FROM TERRITORIALITY TO FUNCTIONALITY? TOWARDS A LEGAL METHODOLOGY OF GLOBALIZATION

Governance and International Legal Theory

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 59-95

  Paulus, Andreas L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748356772     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. N. Luhmann, Das Recht der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Taschenbuch, 1995), pp. 571.
2. S. Krasner, “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables”, in S. Krasner (ed.), International Regimes (Ithaca/London, Princeton University Press, 1983), p. 1.
3. R. Keohane, J. Nye, “The Club Model of Multilateral Cooperation and Problems of Democratic Legitimacy”, in R.B. Porter et al., Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium (Washington, Brookings, 2001), p. 264.
4. D. Kennedy, “These about International Law Discourse”, 23 German Yearbook of International Law, 1980, 353, at 376.
5. M. Koskenniemi, From Apology to Utopia (Helsinki, Lakimiesliiton Kustannus, 1989), p. 48.
6. D. Kennedy, “The Disciplines of International Law and Policy”, 12 Leiden Journal of International Law 1999, at 133.
7. M. Koskenniemi, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870-1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 504-509.
8. T. Franck, Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford, Clarendon, 1995), pp. 3-24).
9. A. Paulus, Die internationale Gemeinschaft im Völkerrecht (München, Beck, 2001), pp. 250-284.
10. C. Tomuschat, “International Law: Ensuring the Survival of Mankind on the Eve of a New Century”, 281 Recueil des Cours, 1989, 55.
11. A. Paulus, “International Law After Postmodernism:Towards Renewal or Decline of International Law?", 14 Leiden Journal of International Law, 2001, 727-755.
12. A. Merkl, “Prolegomena zu einer Theorie des rechtlichen Stufenbaues”, in Gesellschaft, Staat und Recht. Untersuchungen zur Reinen Rechtslehre. Festschrift Hans Kelsen zum 50. Geburtstage (Wien, Springer, 1931), p. 252, at 272-85.
13. H. Kelsen, Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. A Translation of the First Edition of the Reine Rechtslehre or Pure Theory of Law, B. Litschewski Paulson/S. Paulson trans. (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1992), pp. 63-65.
14. B. Fassbender, UN Security Council Reform and the Right of Veto: A Constitutional Perspective (Den Haag, Kluwer Law International, 1998), pp. 73-115.
15. E.U. Petersmann, “How to Reform the UN System? Constitutionalism, International Law, and International Organizations”, 10 Leiden Journal of International Law, 1997, 421.
16. H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2nd edition 1994), pp. 214.
17. C. Tomuschat, “Obligations Arising For States with or against their Will”, 241 Recueil des Cours (1993 IV), p. 307.
18. R. Jennings, A. Watts (eds.), Oppenheim’s International Law (Harlow, Longman, 9th ed. 1992), p. 12.
19. T. Franck, The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations (Oxford, Oxford UP, 1990), pp. 185-87.
20. T. Franck, The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1990), p. 49.
21. M. McAuliffe de Guzman, “Article 21", in O. Triffterer (ed.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Baden-Baden, Nomos, 1999).
22. R. Howse, K. Nicolaïdis, “Legitimacy and Global Governance: Why Constitutionalizing the WTO Is a Step Too Far”, in R.B. Porter et al., Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium (Washington, Brookings, 2001), p. 227, 235-239.
23. O. Korhonen, “International Lawyer: Towards Conceptualization of the Changing World and Practice”, in J. Drolshammer, M. Pfeifer, The Internationalization of the Practice of Law (The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2001), p. 373.