Influence of additional breast ultrasound on cancer detection in a cohort study for quality assurance in breast diagnosis-analysis of 102,577 diagnostic procedures

European Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1085-1092

  Schaefer, Fritz K W ^a   Waldmann, A ^b   Katalinic, A ^b   Wefelnberg, C ^a   Heller, M ^a   Jonat, W ^a   Schreer, I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast; Cancer; Expert reading; Mammography; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HORMONE SUBSTITUTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; OCCULT CANCER; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 77952096153     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1641-x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. L Nystrom I Andersson N Bjurstam J Frisell B Nordenskjold LE Rutqvist 2002 Long-term effects of Mx screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomized trials Lancet 359 909 919 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08020-0 11918907 (Pubitemid 34246378)
2. S Shapiro W Venet P Strax L Venet R Roeser 1982 Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality J Natl Cancer Inst 69 349 355 1:STN:280:DyaL383mvF2qtg%3D%3D 6955542
3. L Tabar C Fagerberg A Gad, et al. 1985 Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomized trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare Lancet 1 829 832 10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92204-4 1:STN:280: DyaL2M7mt1GmtA%3D%3D 2858707
4. MM Roberts FE Alexander TJ Anderson, et al. 1990 Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years Lancet 335 241 246 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90066-E 1:STN:280:DyaK3c7jsFKrtQ%3D%3D 1967717 (Pubitemid 20047710)
5. RE Bird TW Wallace BC Yankaskas 1992 Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography Radiology 184 613 617 1:STN:280:DyaK38zns1WksQ%3D%3D 1509041
6. R Holland JH Hendriks M Mravunac 1983 Mammographically occult breast cancer: a pathologic and radiologic study Cancer 52 1810 1819 10.1002/1097-0142(19831115)52:10<1810::AID-CNCR2820521009>3.0.CO;2-F 1:STN:280:DyaL2c%2Fis1Srsw%3D%3D 6313174
7. L Ma E Fishell B Wright W Hanna S Allan NF Boyd 1992 Case control study factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography J Natl Cancer Inst 84 781 785 10.1093/jnci/84.10.781 1:STN:280:DyaK383ktlCruw%3D%3D 1573665
8. American College of Radiology (1998) Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 3rd edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
9. K Kerlikowske L Ichikawa DL Miglioretti, et al. 2007 Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk J Natl Cancer Inst 99 386 395 10.1093/jnci/djk066 17341730 (Pubitemid 47073482)
10. NF Boyd M Guo LJ Martin, et al. 2007 Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer N Engl J Med 356 227 336 10.1056/NEJMoa062790 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXnslSjsg%3D%3D 17229950 (Pubitemid 46143226)
11. NF Boyd GA Lockwood LJ Martin, et al. 1999 Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer among subjects with a family history of this disease J Natl Cancer Inst 91 1404 1408 10.1093/jnci/91.16.1404 1:STN:280: DyaK1Mzot1ersQ%3D%3D 10451446
12. TM Kolb J Lichy JH Newhouse 1998 Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US - diagnostic yield and tumour characteristics Radiology 207 191 199 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7ptFeqsA%3D%3D 9530316
13. W Buchberger P De Koekkoek-Doll P Springer P Obrist M Düsner 1999 Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup AJR Am J Roentgenol 173 921 927 1:STN:280:DyaK1MvjvFWltQ%3D%3D 10511149
14. SS Kaplan 2001 Clinical utility of bilateral whole breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue Radiology 221 641 649 10.1148/radiol.2213010364 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MnntlOrtw%3D%3D 11719658
15. A Katalinic C Bartel H Raspe I Schreer 2007 Beyond mammography screening: quality assurance in breast cancer diagnosis (the QuaMaDi Project) Br J Cancer 96 157 161 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603506 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s%2Fhs1Ogug%3D%3D 17179994 (Pubitemid 46094655)
16. PC Gotzsche O Olsen 2000 Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? Lancet 355 129 134 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)06065-1 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7jslKntA%3D%3D 10675181
17. O Olsen PC Gotzsche 2001 Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography Lancet 358 1340 1342 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06449-2 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MngvFegug%3D%3D 11684218 (Pubitemid 33016501)
18. L Tabar B Vitak HH Chen MF Yen SW Duffy RA Smith 2001 Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality Cancer 91 1724 1731 10.1002/1097-0142(20010501)91: 9<1724::AID-CNCR1190>3.0.CO;2-V 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3jvFOrug%3D%3D 11335897 (Pubitemid 32377958)
19. Gotzsche PC, Nielsen M (2006) Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006:CD 001877. doi: 101002/14651858.CD001877.pub2
20. TM Kolb J Lichy JH Newhouse 2002 Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27825 patient evaluations Radiology 225 165 175 10.1148/radiol.2251011667 12355001
21. P Crystal SD Strano S Shcharynski MJ Koretz 2003 Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts AJR Am J Roentgenol 181 177 182 12818853
22. CM Rutter MT Mandelson MB Laya DJ Seger S Talpin 2001 Changes in breast density associated with initiation, discontinuation, and continuing use of hormonal replacement therapy JAMA 285 171 176 10.1001/jama.285.2.171 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ks12juw%3D%3D 11176809
23. V Corsetti A Ferrari M Ghirardi, et al. 2006 Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts Radiol Med (Torino) 111 440 448 10.1007/s11547-006-0040-5 1:STN:280: DC%2BD283lvFSjuw%3D%3D
24. W Berg JD Blume JB Cormack, et al. 2008 Combined screening US and mammography vs. mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer JAMA 299 2151 2163 10.1001/jama.299.18.2151 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXlvFCnsrY%3D 18477782 (Pubitemid 351679706)