Laterality effects in motor learning by mental practice in right-handers

Neuroscience

Volumn 297, Issue , 2015, Pages 231-242

  Gentili, R J ^a,b,c   Papaxanthis, C ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

^e Université de Bourgogne   (France)

Author keywords

Arm reaching movement; Forward model; Internal model; Mental practice; Motor imagery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGERY; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL TASK; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; HAND; IMAGINATION; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; LEARNING; MALE; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84928139851     PISSN: 03064522     EISSN: 18737544     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.02.055     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Agnew J.A., Zeffiro T.A., Eden G.F. Left hemisphere specialization for the control of voluntary movement rate. Neuroimage 2004, 22(1):289-303.
2. Allami N., Paulignan Y., Brovelli A., Boussaoud D. Visuo-motor learning with combination of different rates of motor imagery and physical practice. Exp Brain Res 2008, 184(1):105-113.
3. Amunts K., Schlaug G., Schleicher A., Steinmetz H., Dabringhaus A., Roland P.E., Zilles K. Asymmetry in the human motor cortex and handedness. Neuroimage 1996, 4:216-222.
4. Andersen R.A., Buneo C.A. Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 2002, 25:189-220.
5. Avanzino L., Bove M., Tacchino A., Trompetto C., Ogliastro C., Abbruzzese G. Interaction between finger opposition movements and aftereffects of 1Hz-rTMS on ipsilateral motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 2009, 101(3):1690-1694.
6. Bakker M., de Lange F.P., Stevens J.A., Toni I., Bloem B.R. Motor imagery of gait: a quantitative approach. Exp Brain Res 2007, 179(3):497-504.
7. Collet C., Di Rienzo F., El Hoyek N., Guillot A. Autonomic nervous system correlates in movement observation and motor imagery. Front Hum Neurosci 2013, 7:415.
8. Creem-Regehr S.H., Neil J.A., Yeh H.J. Neural correlates of two imagined egocentric transformations. Neuroimage 2007, 35(2):916-927.
9. Debarnot U., Creveaux T., Collet C., Gemignani A., Massarelli R., Doyon J., Guillot A. Sleep-related improvements in motor learning following mental practice. Brain Cogn 2009, 69(2):398-405.
10. Debarnot U., Clerget E., Olivier E. Role of the primary motor cortex in the early boost in performance following mental imagery training. PLoS One 2011, 6(10):e26717.
11. Decety J., Jeannerod M. Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitts's law hold in motor imagery?. Behav Brain Res 1995, 72(1-2):127-134.
12. Decety J., Jeannerod M., Durozard D., Baverel G. Central activation of autonomic effectors during mental simulation of motor actions in man. J Physiol 1993, 461:549-563.
13. Demougeot L., Normand H., Denise P., Papaxanthis C. Discrete and effortful imagined movements do not specifically activate the autonomic nervous system. PLoS One 2009, 4(8):e6769.
14. Desmurget M., Grafton S. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci 2000, 4(11):423-431.
15. Fadiga L., Buccino G., Craighero Fogassi L., Gallese V., Pavesi G. Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by motor imagery: a magnetic stimulation study. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37(2):147-158.
16. Gandrey P., Paizis C., Karathanasis V., Gueugneau N., Papaxanthis C. Dominant vs. nondominant arm advantage in mentally simulated actions in right handers. J Neurophysiol 2013, 110(12):2887-2894.
17. Gentili R.J., Cahouet V., Ballay Y., Papaxanthis C. Inertial properties of the arm are accurately predicted during motor imagery. Behav Brain Res 2004, 155(2):231-239.
18. Gentili R.J., Papaxanthis C., Pozzo T. Improvement and generalization of arm motor performance through motor imagery practice. Neuroscience 2006, 137(3):761-772.
