Hemodynamic performance and durability of Mosaic bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement, up to 13 years

Circulation Journal

Volumn 79, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1044-1051

  Matsumoto, Yorihiko ^a   Fujita, Tomoyuki ^a   Hata, Hiroki ^a   Shimahara, Yusuke ^a   Sato, Shunsuke ^a   Kobayashi, Junjiro ^a  

^a NATIONAL CEREBRAL AND CARDIOVASCULAR CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aortic valve replacement; Bioprosthesis; Small valve

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL ENDOCARDITIS; BODY SURFACE; CARDIOVASCULAR PARAMETERS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; EFFECTIVE ORIFICE AREA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FORWARD HEART FAILURE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART VENTRICLE SEPTUM RUPTURE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; MEDIASTINITIS; MORTALITY; MOSAIC BIOPROSTHESIS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PROSTHETIC VALVE ENDOCARDITIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURVIVAL RATE; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; VALVE DETERIORATION; AORTA VALVE; AORTIC VALVE PROLAPSE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE PROLAPSE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 84928485613     PISSN: 13469843     EISSN: 13474820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-14-0990     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Kobayashi J. Changing strategy for aortic stenosis by transcatheter valve treatment in Japan. Circ J 2013; 77: 309-310.
2. Sawa Y, Saito S, Kobayashi J, Niinami H, Kuratani T, Maeda K, et al. First clinical trial of a self-expandable transcatheter heart valve in Japan in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circ J 2014; 78: 1083-1090.
3. Adams DH, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ, Yakubov SJ, Coselli JS, Deeb GM, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1790-1798.
4. Duarte IG, MacDonald MJ, Cooper WA, Schmarkey SL, Gott JP, Brown WM 3rd, et al. In vivo hemodynamic, histologic, and antimineralization characteristics of the Mosaic bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 92-99.
5. Glaser N, Franco-Cereceda A, Sartipy U. Late survival after aortic valve replacement with the perimount versus the mosaic bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 97: 1314-1320.
6. Celiento M, Ravenni G, Milano AD, Pratali S, Scioti G, Nardi C, et al. Aortic valve replacement with the Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis: A 13-year follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93: 510-515.
7. Jamieson WR, Riess FC, Raudkivi PJ, Metras J, Busse EF, Goldstein J, et al. Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: Assessment of 12-year performance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 142: 302-307.e2, doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.08.090.
8. Riess FC, Cramer E, Hansen L, Schiffelers S, Wahl G, Wallrath J, et al. Clinical results of the Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis up to 13 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 37: 145-153.
9. Mosteller RD. Simplified calculation of body surface area. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 1098.
10. Devereux RB, Reichek N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man: Anatomic validation of the method. Circulation 1977; 55: 613-618.
11. Minakata K, Tanaka S, Okawa Y, Shimamoto M, Kaneko T, Takahara Y, et al. Long-term outcome of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position in Japanese patients. Circ J 2014; 78: 882-889.
12. McClure RS, Narayanasamy N, Wiegerinck E, Lipsitz S, Maloney A, Byrne JG, et al. Late outcomes for aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: Up to 17-year follow-up in 1,000 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 89: 1410-1416.
13. Forcillo J, Pellerin M, Perrault LP, Cartier R, Bouchard D, Demers P, et al. Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position: 25-years experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 96: 486-493.
14. Ruzicka DJ, Hettich I, Hutter A, Bleiziffer S, Badiu CC, Bauernschmitt R, et al. The complete supraannular concept: In vivo hemodynamics of bovine and porcine aortic bioprostheses. Circulation 2009; 120: S139-S145.
15. Dalmau MJ, González-Santos JM, Blázquez JA, Sastre JA, López- Rodríguez J, Bueno M, et al. Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic and Perimount Magna aortic bioprostheses: Fiveyear results of a prospectively randomized study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011; 39: 844-852.
16. Suri RM, Zehr KJ, Sundt TM 3rd, Dearani JA, Daly RC, Oh JK, et al. Left ventricular mass regression after porcine versus bovine aortic valve replacement: A randomized comparison. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88: 1232-1237.
17. Seitelberger R, Bialy J, Gottardi R, Seebacher G, Moidl R, Mittelböck M, et al. Relation between size of prosthesis and valve gradient: Comparison of two aortic bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 25: 358-363.
18. Sato S, Fujita T, Shimahara Y, Hata H, Kobayashi J. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after cryomaze procedure with mitral valve replacement. Circ J 2014; 78: 1908-1914.
19. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: Definition, clinical impact, and prevention. Heart 2006; 92: 1022-1029.
20. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis- patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 1131-1141.
21. Kuehnel RU, Pohl A, Puchner R, Wendt MO, Hartrumpf M, Pohl M, et al. Opening and closure characteristics of different types of stented biological valves. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 54: 85-90.
22. Yoganathan AP, Woo YR, Sung HW, Jones M. Advances in prosthetic heart valves: Fluid mechanics of aortic valve designs. J Biomater 1988; 2: 579-614.
23. Dzemali O, Bakhtiary F, Steinseiffer U, Schmitz C, Glasmacher B, Moritz A, et al. Hemodynamic performance of fresh and calcified aortic valve prostheses in critical low stroke volume. J Heart Valve Dis 2008; 17: 317-324.
24. Bach DS, Schmitz C, Dohmen G, Aaronson KD, Steinseifer U, Kleine P. In vitro assessment of prosthesis type and pressure recovery characteristics: Doppler echocardiography overestimation of bileaflet mechanical and bioprosthetic aortic valve gradients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144: 453-458.
25. Ito T, Maekawa A, Fujii G, Sawaki S, Hoshino S, Hayashi Y. Marked discrepancy in pressure gradient between Doppler and catheter examinations on Medtronic Mosaic valve in aortic position. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 60: 818-821.
26. Amano J, Kuwano H, Yokomise H. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2011: Annual report by The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 61: 578-607.