A blended design in acute care training: similar learning results, less training costs compared with a traditional format

Perspectives on Medical Education

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 289-299

  Dankbaar, Mary E W ^a   Storm, Diana J ^a   Teeuwen, Irene C ^a   Schuit, Stephanie C E ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Acute care education; Blended learning; Effectiveness; Learning results; Online learning; Training costs

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927601265     PISSN: 22122761     EISSN: 2212277X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40037-014-0109-0     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300(10):1181–96.
2. Sitzmann T, Kraiger K, Stewart D, Wisher R. The comparative effectiveness of web-based and clsssroom instruction: a meta-analyses. Pers Psychol. 2006;59(3):623.
3. Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of E-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2006;81(3):207–12.
4. Abdelhai R, Yassin S, Ahmad MF, Fors UGH. An e-learning reproductive health module to support improved student learning and interaction: a prospective interventional study at a medical school in Egypt. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12(1):11.
5. Sung YH, Kwon IG, Ryu E. Blended learning on medication administration for new nurses: integration of e-learning and face-to-face instruction in the classroom. Nurse Educ Today. 2008;28(8):943–52.
6. Taradi SK, Taradi M, Radic K, Pokrajac N. Blending problem-based learning with Web technology positively impacts student learning outcomes in acid-base physiology. Adv Physiol Educ. 2005;29(1):35–9.
7. Beale EG, Tarwater PM, Lee VH. A retrospective look at replacing face-to-face embryology instruction with online lectures in a human anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ. 2013. doi:10.1002/ase.1396.
8. Dankbaar MEW. Online leren: werkt dat? Opleiding en Ontwikkeling. 2012;3:42–7.
9. Clark RC, Mayer RE. E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Pfeiffer; 2008. p. 424.
10. Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Instructional design variations in internet-based learning for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med. 2010;85(5):909–22.
11. Adler MD, Johnson KB. Quantifying the literature of computer-aided instruction in medical education. Acad Med. 2000;75(10):1025–8.
12. Cook DA. The research we still are not doing: an agenda for the study of computer-based learning. Acad Med. 2005;80(6):541–8.
13. Sherman H, Comer L, Putnam L, Freeman H. Blended versus lecture learning: outcomes for staff development. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2012;28(4):186–90.
14. Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Reflections on experimental research in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010;15(3):455–64.
15. Stewart A, Inglis G, Jardine L, Koorts P, Davies MW. A randomised controlled trial of blended learning to improve the newborn examination skills of medical students. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013;98(2):F141–4.
16. Bains M, Reynolds PA, McDonald F, Sherriff M. Effectiveness and acceptability of face-to-face, blended and e-learning: a randomised trial of orthodontic undergraduates. Eur J Dent Educ. 2011;15(2):110–7.
17. Smyth S, Houghton C, Cooney A, Casey D. Students’ experiences of blended learning across a range of postgraduate programmes. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(4):464–8.