Reliability and construct validity of the compatible MRI scoring system for evaluation of haemophilic knees and ankles of haemophilic children. Expert MRI working group of the international prophylaxis study group

Haemophilia

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 503-513

  Doria, Andreia S ^a   Babyn, P S ^a   Lundin, B ^b   Kilcoyne, R F ^c   Miller, S ^a   Rivard, G E ^d   Moineddin, R ^e   Petterson, H ^b  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Arthropathy; Children; Discriminant validity; Haemophilia; MRIscoring systems; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGE; ANKLE INJURY; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CANADA; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EUROPE; HEMARTHROSIS; HEMOPHILIA A; HEMOPHILIA B; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT RADIOGRAPHY; KNEE DISEASE; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL EXPERT; MULTICENTER STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; ANKLE JOINT; AREA UNDER CURVE; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; HEMARTHROSIS; HEMOPHILIA A; HEMOPHILIA B; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; OSTEOCHONDRITIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 33747180131     PISSN: 13518216     EISSN: 13652516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01310.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Globe DR, Cunningham WE, Andersen R et al. The Hemophilia Utilization Group Study (HUGS): Determinants of costs of care in persons with haemophilia A. Haemophilia 2003; 9: 325-31.
2. Resnick D. Bleeding disorders. In: Resnick D, ed. Bone and Joint Imaging. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1989: 715-24.
3. Hilgartner MW. Current treatment of hemophilic arthropathy. Curr Opin Pediatr 2002; 14: 46-9.
4. Graham TB, Blebea JS, Gylys-Morin V, Passo MH. Magnetic resonance imaging in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1997; 27: 161-8.
5. Lundin B, Babyn P, Doria AS et al. Compatible scales for progressive and additive MRI assessments of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2005; 11: 109-15.
6. Nuss R, Kilcoyne RF, Rivard GE, Murphy J. Late clinical, plain X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging findings in haemophilic joints treated with radiosynoviorthesis. Haemophilia 2000; 6: 658-63.
7. Lundin B, Pettersson H, Ljung R. A new magnetic resonance imaging scoring method for assessment of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2004; 10: 383-9.
8. Arnold WD, Hilgartner MW. Hemophilic arthropathy. Current concepts of pathogenesis and management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977; 59: 287-305.
9. Pettersson H, Ahlberg A, Nilsson IM. A radiologic classification of hemophilic arthropathy. Clin Orthop 1980; 149: 153-9.
10. Feinstein AR, Wells CK, Joyce CM, Josephy BR. The evaluation of sensibility and the role of patient collaboration in clinimetric indexes. Trans Assoc Am Physicians 1985; 98: 146-9.
11. Kirshner B, Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis 1985; 38: 27-36.
12. Nunnaly JC. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
13. Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 1998; 17: 101-10.
14. Doria AS, Lundin B, Kilcoyne RF et al. Reliability of progressive and additive MRI scoring systems for evaluation of haemophilic arthropathy in children: Expert MRI Working Group of the International Prophylaxis Study Group. Haemophilia 2005; 11: 245-53.
15. Nuss RKR. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Atlas of Hemophilic Arthropathy. New York: Professional Publishing Group Ltd., 2003.
16. Fleiss JL. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: Wiley, 1981.
17. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall, 1991: 404-8.
18. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29-36.
19. Poolman RW, Hanel DP, Mann FA, Ponsen KJ, Marti RK, Roolker L. Trans-Atlantic hospital agreement in reading first day radiographs of clinically suspected scaphoid fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002; 122: 373-8.
20. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 837-45.
21. Poleksic L, Zdravkovic D, Jablanovic D, Watt I, Bacic G. Magnetic resonance imaging of bone destruction in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with radiography. Skeletal Radiol 1993; 22: 577-80.
22. Lundin B, Ljung R, Pettersson H. MRI scores of ankle joints in children with haemophilia-comparison with clinical data. Haemophilia 2005; 11: 116-22.
23. Manco-Johnson MJ, Pettersson H, Petrini P et al. Physical therapy and imaging outcome measures in a haemophilia population treated with factor prophylaxis: Current status and future directions. Haemophilia 2004; 10 (Suppl. 4): 88-93.
24. Ejbjerg BJ, Narvestad E, Jacobsen S, Thomsen HS, Ostergaard M. Optimised, low cost, low field dedicated extremity MRI is highly specific and sensitive for synovitis and bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis wrist and finger joints: Comparison with conventional high field MRI and radiography. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 1280-7.
25. Tamai M, Kawakami A, Uetani M et al. The presence of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody is associated with magnetic resonance imaging detection of bone marrow oedema in early stage rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 133-4.
26. Kilcoyne RF, Nuss R. Radiological assessment of haemophilic arthropathy with emphasis on MRI findings. Haemophilia 2003; 9 (Suppl. 1): 57-63.