19. Gentili R.J., Han C.E., Schweighofer N., Papaxanthis C. Motor learning without doing: trial-by-trial improvement in motor performance during mental training. J Neurophysiol 2010, 104(2):774-783.
20. Grafton S.T., Hazeltine E., Ivry R.B. Motor sequence learning with the nondominant left hand. A PET functional imaging study. Exp Brain Res 2002, 146:369-378.
21. Gueugneau N., Crognier L., Papaxanthis C. The influence of eye movements on the temporal features of executed and imagined arm movements. Brain Res 2008, 1187:95-102.
22. Guillot A., Collet C. Contribution from neurophysiological and psychological methods to the study of motor imagery. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2005, 50(2):387-397.
23. Haaland K.Y., Harrington D.L. Hemispheric asymmetry of movement. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1996, 6:796-800.
24. Hall C.R., Martin K.A. Measuring movement imagery abilities: a revision of the Movement Imagery Questionnaire. J Mental Imagery 1997, 21(1-2):143-154.
25. Heremans E., Helsen W.F., Feys P. The eyes as a mirror of our thoughts: quantification of motor imagery of goal-directed movements through eye movement registration. Behav Brain Res 2008, 187(2):351-360.
26. Ivry R.B., Robertson L.C. The two sides of perception 1998, MIT Press, Cambridge.
27. Jackson P.L., Lafleur M.F., Malouin F., Richards C.L., Doyon J. Functional cerebral reorganization following motor sequence learning through mental practice with motor imagery. Neuroimage 2003, 20(2):1171-1180.
28. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 2001, 14(1 Pt 2):S103-S109.
29. Jordan M.I., Rumelhart D.E. Forward models: supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cogn Sci 1992, 16(3):307-354.
30. Kawato M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1999, 9(6):718-727.
31. Kuhtz-Buschbeck J.P., Mahnkopf C., Holzknecht C., Siebner H., Ulmer S., Jansen O. Effector-independent representations of simple and complex imagined finger movements: a combined fMRI and TMS study. Eur J Neurosci 2003, 18(12):3375-3387.
32. Lacourse M.G., Orr E.L.R., Cramer S.C., Cohen M.J. Brain activation during execution and motor imagery of novel and skilled sequential hand movements. Neuroimage 2005, 27(3):505-519.
33. Lafleur M.F., Jackson P.L., Malouin F., Richards C.L., Evans A.C., Doyon J. Motor learning produces parallel dynamic functional changes during the execution and imagination of sequential foot movements. Neuroimage 2002, 16(1):142-157.
34. Lorey B., Bischoff M., Pilgramm S., Stark R., Munzert J., Zentgraf K. The embodied nature of motor imagery: the influence of posture and perspective. Exp Brain Res 2009, 194(2):233-243.
35. Lotze M., Montoya P., Erb M., Hülsmann E., Flor H., Klose U., Birbaumer N., Grodd W. Activation of cortical and cerebellar motor areas during executed and imagined hand movements: an fMRI study. J Cogn Neurosci 1999, 11(5):491-501.
36. Maruff P., Wilson P.H., De Fazio J., Cerritelli B., Hedt A., Currie J. Asymmetries between dominant and non-dominant hands in real and imagined motor task performance. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37(3):379-384.
37. Munzert J., Lorey B., Zentgraf K. Cognitive motor processes: the role of motor imagery in the study of motor representations. Brain Res Rev 2009, 60(2):306-326.
38. Mutha P.K., Sainburg R.L., Haaland K.Y. Left parietal regions are critical for adaptive visuomotor control. J Neurosci 2011, 31(19):6972-6981.
39. Mutha P.K., Haaland K.Y., Sainburg R.L. The effects of brain lateralization on motor control and adaptation. J Motor Behav 2012, 44(6):455-469.
40. Mutha P.K., Haaland K.Y., Sainburg R.L. Rethinking motor lateralization: specialized but complementary mechanisms for motor control of each arm. PLoS One 2013, 8(3):e58582.
41. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9(1):97-113.
42. Page S.J., Levine P., Leonard A. Mental practice in chronic stroke: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Stroke 2007, 38(4):1293-1297.
