The Cambridge companion to Berkeley

The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-454

  Winkler, Kenneth P ^a  

^a WELLESLEY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928422850     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CCOL0521450330     Document Type: Book

References (446)

1. “Commonplace Book of Occasional Metaphysical Thoughts.” In Works, ed. A. C. Fraser (1871), volume 4.
2. Berkeley’s Commonplace Book. Ed. G. A. Johnston. London: Faber and Faber, 1930.
3. George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne. Ed. A. A. Luce. London: Thomas Nelson, 1944.
4. The basis for the text appearing in Works, ed. A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop, volume 1.
5. Philosophical Commentaries. Ed. George H. Thomas, with explanatory notes by A. A. Luce. Alliance, OH: Mount Union College, 1976; reprinted New York: Garland, 1989.
6. The Notebooks of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne. Facsimile of Add. MS 39305 in the British Museum, with a postscript by Desiree Park. Oxford: Alden Press, 1984.
7. “First Draft of the Introduction to the Principles.” In Works, ed. A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop, volume 2.
8. George Berkeley’s Manuscript Introduction. Ed. Bertil Belfrage. Oxford: Doxa, 1987.
9. Johnson, Samuel. Samuel Johnson, President of King’s College: His Career and Writings. Ed. H. W. Schneider. 4 vols. New York: Columbia University Press, 1929.
10. “Philosophical Correspondence between Berkeley and Samuel Johnson 1729-30.” In Works, ed. A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop, volume 2.
11. The Works of George Berkeley. Ed. G. N. Wright. 2 vols. London: T. Tegg, 1843.
12. The Works of George Berkeley, D.D. Ed. A. C. Fraser. 4 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1871. Revised edition, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1901.
13. The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne. Ed. A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop, 9 vols. London: Thomas Nelson: 1948-1957.
14. Essay, Principles, Dialogues, with Selections from other Writings. Ed. Mary Whiton Calkins. New York: Scribner’s, 1929.
15. Berkeley’s Philosophical Writings. Ed. David M. Armstrong. London: Macmillan, 1965.
16. Philosophical Works, including the Works on Vision. Ed. Michael R. Ayers. London: J. M. Dent, 1993.
17. Aaron, Richard I. “A Catalogue of Berkeley’s Library.” Mind 41 (1932): 46575.
18. Berman, David. George Berkeley: Idealism and the Man. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
19. A catalogue of the valuable library of the late Right Reverend Dr Berkeley, Lord Bishop of Cloyne, together with the libraries of his son and grandson. London: Leigh and Sotheby, 1796.
20. Alexander Campbell, ed. Life and Letters of George Berkeley. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1871. Reprinted, New York: Garland, 1988.
21. Gaustad, Edwin S. George Berkeley in America. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979.
22. Hone, J. M. and M. M. Rossi. Bishop Berkeley: His Life, Writings, and Philosophy. London: Faber and Faber, 1931.
23. S. Houghton, Raymond W., David Berman, and Maureen T. Lapan, eds. Images of Berkeley. Dublin: National Gallery of Ireland, 1986.
24. Jessop, T. E. George Berkeley. London: British Council and Longmans, Green, 1959.
25. Luce, A. A. The Life of George Berkeley. Bishop of Cloyne. London: Thomas Nelson, 1949.
26. Mc Cracken. C. J. and I. C. Tipton, eds. Berkeley’s Principles and Dialogues: Background Source Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
27. Rand, Benjamin. Berkeley and Percival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1914.
28. Berkeley’s American Sojourn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1932.
29. Stock, Joseph. An Account of the Life of George Berkeley. London: J. Murray, 1776.
30. Wild, John. George Berkeley: A Study of His Life and Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1936.
31. S. Winkler, Kenneth P. “Empiricism and Multiculturalism,” Philosophic Exchange 34 (2003-2004): 55-84.
32. —. “George Berkeley (1685-1753).” In British Prose Writers, 1660-1800.
33. First Series, ed. Donald T. Seibert. Dictionary of Literary Biography, volume 101. Detroit: Gale Research, 1991.
34. Keynes, Geoffrey. A Bibliography of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne: His Works and His Critics in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.
35. Jessop, T. E. A Bibliography of George Berkeley. London: Oxford University Press, 1934.
36. Turbayne, Colin M. and Robert Ware. –A Bibliography of George Berkeley, 1933-62.— Journal of Philosophy 60 (1963): 93-112.
37. S. Turbayne, Colin M. and R. Appelbaum. –A Bibliography of George Berkeley, 1963-1974.— Journal of the History of Philosophy 15 (1977): 83-95.
38. Colin M. "A Bibliography of George Berkeley 1963-1979.
39. Kapstein, Matthew. –A Bibliography of George Berkeley 1980-1985.— In Sosa, ed. (seeII.G., Collections of essays).
40. The Berkeley Newsletter has been revived as an on-line journal (http://people.hsc.edu/berkeleynews/index.php). The site includes electronic files of past issues.
41. Ancillon, Louis Frederic. –Dialogue between Berkeley and Hume.— Translated by Charlotte Stanley. Hume Studies 27 (2001): 99-127.
42. Baxter, Andrew. An Enquiry into the Nature of the Human Soul. London: A. Baxter and J. Bettenham, 1733.
43. Baxter, Andrew, ed. George Berkeley: Eighteenth-Century Responses. 2 vols. New York: Garland, 1989.
44. Eschenbach, Johann Christian. Samlung der vornehmsten Schriftsteller die die WUrklichkeit ihres Eignenkorpers und der ganzen Korperwelt Laugnen. Rostock: A. F. Rose, 1756. A German translation of the Dialogues, with extensive commentary.
45. [S. Garve, S. Christian, and Johann Georg, Heinrich Feder.] –The Gottingen Review.— In Kant’s Early Critics: The Empiricist Critique of Transcendental Philosophy, ed. Brigitte Sassen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
46. Hume, David. An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding. Ed. Tom L. Beauchamp. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
47. —. A Treatise of Human Nature. Ed. David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
48. Hutcheson, Francis. Letter to William Mace. The European Magazine and London Review 14 (1788): 158-160.
49. Johnson, Samuel. Elementa Philosophica. Philadelphia: B. Franklin and D. Hall, 1752. Reprinted, New York: Kraus, 1969.
50. Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
51. Reid, Thomas. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man, A Critical Edition. Ed. Derek R. Brookes and Knud Haakonssen. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2000.
52. Ardley, Gavin W. R. Berkeley’s Renovation of Philosophy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1968.
53. Bender, F. George Berkeley’s Philosophy Re-examined. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij H. J. Paris, 1944.
54. Berman, David. George Berkeley: Idealism and the Man. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
55. —. Berkeley: Experimental Philosophy. London: Phoenix, 1997.
56. Bracken, H. M. Berkeley.London: Macmillan, 1974.
57. Dancy, Jonathan. Berkeley: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987. Fogelin, Robert J. Berkeley and the Principles of Human Knowledge. London: Routledge, 2001.
58. Grayling, A. C. Berkeley: The Central Arguments. London: Duckworth, 1986.
59. Hedenius, Ingemar. Sensationalism and Theology in Berkeley’s Philosophy. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksells, 1936.
