Somatosensory saccades reveal the timing of tactile spatial remapping

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 49, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 3046-3052

  Overvliet, Krista E ^a,d   Azanon E ^a,b   Soto Faraco, S ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^c INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Human; Proprioception; Reference frames; Tactile perception; Tactile remapping

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PROPRIOCEPTION; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM; TACTILE SPATIAL REMAPPING; TACTILE STIMULATION; TOUCH;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SACCADES; SPACE PERCEPTION; TOUCH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051784831     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aglioti S., Smania N., Peru A. Frames of reference for mapping tactile stimuli in brain-damaged patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1999, 11(1):67-79.
2. Aivar M.P., Brenner E., Smeets J.B. Avoiding moving obstacles. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 190(3):251-264.
3. Amlot R., Walker R. Are somatosensory saccades voluntary or reflexive?. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 168:557-565.
4. Azañón E., Camacho K., Soto Faraco S. Tactile remapping beyond space. European Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 31(10):1858-1867.
5. Azañón E., Soto-Faraco S. Changing reference frames during the encoding of tactile events. Current Biology 2008, 18(14):1044-1049.
6. Azañón E., Soto-Faraco S. Spatial remapping of tactile events: Assessing the effects of frequent posture changes. Communicative and Integrative Biology 2008, 1(1):45.
7. Blanke O., Grüsser O.J. Saccades guided by somatosensory stimuli. Vision Research 2001, 41(18):2407-2412.
8. Bromage P.R. Phantom limbs and the body schema. Canadian Anaesthetists' Society Journal 1974, 21(3):267.
9. Eimer M., Cockburn D., Smedley B., Driver J. Cross-modal links in endogenous spatial attention are mediated by common external locations: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Experimental Brain Research 2001, 139(4):398-411.
10. Eimer M., Forster B., Fieger A., Harbich S. Effects of hand posture on preparatory control processes and sensory modulations in tactile-spatial attention. Clinical Neurophysiology 2004, 115(3):596-608.
11. Gezeck S., Fischer B., Timmer J. Saccadic reaction times: A statistical analysis of multimodal distributions. Vision Research 1997, 37(15):2119-2131.
12. Gomez C., Atienza M., Lopez-Mendoza D., Gomez G.J., Vazquez M. Cortical potentials during gap and non-gap paradigms using manual responses in humans. Neuroscience Letters 1995, 186(2-3):107-110.
13. Groh J.M., Sparks D.L. Saccades to somatosensory targets. I. Behavioral characteristics. Journal of Neurophysiology 1996, 75(1):412-427.
14. Heed T., Röder B. Common anatomical and external coding for hands and feet in tactile attention: Evidence from event-related potentials. Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22(1):184-202.
15. Kalesnykas R.P., Hallett P.E. The differentiation of visually guided and anticipatory saccades in gap and overlap paradigms. Experimental Brain Research 1987, 68(1):115-121.
16. Kingstone A., Klein R.M. What are human express saccades?. Perception and Psychophysics 1993, 54(2):260-273.
17. Kitazawa S. Where conscious sensation takes place. Consciousness and Cognition 2002, 11(3):475-477.
18. Ludwig C.J.H., Gilchrist I.D. Stimulus-driven and goal-driven control over visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28(4):902-912.
19. Melzack R., Bromage P.R. Experimental phantom limbs. Experimental Neurology 1973, 39(2):261-269.
20. Moro V., Zampini M., Aglioti S.M. Changes in spatial position of hands modify tactile extinction but not disownership of contralesional hand in two right brain-damaged patients. Neurocase 2004, 10(6):437-443.
21. Post L.J., Chapman C.E. The effects of cross-modal manipulations of attention on the detection of vibrotactile stimuli in humans. Somatosensory and Motor Research 1991, 8(2):149-157.
22. Resulaj A., Kiani R., Wolpert D.M., Shadlen M.N. Changes of mind in decision-making. Nature 2009, 461(7261). 263-U141.
23. Schroeder C.E., Mehta A.D., Givre S.J. A spatiotemporal profile of visual system activation revealed by current source density analysis in the awake macaque. Cerebral Cortex 1998, 8(7):575-592.
24. Smania N., Aglioti S. Sensory and spatial components of somatesthetic deficits following right brain-damage. Neurology 1995, 45(9):1725-1730.
25. Thompson K.G., Bichot N.P., Schall J.D. Dissociation of visual discrimination from saccade programming in macaque frontal eye field. Journal of Neurophysiology 1997, 77(2):1046.
26. Thompson K.G., Hanes D.P., Bichot N.P., Schall J.D. Perceptual and motor processing stages identified in the activity of macaque frontal eye field neurons during visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology 1996, 76(6):4040.
27. van der Stigchel S., Meeter M., Theeuwes J. Eye movement trajectories and what they tell us. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 2006, 30(5):666-679.
28. Wada M., Yamamoto S., Kitazawa S. Effects of handedness on tactile temporal order judgment. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1887-1895.
29. Yamamoto S., Kitazawa S. Reversal of subjective temporal order due to arm crossing. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4(7):759-765.
30. Yao L., Peck C.K. Saccadic eye movements to visual and auditory targets. Experimental Brain Research 1997, 115(1):25-34.
31. Zambarbieri D., Schmid R., Magenes G., Prablanc C. Saccadic responses evoked by presentation of visual and auditory targets. Experimental Brain Research 1982, 47(3):417-427.