The emerging need for family-centric initiatives for obtaining consent in personal genome research

Genome Medicine

Volumn 6, Issue 12, 2014, Pages

  Minari, Jusaku ^a   Teare, Harriet ^b   Mitchell, Colin ^b   Kaye, Jane ^b   Kato, Kazuto ^a,c  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FAMILY CENTERED CARE; GENETICS; GENOME; HUMAN; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 84927738759     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1756994X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13073-014-0118-y     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. McGuire AL, Beskow LM. Informed consent in genomics and genetic research. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2010, 11:361-381. 10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141711, 20477535.
2. Kohane IS. No small matter: qualitatively distinct challenges of pediatric genomic studies. Genome Med 2011, 3:62. 10.1186/gm278, 21961648.
3. Caulfield T, McGuire AL. Policy uncertainty, sequencing, and cell lines. G3 (Bethesda) 2013, 3:1205-1207. 10.1534/g3.113.007435.
4. Kaye J, Whitley EA, Lund D, Morrison M, Teare H, Melham K. Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks. Eur J Hum Genet 2014
5. Kaye J, Curren L, Anderson N, Edwards K, Fullerton SM, Kanellopoulou N, Lund D, MacArthur DG, Mascalzoni D, Shepherd J, Taylor PL, Terry SF, Winter SF. From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research. Nat Rev Genet 2012, 13:371-376. 10.1038/nrg3218, 22473380.
6. Jarvik GP, Amendola LM, Berg JS, Brothers K, Clayton EW, Chung W, Evans BJ, Evans JP, Fullerton SM, Gallego CJ, Garrison NA, Gray SW, Holm IA, Kullo IJ, Lehmann LS, McCarty C, Prows CA, Rehm HL, Sharp RR, Salama J, Sanderson S, Van Driest SL, Williams MS, Wolf SM, Wolf WA, Burke W. Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between. Am J Hum Genet 2014, 94:818-826. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.04.009, 24814192.
7. Minari J, Chalmers D, Kato K. Return of genetic research results: the Japanese experience and its implications for the international debate. SCRIPTed (Analysis) 2014, 11:180-192.
8. McGuire AL, Caulfield T, Cho MK. Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing. Nat Rev Genet 2008, 9:152-156. 10.1038/nrg2302, 18087293.
9. Knoppers BM, Chadwick R. Human genetic research: emerging trends in ethics. Nat Rev Genet 2005, 6:75-79. 10.1038/nrg1505, 15630423.
10. Akabayashi A, Fetters MD, Elwyn TS. Family consent, communication, and advance directives for cancer disclosure: a Japanese case and discussion. J Med Ethics 1999, 25:296-301. 10.1136/jme.25.4.296, 10461591.