60. Hicks, G. Dawes. Berkeley. London: Ernest Benn, 1932. Reprinted, New York: Garland, 1988.
61. Johnston, G. A. The Development of Berkeley’s Philosophy. London: Macmillan, 1923. Reprinted, New York: Garland, 1988.
62. Kingston, F. T. The Metaphysics of George Berkeley, 1685-1753: Irish Philosopher. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1992.
63. Luce, A. A. Berkeley and Malebranche: A Study in the Origins of Berkeley’s Thought. London: Oxford University Press, 1934. Reprinted, New York: Garland, 1988.
64. —. Berkeley’s Immaterialism: A Commentary on His –A Treatise concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.— London: Thomas Nelson, 1945.
65. Muehlmann, Robert G. Berkeley’s Ontology. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992.
66. Pappas, George S. Berkeley’s Thought. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000.
67. Park, Desiree. Complementary Notions: A Critical Study of Berkeley’s Theory of Concepts. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1972.
68. Pitcher, George. Berkeley. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1977.
69. Porter, Noah. The Two-Hundredth Birthday of Bishop George Berkeley: A Discourse Given at Yale College. New York: Scribner’s, 1885.
70. Ritchie, A. D. George Berkeley: A Reappraisal. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1967.
71. Stack, George J. Berkeley’s Analysis of Perception. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1970.
72. Stoneham, Tom. Berkeley’s World: An Examination of the Three Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
73. Tipton, I. C. Berkeley: The Philosophy of Immaterialism. London: Methuen, 1974. Reprinted, New York: Garland, 1988.
74. Umbaugh, Bruce. On Berkeley. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson, 2000.
75. Urmson, J. O. Berkeley. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.
76. Vesey, Godfrey. Berkeley: Reason and Experience. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1982.
77. Walmsley, Peter. The Rhetoric of Berkeley’s Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
78. Warnock G. J. Berkeley. 3rd edition. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982.
79. Wild, John. George Berkeley: A Study of His Life and Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1936.
80. Winkler, Kenneth P. Berkeley: An Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.
81. Wisdom, J. O. The Unconscious Origin of Berkeley’s Philosophy. London: Hogarth, 1953.
82. Young, Theodore A. Completing Berkeley’s Project: Classical vs. Modern Philosophy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1985.
83. Bennett, Jonathan. Learning from Six Philosophers. volume 2, Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.
84. —. Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central Themes. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971.
85. Foster, John. The Case for Idealism. London: Routledge, 1982.
86. Hausman, David G., and Alan Hausman. Descartes’s Legacy: Minds and Meaning in Early Modern Philosophy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997.
87. Huxley, Thomas H. Hume: With Helps to the Study of Berkeley. London: Macmillan, 1894.
88. Loeb, Louis. From Descartes to Hume: Continental Metaphysics and the Development of Modern Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1981.
89. McCosh, James. Locke’s Theory of Knowledge with a Notice of Berkeley. New York: Scribner’s, 1884.
90. McCracken, Charles J. Malebranche and British Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.
91. Morris, C. R. Locke, Berkeley, Hume. London: Oxford University Press, Reprinted, Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1980.
92. Priest, Stephen. The British Empiricists: Hobbes to Ayer. London: Penguin, 1970.
93. Richetti, John. Philosophical Writing: Locke, Berkeley, Hume. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983.
94. S. Shepherd, Lady Mary. Essays on the Perception of an External Universe. London: J. Hatchard, 1827. Excerpted in Women Philosophers of the Early Modern Period. Ed. Margaret Atherton. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994.
95. Turbayne, Colin M. The Myth of Metaphor. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1962. Revised edition. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1970.
96. Waxman, Wayne. Kant and the Empiricists: Understanding Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005.
97. Wilson, Margaret Dauler. Ideas and Mechanism: Essays in Modern Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.
98. Woolhouse, Roger. The Empiricists. A History of Western Philosophy, volume 5. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.
99. Yolton, John W. Perceptual Acquaintance from Descartes to Reid. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.
100. —. Realism and Appearances: An Essay in Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
101. —. Berlioz, Dominique. Berkeley: un nominalisme realiste. Paris: Vrin, 2000.
102. Bouveresse-Quillot, Renee, ed. Berkeley. Dijon: Centre Gaston Bachelard, 2000.
103. Breidert, Wolfgang. George Berkeley, 1685-1753. Vita Mathematica, no. 4. Basel: Birkauser, 1989.
104. Brykman, Genevieve. Berkeley: philosophie et apologetique. 2 vols. Paris: Vrin, 1984.
105. —. Berkeley et le voile de mots. Paris: J. Vrin, 1993.
106. Charles, Sebastien, ed. Epistemologie et science selon Berkeley. Quebec: Presses de l’Universite Laval, 2004.
107. Glauser, Richard. Berkeley et les philosophes du XVIIe siecle: perception et scepticisme. Sprimont, Belgium: Mardaga, 1999.
108. Gueroult, Martial. Berkeley: Quatre etudes sur la perception et sur Dieu. Aubier: Editions Montaigne, 1956.
109. Leroy, Andre Louis. George Berkeley. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1959.
110. Metz, Rudolf. George Berkeley, Leben and Lehre. Stuttgart: Fr. Frommanns (H. Kurtz), 1925.
111. Parigi, Silvia. Il mondo visibile: George Berkeley ela ‘perspectiva.’ Firenze: L. S. Olschki, 1995.
112. Robles, Jose Antonio. Estudios Berkeleyanos. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, 1990.
113. Berman, David, ed. George Berkeley: Essays and Replies. Dublin: Irish Academic Press, 1985. A reprint of Hermathena 139 (1985): 1-171.
114. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4, no. 13 (1953). Reprinted as George Berkeley Bicententary. Ed. A. C. Crombie. New York: Garland, 1988.
115. Creery, Walter E., ed. George Berkeley: Critical Assessments. 3 vols. London: Routledge, 1991.
116. Engle, Gale W., and Gabriele Taylor, eds. Berkeley’s Principles of Human Knowledge: Critical Studies. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1968.
117. Foster, John, and Howard Robinson, eds. Essays on Berkeley: A Tercentennial Celebration. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.
118. George Berkeley: Essays and Replies. Reprinted as George Berkeley: Essays and Replies. Ed. David Berman. Dublin: Irish Academic Press, 1986.
119. Martin, C. B., and David Armstrong, eds. Locke and Berkeley: A Collection of Critical Essays. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1968.
120. Berkeley: A Collection of Critical Essays. Ed. C. B. Martin and David Armstrong. New York: Garland, 1988.
121. Muehlmann, Robert G., ed. Berkeley’s Metaphysics: Structural, Interpretive, and Critical Essays. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.
122. Pepper, S. C., Karl Aschenbrenner, and Benson Mates, eds. George Berkeley; Lectures Delivered before the Philosophical Union of the University of California in Honor of the Two Hundredth Anniversary of the Death of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne (1685-1753). Berkeley: University of California Press, 1957.
