Planned bone resections using an MRI-based custom cutting guide system versus 3-dimensional, weight-bearing images in total knee arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 567-572

  Nam, Denis ^a   Williams, Brandon ^a   Hirsh, Jeffrey ^a   Johnson, Staci R ^a   Nunley, Ryan M ^a   Barrack, Robert L ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Alignment; Custom cutting guides; Rotation; Total knee arthroplasty; Weight bearing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE RESECTION; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROTATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VALGUS KNEE; VARUS KNEE; WEIGHT BEARING; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DEVICES; IMAGE PROCESSING; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; LEG; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SURGERY;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LOWER EXTREMITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROTATION; SOFTWARE; TIBIA; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84928316762     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Chao E.Y., Neluheni E.V., Hsu R.W., et al. Biomechanics of malalignment. Orthop Clin North Am 1994, 25(3):379.
2. Choong P.F., Dowsey M.M., Stoney J.D. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(4):560.
3. Longstaff L.M., Sloan K., Stamp N., et al. Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(4):570.
4. Berend M.E., Ritter M.A., Meding J.B., et al. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 428(428):26.
5. Ritter M.A., Faris P.M., Keating E.M., et al. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994, 299(299):153.
6. Ritter M.A., Davis K.E., Meding J.B., et al. The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93(17):1588.
7. Anand S., Harrison J.W., Buch K.A. Extramedullary or intramedullary tibial alignment guides: a randomised, prospective trial of radiological alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003, 85(7):1084. [author reply 1084].
8. Anderson K.C., Buehler K.C., Markel D.C. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20(7 Suppl 3):132.
9. Bardakos N., Cil A., Thompson B., et al. Mechanical axis cannot be restored in total knee arthroplasty with a fixed valgus resection angle: a radiographic study. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(6 Suppl 2):85.
10. Dennis D.A., Channer M., Susman M.H., et al. Intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1993, 8(1):43.
11. Mason J.B., Fehring T.K., Estok R., et al. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(8):1097.
12. Confalonieri N., Manzotti A., Pullen C., et al. Computer-assisted technique versus intramedullary and extramedullary alignment systems in total knee replacement: a radiological comparison. Acta Orthop Belg 2005, 71(6):703.
13. Hinarejos P., Corrales M., Matamalas A., et al. Computer-assisted surgery can reduce blood loss after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009, 17(4):356.
14. Manzotti A., Pullen C., Confalonieri N. Computer-assisted alignment system for tibial component placement in total knee replacement: a radiological study. Chir Organi Mov 2008, 91(1):7.
15. Zorman D., Etuin P., Jennart H., et al. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: comparative results in a preliminary series of 72 cases. Acta Orthop Belg 2005, 71(6):696.
16. Canale S.T., Beaty J.H. Campbell's operative orthopaedics 2008, Elsevier Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 11th ed.
17. Nam D., McArthur B.A., Cross M.B., et al. Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a review. J Knee Surg 2012, 25(3):213.
18. Krishnan S.P., Dawood A., Richards R., et al. A review of rapid prototyped surgical guides for patient-specific total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012, 94(11):1457.
19. Ng V.Y., Declaire J.H., Berend K.R., et al. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470(1):99.
20. Watters T.S., Mather R.C., Browne J.A., et al. Analysis of procedure-related costs and proposed benefits of using patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv 2011, 20(2):112.
21. Slover J., Rubash H., Malchau H., et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of custom total knee cutting blocks. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27(2):180.
22. Barrack R.L., Ruh E.L., Williams B.M., et al. Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012, 94(11 Suppl A):95.
23. Lustig S., Scholes C.J., Oussedik S.I., et al. Unsatisfactory accuracy as determined by computer navigation of VISIONAIRE patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013, 28(3):469.
24. Conteduca F., Iorio R., Mazza D., et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation by navigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013, 21(10):2194.
25. Chareancholvanich K., Narkbunnam R., Pornrattanamaneewong C. A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-specific cutting guides compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2013, 95-B(3):354.
26. Nunley R.M., Ellison B.S., Ruh E.L., et al. Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470(3):889.
27. Woolson S.T., Harris A.H., Wagner D.W., et al. Component alignment during total knee arthroplasty with use of standard or custom instrumentation: a randomized clinical trial using computed tomography for postoperative alignment measurement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014, 96(5):366.
28. Sassoon A., Nam D., Nunley R., et al. Systematic review of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: new but not improved. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014, [Epub ahead of print].
29. Deschenes S., Charron G., Beaudoin G., et al. Diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities: reducing patients radiation dose with a new slot-scanning x-ray imager. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010, 35(9):989.
30. Than P., Szuper K., Somoskeoy S., et al. Geometrical values of the normal and arthritic hip and knee detected with the EOS imaging system. Int Orthop 2012, 36(6):1291.
31. Schlatterer B., Suedhoff I., Bonnet X., et al. Skeletal landmarks for TKR implantations: evaluation of their accuracy using EOS imaging acquisition system. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009, 95(1):2.
32. Buck F.M., Guggenberger R., Koch P.P., et al. Femoral and tibial torsion measurements with 3D models based on low-dose biplanar radiographs in comparison with standard CT measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012, 199(5):W607.
33. Nam D., Shah R.R., Nunley R.M., et al. Evaluation of the 3-dimensional, weight-bearing orientation of the normal adult knee. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29(5):906.
34. Munro B.H. Correlation. Statistical methods for healthcare research 1997, 224. Lippincott-Raven. 3rd ed.
35. Bourne R.B., Chesworth B.M., Davis A.M., et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468(1):57.
36. Noble P.C., Conditt M.A., Cook K.F., et al. The John Insall Award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 452:35.
37. Parvizi J., Nunley R.M., Berend K.R., et al. High level of residual symptoms in young patients with total knee arthroplasty. Open Meeting of the Knee Society 2013.
38. Fang D.M., Ritter M.A., Davis K.E. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it?. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(6 Suppl):39.
39. Parratte S., Pagnano M.W., Trousdale R.T., et al. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92(12):2143.
40. Chen J.Y., Yeo S.J., Yew A.K., et al. The radiological outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014, 22(3):630.
41. Marimuthu K., Chen D.B., Harris I.A., et al. A multi-planar CT-based comparative analysis of patient-specific cutting guides with conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29(6):1138.
42. Nunley R.M., Ellison B.S., Zhu J., et al. Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470(3):895.
43. Thienpont E., Bellemans J., Delport H., et al. Patient-specific instruments: industry's innovation with a surgeon's interest. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013, 21(10):2227.
44. Radtke K., Becher C., Noll Y., et al. Effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010, 130(4):451.
45. Jiang C.C., Insall J.N. Effect of rotation on the axial alignment of the femur. pitfalls in the use of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 248(248):50.