Integration of hand and finger location in external spatial coordinates for tactile localization

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 386-401

  Heed, Tobias ^a   Backhaus, Jenny ^b   Röder, Brigitte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Multisensory integration; Remapping; Temporal order judgment; Touch

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FINGER; HAND; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; TOUCH;

ADULT; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FINGERS; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; POSTURE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; TOUCH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865310915     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024059     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Alais, D., & Burr, D. (2004). The ventriloquist effect results from nearoptimal bimodal integration. Current Biology, 14, 257-262.
2. Anema, H. A., Kessels, R. P., de Haan, E. H., Kappelle, L. J., Leijten, F. S., van Zandvoort, M. J., & Dijkerman, H. C. (2008). Differences in finger localisation performance of patients with finger agnosia. Neuroreport, 19, 1429-1433.
3. Azanon, E., Camacho, K., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2010). Tactile remapping beyond space. European Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 1858-1867.
4. Azanon, E., Longo, M. R., Soto-Faraco, S., & Haggard, P. (2010). The posterior parietal cortex remaps touch into external space. Current Biology, 20, 1304-1309.
5. Azanon, E., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2007). Alleviating the 'crossed-hands' deficit by seeing uncrossed rubber hands. Experimental Brain Research, 182, 537-548.
6. Azanon, E., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2008). Changing reference frames during the encoding of tactile events. Current Biology, 18, 1044-1049.
7. Benedetti, F. (1985). Processing of tactile spatial information with crossed fingers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 517-525.
8. Benedetti, F. (1988). Exploration of a rod with crossed fingers. Perception and Psychophysics, 44, 281-284.
9. Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature, 391, 756.
10. Brozzoli, C., Ishihara, M., Gobel, S. M., Salemme, R., Rossetti, Y., & Farne, A. (2008). Touch perception reveals the dominance of spatial over digital representation of numbers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 5644-5648.
11. Buneo, C. A., & Andersen, R. A. (2006). The posterior parietal cortex: Sensorimotor interface for the planning and online control of visually guided movements. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2594-2606.
12. Cadieux, M. L., Barnett-Cowan, M., & Shore, D. I. (2010). Crossing the hands is more confusing for females than males. Experimental Brain Research, 204, 431-446.
13. Cardinali, L., Brozzoli, C., & Farne, A. (2009). Peripersonal space and body schema: Two labels for the same concept? Brain Topography, 21, 252-260.
14. Cohen, Y. E., & Andersen, R. A. (2002). A common reference frame for movement plans in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 553-562.
15. Collins, T., Schicke, T., & Röder, B. (2008). Action goal selection and motor planning can be dissociated by tool use. Cognition, 109, 363-371.
16. Craig, J. C. (2003). The effect of hand position and pattern motion on temporal order judgments. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 779-788.
17. Craig, J. C., & Belser, A. N. (2006). The crossed-hands deficit in tactile temporal-order judgments: The effect of training. Perception, 35, 1561-1572.
18. Craig, J. C., & Busey, T. A. (2003). The effect of motion on tactile and visual temporal order judgments. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 81-94.
19. de Haan, A., Anema, H. A., & Dijkerman, H. C. (2011). Fingers crossed! An investigation of somatotopic representations using spatial directional judgements. Manuscript submitted for publication.
20. de Vignemont, F., Majid, A., Jola, C., & Haggard, P. (2009). Segmenting the body into parts: Evidence from biases in tactile perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Colchester), 62, 500-512.
21. Duhamel, J. R., Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1998). Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: Congruent visual and somatic response properties. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 126-136.
22. Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429-433.
23. Gallace, A., Soto-Faraco, S., Dalton, P., Kreukniet, B., & Spence, C. (2008). Response requirements modulate tactile spatial congruency effects. Experimental Brain Research, 191, 171-186.
24. Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2005). Visual capture of apparent limb position influences tactile temporal order judgments. Neuroscience Letters, 379, 63-68.
25. Goldenberg, G., & Karnath, H. O. (2006). The neural basis of imitation is body part specific. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 6282-6287.
26. Graziano, M. S. (1999). Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96, 10418-10421.
27. Graziano, M. S., & Cooke, D. F. (2006). Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neuropsychologia, 44, 845-859.
28. Graziano, M. S., Hu, X. T., & Gross, C. G. (1997). Visuospatial properties of ventral premotor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77, 2268-2292.
29. Haggard, P., Christakou, A., & Serino, A. (2007). Viewing the body modulates tactile receptive fields. Experimental Brain Research, 180, 187-193.