123. Revue internationale de philosophie 7, no. 23-4 (1953).
124. Sosa, Ernest, ed. Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.
125. Steinkraus, Warren, ed. New Studies in Berkeley’s Philosophy. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966.
126. Turbayne, Colin M., ed. Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.
127. Berkeley, with Critical Essays. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1970.
128. Adams, Robert M. –Berkeley and Epistemology.— In E. Sosa, ed. (see II.G., Collections of essays).
129. Airaksinen, Timo. –Berkeley and the Justification of Beliefs.— Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48 (1987): 235-56.
130. Allaire, Edwin B. –Berkeley’s Idealism.— Theoria 29 (1963): 229-44.
131. Anscombe, G. E. M. –The Intentionality of Sensation.— In G. E. M. Anscombe, Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1981.
132. Armstrong, David M. –The Heart of Berkeley’s Metaphysics? A Reply to Ernest Sosa.— Hermathena 139 (1985): 162-4.
133. Atherton, Margaret. –How Berkeley Can Maintain that Snow Is White.— Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (2003): 101-13.
134. —. “Lady Mary Shepherd’s Case against George Berkeley.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 4 (1996): 347-366.
135. Ayer, A. J. –Berkeleianism and Physicalism as Constructively Critical.— In The Nature of Philosophical Inquiry, ed. Joseph Bobik. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1970.
136. Ayers, M. R. –Berkeley on the Meaning of Existence.— History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 567-73.
137. —. “Substance, Reality, and the Great, Dead Philosophers.” American Philosophical Quarterly 7 (1970): 38-49.
138. Barnes, Winston H. F. –Did Berkeley Misunderstand Locke?— Mind 49 (1940): 52-57.
139. Baxter, Donald L. M. –Berkeley, Perception, and Identity.— Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (1991): 85-98.
140. Bennett, Jonathan. –Substance, Reality and Primary Qualities.— American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (1965): 1-17.
141. Bouwsma, O. K. –Notes on Berkeley’s Idealism.— In his Toward a New Sensibility, ed. J. L. Craft and Ronald E. Hustwit. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1982.
142. Bracken, Harry M. –Berkeley and Malebranche on Ideas.— Modern Schoolman 41 (1963): 1-15.
143. —. “Berkeley’s Realisms.” Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1958): 41-57.
144. Broad, C. D. –Berkeley’s Denial of Material Substance.— Philosophical Review 63 (1954): 155-81.
145. Burnyeat, Myles. –Idealism and Greek Philosophy: What Descartes Saw and Berkeley Missed.— Philosophical Review 91 (1982): 3-40.
146. Carriero, John. –Berkeley, Resemblance, and Sensible Things.— Philosophical Topics 31 (2003): 21-46.
147. Cummins, Phillip. –Berkeley’s Ideas of Sense.— Nous 9 (1975): 55-72.
148. —. “Berkeley’s Likeness Principle.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 4 (1966): 63-69.
149. —. “Berkeley’s Manifest Qualities Thesis.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (1990): 385-401.
150. —. “Perceptual Relativity and Ideas in the Mind.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Researc 24 (1963-1964): 202-214.
151. —. “Berkeley’s Unstable Ontology.” Modern Schoolman 67 (1989): 1532.
152. Daniel, Stephen H. –Berkeley, Suarez, and the Esse-Existere Distinction.— American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 74 (2000): 621-36.
153. —. “Berkeley’s Christian Neoplatonism, Archetypes and Divine Ideas.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2001): 239-256.
154. —. “The Ramist Context of Berkeley’s Philosophy.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (2001): 487-505.
155. Davis, John W. –Berkeley and Phenomenalism.— Dialogue 1 (1962): 67-80.
156. Dicker, Georges. –Berkeley on the Immediate Perception of Objects.— In Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays on the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy, ed. Phillip D. Cummins and Guenter Zoeller. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1992.
157. —. “The Concept of Immediate Perception in Berkeley’s Immaterial-ism.” In C. M. Turbayne, ed. 1982 (see II.G., Collections of essays).
158. Doney, Willis. –Two Questions about Berkeley.— Philosophical Review 61: 382-391.
159. Elugardo, Reinaldo. –An Alleged Incoherence in Berkeley’s Philosophy.— In New Essays on Rationalism and Empiricism, ed. Charles E. Jarrett, John King-Farlow, and F. J. Pelletier. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 4 (1978): 177-89.
160. Faaborg, Robert. –Berkeley and the Argument from Microscopes.— Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (1991): 301-323.
161. Fleming, Noel. –Berkeley and Idealism.— Philosophy 60 (1985): 309-25.
162. —. “The Tree in the Quad.” American Philosophical Quarterly 22: 25-36.
163. Flage, Daniel E. –Berkeley’s Epistemic Ontology: The Principles.— Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (2004): 25-60.
164. —. “Berkeley, Individuation, and Physical Objects.” Individuation and Identity in Early Modern Philosophy: Descartes to Kant, ed. Kenneth R. Barber and J. M. Gracia. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994.
165. —. “Berkeley’s Principles, Section 10.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2003): 543-551.
166. Fogelin, Robert. –Hume and Berkeley on the Proofs of Infinite Divisibility.— Philosophical Review 97 (1988): 47-69.
167. Furlong, E. J. –An Ambiguity in Berkeley’s Principles.— Philosophical Quarterly 14 (1964): 334-44.
168. Gallois, Andre. –Berkeley’s Master Argument.— Philosophical Review 83 (1974): 55-69.
169. Garber, Daniel. –Something-I-Know-Not-What: Berkeley on Locke on Substance.— In E. Sosa, ed. (see II.G., Collections of essays).
170. Graham, Jody. –Common Sense and Berkeley’s Perception by Suggestion.— International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (1997): 397-423.
171. Grave, S. A. –The Mind and Its Ideas: Some Problems in the Interpretation of Berkeley.— Australasian Journal of Philosophy 42 (1964): 199-210.
172. Grey, Denis. –The Solipsism of Bishop Berkeley.— Philosophical Quarterly 2 (1952): 338-49.
173. Greco, John. –Reid’s Critique of Berkeley and Hume: What’s the Big Idea?— Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (1995): 279-96.
174. Harris, Stephen. –Berkeley’s Argument from Perceptual Relativity.— History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (1997): 99-120.
175. Hausman, Alan. –Adhering to Inherence: A New Look at the Old Steps in Berkeley’s March to Idealism.— Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (1984): 421-43.
176. Hay, W. H. –Berkeley’s Argument from Nominalism.— Revue internationale de philosophie 7 (1953): 19-27.
177. Hestevold, H. S. –Berkeley’s Theory of Time.— History of Philosophy Quarterly 7(1990): 179-92.
178. Immerwahr, John. –Berkeley’s Causal Thesis.— New Scholasticism 48 (1974): 153-70.
179. Jolley, S. Nicholas. –Berkeley, Malebranche, and Vision in God.— Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (1966): 535-48.
180. Laird, J. –Berkeley’s Realism.— Mind 25 (1916): 308-28.
181. Lennon, Thomas M. –Berkeley on the Act-Object Distinction.— Dialogue 40 (2001): 651-67.
182. Leroy, Andre-Louis. –Was Berkeley an Idealist?— In W. Steinkraus (see II.G., Collections of essays).
183. Light, Marc A. –Why We Do Not See What We Feel.— Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 (2002): 148-62.
