Impact of the supramolecular structure of cellulose on the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Peciulyte, Ausra ^a   Karlström, Katarina ^b   Larsson, Per Tomas ^b,c   Olsson, Lisbeth ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b INNVENTIA AB   (Sweden)

^c ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cellulose I; Cellulose supramolecular structure; Crystallinity; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Porosity; Solid state cross polarization magic angle spinning carbon 13 nuclear magnetic resonance (CP MAS13C NMR)

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; COTTON; HYDROLYSIS; MAGIC ANGLE SPINNING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PORE SIZE; POROSITY; SUBSTRATES; SUPRAMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY;

ACCESSIBLE SURFACE AREAS; CARBON-13; CELLULOSE I; COMPLEX SUPRAMOLECULAR STRUCTURE; CRYSTALLINITIES; DEGREE OF CRYSTALLINITY; SPECIFIC SURFACE AREA (SSA); SUPRAMOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS;

CELLULOSE; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; ENZYME; HYDROLYSIS; POROSITY; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SUBSTRATE;

CELLULOSE; CRYSTALLINITY; ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY; HYDROLYSIS; POROSITY;

EID: 84927641545     PISSN: 17546834     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13068-015-0236-9     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. FitzPatrick M, Champagne P, Cunningham MF, Whitney RA. A biorefinery processing perspective: treatment of lignocellulosic materials for the production of value-added products. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:8915-22.
2. Otero J, Panagiotou G, Olsson L. Fueling industrial biotechnology growth with bioethanol. In: Olsson L, editor. Biofuels, vol. 108. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2007. p. 1-40.
3. Mansfield SD, Mooney C, Saddler JN. Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Prog. 1999;15:804-16.
4. Pauly M, Keegstra K. Cell-wall carbohydrates and their modification as a resource for biofuels. Plant J. 2008;54:559-68.
5. Yang B, Dai Z, Ding S-Y, Wyman CE. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic biomass. Biofuels. 2011;2:421-50.
6. Hemsworth GR, Henrissat B, Davies GJ, Walton PH. Discovery and characterization of a new family of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10:122-6.
7. Horn SJ, Vaaje-Kolstad G, Westereng B, Eijsink VG. Novel enzymes for the degradation of cellulose. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012;5:45.
8. Ding S-Y, Liu Y-S, Zeng Y, Himmel ME, Baker JO, Bayer EA. How does plant cell wall nanoscale architecture correlate with enzymatic digestibility? Science. 2012;338:1055-60.
9. Yu ZY, Jameel H, Chang HM, Philips R, Park S. Evaluation of the factors affecting Avicel reactivity using multi-stage enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109:1131-9.
10. Igarashi K, Uchihashi T, Koivula A, Wada M, Kimura S, Okamoto T, et al. Traffic jams reduce hydrolytic efficiency of cellulase on cellulose surface. Science. 2011;333:1279-82.
11. Ooshima H, Kurakake M, Kato J, Harano Y. Enzymatic activity of cellulase adsorbed on cellulose and its change during hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1991;31:253-66.
12. Andersen N, Johansen KS, Michelsen M, Stenby EH, Krogh KBRM, Olsson L. Hydrolysis of cellulose using mono-component enzymes shows synergy during hydrolysis of phosphoric acid swollen cellulose (PASC), but competition on Avicel. Enzyme Microb Tech. 2008;42:362-70.
13. Zeng Y, Zhao S, Yang S, Ding S-Y. Lignin plays a negative role in the biochemical process for producing lignocellulosic biofuels. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014;27:38-45.
14. Chandra RP, Bura R, Mabee WE, Berlin A, Pan X, Saddler JN. Substrate pretreatment: the key to effective enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics? Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2007;108:67-93.
15. Bergenstrahle M, Wohlert J, Larsson PT, Mazeau K, Berglund LA. Dynamics of cellulose-water interfaces: NMR spin-lattice relaxation times calculated from atomistic computer simulations. J Phys Chem B. 2008;112:2590-5.
16. Heiner AP, Kuutti L, Teleman O. Comparison of the interface between water and four surfaces of native crystalline cellulose by molecular dynamics simulations. Carbohyd Res. 1998;306:205-20.
17. Brown RM. Cellulose structure and biosynthesis: what is in store for the 21st century? J Polym Sci, Part A Polym Chem. 2004;42:487-95.
18. Hult E-L, Larsson P, Iversen T. Cellulose fibril aggregation - an inherent property of kraft pulps. Polymer. 2001;42:3309-14.
