., et al. Multisensory space representations in the macaque ventral intraparietal area. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25:4616-4625.
42. Chen X., et al. Diverse spatial reference frames of vestibular signals in parietal cortex. Neuron 2013, 80:1310-1321.
43. Chang S.W.C., Snyder L.H. Idiosyncratic and systematic aspects of spatial representations in the macaque parietal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:7951-7956.
44. Stricanne B., et al. Eye-centered, head-centered, and intermediate coding of remembered sound locations in area LIP. J. Neurophysiol. 1996, 76:2071-2076.
45. Mullette-Gillman O.A., et al. Eye-centered, head-centered, and complex coding of visual and auditory targets in the intraparietal sulcus. J. Neurophysiol. 2005, 94:2331-2352.
46. Mullette-Gillman O.A., et al. Motor-related signals in the intraparietal cortex encode locations in a hybrid, rather than eye-centered reference frame. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19:1761-1775.
47. Andersen R.A., et al. Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons. Science 1985, 230:456-458.
48. Salinas E., Thier P. Gain modulation: a major computational principle of the central nervous system. Neuron 2000, 27:15-21.
49. Graziano M.S.A., et al. Visuospatial properties of ventral premotor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 1997, 77:2268-2292.
50. Duhamel J-R., et al. Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: congruent visual and somatic response properties. J. Neurophysiol. 1998, 79:126-136.
51. Graziano M.S.A., et al. A neuronal representation of the location of nearby sounds. Nature 1999, 397:428-430.
52. Graziano M.S.A., Cooke D.F. Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:845-859.
53. Pouget A., et al. A computational perspective on the neural basis of multisensory spatial representations. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3:741-747.
54. Ma W.J., et al. Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes. Nat. Neurosci. 2006, 9:1432-1438.
55. Makin J.G., et al. Learning multisensory integration and coordinate transformation via density estimation. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2013, 9:e1003035.
56. Beck J.M., et al. Marginalization in neural circuits with divisive normalization. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:15310-15319.
57. Bremmer F., et al. Polymodal motion processing in posterior parietal and premotor cortex: a human fMRI study strongly implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys. Neuron 2001, 29:287-296.
58. Brozzoli C., et al. That's near my hand! Parietal and premotor coding of hand-centered space contributes to localization and self-attribution of the hand. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:14573-14582.
59. Bolognini N., Maravita A. Proprioceptive alignment of visual and somatosensory maps in the posterior parietal cortex. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:1890-1895.
60. Azañón E., et al. The posterior parietal cortex remaps touch into external space. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:1304-1309.
61. Serino A., et al. Fronto-parietal areas necessary for a multisensory representation of peripersonal space in humans: an rTMS study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:2956-2967.
62. Renzi C., et al. Spatial remapping in the audio-tactile ventriloquism effect: a TMS investigation on the role of the ventral intraparietal area. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2013, 25:790-801.
63. Holmes N.P., Spence C. The body schema and multisensory representation(s) of peripersonal space. Cogn. Process. 2004, 5:94-105.
64. Engel A.K., et al. Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2001, 2:704-716.
65. Fries P. A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2005, 9:474-480.
66. Engel A.K., et al. Intrinsic coupling modes: multiscale interactions in ongoing brain activity. Neuron 2013, 80:867-886.
67. Akam T., Kullmann D.M. Oscillatory multiplexing of population codes for selective communication in the mammalian brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2014, 15:111-122.
68. Siegel M., et al. Spectral fingerprints of large-scale neuronal interactions. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2012, 13:121-134.
69. Lisman J. The theta/gamma discrete phase code occuring during the hippocampal phase precession may be a more general brain coding scheme. Hippocampus 2005, 15:913-922.
70. Royer S., et al. Control of timing, rate and bursts of hippocampal place cells by dendritic and somatic inhibition. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15:769-775.
71. Haegens S., et al. α-Oscillations in the monkey sensorimotor network influence discrimination performance by rhythmical inhibition of neuronal spiking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:19377-19382.
72. Dean H.L., et al. Only coherent spiking in posterior parietal cortex coordinates looking and reaching. Neuron 2012, 73:829-841.
73. Buchholz V.N., et al. Different roles of alpha and beta band oscillations in anticipatory sensorimotor gating. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8:446.
74. Buchholz V.N., et al. Parietal oscillations code nonvisual reach targets relative to gaze and body. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:3492-3499.
75. Haegens S., et al. Top-down controlled alpha band activity in somatosensory areas determines behavioral performance in a discrimination task. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:5197-5204.
76. Romei V., et al. On the role of prestimulus alpha rhythms over occipito-parietal areas in visual input regulation: correlation or causation?. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:8692-8697.
77. Ruzzoli M., Soto-Faraco S. Alpha stimulation of the human parietal cortex attunes tactile perception to external space. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24:329-332.
78. O'Regan J.K., Noë A. A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behav. Brain Sci. 2001, 24:939-972.
79. Fiser J., et al. Statistically optimal perception and learning: from behavior to neural representations. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:119-130.
80. Engel A.K., et al. Where's the action? The pragmatic turn in cognitive science. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2013, 17:202-209.
81. Lallee S., Dominey P.F. Multi-modal convergence maps: from body schema and self-representation to mental imagery. Adapt. Behav. 2013, 21:274-285.
82. Herbort O., Butz M.V. Too good to be true? Ideomotor theory from a computational perspective. Front. Psychol. 2012, 3:494.
83. James W. The Principles of Psychology 1890, Vol. I. Harvard University Press.
84. Roux F., et al. The phase of thalamic alpha activity modulates cortical gamma-band activity: evidence from resting-state MEG recordings. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33:17827-17835.
85. Womelsdorf T., Fries P. Neuronal coherence during selective attentional processing and sensory-motor integration. J. Physiol. Paris 2006, 100:182-193.
86. Bosman C.A., et al. Attentional stimulus selection through selective synchronization between monkey visual areas. Neuron 2012, 75:875-888.
87. Hipp J.F., et al. Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15:884-890.
88. Bastos A.M., et al. Visual areas exert feedforward and feedback influences through distinct frequency channels. Neuron 2015, 85:390-401.