184. Luce, A. A. –Berkeley’s Existence in the Mind.— Mind 50 (1941): 258-67.
185. Mabbott, J. D. –The Place of God in Berkeley’s Philosophy.— Philosophy 6 (1931): 18-29.
186. Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays on the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy. ed. Phillip D. Cummins and Guenter Zoeller. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1992.
187. —. “What Does Berkeley’s God See in the Quad?” Archivfur Geschichte der Philosophie 61 (1979): 280-292.
188. McKim, Robert. –Berkeley on Private Ideas and Public Objects.— In Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays on the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy, ed. Phillip D. Cummins and Guenter Zoeller. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1992.
189. —. “Wenz on Abstract Ideas and Christian Neo-Platonism in Berkeley.” Journal of the History of Ideas 43 (1982): 665-671.
190. —. “What Is God Doing in the Quad?” Philosophy Research Archives (1987-1988): 637-653.
191. Marc-Wogau, Konrad. –The Argument from Illusion and Berkeley’s Idealism.— Theoria 24 (1958): 94-106.
192. —. “Berkeley’s Sensationalism and the Esse Est Percipi Principle.” Theoria 23 (1957): 12-36.
193. Mates, Benson. –Berkeley Was Right.— In S. C. Pepper et al., eds. (see II.G., Collections of essays).
194. Mill, John Stuart. –Berkeley’s Life and Writings.— In The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, volume 11, ed. J. M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978.
195. Moore, G. E. –The Refutation of Idealism.— In his Philosophical Studies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1922.
196. Nadler, Steven. –Berkeley’s Ideas and the Primary/Secondary Quality Distinction.— Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (1990): 47-61.
197. Oaklander, L. Nathan. –The Inherence Interpretation of Berkeley: A Critique.— Modern Schoolman 54 (1977): 261-269.
198. Odegard, Douglas. –Berkeley and the Perception of Ideas.— Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (1971): 155-171.
199. Ott, Walter, and Marc Light. –The New Berkeley.— Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (2004): 1-24.
200. Pappas, George. –Adversary Metaphysics.— Philosophy Research Archives 9: 571-585.
201. —. “Berkeley and Immediate Perception.” In E. Sosa, ed. (see II.G., Collections of essays).
202. —. “Berkeley, Perception, and Common Sense.” In C. M. Turbayne, ed. 1982 (see II.G., Collections of essays).
203. —. –Ideas, Minds and Berkeley.— American Philosophical Quarterly 17 (1980): 181-194.
204. Park, Desiree. –Prior and Williams on Berkeley.— Philosophy 56 (1981): 231-41.
205. Patey, Douglas. –Johnson’s Refutation of Berkeley: Kicking the Stone Again.— Journal of the History of Ideas 47 (1986): 139-45.
206. Peacocke, Christopher. –Imagination, Experience and Possibility: A Berke- leian View Defended.— In J. Foster and H. Robinson, eds. (see II.G., Collections of essays).
207. Peirce, Charles S. Review of A. C. Fraser, The Works of George Berkeley. In Writings of Charles S. Peirce, volume 2, ed. Edward C. Moore. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984.
208. Pitcher, George. –Berkeley and the Perception of Objects.— Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1986): 99-105.
209. Popkin, Richard H. –Berkeley and Pyrrhonism.— Review of Metaphysics 5 (1951-1952): 223-246.
210. —. –The New Realism of Bishop Berkeley.— In S. C. Pepper et al., eds. (see II.G., Collections of essays).
211. Preist, Graham. –The Limits of Conception.— In his Beyond the Limits of Thought. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
212. Prior, A. N. –Berkeley in Logical Form.— Theoria 21 (1955): 117-22.
213. Raynor, David. –Berkeley’s Ontology.— Dialogue 26 (1987): 611-20.
214. Ritchie, A. D. George Berkeley’s Siris: The Philosophy of the Great Chain of Being and the Alchemical Theory. London: British Academy, 1954.
215. Robles, Jose. –Berkeley: Scepticism, Matter and Infinite Divisibility.— In Scepticism in the History of Philosophy: A Pan-American Dialogue, ed. Richard H. Popkin. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.
216. Saporiti, Katia. –Berkeley’s Perceptual Realism.— In Perception and Reality: From Descartes to the Present, ed. Ralph Schumacher. Paderborn: Mentis, 2004.
217. Sellars, Wilfrid. –Berkeley and Descartes: Reflections on the Theory of Ideas.— In Studies in Perception, ed. Peter K. Machamer and Robert G. Turnbull. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1977.
218. Silver, Bruce. –Boswell on Johnson’s Refutation of Berkeley: Revisiting the Stone.— Journal of the History of Ideas 54 (1993): 437-48.
219. Smith, A. D. –Berkeley’s Central Argument Against Material Substance.— In J. Foster and H. Robinson, eds. (see II.G., Collections of essays).
220. Stewart, Dugald. –On the Idealism of Berkeley.— In his Philosophical Essays, ed. Sir William Hamilton. The Collected Works of Dugald Stewart, volume 5. Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark, 1877.
221. Stroud, Barry. –Berkeley v. Locke on Primary Qualities.— Philosophy 55 (1980): 149-66.
222. Taylor, C. C. W. –Berkeley on Archetypes.— Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie 67 (1985): 65-79.
223. Thomas, George H. –Berkeley’s God Does Not Perceive.— Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (1976): 163-8.
224. Thomson, James. –Berkeley.— In A Critical History of Western Philosophy, ed. D. J. O’Connor. New York: Free Press, 1964.
225. Tipton, Ian. –Berkeley’s Imagination.— In E. Sosa, ed. (see II.G., Collections of essays).
226. —. –Descartes Demon and Berkeley’s World.— Philosophical Investigations 15 (1992): 111-130.
227. —. –‘Ideas’ in Berkeley and Arnauld.— History of European Ideas 7: 575-584.
228. Turbayne, Colin M. –Lending a Hand to Hylas: The Berkeley, Plato, Aristotle Connection.— In C. M. Turbayne, ed. 1982 (seeII.G., Collections of essays).
229. Van Iten, Richard J. –Berkeley’s Alleged Solipsism.— Revue internationale de philosophie 16 (1962): 447-52.
230. Watson, Richard. –Berkeley in a Cartesian Context.— Revue internationale de philosophie 17 (1963): 381-94.
231. Wenz, Peter. –Berkeley’s Christian Neo-Platonism.— Journal of the History of Ideas 37 (1976): 537-46.
232. —. –Berkeley’s Two Concepts of Impossibility: A Reply to McKim.— Journal of the History of Ideas 43 (1982): 673-680.
233. Williams, Bernard. –Imagination and the Self.— In his Problems of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
234. Wilson, Fred. –Berkeley’s Metaphysics and Ramist Logic.— In Logic and the Workings of the Mind, ed. Patricia A. Easton. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1997.
235. Wilson, Margaret Dauler. –Berkeley on the Mind-Dependence of Colors.— Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 68 (1987): 249-64.
