The international legal system as a constitution

Ruling the World?: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 69-110

  Paulus, Andreas L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928415869     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511627088.004     Document Type: Chapter

References (91)

1. Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (2d ed. 1995)
2. Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics 89, 102–38 (1979)
3. Friedrich V. Kratochwil, Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs 45–68 (1989)
4. Alexander Wendt, Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Constructionof Power Politics46 Int’l Org. 391 (1992).
5. Martti Koskenniemi, President of the International Law Commission, Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law: Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, U.N. Doc.A/CN.4/L.682 (Apr. 13, 2006)
6. Martti Koskenniemi & Paivi Leino, Fragmentation of International Law: Postmodern Anxieties?, 15 Leiden J. Int’l L. 553 (2002)
7. Bruno Simma & Dirk Pulkowski, Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimesin International Law, 17 Eur. J. Int’l L. 483, 494–506 (2006)
8. Diversity of Cacophony? New Sources of Norms in International Law, 25 Mich. J. Int’l L. 845 (2004).
9. Joel P. Trachtman, The Constitutions of the WTO, 17 Eur. J. Int’l L. 623, 645–46 (2006)
10. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, Constitutional Functions and Constitutional Problems of International Economic Law: International and Domestic Foreign Trade Law and Foreign Trade Policy in the United States, the European Community, and Switzerland (1991)
11. Deborah Cass, The Constitutionalization of the World Trade Organization (2005).
12. Dick Marty, Provisional Draft Report on UN Security Council and European Union Blacklists (Nov. 12, 2007)
13. Andreas L. Paulus, From Territoriality to Functionality? Towards a Legal Methodology of Globalization, in Governance and International LegalTheory 59 (I. F. Dekker & W. G. Werner eds., 2004).
14. Martti Koskenniemi, Constitutionalism as Mindset: Reflections on Kantian Themes about International Law and Globalization, 8 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 9 (2007).
15. J. H. H. Weiler & Andreas Paulus, The Structure of Change in International Law or Is There a Hierarchy of Norms in International Law? 8 Eur. J. Int’l L. 545 547 (1997).
16. Hans Kelsen, Reine Rechtslehre. Einleitung in die rechtswissenschaftliche Problematik, 147–54 (Leipzig 1934)
17. A. Verdross, Die Einheit des rechtlichen Weltbildes auf Grundlage der Völkerrechtsverfassung 101 (1923)
18. A. Verdross, Die Verfassung der Völkerrechtsgemeinschaft (1926).
19. Hersch Lauterpacht, The Function of Law in the International Community 123 (1933).
20. Hans Kelsen, Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts, 284 (1928)
21. Prosper Weil, Towards Relative Normativity in International Law? 77 Am. J. Int’l L. 413, 422–23 (1989).
22. O. Spiermann, International Legal Argument in the Permanent Court of International Justice, 79–126 (2005).
23. David Kennedy, The Move to Institutions, 8 Cardozo L. Rev. 841 849 (1987).
24. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, How to Reform the UN System? Constitutionalism, International Law, and International Organizations, 10Leiden J. Int’l L. 421 (1997).
25. M. Weber, Politik als Beruf, in Gesamtausgabe I/17, 157, 159–60 (W. J. Mommsen & W. Schluchter eds.,1992)
26. Hans Kelsen, The law of the United Nations: a Critical Analysis of its Fundamental Problems 732–37 (1950)
27. Bardo Fassbender, The United Nations Charter as Constitution of the International Community, 36 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 529 (1998)
28. B. Simma, From Bilateralism to CommunityInterest in International Law, 250 Recueil des Cours 217 258. (1994).
29. Bardo Fassbender, UN Security Council Reform and the Right of Veto: A Constitutional Perspective 114 (1998)
30. S. Kadelbach & T. Kleinlein, International Law: A Constitution for Mankind? An Attempt at a Re-appraisal with an Analysis of Constitutional Principles, 50 German Y.B. Int’l L. 303 319 (2008).
