Functional brain network modularity predicts response to cognitive training after brain injury

Neurology

Volumn 84, Issue 15, 2015, Pages 1568-1574

  Arnemann, Katelyn L ^a,b   Chen, Anthony J W ^a,b,c,d   Novakovic Agopian, Tatjana ^a,c,d,e   Gratton, Caterina ^b   Nomura, Emi M ^b   D'Esposito, Mark ^a,b,c  

^a Veterans Administration   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d SAN FRANCISCO VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; COGNITIVE REHABILITATION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL BRAIN NETWORK MODULARITY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMAN; MALE; NERVOUS SYSTEM PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; BRAIN INJURIES; COGNITIVE THERAPY; CONNECTOME; INDIVIDUALITY; MIDDLE AGED; MINDFULNESS; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN INJURIES; COGNITIVE THERAPY; CONNECTOME; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINDFULNESS; NERVE NET; PROGNOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84927732020     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: 1526632X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001476     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Malec JF, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1681-1692.
2. Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 2010;52:1059-1069.
3. Simon HA. The architecture of complexity. Proc Am Philos Soc 1962;106:467-482.
4. Simon HA. Near-decomposability and complexity: how a mind resides in a brain. In: Morowitz H, Singer J, editors. The Mind, the Brain, and Complex Adaptive. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1995:25-43.
5. Stevens AA, Tappon SC, Garg A, Fair DA. Functional brain network modularity captures inter-and intraindividual variation in working memory capacity. PLoS One 2012;7:e30468.
6. Chen AJ, Abrams GM, D'Esposito M. Functional reintegration of prefrontal neural networks for enhancing recovery after brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2006;21:107-118.
7. Crofts JJ, Higham DJ, Bosnell R, et al. Network analysis detects changes in the contralesional hemisphere following stroke. Neuroimage 2011;54:161-169.
8. Gratton C, Nomura EM, Perez F, D'Esposito M. Focal brain lesions to critical locations cause widespread disruption of the modular organization of the brain. J Cogn Neurosci 2012;24:1275-1285.
9. He Y, Wang J, Wang L, et al. Uncovering intrinsic modular organization of spontaneous brain activity in humans. PLoS One 2009;4:e5226.
10. Meunier D, Lambiotte R, Bullmore ET. Modular and hierarchically modular organization of brain networks. Front Neurosci 2010;4:200.
11. Novakovic-Agopian T, Chen AJ, Rome S, et al. Rehabilitation of executive functioning with training in attention regulation applied to individually defined goals: a pilot study bridging theory, assessment, and treatment. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2011;26:325-338.
12. Chen AJ, Novakovic-Agopian T, Nycum TJ, et al. Training of goal-directed attention regulation enhances control over neural processing for individuals with brain injury. Brain 2011;134:1541-1554.
13. Levine B, Robertson IH, Clare L, et al. Rehabilitation of executive functioning: an experimental-clinical validation of goal management training. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2000;6:299-312.
14. Wechsler D. WAIS-III: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale: Administration and Scoring Manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1997.
15. Stuss D, Stethem LL, Pelchat G. Three tests of attention and rapid information processing: an extension. Clin Neuropsychol 1988;1:139-152.
16. Heaton RK, Miller S, Michael J, Grant I. Comprehensive Norms for an Expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery: Demographically Adjusted Neuropsychological Norms for African American and Caucasian Adults (HRB). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2004.
17. Delis DKE, Kramer J. Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Assessment and Information; 2001.
18. Cox RW. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res 1996;29:162-173.
19. Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 2002;15:273-289.
20. Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Van Essen DC, Raichle ME. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:9673-9678.
21. Achard S, Bullmore E. Efficiency and cost of economical brain functional networks. PLoS Comput Biol 2007;3:e17.
22. Bartolomei F, Bosma I, Klein M, et al. How do brain tumors alter functional connectivity? A magnetoencephalography study. Ann Neurol 2006;59:128-138.
23. Hagberg A, Swart P, Schult D. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. In: Varoquaux G, Vaught T, Millman J, editors. Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy 2008); 2008:11-15.
24. Newman M, Girvan M. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2004;69:026113.
25. Guimera R, Nunes Amaral LA. Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks. Nature 2005;433:895-900.
26. D'Esposito M, Chen AJW. Remediating frontal lobe dysfunction: from bench to bedside. In: Knight RT, Stuss DT, editors. Principles of Frontal Lobe Function. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2012:43.
27. Bonnelle V, Leech R, Kinnunen KM, et al. Default mode network connectivity predicts sustained attention deficits after traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci 2011;31: 13442-13451.
28. Mayer AR, Mannell MV, Ling J, Gasparovic C, Yeo RA. Functional connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury. Hum Brain Mapp 2011;32:1825-1835.
29. Castellanos NP, Paul N, Ordonez VE, et al. Reorganization of functional connectivity as a correlate of cognitive recovery in acquired brain injury. Brain 2010;133:2365-2381.
30. Stevens MC, Lovejoy D, Kim J, Oakes H, Kureshi I, Witt ST. Multiple resting state network functional connectivity abnormalities in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Imaging Behav 2012;6:293-318.
31. Bassett DS, Bullmore E. Small-world brain networks. Neuroscientist 2006;12:512-523.
32. Messé A, Caplain S, Pélégrini-Issac M, et al. Specific and evolving resting-state network alterations in postconcussion syndrome following mild traumatic brain injury. PLoS One 2013;8:e65470.
33. Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Zacks JM, Raichle ME. Coherent spontaneous activity accounts for trial-to-trial variability in human evoked brain responses. Nat Neurosci 2006;9: 23-25.
34. Bassett DS, Wymbs NF, Porter MA, Muhca PJ, Carlson JM, Grafton ST. Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:7641-7646.
35. Papo D. Why should cognitive neuroscientists study the brain's resting state? Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7:45.
36. Kitzbichler MG, Henson RN, Smith ML, Nathan PJ, Bullmore ET. Cognitive effort drives workspace configuration of human brain functional networks. J Neurosci 2011;31:8259-8270.
37. Nakamura T, Hillary FG, Biswal BB. Resting network plasticity following brain injury. PLoS One 2009;4:e8220.
38. Pandit AS, Expert P, Lambiotte R, et al. Traumatic brain injury impairs small-world topology. Neurology 2013;80: 1826-1833.
39. Hashmi JA, Kong J, Spaeth R, Khan S, Kaptchuk TJ, Gollub RL. Functional network architecture predicts psychologically mediated analgesia related to treatment in chronic knee pain patients. J Neurosci 2014;34:3924-3936.