236. —. –Did Berkeley Completely Misunderstand the Basis of the Primary- Secondary Quality Distinction in Locke?— In C. M. Turbayne, ed. 1982 (seeII.G., Collections of essays).
237. Winkler, Kenneth P. –Berkeley, Pyrrhonism, and the Theaetetus.— In Pyrrhonian Skepticism, ed. Walter Sinnott-Armstrong. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
238. —. –Ideas, Sentiments, and Qualities.— In Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays on the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy, ed. Phillip Cummins and Guenter Zoeller. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1992.
239. Yandell, David. –Berkeley on Common Sense and the Privacy of Ideas.— History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (1995): 411-23.
240. Aaron, Richard I. –Locke and Berkeley’s Commonplace Book.— Mind 40 (1931): 439-59.
241. Belfrage, Bertil. –The Order and Dating of Berkeley’s Notebooks.— Revue Internationale de Philosophie 154 (1985): 196-214.
242. —. –A New Appoach to Berkeley’s Philosophical Notebooks.— In E. Sosa, ed. (see II.G., Collections of essays).
243. —. –The Clash on Semantics in Berkeley’s Notebook A.— Hermathena 139 (1985): 117-126.
244. —. –A Response to M. A. Stewart’s ‘Berkeley’s Introduction Draft’.— Berkeley Newsletter 12 (1991-1992): 1-10.
245. Luce, A. A. –Another Look at Berkeley’s Notebooks.— Hermathena 110 (1970): 5-23.
246. —. –Development within Berkeley’s Commonplace Book.— Mind 49 (1940): 42-51.
247. McKim, Robert. –The Entries in Berkeley’s Notebooks: A Reply to Bertil Belfrage.— Hermathena 139 (1985): 156-61.
248. Stewart, M. A. –Add. MS 39305.— Berkeley Newsletter 9 (1986): 6-11.
249. —. –Berkeley’s Introduction Draft.— Berkeley Newsletter 11 (1989-1990): 1-10.
250. Abbott, Thomas. Sight and Touch: An Attempt to Disprove the Received (or Berkeleian) Theory of Vision. London: Longman, Roberts and Green, 1864.
251. Armstrong, D. M. –Discussion: Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision.— Journal of the History of Ideas 17 (1956): 127-9.
252. Berkeley’s Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision. Parkeville: Melbourne University Press, 1960. Reprinted, New York: Garland, 1988.
253. Arsic, Branka. The Passive Eye: Gaze and Subjectivity in Berkeley (via Beckett). Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.
254. Atherton, Margaret. Berkeley’s Revolution in Vision. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.
255. Bailey, Samuel. A Review of Berkeley’s Theory of Vision, Designed to Show the Unsoundness of That Celebrated Speculation. London: James Ridgway, 1842.
256. Belfrage, Bertil. –The Constructivism of Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision.— In Minds, Ideas and Objects, ed. Philip D. Cummins and Guenter Zoeller. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1992.
257. Berchielli, Laura. –Color, Space, and Figure in Locke: An Interpretation of the Molyneux Problem.— Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2002): 47-65.
258. Berman, David. –Berkeley and the Moon Illusions.— Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 215-222.
259. Brandt, Reinhard. –Historical Obervations on the Genesis of the ThreeDimensional Optical Picture.— Ratio 17 (1975): 176-90.
260. Brook, Richard J. –Berkeley’s Theory of Vision: Transparency and Signification.— British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2003): 691-9.
261. Condillac, Etienne Bonnot de. Essay on the Origin of Human Knowledge. Translated by Hans Aarsleff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
262. Cummins, Phillip D. –On the Status of Visuals in Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision.— In C. M. Turbayne, ed. 1982 (see II.G., Collections of essays).
263. Davis, John W. –The Molyneux Problem.— Journal of the History of Ideas 21 (1960): 392-408.
264. Donagan, Alan. –Berkeley’s Theory of the Immediate Objects of Vision.— In Studies in Perception, ed. Peter Machamer and Robert Turnbull. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1978.
265. Falkenstein, Lorne. –Intuition and Construction in Berkeley’s Account of Visual Space.— Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (1994): 63-84.
266. —. –Reid’s Critique of Berkeley’s Position on the Inverted Image.— Reid Studies 4 (2000): 35-51.
267. Ferrier, James F. –Berkeley and Idealism.— Blackwood’s Magazine 51 (1842): 812-30.
268. Graham, Elsie C. Optics and Vision: The Background of the Metaphysics of Berkeley. New York: Columbia University Press, 1929.
269. Gregory, Richard L. –Blindness, Recovery from.— In The Oxford Companion to the Mind, ed. Richard L. Gregory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
270. Hara, Akira. –Depth and Distance in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.— History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (2004): 101-17
271. Mill, John Stuart. –Bailey on Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.— In Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, volume 11, ed. J. M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978.
272. Pappas, George. –Abstract Ideas and the New Theory of Vision.— British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (2002): 55-70.
273. Pitcher, George, ed. Berkeley on Vision: ANineteenth-Century Debate. New York: Garland, 1988.
274. Raynor, David. –‘Minima Sensibilia‘ in Berkeley and Hume. Dialogue 19 (1980): 196-200.
275. Sacks, Oliver. –To See and Not See.— In Oliver Sacks, An Anthropologist on Mars: Seven Paradoxical Tales. New York: Knopf, 1995.
276. Schwartz, Robert. Vision: Variations on Some Berkeleian Themes. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.
277. Smith. A.D. –Space and Sight.— Mind 109 (2000): 487-518.
278. Smith, Adam. –Of the External Senses.— In Essays on Philosophical Subjects, ed. W. P. D. Wightman, J. C. Bryce, and I. S. Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.
279. Thrane, Gary. –Berkeley’s Proper Objects of Vision.— Journal of the History of Ideas 37 (1977): 243-60.
280. Turbayne, Colin M. –Berkeley and Molyneux on Retinal Images.— Journal of the History of Ideas 16 (1955): 339-55.
281. Vesey, G. N. A. –Berkeley and the Man Born Blind.— Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 61 (1960-1961): 189-206.
282. Voltaire. The Elements of Sir Isaac Newton’s Philosophy. London: S. Austen, 1738.
283. von Senden, Marius. Space and Sight. Translated by Peter Heath. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1960.
284. Wilson, Margaret Dauler. –The Issue of ‘Common Sensibles’ in Berkeley’s New Theory of Vision.— In M. D. Wilson, Ideas and Mechanism (see II.E., Other books relating to immaterialism).
285. Yaffe, Gideon. –Berkeley and the ‘Mighty Difficulty’: The Idealist Lesson of the Inverted Retinal Image.— Philosophical Topics 31 (2003): 485-510.
286. Armstrong, R. L. –Berkeley’s Theory of Signification.— Journal of the History of Philosophy 7 (1969): 163-76.
287. Atherton, Margaret. –Berkeley’s Anti-Abstractionism.— In E. Sosa, ed. (see II.G., Collections of essays).
288. Baxter, Donald L. M. –Abstraction, Inseparability, and Identity.— Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1997): 307-30.