31. Jürgen Habermas, Der gespaltene Westen 44 (2004).
32. Michael Barkun, Law without Sanctions (1968).
33. Bruno Simma, Comments on Global Governance, the United Nations, and the Place of Law, 9 Finnish Y.B. Int’l L. 61 65 (1998).
34. Andreas L. Paulus, The War against Iraq and the Future of International Law: Hegemony or Pluralism? 25 Mich. J. Int’l L. 691 (2004)
35. R. Peerenbom, What’s Wrong with Chinese Rights? Toward a Theory of Rights with Chinese Characteristics, 6 Harv. Hum. Rts.J. 29 (1993).
36. Dmitry Rogozin, Washington’s Hypocrisy, Int’l Herald Trib., Aug. 18, 2008.
37. Gunther Teubner & Andreas Fischer-Lescano, Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law, 25 Mich J. Int’l L. 999 1045(2004).
38. Dirk Pulkowski, Structural Paradigms of International Law, in The Shifting Allocation of Authority in International Law 51 54 (T. Broude & Y. Shany eds., 2008)
39. Judith Goldstein et al., Legalization andWorld Politics: A Special Issue of International Organization, 54 Int’l Org. 385 (2000).
40. J. H. H. Weiler, The Geology of International Law, 64 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 547 (2004)
41. Anne-Marie Slaughter, A New World Order (2004).
42. Kenneth Anderson, The Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines, the Role of International Non-Governmental Organizations and the Idea of International Civil Society, 11 Eur. J. Int’lL. 91 (2000).
43. Carsten Hoppe, Implementation of LaGrand and Avena in Germany and the United States: Exploring a Transatlantic Divide in Search of a Uniform Interpretation of Consular Rights, 18 Eur. J. Int’l L. 317 (2007).
44. Andreas L. Paulus, Comment to Andreas Fischer-Lescano & Gunther Teubner: The Legitimacy of International Law and the Role of the State, 25 Mich.J. Int’l L. 1047 1053 (2004).
45. Andreas L. Paulus, International Adjudication, in Philosophy of International Law (S. Besson & J. Tasioulas eds., 2007).
46. Benedict Kingsbury (ed.), The Proliferation of International Tribunals: Piecing Together the Puzzle, 31 N.Y.U J. Int’l L. & Pol. 679 (1999)
47. Yuval Shany, TheCompeting Jurisdictions of International Courts and Tribunals (2003).
48. Thomas Franck, The Power of Legitimacy among Nations, 24 (1990)
49. D. Georgiev, To the Editor in Chief, 83 Am. J. Int’l L. 551 (1989)
50. Alexander Orakhelashvili, Peremptory Norms in International Law (2006)
51. Robert Kolb, Théorie du jus cogens international (2001).
52. Thomas Franck, The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance, 86 Am. J. Int’l L. 46 (1992).
53. Michael Byers, Book Review (Orakelashvili, Peremptory Norms in International Law), 101 Am. J. Int’l L. 913 (2007).
54. Alexander Orakhelashvili, Letter to the Editors in Chief, 102 Am. J. Int’l L. 309 (2008).
55. Susan Strange, The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy (1996)
56. Neil Walker, The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism, 65 Mod. L. Rev. 317 (2002)
57. C. Walter, Constitutionalizing (Inter)national Governance: Possibilities for and Limits to the Development of an International Constitutional Law, 44 German Y.B. Int’l L. 170 (2001)
58. Anne Peters, Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures, 19 Leiden J. Int’l L. 579 (2006).
59. Eyal Benvenisti, ReclaimingDemocracy: The StrategicUses of Foreign and International Lawby National Courts, 102 Am. J. Int’l L. 241 (2008).
60. A. Watts, The International Rule of Law, 36 German Y.B Int’l L. 15 21 (1993)
61. Kotzur, Soziales Völkerrecht für eine solidarische Völkergemeinschaft? 63 Juristenzeitung 265 (2008).
62. Stanley Hoffmann, Duties beyond Borders: On the Limits and Possibilities of Ethical International Politics 156–59 (1981).