43. Page S.J., Szaflarski J.P., Eliassen J.C., Pan H., Cramer S.C. Cortical plasticity following motor skill learning during mental practice in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009, 23(4):382-388.
44. Papaxanthis C., Schieppati M., Gentili R., Pozzo T. Imagined and actual arm movements have similar durations when performed under different conditions of direction and mass. Exp Brain Res 2002, 143(4):447-452.
45. Papaxanthis C., Paizis C., White O., Pozzo T., Stucchi N. The relation between geometry and time in mental actions. PLoS One 2012, 7(11):e51191.
46. Pelgrims B., Michaux N., Olivier E., Andres M. Contribution of the primary motor cortex to motor imagery: a subthreshold TMS study. Hum Brain Mapp 2011, 32(9):1471-1482.
47. Pylyshyn Z.W. Mental imagery: in search of a theory. Behav Brain Sci 2002, 25(2):157-182.
48. Ranganathan V.K., Siemionow V., Liu J.Z., Sahgal V., Yue G.H. From mental power to muscle power - gaining strength by using the mind. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42(7):944-956.
49. Rushworth M.F., Krams M., Passingham R.E. The attentional role of the left parietal cortex: the distinct lateralization and localization of motor attention in the human brain. J Cogn Neurosci 2001, 13:698-710.
50. Sabaté M., González B., Rodríguez M. Brain lateralization of motor imagery: motor planning asymmetry as a cause of movement lateralization. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42(8):1041-1049.
51. Sainburg R.L. Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness. Exp Brain Res 2002, 142(2):241-258.
52. Schluter N.D., Rushworth M.F., Passingham R.E., Mills K.R. Temporary interference in human lateral premotor cortex suggests dominance for the selection of movements. A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain 1998, 121:785-799.
53. Serrien D.J., Ivry R.B., Swinnen S.P. Dynamics of hemispheric specialization and integration in the context of motor control. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006, 7(2):160-166.
54. Skoura X., Personnier P., Vinter A., Pozzo T., Papaxanthis C. Decline in motor prediction in elderly subjects: right versus left arm differences in mentally simulated motor actions. Cortex 2008, 44(9):1271-1278.
55. Skoura X., Vinter A., Papaxanthis C. Mentally simulated motor actions in children. Dev Neuropsychol 2009, 34(3):356-367.
56. Stinear C.M., Fleming M.K., Byblow W.D. Lateralization of unimanual and bimanual motor imagery. Brain Res 2006, 1:139-147.
57. Stinear C.M., Byblow W.D., Steyvers M., Levin O., Swinnen S.P. Kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticomotor excitability. Exp Brain Res 2006, 168(1-2):157-164.
58. Wolpert D.M., Flanagan J.R. Motor prediction. Curr Biol 2001, 11(18):729-732.
59. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 2000, 3:1212-1217.
60. Wolpert D.M., Miall R.C. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw 1996, 9(8):1265-1279.
61. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z., Jordan M.I. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 1995, 269(5232):1880-1882.
62. Wolpert D.M., Goodbody S.J., Husain M. Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe. Nat Neurosci 1998, 1(6):529-533.
63. Yadav V., Sainburg R.L. Motor lateralization is characterized by a serial hybrid control scheme. Neuroscience 2011, 196:153-167.
64. Yágüez L., Nagel D., Hoffman H., Canavan A.G., Wist E., Hömberg V. A mental route to motor learning: improving trajectorial kinematics through imagery training. Behav Brain Res 1998, 90(1):95-106.
65. Yue G., Cole K.J. Strength increases from the motor program: comparison of training with maximal voluntary and imagined muscle contractions. J Neurophysiol 1992, 67(5):1114-1123.
66. Zijdewind I., Toering S.T., Bessem B., Van Der Laan O., Diercks R.L. Effects of imagery motor training on torque production of ankle plantar flexor muscles. Muscle Nerve 2003, 28(2):168-173.