289. Beal, Melvin W. –Berkeley’s Linguistic Criterion.— Personalist 52 (1971): 499-514.
290. Beardsley, Monroe C. –Berkeley on ‘Abstract Ideas.’— Mind 52 (1943): 157-170.
291. Benschop, Hans-Peter. –Berkeley, Lee and Abstract Ideas.— British Journal for the History of Philosophy 5 (1997): 55-66.
292. Belfrage, Bertil. –Berkeley’s Theory of Emotive Meaning (1708).— History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 643-9.
293. —. –Development of Berkeley’s Early Theory of Meaning.— Revue philosophique de la France et de l’etranger 176 (1986): 319-330.
294. Berman, David. –Berkeley’s Semantic Revolution: 19 November 1707-11 January 1708.— History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 603-607.
295. Bolton, Martha Brandt. –Berkeley’s Objection to Abstract Ideas and Unconceived Objects.— In E. Sosa, ed. (see II.G., Collections of essays).
296. Cornman, James W. –Theoretical Terms, Berkeleian Notions, and Minds.— In C. M. Turbayne, ed. 1970 (see II.G., Collections of essays).
297. Craig, E. J. –Berkeley’s Attack on Abstract Ideas.— Philosophical Review 77 (1968): 425-437.
298. Doney, Willis. –Berkeley’s Argument Against Abstract Ideas.— Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8 (1983): 295-308.
299. Berkeley on Abstraction and Abstract Ideas. New York: Garland, 1989.
300. Drebushenko, David. –Abstraction and a New Argument for the Esse is Percipi Thesis.— Hermathena 167 (1999): 35-58.
301. Flage, Daniel E. Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions: A Reconstruction Based on His Theory of Meaning. London: Croom Helm, 1987.
302. —. –Relative Ideas and Notions.— In Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays on the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy, ed. Phillip D. Cummins and Guenter Zoeller. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview, 1992.
303. Flew, Antony. –Was Berkeley a Precursor of Wittgenstein?— In Hume and the Enlightenment: Essays Presented to Ernest Campbell Mossner, ed. W. B. Todd. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1974.
304. Friedman, Lesley. –Pragmatism: The Unformulated Method of Bishop Berkeley.— Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2003): 81-96.
305. Glouberman, Mark. –Berkeley’s Anti-Abstractionism.— British Journal for the History of Philosophy 2 (1994): 145-163.
306. Hacking, Ian. Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.
307. Jakapi, Roomet. –Emotive Meaning and Christian Mysteries in Berkeley’s Alciphron.— British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (2002): 40111.
308. —. –Entry 720 of Berkeley’s Philosophical Commentaries and ‘Non-Cognitive’ Propositions in Scripture.— Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie 85 (2003): 86-90.
309. Land, S. K. –Berkeleyan Linguistics.— Linguistics 213 (1978): 5-28.
310. Lee, R. N. –What Berkeley’s Notions Are.— Idealistic Studies 20 (1990): 19-41.
311. Lennon, Thomas M. –Berkeley and the Ineffable.— Synthese 75 (1988): 231-50.
312. McGowan, William. –Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs.— In C. M. Turbayne, ed. 1982 (seeII.G., Collections of essays).
313. McKim, Robert. –Abstraction and Immaterialism: Recent Interpretations.— Berkeley Newsletter 15 (1997-1998): 1-13.
314. Ott, Walter R. Locke’s Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
315. Pappas, George. –Abstraction and Existence.— History of Philosophy Quarterly 19 (2002): 43-63.
316. Taylor, C. C. W. –Berkeley’s Theory of Abstract Ideas.— Philosophical Quarterly 28 (1978): 97-115.
317. Turbayne, Colin M. –Berkeley’s Metaphysical Grammar.— In C. M. Turbayne, ed. 1970 (see II.G., Collections of essays).
318. The Myth of Metaphor. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1962.
319. Van Steenburgh, E. W. –Berkeley Revisited.— Journal of Philosophy 60 (1963): 85-89.
320. Weinberg, Julius. –The Nominalism of Berkeley and Hume.— In his Abstraction, Relation, and Induction. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1965.
321. Williford, Kenneth. –Berkeley’s Theory of Operative Language in the Manuscript Introduction.— British Journal of the History of Philosophy (2003): 271-301.
322. Winkler, Kenneth P. –Berkeley on Abstract Ideas.— Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie 65 (1983): 63-80.
323. Woozley, A. D. –Berkeley’s Doctrine of Notions and Theory of Meaning.— Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (1976): 427-434.
324. Adams, Robert. –Berkeley’s ‘Notion’ of Spiritual Substance.— Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie 55 (1973): 47-69.
325. Atherton, Margaret. –The Coherence of Berkeley’s Theory of Mind.— Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 43 (1983): 389-399.
326. Ayers, M. R. –Perception and Action.— In Knowledge and Necessity, ed. N. A. Vesey. London: Macmillan, 1970.
327. Baier, Annette C. –The Intentionality of Intentions.— Review of Metaphysics 30 (1977): 389-414.
328. Beardsley, William. –Berkeley on Spirit and Its Unity.— History of Philosophy Quarterly 18 (2001): 259-727.
329. Cummins, Phillip. –Hylas’ Parity Argument.— In C. M. Turbayne, ed. 1982 (see II.G., Collections of essays).
330. Davis. John W. –Berkeley’s Doctrine of the Notion.— Review of Metaphysics (1959): 378-389.
331. Doney, Willis. –Is Berkeley’s a Cartesian Mind?— In C. M. Turbayne, ed. 1982 (see II.G., Collections of essays).
332. Jolley, Nicholas. –Malebranche and Berkeley on Causality and Volition.— In Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy: Essays Presented to Jonathan Bennett, ed. J. A. Cover and Mark Kulstad. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1990.
333. Lloyd, A. C. –The Self in Berkeley’s Philosophy.— In J. Foster and H. Robinson, eds. (see II.G., Collections of essays).
334. McCracken, Charles J., –Berkeley’s Notion of Spirit.— History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 597-602.
335. —. –Berkeley’s Cartesian Conception of Mind.— Monist 71 (1988): 596-611.
336. McKim, Robert. –Berkeley’s Active Mind.— Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie 71 (1989): 335-343.
337. —. –Berkeley on Human Agency.— History of Philosophy Quarterly 2: 181-194.
338. Pitcher, George. –Berkeley on the Mind’s Activity.— American Philosophical Quarterly 18 (1981): 221-7.
339. Taylor, C. C. W. –Action and Inaction in Berkeley.— In J. Foster and H. Robinson, eds. (seeII.G., Collections of essays).
340. Tipton. Ian C. –Berkeley’s View of Spirit.— In W. Steinkraus, ed. (see II.G., Collections of essays).
341. Turbayne. Colin M. “Berkeley’s Two Concepts of Mind.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 20 (1959): 85-92.
342. Woozley, A. D. –Berkeley on Action.— Philosophy 60 (1985): 293-307.
343. Ardley, Gavin W. R. Berkeley’s Philosophy of Nature. Auckland: University of Auckland, 1962.
344. Asher, Warren O. –Berkeley on Absolute Motion.— History of Philosophy Quarterly 4 (1987): 447-66.
345. Atherton, Margaret. –Corpuscles, Mechanism and Essentialism in Berkeley and Locke.— Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1991): 47-67.