63. Immanuel Kant, Zum ewigen Frieden (Perpetual Peace), 216–17 (1795, 46).
64. Hauke Brunkhorst, Solidarity: From Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community (2005).
65. Andrew Hurrell & Ngaire Woods, Globalisation and Inequality, 24 Millennium 447 (1995)
66. Andrew Hurrell, On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society, 194–215, 298–308 (2007).
67. Kalypso Nicolaїdes, Our European Demoi-cracy: Is This Constitution a Third Way for Europe? in Whose Europe? National Models and the Constitution of the European Union,137 144 (Kalypso Nicolaїdes & Stephen Weatherill eds., 2003)
68. Samantha Besson, Institutionalizing Global Demoi-cracy, in International Law, Justice and Legitimacy (L. Meyered., 2007)
69. J. Isensee, Nachwort. Europa – die politische Erfindung eines Erdteils, in Europa als politische Idee und als rechtliche Form 103 133 (J. Isensee ed., 2d ed. 1994)
70. Jack L. Goldsmith & Eric A. Posner, The Limits of International Law 199 (2005).
71. O. Höffe, Demokratie im Zeitalter der Globalisierung (1999)
72. Andreas L. Paulus, Subsidiarity, Fragmentation and Democracy: Towards the Demise of General International Law? in The Shifting Allocationof Authority in International Law: Considering Sovereignty, Supremacyand Subsidiarity 193 (Tomer Broude & Yuval Shany eds., 2008).
73. Lord Bingham, The Rule of Law 66 Cambridge L.J. 67 (2007)
74. Paul Craig, Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework, 1997 Public Law 467
75. A. V. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution 188 (9th ed. Macmillan, 1956)
76. Anne Marie Slaughter, A Global Community of Courts, 44 Harv. Int’l L.J. 191 (2003).
77. Eric A. Posner & John C. Yoo, Judicial Independence in International Tribunals, 93 Cal. L. Rev. 1 27 (2005)
78. Laurence R. Helfer & Anne-MarieSlaughter, Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo, 93 Cal. L. Rev. 899 905 (2005).
79. Stefan Talmon, The Security Council as World Legislature, 99 Am. J. Int’l L. 175 (2005)
80. Ian Johnstone, Legislation and Adjudication in the UN Security Council: Bringing Down the Deliberative Deficit, 102 Am. J. Int’l L. 275 (2008).
81. Martti Koskenniemi, The Police in the Temple. Order, Justice and the UN: A Dialectical View, 6 Eur. J. Int’l L. 325 (1995)
82. AndreasZimmermann & Björn Elberling, Grenzen der Legislativbefugnisse des Sicherheitsrats, 52Vereinte Nationen 71 (2004).
83. Fernando R. Tesón, The Kantian Theory of International Law, 92 Colum. L. Rev. 53 (1992)
84. Christian Calliess, Susidiaritätsprinzip und Solidarit ätsprinzip als rechtliches Regulativ der Globalisierung von Staat und Gesellschaft –dargestellt am Beispiel von EU und WTO, 20 Rechtstheorie Beiheft 371 (2002)
85. UlrichFastenrath, Subsidiarität im Völkerrecht, 20 Rechtstheorie Beiheft 475 (2002)
86. Richard A. Posner, Not a Suicide Pact: The Constitution in a Time of National Emergency (2006).
87. Joseph Weiler, Editorial, 19 Eur. J. Int’ L. 895–96 (2008)
88. Andrea Gattini, Comment, 46 C.M.L. Rev. 213–14, 226–27 (2009)
89. Daniel Halberstam and Eric Stein, TheUN, the EU, and the King of Sweden, 46 C.M.L. Rev. 13, 71–72 (2009)
90. Bjørn Kunoy and Anthony Dawes, Plate Tectonics in Luxembourg, 46 C.M.L. Rev. 73, 103–04 (2009).
91. Michael Walzer, Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad (1994).