30. Haggard, P., Kitadono, K., Press, C., & Taylor-Clarke, M. (2006). The brain's fingers and hands. Experimental Brain Research, 172, 94-102.
31. Hayward, V. (2008). A brief taxonomy of tactile illusions and demonstrations that can be done in a hardware store. Brain Research Bulletin, 75, 742-752.
32. Heed, T. (2010). Touch perception: How we know where we are touched. Current Biology, 20, R604-R606.
33. Heed, T., Habets, B., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2010). Others' actions reduce crossmodal integration in peripersonal space. Current Biology, 20, 1-5.
34. Heed, T., & Röder, B. (2010). Common Anatomical and External Coding for Hands and Feet in Tactile Attention: Evidence from Event-related Potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 184-202.
35. Holmes, N. P., Calvert, G. A., & Spence, C. (2004). Extending or projecting peripersonal space with tools? Multisensory interactions highlight only the distal and proximal ends of tools. Neuroscience Letters, 372, 62-67.
36. Holmes, N. P., Calvert, G. A., & Spence, C. (2007). Tool use changes multisensory interactions in seconds: Evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. Experimental Brain Research, 183, 465-476.
37. Holmes, N. P., & Spence, C. (2004). The body schema and multisensory representation(s) of peripersonal space. Cognitive Processes, 5, 94-105.
38. Holmes, N. P., Spence, C., Hansen, P. C., Mackay, C. E., & Calvert, G. A. (2008). The multisensory attentional consequences of tool use: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. PLoS ONE, 3, e3502.
39. Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., & Iwamura, Y. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport, 7, 2325-2330.
40. Jackson, S. R., Newport, R., Husain, M., Fowlie, J. E., O'Donoghue, M., & Bajaj, N. (2009). There may be more to reaching than meets the eye: Re-thinking optic ataxia. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1397-1408.
41. Karnath, H. O., Schenkel, P., & Fischer, B. (1991). Trunk orientation as the determining factor of the 'contralateral' deficit in the neglect syndrome and as the physical anchor of the internal representation of body orientation in space. Brain, 114, 1997-2014.
42. Kim, D. H., & Cruse, H. (2001). Two kinds of body representation are used to control hand movements following tactile stimulation. Experimental Brain Research, 139, 76-91.
43. Kitagawa, N., Zampini, M., & Spence, C. (2005). Audiotactile interactions in near and far space. Experimental Brain Research, 166, 528-537.
44. Kitazawa, S. (2002). Where conscious sensation takes place. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 475-477.
45. Kitazawa, S., Moizumi, S., Okuzumi, A., Saito, F., Shibuya, S., Takahashi, T., Yamamoto, S. (2007). Reversal of subjective temporal order due to sensory and motor integrations. In P. Haggard, M. Kawato, & Y. Rossetti (Eds.), Attention and performance (pp. 73-97). New York: Academic Press.
46. Knill, D. C. (2007). Robust cue integration: A Bayesian model and evidence from cue-conflict studies with stereoscopic and figure cues to slant. Journal of Vision, 7, 1-24.
47. Kobor, I., Furedi, L., Kovacs, G., Spence, C., & Vidnyanszky, Z. (2006). Back-to-front: Improved tactile discrimination performance in the space you cannot see. Neuroscience Letters, 400, 163-167.
48. Kuroki, S., Watanabe, J., Kawakami, N., Tachi, S., & Nishida, S. (2010). Somatotopic dominance in tactile temporal processing. Experimental Brain Research, 203, 51-62.
49. Ladavas, E. (2002). Functional and dynamic properties of visual peripersonal space. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 17-22.
50. Ladavas, E., & Serino, A. (2008). Action-dependent plasticity in peripersonal space representations. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 1099-1113.
51. Longo, M. R., Azanon, E., & Haggard, P. (2010). More than skin deep: Body representation beyond primary somatosensory cortex. Neuropsychologia, 48, 655-668.
52. Macaluso, E., Frith, C. D., & Driver, J. (2002). Crossmodal spatial influences of touch on extrastriate visual areas take current gaze direction into account. Neuron, 34, 647-658.
53. Maravita, A., Spence, C., Kennett, S., & Driver, J. (2002). Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition, 83, B25-B34.
54. Maravita, A., Spence, C., Sergent, C., & Driver, J. (2002). Seeing your own touched hands in a mirror modulates cross-modal interactions. The Journal of Psychological Sciences, 13, 350-355.