19. Larsson PT, Svensson A, Wagberg L. A new, robust method for measuring average fibre wall pore sizes in cellulose I rich plant fibre walls. Cellulose. 2013;20:623-31.
20. Duchesne I, Daniel G. Changes in surface ultrastructure of Norway spruce fibres during kraft pulping - visualisation by field emission-SEM. Nord Pulp Pap Res J. 2000;15:54-61.
21. Preston RD, Cronshaw J. Constitution of the fibrillar and non-fibrillar components of the walls of Valonia ventricosa. Nature. 1958;181:248-50.
22. Ohad I, Danon IO, Hestrin S. Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. V Ultrastructure of polymer J Cell Biol. 1962;12:31-46.
23. Ding SY, Himmel ME. The maize primary cell wall microfibril: a new model derived from direct visualization. J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54:597-606.
24. Gilkes NR, Kilburn DG, Miller Jr RC, Warren RA, Sugiyama J, Chanzy H, et al. Visualization of the adsorption of a bacterial endo-beta-1,4-glucanase and its isolated cellulose-binding domain to crystalline cellulose. Int J Biol Macromol. 1993;15:347-51.
25. Tormo J, Lamed R, Chirino AJ, Morag E, Bayer EA, Shoham Y, et al. Crystal structure of a bacterial family-III cellulose-binding domain: a general mechanism for attachment to cellulose. EMBO J. 1996;15:5739-51.
26. Liu YS, Baker JO, Zeng Y, Himmel ME, Haas T, Ding SY. Cellobiohydrolase hydrolyzes crystalline cellulose on hydrophobic faces. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:11195-201.
27. Chunilall V, Bush T, Larsson PT, Iversen T, Kindness A. A CP/MAS 13C-NMR study of cellulose fibril aggregation in eucalyptus dissolving pulps during drying and the correlation between aggregate dimensions and chemical reactivity. Holzforschung. 2010;64:693-8.
28. Ding SY, Xu Q, Ali MK, Baker JO, Bayer EA, Barak Y, et al. Versatile derivatives of carbohydrate-binding modules for imaging of complex carbohydrates approaching the molecular level of resolution. Biotechniques. 2006;41:435-42.
29. Zhu P, Moran-Mirabal JM, Luterbacher JS, Walker LP, Craighead HG. Observing Thermobifida fusca cellulase binding to pretreated wood particles using time-lapse confocal laser scanning microscopy. Cellulose. 2011;18:749-58.
30. Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK. Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2010;3:10.
31. 13C NMR investigation of molecular ordering in celluloses. Carbohydr Res. 1997;302:19-25.
32. 13C NMR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res. 1998;312:123-9.
33. Reier EG. Avicel PH microcrystalline cellulose, NF, Ph Eur., JP, BP. FMC Corporation. 2000;11:1-27.
34. Larsson PT, Salmén L. Influence of cellulose supramolecular structure on strength properties of chemical pulp. Holzforschung. 2014;68:861-6.
35. Pettersen RC. The chemical-composition of wood. Adv Chem Ser. 1984;207:57-126.
36. Peciulyte A, Anasontzis GE, Karlström K, Larsson PT, Olsson L. Morphology and enzyme production of Trichoderma reesei Rut C-30 are affected by the physical and structural characteristics of cellulosic substrates. Fungal Genet Biol. 2014;72:64-72.
37. Testova L, Borrega M, Tolonen LK, Penttilä PA, Serimaa R, Larsson PT, et al. Dissolving-grade birch pulps produced under various prehydrolysis intensities: quality, structure and applications. Cellulose. 2014;21:2007-21.
38. Hall M, Bansal P, Lee JH, Realff MJ, Bommarius AS. Cellulose crystallinity - a key predictor of the enzymatic hydrolysis rate. FEBS J. 2010;277:1571-82.
39. Puls J, Wood TM. The degradation pattern of cellulose by extracellular cellulases of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms. Bioresour Technol. 1991;36:15-9.
40. 1H NMR. Nord Pulp Pap Res J (Sweden). 1993;8:326-30.
41. Stone J, Scallan A. The effect of component removal upon the porous structure of the cell wall of wood. II. Swelling in water and the fiber saturation point. Tappi. 1967;50:496-501.
42. Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E. Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc. 1938;60:309-19.
43. Kohnke T, Ostlund A, Brelid H. Adsorption of arabinoxylan on cellulosic surfaces: influence of degree of substitution and substitution pattern on adsorption characteristics. Biomacromolecules. 2011;12:2633-41.
44. 13C-NMR. In: van de Ven T, Godbout L, editors. Cellulose-fundamental aspects. 2013.
45. Rydholm SA. Pulping processes. New York, US: Interscience Pub; 1965.
46. SCAN-CM standard 49:03. Content of acetone-soluble matter. Scandinavian pulp, paper and board testing committee; 2003.
47. SCAN-CM 71:09. Carbohydrate composition. Scandinavian pulp, paper and board testing committee; 2009.
48. TAPPI. Test Method T 222 om-02. Acid-insoluble lignin in wood and pulp. Atlanta: TAPPI Test Methods; 2002.
49. TAPPI. Useful Method UM-250. Acid-soluble lignin in wood and pulp. Atlanta: Tappi Press; 1991.