346. Brook, Richard J. –Berkeley, Causality, and Signification.— International Studies in Philosophy 27 (1995): 15-31.
347. Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.
348. Buchdahl, Gerd. Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science. The Classical Origins: Descartes to Kant. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1969.
349. Davidson, Arnold I., and Norbert Hornstein. –The Primary/Secondary Quality Distinction: Berkeley, Locke, and the Foundations of Corpuscularian Science.— Dialogue 23 (1984): 281-303.
350. Downing, Lisa. –Berkeley’s Case Against Realism About Dynamics.— In R. G. Muehlmann, ed. (seeII.G., Collections of essays).
351. —. –Siris and the Scope of Berkeley’s Instrumentalism.— British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3 (1995): 279-300.
352. Garber, Daniel. –Locke, Berkeley, and Corpuscular Scepticism.— In C. M. Turbayne, ed. 1982 (seeII.G., Collections of essays).
353. Hinrichs, Gerard. –The Logical Positivism of Berkeley’s De Motu.— Review of Metaphysics 3 (1950): 491-505.
354. Hughes, M. –Newton, Hermes and Berkeley.— British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (1992): 1-19.
355. Jessop, T. E. –Berkeley and the Contemporary Physics.— Revue internationale de philosophie 7 (1953): 101-133.
356. —. –Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science.— Hermathena 97 (1963): 23-35.
357. Maull, Nancy L. –Berkeley on the Limits of Mechanistic Explanation.— In C. M. Turbayne, ed. 1982 (see II.G., Collections of essays).
358. Mirarchi, Lawrence A. –Force and Absolute Motion in Berkeley’s Philosophy of Physics.— Journal of the History of Ideas (1977): 705-713.
359. Moked, Gabriel. Particles and Ideas: Bishop Berkeley’s Corpuscularian Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.
360. Myhill, John. –Berkeley’s De Motu - An Anticipation of Mach.— In S. C. Pepper, et al., eds. (see II.G., Collections of essays).
361. Newton-Smith, W. H. –Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science.— In J. Foster and Robinson, eds. (see II.G., Collections of essays).
362. Pappas, George S. –Science and Metaphysics in Berkeley.— International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2 (1987): 105-114.
363. Popper, Karl. –Berkeley as Precursor of Mach and Einstein.— British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4 (1953): 26-36.
364. Silver, Bruce. –Berkeley and the Principle of Inertia.— Journal of the History of Ideas 34 (1973): 599-608.
365. Suchting, W. A. –Berkeley’s Criticism of Newton on Space and Time.— Isis 58 (1967): 186-197.
366. Tipton, Ian C. –The ‘Philosopher by Fire’ in Berkeley’s Alciphion.— In C. M. Turbayne, ed. 1982 (see II.G., Collections of essays).
367. Urmson, J. O. –Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science in the Siris.— History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 563-536.
368. Wilson, Margaret. –Berkeley and the Essences of the Corpuscularians.— In J. Foster and H. Robinson, eds. (see II.G., Collections of essays).
369. Whitrow, G. J. –Berkeley’s Critique of the Newtonian Analysis of Motion.— Hermathena 82 (1953): 90-112.
370. —. –Berkeley’s Philosophy of Motion.— British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4 (1953): 37-45.
371. Winkler, Kenneth P. –Berkeley, Newton, and the Stars.— Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 17 (1986): 23-42.
372. Baum, Robert J. –The Instrumentalist and Formalist Elements of Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics.— Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3 (1972): 119-35.
373. Cajori, Florian. –Discussion of Fluxions from Berkeley to Woodhouse.— American Mathematical Monthly 24 (1917): 145-54.
374. Cantor, Geoffrey. –Berkeley’s The Analyst Revisited.— Isis 75 (1984): 66883.
375. Grattan-Guinness, I. –Berkeley’s Criticism of the Calculus as a Study in the Theory of Limits.— Janus 56 (1969): 215-227.
376. Jesseph, Douglas M. Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
377. Levy, David M. –Bishop Berkeley Exorcises the Infinite: Fuzzy Consequences of Strict Finitism.— Hume Studies 18 (1992): 511-536.
378. Pycior, Helena. –Mathematics and Philosophy: Wallis, Hobbes, Barrow, and Berkeley.— Journal of the History of Ideas 48 (1987): 265-286.
379. Reid, Jasper. –Faith, Fluxions and Impossible Numbers in Berkeley’s Writings of the Early 1730s.— Modern Schoolman 80 (2002): 1-22.
380. Sherry, David. –The Wake of Berkeley’s Analyst: Rigor Mathematicae?— Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18 (1987): 455-480.
381. —. –Don't Take Me Half the Way: Berkeley on Mathematical Reasoning.— Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 24 (1993): 207-222. Strong, Edward W. –Mathematical Reasoning and Its Objects.— In S. C. Pepper, et al., eds. (seeII.G., Collections of essays).
382. Szabo, Zoltan. –Berkeley’s Triangle.— History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (1995): 41-63.
383. Wisdom, J. O. –The Analyst Controversy: Berkeley as Mathematician.— Hermathena 59 (1942): 111-128.
384. —. –Berkeley’s Criticism of the Infinitesimal.— British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4 (1953): 22-5.
385. Caffentzis, C. George. Exciting the Industry of Mankind: George Berkeley’s Philosophy of Money. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press, 2000.
386. —. –Querying the Querist.— Maine Scholar 3 (1990): 287-307.
387. Clark, Stephen R. L., ed. Money, Obedience, and Affection: Essays on Berkeley’s Moral and Political Thought. New York: Garland, 1989.
388. Hutchison, T. W. –Berkeley’s Querist and Its Place in the Economic Thought of the Eighteenth Century.— British Journal of the Philosophy of Science 4 (1953-1954): 52-77.
389. Johnston, Joseph. –Berkeley’s Influence as an Economist.— Hermathena 82: 76-89.
390. Kelly, Patrick. –Berkeley and Ireland.— Etudes Irlandaises 11 (1986): 7-26.
391. —. –Ireland and the Critique of Mercantilism in Berkeley’s Querist.— Hermathena 139 (1985): 101-116.
392. —. –'Industry and Virtue versus Luxury and Corruption’: Berkeley, Walpole, and the South Sea Bubble Crisis.— Eighteenth-Century Ireland 7 (1992): 57-74.
393. Murray, Patrick. –Money, Wealth, and Berkeley’s Doctrine of Signs: A Reply to Patrick Kelly.— Hermathena 139 (1985): 152-5.
394. Rashid, Salim. –Berkeley’s Querist and Its Influence.— Journal of the History of Economic Thought 12 (1990): 38-60.
395. —. –The Irish School of Economic Development: 1720-1750.— Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 56 (1988): 345-369.
396. Vickers, Douglas. Studies in the Theory of Money, 1690-1776. London: Peter Owen, 1960.
397. Ward, Ian D. S. –George Berkeley: Precursor of Keynes or Moral Economist on Underdevelopment?— Journal of Political Economy 67 (1959): 31-40.
