Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of healthy paediatric ankles and knees: A baseline for comparison with haemophilic joints

Haemophilia

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2015, Pages e210-e222

  Keshava, S N ^a   Gibikote, S V ^a   Mohanta, A ^b   Poonnoose, P ^a   Rayner, T ^b   Hilliard, P ^b   Lakshmi, K M ^a   Moineddin, R ^c   Ignas, D ^b   Srivastava, A ^a   Blanchette, V ^b   Doria, A S ^b  

^a CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

^b HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cartilage; Children; Haemophilia; MRI; Normal joints; Phantom; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANKLE; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; CANADA; CHILD; ECHOGRAPHY; EX VIVO STUDY; GROUPS BY AGE; HEMOPHILIC ARTHROPATHY; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; INDIA; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; KNEE; KNEE MENISCUS; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SOFT TISSUE; SYNOVIAL FLUID; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER; VALIDITY; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPLICATION; FEMALE; HEMARTHROSIS; HEMOPHILIA A; IMAGE PROCESSING; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADOLESCENT; ANKLE JOINT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHILD; FEMALE; HEMARTHROSIS; HEMOPHILIA A; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 84928824820     PISSN: 13518216     EISSN: 13652516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hae.12614     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Hilgartner MW. Current treatment of hemophilic arthropathy. Curr Opin Pediatr 2002; 14: 46-9.
2. Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Jimenez-Yuste V, Aznar JA et al. Joint protection in haemophilia. Haemophilia 2011; 17(Suppl. 2): 1-23
3. Lundin B, Manco-Johnson ML, Ignas DM et al.; International Prophylaxis Study Group. An MRI scale for assessment of haemophilic arthropathy from the International Prophylaxis Study Group. Haemophilia 2012; 18: 962-70.
4. Zukotynski K, Jarrin J, Babyn PS et al. Sonography for assessment of hemophilic arthropathy in children: a systematic protocol. Haemophilia 2007; 13: 293-304.
5. Keshava S, Gibikote S, Mohanta A, Doria AS. Refinement of a sonographic protocol for assessment of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2009; 15: 1168-71.
6. Xavier F, Zhang N, Mohanta M et al. Sonography for assessment of elbows in haemophilic children: a systematic protocol. Rheumatology (Current Research) 2012; 2161-1149(Suppl. 2): 1-9.
7. Melchiorre D, Linari S, Innocenti M et al. Ultrasound detects joint damage and bleeding in haemophilic arthropathy: a proposal of a score. Haemophilia 2011; 17: 112-7.
8. Doria AS, Lundin B. Imaging Modalities for Assessment of Hemophilic Arthropathy. In: Lee C, Berntorp EE, Hoots WK eds. Textbook of Hemophilia. London, Wiley-Blackwell, 2009: chapter 30, 191-9.
9. Spannow AH, Pfeiffer-Jensen M, Andersen NT, Herlin T, Stenbøg E. Ultrasonographic measurements of joint cartilage thickness in healthy children: age- and sex-related standard reference values. J Rheumatol 2010; 37: 2595-601.
10. Panghaal V, Janow G, Trinh A, Ilowite N, Levin TL. Normal epiphyseal cartilage measurements in the knee in children: an alternative sonographic approach. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31: 49-53.
11. Spannow AH, Stenboeg E, Pfeiffer-Jensen M et al. Ultrasound and MRI measurements of joint cartilage in healthy children: a validation study. Ultraschall Med 2011; 32(Suppl. 1): S110-6.
12. Di Minno MND, Iervolino S, Soscia E et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound evaluation of "healthy" joints in young subjects with severe haemophilia A. Haemophilia 2013; 19: e167-73.
13. Lutz AM, Göpfert K, Jochum W et al. USPIO-enhanced MR imaging for visualization of synovial hyperperfusion and detection of synovial macrophages: preliminary results in an experimental model of antigen-induced arthritis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 657-66.
14. Sasaki T, Ishibashi I, Okamura Y et al. MRI evaluation of growth plate closure rate and pattern in the normal knee joint. J Knee Surg 2002; 15: 72-6.
15. Laor T, Jaramillo D. MR imaging insights into skeletal maturation; what is normal? Radiology 2009; 250: 28-38.
16. White JR, Wilsman NJ, Leiferman EM, Noonan KJ. Histomorphometric analysis of an adolescent distal tibial physis prior to growth plate closure. J Child Orthop 2008; 2: 315-9
17. Rickey DW, Picot PA, Christopher DA, Fenster A. A wall-less vessel phantom for Doppler ultrasound studies. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995; 21: 1163-76
18. Swinscow TDV. Correlation and regression. In: Statistics at Square One ed. 9th. 10 London: BMJ, 1997. Accessed online http://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-readers/publications/statistics-square-one/11-correlation-and-regression.
19. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991: 404-8.
20. Doria AS, Lundin B, Miller S et al.; Expert Imaging Working Group of The International Prophylaxis Study Group. Reliability and construct validity of the compatible MRI scoring system for evaluation of elbows in haemophilic children. Haemophilia 2008; 14: 303-14.
21. Roosendaal G, van Rinsum AC, Vianen ME, van den Berg HM, Lafeber FP, Bijlsma JW. Haemophilic arthropathy resembles degenerative rather than inflammatory joint disease. Histopathology 1999; 34: 144-53.
22. Speer DP. Early pathogenesis of haemophilic arthropathy. Evolution of the subchondral cyst. Clin Orthop 1984; 185: 250-65.
23. Walter U, Kanowski M, Kaufmann J, Grossmann A, Benecke R, Niehaus L. Contemporary ultrasound systems allow high-resolution transcranial imaging of small echogenic deep intracranial structures similarly as MRI: a phantom study. NeuroImage 2008; 40: 551-8.
24. Kremkau FW. Transducers and sound beams. In: Kremkau FW ed. Diagnostic Ultrasound: Principles, Instrumentation and Exercises, 2nd edn. Orlando, FL, Gruen & Straton Inc., 1984: 48-73.
25. Chung MH, Chiang IJ, Chou KR, Chu H, Chang HJ. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of nursing process records for patients with schizophrenia. J Clin Nurs 2010; 19:3023-30.