55. Pavani, F., & Castiello, U. (2004). Binding personal and extrapersonal space through body shadows. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 14-16.
56. Pavani, F., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2000). Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. The Journal of Psychological Sciences, 11, 353-359.
57. Pellijeff, A., Bonilha, L., Morgan, P. S., McKenzie, K., & Jackson, S. R. (2006). Parietal updating of limb posture: An event-related fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2685-2690.
58. Penfield, W., & Boldrey, E. (1937). Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain, 60, 389-443.
59. Pouget, A., Ducom, J. C., Torri, J., & Bavelier, D. (2002). Multisensory spatial representations in eye-centered coordinates for reaching. Cognition, 83, B1-B11.
60. Riemer, M., Trojan, J., Kleinbohl, D., & Hölzl, R. (2010). Body posture affects tactile discrimination and identification of fingers and hands. Experimental Brain Research, 206, 47-57.
61. Riggio, L., Gawryszewski, L. d. G., & Umilta, C. (1986). What is crossed in cross-hand effects? Acta Psychologica, 62, 89-100.
62. Roberts, R. D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Task effects on tactile temporal order judgments: When space does and does not matter. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 592-604.
63. Roberts, R. D., Wing, A. M., Durkin, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Effects of posture on tactile temporal order judgements. Eurohaptics, 300-304.
64. Röder, B., Rösler, F., & Spence, C. (2004). Early vision impairs tactile perception in the blind. Current Biology, 14, 121-124.
65. Röder, B., Spence, C., & Rösler, F. (2002). Assessing the effect of posture change on tactile inhibition-of-return. Experimental Brain Research, 143, 453-462.
66. Rusconi, E., Gonzaga, M., Adriani, M., Braun, C., & Haggard, P. (2009). Know thyself: Behavioral evidence for a structural representation of the human body. PLoS ONE, 4, e5418.
67. Schicke, T., Bauer, F., & Röder, B. (2009). Interactions of different body parts in peripersonal space: How vision of the foot influences tactile perception at the hand. Experimental Brain Research, 192, 703-715.
68. Schicke, T., & Röder, B. (2006). Spatial remapping of touch: Confusion of perceived stimulus order across hand and foot. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 11808-11813.
69. Sekine, T., & Mogi, K. (2009). Distinct neural processes of bodily awareness in crossed fingers illusion. Neuroreport, 20, 467-472.
70. Shore, D. I., Gray, K., Spry, E., & Spence, C. (2005). Spatial modulation of tactile temporal-order judgments. Perception, 34, 1251-1262.
71. Shore, D. I., Spry, E., & Spence, C. (2002). Confusing the mind by crossing the hands. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 153-163.
72. Soto-Faraco, S., Ronald, A., & Spence, C. (2004). Tactile selective attention and body posture: Assessing the multisensory contributions of vision and proprioception. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 1077-1094.
73. Spence, C., Pavani, F., Maravita, A., & Holmes, N. (2004). Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: Evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. Journal of Physiology Paris, 98, 171-189.
74. Spence, C., Shore, D. I., & Klein, R. M. (2001). Multisensory prior entry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 799-832.
75. Taylor-Clarke, M., Jacobsen, P., & Haggard, P. (2004). Keeping the world a constant size: Object constancy in human touch. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 219-220.
76. von Skramlik, E. (1923). Varianten zur Aristotelischen täuschung [Variants of the Aristotle illusion]. Pflügers Archives of Gestational Physiology, 250-304.
77. World Medical Association. (2008). Declaration of Helsinki (revised). Retrieved from http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html.
78. Yamamoto, S., & Kitazawa, S. (2001a). Reversal of subjective temporal order due to arm crossing. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 759-765.
79. Yamamoto, S., & Kitazawa, S. (2001b). Sensation at the tips of invisible tools. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 979-980.
80. Yamamoto, S., Moizumi, S., & Kitazawa, S. (2005). Referral of tactile sensation to the tips of L-shaped sticks. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 2856-2863.
81. Yue, Z., Bischof, G. N., Zhou, X., Spence, C., & Röder, B. (2009). Spatial attention affects the processing of tactile and visual stimuli presented at the tip of a tool: An event-related potential study. Experimental Brain Research, 193, 119-128.
82. Zampini, M., Harris, C., & Spence, C. (2005). Effect of posture change on tactile perception: Impaired direction discrimination performance with interleaved fingers. Experimental Brain Research, 166, 498-508.