Screening breast ultrasound: Past, present, and future

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 204, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 234-240

  Brem, Rachel F ^a   Lenihan, Megan J ^a   Lieberman, Jennifer ^a   Torrente, Jessica ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast imaging; Breast ultrasound; Cancer screening; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CAUSE OF DEATH; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; BREAST TUMOR; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; FORECASTING; PROCEDURES; TRENDS;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84928568841     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.12072     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Cancer among women. Cancer Prevention and Control website, www.cdc.gov/cancer/dcpc/data/women.htm. Published January 2,2013. Accessed October 7, 2013
2. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Breast cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2008. QLOBOCAN website. globocan.iarc.lr/Pages/fact-sheets-cancer.asp. Published July 10, 2013. Accessed October 7, 2013
3. Etzioni R, Urban N, Ramsey S, et al. The case for early detection. Nat Rev Cancer 2003; 3:243-252
4. Lehman CD, Isaacs C. Schnall MD, et al. Cancer yield of mammography. MR and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institutional breast cancer screening study. Radiology 2007; 244:381-388
5. Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al. Efficacy of MR I and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:427-437
6. Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, et al. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 2005; 365:1769-1778
7. Coffey C, Brem R, Lieberman J, et al. Breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) for the detection of mammographieally occult breast cancer in high-risk women. Proceedings of the RSNA 2012 annual meeting. Oak Brook, IL: Radiological Society of North America, 2012
8. Tabar L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A, et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer alter mass screening with mammography: randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1985; 1:829-832
9. Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, et al. Ten-to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 1982; 69:349-355
10. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002; 225:165-175
11. Checka CM, Chun JE, Schnabel PR. Lee J, Toth H. The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening. AJR 2012; 198:[web]W292-W295
12. Pisano ED, Gastonis C, Hendriek E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus lilm mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005; 353:1773-1783
13. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:227-236
14. Yaghjyan L, Colditz GA, Collins L.C. et al. Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to tumor characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011; 103:1179-1189
15. KolbTM, Lichy J. Newhouse J H. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 1998; 207:191-199
16. Berg WA, Gilbreath PL. Multicentric and multifocal cancer: whole-breast US in preoperative evaluation. Radiology 2000; 214:59-66
17. Huchberger W, DeKoekkoek-Doll P. Springer P, et al. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR 1999; 173:921-927
18. Gordon PB, Goldenberg SI. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound: a retrospective review. Cancer 1995; 76:626-630
19. Kaplan SS, Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2001; 221:641-649
20. Leconte I. FegerC.Galanl C. et al. Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. AJR 2003; 180:1675-1679
21. Schaefer IK. Waldmann A, Katalinic A, et al. Influence of additional breast ultrasound on cancer detection in a cohort study for quality assurance in breast diagnosis: analysis of 102,577 diagnostic procedures. Eur Radiol 2010;20:1085-1092
22. Berg WA, Blume JD. Cormack JB, et al. Com bined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women al elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008; 299:2151-2163
23. SaslowD, Boetes C, Burke W, et al.; American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Advisory Group American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MKI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007: 57:75-89
24. Berg WA. Zhang Z. Lehrer D, et al. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 2012; 307:1394-1404
25. Berg WA, Blume JD, Adams AM, et al. Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666. Radiology 2010; 254:79-87
26. Weigert J. Sleenliergen S. The Connecticut experiment: the role of ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts, Breast J 2012; 18:517-522
27. Hooley RJ, Grecnherg KL, Slackhouse RM. et al. Screening US in patients with mammogruphically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology 2012; 265:59-69
28. Kelly KM. Dean J, Comulada WS, Lee SJ. Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographi-cally dense breasts. Eur Radiol 2010; 20:734-742
29. Kelly KM, Dean J. Lee SJ. Comulada WS. Breast cancer detection: radiologists' performance using mammography with and without automated whole-breast ultrasound. Iio Radiol 2010; 20:2557-2564
30. Brem RF, Tabar L, Duffy SW, et al. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast us in women with dense breast tissue: the Somolnxight Study. Radiology 2014 [Epub ahead of print]
31. Feig S. Cost effectiveness of mammography, MRI, and Ultrasonography for breast cancer screening Radiol Clin North Am 2010; 48:879 891
32. Giger M. Miller D. Bancroft Brown J, et al. Clinical reader study examining the performance of mammography and automatic breast ultrasound in breast cancer screening. Proceedings of the RSNA 2012 annual meeting. Oak Brook. II.: Radiological Society of North America, 2012
33. Brem RF, Rapelyea JA, Torrente J, et al. Interpretation time of 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS)(abstract 183). In: Kruskal .1. Anderson S, Solo J, eds. ARRS 2012. Lecsburg, VA: American Roentgen Ray Society, 2012