Evaluation of the factors affecting avicel reactivity using multi-stage enzymatic hydrolysis

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 109, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1131-1139

  Yu, Zhiying ^a   Jameel, Hasan ^a   Chang, Hou Min ^a   Philips, Richard ^a   Park, Sunkyu ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cellulose; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Enzyme blockage; Product inhibition; Substrate reactivity

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE SITE; ADSORBED ENZYME; CRYSTALLINITIES; ENZYME DEACTIVATION; ENZYME LOADING; INDIVIDUAL FACTORS; MULTI-STAGE; PRODUCT INHIBITION; SINGLE STAGE; TOTAL CARBOHYDRATES;

CARBOHYDRATES; CELLULOSE; ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS; LOADING; SUBSTRATES; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

ENZYME INHIBITION;

CARBOHYDRATE; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE;

ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENZYME INACTIVATION; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; HYDROLYSIS; METABOLIC INHIBITION; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

CELLULASES; CELLULOSE; ENZYME INHIBITORS; HYDROLYSIS; KINETICS;

EID: 84858447449     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.24386     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Arantes V, Saddler JN. 2010. Access to cellulose limits the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis: The role of amorphogenesis. Biotechnol Biofuels 3(1):4.
2. Barnette AL, Bradley LC, Veres BD, Schreiner EP, Park YB, Park J, Park S, Kim SH. 2011. Selective detection of crystalline cellulose in plant cell walls with sum-frequency-generation (SFG) vibration spectroscopy. Biomacromolecules 12(7):2434-2439.
3. Basu S, Pal P. 1956. An unfavourable effect of shaking on fungal cellulases. Nature 178:312-313.
4. Berlin A, Gilkes N, Kurabi A, Bura R, Tu M, Kilburn D, Saddler J. 2005. Weak lignin-binding enzymes. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 121-124:163-170.
5. Borchert A, Buchholz K. 1987. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic materials. Proc Biochem 22:173-180.
6. Caminal G, Lopez-Santin J, Sola C. 1985. Kinetic modeling of the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 27:1282-1290.
7. Converse AO, Matsuno R, Tanaka M, Taniguchi M. 1988. A model of enzyme adsorption and hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose with slow deactivation of the adsorbed enzyme. Biotechnol Bioeng 32:38-45.
8. Dekker RFH, Karageorge H, Wallis AFA. 1987. Pretreatment of hardwood (Eucalyptus Regnans) sawdust by autohydrolysis explosion and its saccharification by trichodermal cellulases. Biocatal Biotransform 1:47-61.
9. Elias CB, Joshi JB. 1998. Role of hydrodynamic shear on activity and structure of proteins. Adv Biochem Eng Biot 58:47-71.
10. Eriksson T, Karlsson J, Tjerneld F. 2002. A model explaining declining rate in hydrolysis of lignocellulose substrates with cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A) and endoglucanase I (Cel7B) of Trichoderma reesei. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 101:41-60.
11. Ghadge R, Patwardhan A, Sawant S, Joshi J. 2005. Effect of flow pattern on cellulase deactivation in stirred tank bioreactors. Chem Eng Sci 60(4):1067-1083.
12. Gusakov A, Sinitsyn A. 1992. A theoretical analysis of cellulase product inhibition effect of cellulase binding constant, enzyme substrate ratio, and beta-glucosidase activity on the inhibition pattern. Biotechnol Bioeng 40(6):663-671.
13. Hall M, Bansal P, Lee JH, Realff MJ, Bommarius AS. 2010. Cellulose crystallinity-A key predictor of the enzymatic hydrolysis rate. FEBS J 277(6):1571-1582.
14. Hallac BB, Ragauskas AJ. 2011. Analyzing cellulose degree of polymerization and its relevancy to cellulosic ethanol. Biofuel Bioprod Bior 5(2):215-225.
15. Hames B, Scarlata C, Sluiter A. 2008. Determination of protein content in biomass. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
16. Hogan CM, Mes-Hartree M, Saddler JN, Kushner DJ. 1990. Assessment of methods to determine minimal cellulase concentrations for efficient hydrolysis of cellulose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 32:614-620.
