Erratum: Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for assessment of hemophilic arthropathy: MRI Correlation (AJR (2020) 215 (127-132) DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.12501);Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for assessment of hemophilic arthropathy: MRI correlation

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 204, Issue 3, 2015, Pages W336-W347

  Doria, Andrea S ^a   Keshava, Shyamkumar N ^b   Mohanta, Arun ^a   Jarrin, Jose ^a   Blanchette, Victor ^a   Srivastava, Alok ^b   Moineddin, Rahim ^c   Kavitha, M L ^b   Hilliard, Pamela ^a   Poonnoose, Pradeep ^b   Gibikote, Sridhar ^b  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^b CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Ankles; Children; Hemophilia; Knees; MRI; Radiography; Ultrasound; X rays

Indexed keywords

HEMOSIDERIN;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; HEMOPHILIC ARTHROPATHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT EFFUSION; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ANKLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPLICATION; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HEMOPHILIA A; JOINT DISEASES; KNEE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VON WILLEBRAND DISEASE;

ADOLESCENT; ANKLE JOINT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HEMOPHILIA A; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VON WILLEBRAND DISEASES;

EID: 84928414281     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.20.23388     Document Type: Erratum

References (33)

1. Globe DR, Cunningham WE, Andersen R, et al. The Hemophilia Utilization Group Study (HUGS): determinants of costs of care in persons with haemophilia A. Haemophilia 2003; 9:325-331
2. Resnick D. Bleeding disorders. In: Resnick D, ed. Bone and joint imaging. Philadelphia, PA: Saun-ders, 1989:715-724
3. Hilgartner M W. Current treatment of hemophilic arthropathy. Curr Opin Pediatr 2002; 14:46-49
4. Chan M W, Xavier F, Blanchette V, Doria AS. MR imaging as a screening tool for early detection of ar-thropathy in hemophilic children: systematic review and recommendations. Haemophilia 2012; 18(suppl s3):119-120
5. Doria AS, Lundin B. Imaging modalities for assessment of hemophilic arthropathy, chapter 30. In: Lee CA, Berntorp E, Hoots K, eds. Textbook of hemophilia, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Black-well, 2009:191-199
6. Spannow AH, Stenboeg E, Pfeiffer-Jensen M, et al. Ultrasound and MRI measurements of joint cartilage in healthy children: a validation study. Ultraschall Med 2011; 32 (suppl 1):S110-S116
7. Spannow AH, Pfeiffer-Jensen M, Andersen NT, Herlin T, Stenbøg E. Ultrasonographic measurements of joint cartilage thickness in healthy children: age-and sex-related standard reference values. J Rheumatol 2010; 37:2595-2601
8. Panghaal V, Janow G, Trinh A, Ilowite N, Levin TL. Normal epiphyseal cartilage measurements in the knee in children: an alternative sonographic approach. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31: 49-53
9. Manco-Johnson MJ, Abshire TC, Shapiro AD, et al. Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophilia. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:535-544
10. Kraft J, Blanchette V, Babyn P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and joint outcomes in boys with severe hemophilia A treated with tailored primary prophylaxis in Canada. J Thromb Hae-most 2012; 10:2494-2502
11. Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 1998; 17:101-110
12. Banoo S, Bell D, Bossuyt P, et al.; TDR Diagnostics Evaluation Expert Panel. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles. Nat Rev Microbiol 2010; 8(suppl):S17-S29
13. Harper R, Reeves B. Reporting of precision of estimates for diagnostic accuracy: a review. BMJ 1999; 318:1322-1323
14. Zukotynski K, Jarrin J, Babyn PS, et al. Sono-graphy for assessment of haemophilic arthropathy in children: a systematic protocol. Haemophilia 2007; 13:293-304
15. Keshava S, Gibikote S, Mohanta A, Doria AS. Re-fnement of a sonographic protocol for assessment of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2009; 15:1168-1171
16. Feldman BM, Funk SM, Bergstrom BM, et al. Validation of a new pediatric joint scoring system from the international hemophilia prophylaxis study group: validity of the hemophilia joint health score (HJHS). Arthritis Care Res (Hobo-ken) 2011; 63:223-230
17. Keshava SN, Gibikote S, Mohanta A, Srivastava A, Blanchette V, Doria AS. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of normal pediatric ankles and knees: a baseline for comparisons with haemophilic joints. Haemophilia 2015 (in press)
18. Lundin B, Manco-Johnson ML, Ignas DM, et al.; The International Prophylaxis Study Group. An MRI scale for assessment of haemophilic arthrop-athy from the International Prophylaxis Study Group. Haemophilia 2012; 18:962-970
19. Doria AS, Lundin B, Kilcoyne R F, et al. Reliability of progressive and additive MRI scoring systems for evaluation of haemophilic arthropathy in children: Expert MRI Working Group of the International Prophylaxis Study Group. Haemophilia 2005; 11:245-253
20. Doria AS, Babyn PS, Lundin B, et al. Reliability and construct validity of the compatible MRI scoring system for evaluation of hemophilic knees and ankles of haemophilic children: Expert MRI Working Group of the International Prophylaxis Study Group. Haemophilia 2006; 12:503-513
21. Doria AS, Lundin B, Miller S, et al.; Expert Imaging Working Group of the International Prophylaxis Study Group. Reliability and construct validity of the compatible MRI scoring system for evaluation of elbows in haemophilic children. Haemophilia 2008; 14:303-314
22. Nuss R, Kilcoyne R F. The MRI atlas of hemo-philic arthropathy. New York, NY: Professional Publishing Group, 2003
23. Pettersson H, Ahlberg A, Nilsson IM. A radio-logic classifcation of hemophilic arthropathy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; 149:153-159
24. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London, UK: Chapman and Hall, 1991
25. Garcea G, Mahmoud A, Ong SL, Rees Y, Berry DP, Dennison AR. Caveat reporting in ultrasound interpretation of surgical pathology: a comparison of sonographer versus radiologist. J Eval Clin Pract 2010; 16:97-99
26. Jaramillo D, Hoffer FA. Cartilaginous epiphysis and growth plate: normal and abnormal MR imaging findings. AJR 1992; 158:1105-1110
27. Martinoli C, Della Casa Alberighi O, Di Minno G, et al. Development and defnition of a simplifed scanning procedure and scoring method for Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US). Thromb Haemost 2013; 109:1170-1179
28. Fallon T Jr, Schwab-Stone M. Determinants of reliability in psychiatric surveys of children aged 6-12. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1994; 35:1391-1408
29. Melchiorre D, Linari S, Innocenti M, et al. Ultrasound detects joint damage and bleeding in hae-mophilic arthropathy: a proposal of a score. Haemophilia 2011; 17:112-117
30. Xavier F, Zhang N, Mohanta M, et al. Sonography for assessment of elbows in haemophilic children: a systematic protocol. Rheumatol Curr Res 2012; S2:1-9
31. Knuiman MW, Divitini ML, Buzas JS, Fitzgerald PE. Adjustment for regression dilution in epide-miological regression analyses. Ann Epidemiol 1998; 8:56-63
32. Winalski CS, Palmer WE, Rosenthal RI, Weissman BN. Magnetic resonance imaging of rheumatoid arthritis. Radiol Clin North Am 1996; 34:243-258
33. Mann CJ. Observational research methods: research design II-cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Emerg Med J 2003; 20:54-60