398. Berman, David. –The Jacobitism of Berkeley’s Passive Obedience.— Journal of the History of Ideas 47 (1986): 309-319.
399. Broad, C. D. –Berkeley’s Theory of Morals.— Revue internationale de philosophie 7 (1953): 72-86.
400. Clark, Stephen R. L. –God-appointed Berkeley and the General Good.— In J. Foster and H. Robinson, eds. (see II.G., Collections of essays).
401. —. –, ed. Money, Obedience, and Affection: Essays on Berkeley’s Moral and Political Thought. New York: Garland, 1989.
402. Conroy, Graham P. –George Berkeley on Moral Demonstration.— Journal of the History of Ideas 22 (1961): 205-214.
403. Hayry, Matti, and Hetta Hayry. –Obedience to Rules and Berkeley’s Theological Utilitarianism.— Utilitas 6 (1994): 233-242.
404. Johnston, G. A. –The Development of Berkeley’s Ethical Theory.— Philosophical Review 24 (1915): 419-430.
405. Kupfer, Joseph. –Universalization in Berkeley’s Rule-Utilitarianism.— Revue internationale de philosophie 28 (1974): 511-531.
406. Olscamp, Paul S. –Does Berkeley Have an Ethical Theory?— In C. M. Turbayne, ed. 1970 (see II.G., Collections of essays).
407. The Moral Philosophy of George Berkeley. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1970.
408. Orange, Hugh W. –Berkeley as a Moral Philosopher.— Mind 15 (1890): 514-23.
409. Rivers, Isabel. Reason, Grace, and Sentiment: A Study of the Language of Religion and Ethics in England, 1660-1780. Volume 2, Shaftesbury to Hume. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
410. Robbins, Caroline. The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1959. Reprinted, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2004.
411. Tussman, Joseph. –Berkeley as a Political Philosopher.— In S. C. Pepper, et al., eds. (see II.G., Collections of essays).
412. Warnock, G. J. –On Passive Obedience.— History of European Ideas 7 (1986): 555-62.
413. Berman, David. –Cognitive Theology and Emotive Mysteries in Berkeley’s Alciphron.— Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 81 (1981): 219-29.
414. Bracken, Harry M. –Berkeley on the Immortality of the Soul.— Modern Schoolman 37(1960): 77-94, 197-212.
415. Byrne, P. A. –Berkeley, Scientific Realism, and Creation.— Religious Studies 20 (1984): 453-464.
416. Cates, Lynn D. –Berkeley on the Work of the Six Days.— Faith and Philosophy (1997): 82-86.
417. Crain, Steven D. –Must a Classical Theist Be an Immaterialist?— Religious Studies 33 (1997): 81-92.
418. Everitt, Nicholas. –Quasi-Berkeleyan Idealism as Perspicuous Theism.— Faith and Philosophy 14 (1997): 353-77.
419. Hooker, Michael. –Berkeley’s Argument from Design.— In C. M. Turbayne, ed. 1982 (seeII.G., Collections of essays).
420. Hurlbutt, Robert H. –Berkeley’s Theology.— In S. C. Pepper, et al., eds. (see II.G., Collections of essays).
421. Jakapi, Roomet. –Faith, Truth, Revelation and Meaning in Berkeley’s Defense of the Christian Religion (in Alciphron).— Modern Schoolman 80 (2002): 23-34.
422. Kline, A. David. –Berkeley’s Divine Language Argument.— In E. Sosa, ed. (seeII.G., Collections of essays).
423. Oakes, Robert A. –God and Physical Objects.— International Journal of the Philosophy of Religion 9 (1978): 16-29.
424. Pittion, Jean-Paul, and David Berman, with A. A. Luce. –A New Letter by Berkeley to Browne on Divine Analogy.— Mind 78 (1969): 375-92.
425. Silem, Edward A. George Berkeley and the Proofs for the Existence of God. London: Longmans, Green, 1957.
426. Spiegel, James S. –The Theological Orthodoxy of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.— Faith and Philosophy 13 (1996): 216-235.
427. Ramsey, I. T. –Sermon Preached at Festival Service in the Chapel of Trinity College, Dublin.— Hermathena 82 (1953): 113-127.
428. Ayers, M. R. –Berkeley and Hume: A Question of Influence.— In Philosophy in History, ed. Richard Rorty, J. B. Schneewind, and Quentin Skinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
429. Atherton, Margaret. –Mr. Abbott and Professor Fraser: A Nineteenth- Century Debate about Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.— Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie 85 (2003): 21-50.
430. Berman, David. –Berkeley’s Philosophical Reception after America.— Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie 62 (1980): 311-320.
431. Bracken, Harry M. The Early Reception of Berkeley’s Immaterialism, 17101733. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1959. Revised edition, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1965.
432. Breidert, Wolfgang. –On the Early Reception of Berkeley in Germany.— In Sosa, ed. (see II.G., Collection of essays). Based on the author’s –Die Rezeption Berkeleys in Deutschland im 18. Jahrhundert.— Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 223-241.
433. Charles, Sebastien. Berkeley au siecle des Lumieres. Immaterialisme et scepticisme au XVIIIe siecle. Paris: Vrin, 2003.
434. Charles, S., J. C. Laursen, R. H. Popkin, and A. Zakatistovs, –Hume and Berkeley in the Prussian Academy: Louis Frederic Ancillon’s ‘Dialogue between Berkeley and Hume’ of 1796.— Hume Studies 27 (2001): 85-97.
435. Leroy, Andre-Louis. –Influence de la philosophie berkeleyenne sur la pensee continentale.— Hermathena 82 (1953): 27-48.
436. McCracken, C. J. and I. C. Tipton, eds. Berkeley’s Principles and Dialogues: Background Source Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
437. Morrisroe, Michael, Jr. –Did Hume Read Berkeley? A Conclusive Answer.— Philological Quarterly 52 (1973): 310-15.
438. Popkin, Richard. –Berkeley’s Influence on American Philosophy.— Hermathena 82 (1953): 128-46.
439. —. –Did Hume Ever Read Berkeley?— Journal of Philosophy 56 (1959): 535-545.
440. —. –So, Hume Did Read Berkeley.— Journal of Philosophy 61 (1964): 773-778.
441. Raynor David. –Hume and Berkeley’s Three Dialogues.— In Studies in the Philosophy of the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. M. A. Stewart. Oxford Studies in Modern Philosophy, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.
442. Rome, S. C. –The Scottish Refutation of Berkeley’s Immaterialism.— Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (1943): 313-25.
443. Stabler, Eugen. George Berkeley’s Auffassung and Wirkungin der Deutschen Philosophie bis Hegel. Zeulenroda: B. Sporn, 1935.
444. Stewart, M. A. –Berkeley and the Rankenian Club.— Hermathena 139 (1985): 25-45.
445. Turbayne, Colin M. –Hume’s Influence on Berkeley.— Revue internationale de philosophie 154 (1985): 259-269.
446. Walker, Ralph C. S. The Real in the Ideal: Berkeley’s Relation to Kant. New York: Garland, 1989.