Late survival after aortic valve replacement with the perimount versus the mosaic bioprosthesis

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1314-1320

  Glaser, Natalie ^a   Franco Cereceda, Anders ^a,b   Sartipy, Ulrik ^a,b  

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CARPENTIER EDWARDS BIOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; MOSAIC BIOPROSTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS PATIENT MISMATCH; REOPERATION; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HEART DEFECTS, CONGENITAL; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REOPERATION; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84898600310     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: 15526259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.10.078     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. S.H. Rahimtoola Choice of prosthetic heart valve in adults an update J Am Coll Cardiol 55 2010 2413 2426
2. J. Forcillo, M. Pellerin, and L.P. Perrault et al. Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position: 25 years; experience Ann Thorac Surg 96 2013 486 493
3. N.C. Poirer, L.C. Pelletier, M. Pellerin, and M. Carrier 15-year experience with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis Ann Thorac Surg 66 1998 S57 S61
4. M.K. Banbury, D.M. Cosgrove 3rd, J.A. White, E.H. Blackstone, R.W. Frater, and J.E. Okies Age and valve size effect on the long-term durability of the Carpentier-Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthesis Ann Thorac Surg 72 2001 753 757
5. M. Celiento, G. Ravenni, and A.D. Milano et al. Aortic valve replacement with the Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis: a 13-year follow-up Ann Thorac Surg 93 2012 510 515
6. W.R. Jamieson, F.C. Riess, and P.J. Raudkivi et al. Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: assessment of 12-year performance J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142 2011 302 307.e2
7. F.C. Riess, E. Cramer, and L. Hansen et al. Clinical results of the Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis up to 13 years Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 37 2010 145 153
8. M.J. Dalmau, J.M. Gonzalez-Santos, and J.A. Blazquez et al. Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic and Perimount Magna aortic bioprostheses: five-year results of a prospectively randomized study Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 39 2011 844 852
9. S.M. Said, E. Ashikhmina, and K.L. Greason et al. Do pericardial bioprostheses improve outcome of elderly patients undergoing aortic valve replacement? Ann Thorac Surg 93 2012 1868 1874
10. J.B. Chambers, R. Rajani, and D. Parkin et al. Bovine pericardial versus porcine stented replacement aortic valves: early results of a randomized comparison of the Perimount and the Mosaic valves J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136 2008 1142 1148
11. W.B. Eichinger, F. Botzenhardt, and A. Keithahn et al. Exercise hemodynamics of bovine versus porcine bioprostheses: a prospective randomized comparison of the mosaic and perimount aortic valves J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129 2005 1056 1063
12. R. Seitelberger, J. Bialy, and R. Gottardi et al. Relation between size of prosthesis and valve gradient: comparison of two aortic bioprosthesis Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25 2004 358 363
13. J.S. Lawton, N. Moazami, M.K. Pasque, M.R. Moon, and R.J. Damiano Jr. Early stenosis of Medtronic Mosaic porcine valves in the aortic position J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137 2009 1556 1557
14. S. Peeceeyen, C. Cao, G. Fermanis, and C. Manganas Early stenosis of Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143 2012 e13 e14
15. C.W. Akins, D.C. Miller, and M.I. Turina et al. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions Ann Thorac Surg 85 2008 1490 1495
16. J.F. Ludvigsson, P. Otterblad-Olausson, B.U. Pettersson, and A. Ekbom The Swedish personal identity number: possibilities and pitfalls in healthcare and medical research Eur J Epidemiol 24 2009 659 667
17. P. Pibarot, and J.G. Dumesnil Prosthetic heart valves: selection of the optimal prosthesis and long-term management Circulation 119 2009 1034 1048
18. T.E. David, S. Armstrong, and M. Maganti Hancock II bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: the gold standard of bioprosthetic valves durability? Ann Thorac Surg 90 2010 775 781
19. W.B. Eichinger, I.M. Hettich, and D.J. Ruzicka et al. Twenty-year experience with the St. Jude medical Biocor bioprosthesis in the aortic position Ann Thorac Surg 86 2008 1204 1210
20. A. Anselmi, E. Flecher, and V.G. Ruggieri et al. Long-term results of the Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis in the aortic position J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013 Aug 26 [Epub ahead of print]
21. D.J. Ruzicka, I. Hettich, and A. Hutter et al. The complete supraannular concept: in vivo hemodynamics of bovine and porcine aortic bioprostheses Circulation 120 2009 S139 S145
22. V. Chan, A. Kulik, and A. Tran et al. Long-term clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Hancock II versus the Perimount aortic bioprostheses Circulation 122 2010 S10 S16
23. K. Kandler, H.M. Moller, C. Hassager, S.P. Olsen, N. Lilleor, and D.A. Steinbruchel Patient-prosthesis mismatch and reduction in left ventricular mass after aortic valve replacement Ann Thorac Surg 96 2013 66 71
24. S.J. Head, M.M. Mokhles, and R.L. Osnabrugge et al. The impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27 186 patients with 133 141 patient-years Eur Heart J 33 2012 1518 1529