17. Hong J, Ye X, Zhang Y-HP. 2007. Quantitative determination of cellulose accessibility to cellulase based on adsorption of a nonhydrolytic fusion protein containing CBM and GFP with its applications. Langmuir 23(25):12535-12540.
18. Howell JA, Mangat M. 1978. Enzyme deactivation during cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 20(6):847-863.
19. Jeoh T, Ishizawa CI, Davis MF, Himmel ME, Adney WS, Johnson DK. 2007. Cellulase digestibility of pretreated biomass is limited by cellulose accessibility. Biotechnol Bioeng 98(1):112-122.
20. Jones EO, Lee JM. 1988. Kinetic analysis of bioconversion of cellulose in attrition bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 31(1):35-40.
21. Lee Y, Fan L. 1983. Kinetic studies of enzymatic hydrolysis of insoluble cellulose: (II). Analysis of extended hydrolysis times. Biotechnol Bioeng 25(4):939-966.
22. Ma A, Hu Q, Qu Y, Bai Z, Liu W, Zhuang G. 2008. The enzymatic hydrolysis rate of cellulose decreases with irreversible adsorption of cellobiohydrolase I. Enzyme Microb Technol 42(7):543-547.
23. O'Dwyer JP, Zhu L, Granda CB, Holtzapple MT. 2007. Enzymatic hydrolysis of lime-pretreated corn stover and investigation of the HCH-1 Model: Inhibition pattern, degree of inhibition, validity of simplified HCH-1 Model. Bioresour Technol 98(16):2969-2977.
24. Ohmine K, Ooshima H, Harano Y. 1983. Kinetic study on enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose by cellulose from Trichoderma viride. Biotechnol Bioeng 25(8):2041-2053.
25. Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK. 2010. Cellulose crystallinity index: Measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol Biofuels 3(1):10.
26. 13C nuclear magnetic resonance. Cellulose 16(4):641-647.
27. Qing Q, Yang B, Wyman CE. 2010. Xylooligomers are strong inhibitors of cellulose hydrolysis by enzymes. Bioresour Technol 101(24):9624-9630.
28. Ramos LP, Breuil C, Saddler J. 1992. Comparison of steam pretreatment of eucalyptus, aspen, and spruce wood chips and their enzymatic hydrolysis Appl Biochem Biotechnol 34-35:37-48.
29. Sathitsuksanoh N, Zhu Z, Wi S, Percival Zhang YH. 2011. Cellulose solvent-based biomass pretreatment breaks highly ordered hydrogen bonds in cellulose fibers of switchgrass. Biotechnol Bioeng 108(3):521-529.
30. Smith BT, Knutsen JS, Davis RH. 2010. Empirical evaluation of inhibitory product, substrate, and enzyme effects during the enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 161(1-8):468-482.
31. Gunjikar TejasP, Sawant SudhirB, Joshi JB. 2001. Shear deactivation of cellulase, exoglucanase, endoglucanase, and β-glucosidase in a mechanically agitated reactor. Biotechnol Prog 17(6):1166-1168.
32. Wu S-F, Treasure T, Chang H-M, Philips R. 2010. Technical and Economic feasibility of repurposing uneconomic softwood kraft pulp mills to ethanol production. Proceedings of the Canadian For-Expo and Annual Meeting of PAPTAC Montreal, Canada. p 70-78.
33. Xiao Z, Zhang X, Gregg DJ, Saddler J. 2004. Effects of sugar inhibition on cellulases and β-glucosidase during enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood substrates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 113-116:1115-1126.
34. Yang B, Willies DM, Wyman CE. 2006. Changes in the enzymatic hydrolysis rate of Avicel cellulose with conversion. Biotechnol Bioeng 94(6):1122-1128.
35. Yang J, Zhang X, Yong Q, Yu S. 2010. Three-stage hydrolysis to enhance enzymatic saccharification of steam-exploded corn stover. Bioresour Technol 101(13):4930-4935.
36. Yeh A-I, Huang Y-C, Chen SH. 2010. Effect of particle size on the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Carbohyd Polym 79(1):192-199.
37. Yu Z, Jameel H, Chang H-M, Park S. 2011. The effect of delignification of forest biomass on enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol 102(19):9083-9089.
38. Zhang PY-H, Himmel M, Mielenz J. 2006. Outlook for cellulase improvement: Screening and selection strategies. Biotechnol Adv 24(5):452-481.
39. Zhang S, Wolfgang D, Wilson D. 1999. Substrate heterogeneity causes the nonlinear kinetics of insoluble cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 66(1):35-41.