-
1
-
-
33646534004
-
Design Principles and Outcomes of Peer Assessment in Higher Education
-
I.Van den Berg,, W.Admiraal, and A.Pilot. 2006. “Design Principles and Outcomes of Peer Assessment in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (3): 341–356. doi:10.1080/03075070600680836.
-
(2006)
Studies in Higher Education
, vol.31
, Issue.3
, pp. 341-356
-
-
Van den Berg, I.1
Admiraal, W.2
Pilot, A.3
-
3
-
-
33749366889
-
Understanding the Rules of the Game: Marking Peer Assessment as a Medium for Developing Students’ Conceptions of Assessment
-
S.Bloxham,, and A.West. 2004. “Understanding the Rules of the Game: Marking Peer Assessment as a Medium for Developing Students’ Conceptions of Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (6): 721–733. doi:10.1080/0260293042000227254.
-
(2004)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.29
, Issue.6
, pp. 721-733
-
-
Bloxham, S.1
West, A.2
-
4
-
-
0346728653
-
The Use of Self-, Peer and Co-assessment in Higher Education: A Review
-
F.Dochy,, M.Segers, and D.Sluijsmans. 1999. “The Use of Self-, Peer and Co-assessment in Higher Education: A Review.” Studies in Higher Education 24 (3): 331–350. doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935.
-
(1999)
Studies in Higher Education
, vol.24
, Issue.3
, pp. 331-350
-
-
Dochy, F.1
Segers, M.2
Sluijsmans, D.3
-
5
-
-
21844500642
-
Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment
-
N.Falchikov, 1995. “Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment.” Programmed Learning 32 (2): 175–187. doi:10.1080/1355800950320212.
-
(1995)
Programmed Learning
, vol.32
, Issue.2
, pp. 175-187
-
-
Falchikov, N.1
-
6
-
-
1642305682
-
Multiple Approaches to Assessment: Reflections on Use of Tutor, Peer and Self-assessment
-
S.Fallows,, and B.Chandramohan. 2001. “Multiple Approaches to Assessment: Reflections on Use of Tutor, Peer and Self-assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 6 (2): 229–246. doi:10.1080/13562510120045212.
-
(2001)
Teaching in Higher Education
, vol.6
, Issue.2
, pp. 229-246
-
-
Fallows, S.1
Chandramohan, B.2
-
8
-
-
0002689016
-
Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The Students’ Views
-
S.J.Hanrahan,, and G.Isaacs. 2001. “Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The Students’ Views.” Higher Education Research & Development 20 (1): 53–70. doi:10.1080/07294360123776.
-
(2001)
Higher Education Research & Development
, vol.20
, Issue.1
, pp. 53-70
-
-
Hanrahan, S.J.1
Isaacs, G.2
-
9
-
-
84961932441
-
-
Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation
-
IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows Version 22.0. 2013. Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation.
-
(2013)
-
-
-
10
-
-
77949873532
-
Peer Assessment as Collaborative Learning: A Cognitive Perspective
-
I.Kollar,, and F.Fischer. 2010. “Peer Assessment as Collaborative Learning: A Cognitive Perspective.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 344–348. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005.
-
(2010)
Learning and Instruction
, vol.20
, Issue.4
, pp. 344-348
-
-
Kollar, I.1
Fischer, F.2
-
11
-
-
33749331250
-
Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment
-
N.Liu,, and D.Carless. 2006. “Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (3): 279–290. doi:10.1080/13562510600680582.
-
(2006)
Teaching in Higher Education
, vol.11
, Issue.3
, pp. 279-290
-
-
Liu, N.1
Carless, D.2
-
12
-
-
84941740762
-
Making Judgements: Investigating the Process of Composing and Receiving Peer Feedback
-
Web
-
T.McConlogue, 2014. “Making Judgements: Investigating the Process of Composing and Receiving Peer Feedback.” Studies in Higher Education 1–12. Web, 25 February 2014. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.868878.
-
(2014)
Studies in Higher Education
, pp. 1-12
-
-
McConlogue, T.1
-
13
-
-
21844506355
-
Using Self and Peer Assessment to Improve Students’ Essay Writing: A Case Study from Geography
-
G.Mowl,, and R.Pain. 1995. “Using Self and Peer Assessment to Improve Students’ Essay Writing: A Case Study from Geography.” Programmed Learning 32 (4): 324–335. doi:10.1080/1355800950320404.
-
(1995)
Programmed Learning
, vol.32
, Issue.4
, pp. 324-335
-
-
Mowl, G.1
Pain, R.2
-
15
-
-
84880040881
-
Dancing with the Devil: Formative Peer Assessment and Academic Performance
-
J.D.Snowball,, and M.Mostert. 2013. “Dancing with the Devil: Formative Peer Assessment and Academic Performance.” Higher Education Research & Development 32 (4): 646–659. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.705262.
-
(2013)
Higher Education Research & Development
, vol.32
, Issue.4
, pp. 646-659
-
-
Snowball, J.D.1
Mostert, M.2
-
16
-
-
0348067453
-
Issues in Assessment, Enterprise and Higher Education: The Case for Self‐peer and Collaborative Assessment
-
H.Somervell, 1993. “Issues in Assessment, Enterprise and Higher Education: The Case for Self‐peer and Collaborative Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 18 (3): 221–233. doi:10.1080/0260293930180306.
-
(1993)
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.18
, Issue.3
, pp. 221-233
-
-
Somervell, H.1
-
17
-
-
77949873085
-
Peer Feedback Content and Sender’s Competence Level in Academic Writing Revision Tasks: Are They Critical for Feedback Perceptions and Efficiency?
-
J.Strijbos,, S.Narciss, and K.Dünnebier. 2010. “Peer Feedback Content and Sender’s Competence Level in Academic Writing Revision Tasks: Are They Critical for Feedback Perceptions and Efficiency?” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 291–303. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008.
-
(2010)
Learning and Instruction
, vol.20
, Issue.4
, pp. 291-303
-
-
Strijbos, J.1
Narciss, S.2
Dünnebier, K.3
-
18
-
-
77949874605
-
Unravelling Peer Assessment: Methodological, Functional, and Conceptual Developments
-
J.Strijbos,, and D.Sluijsmans. 2010. “Unravelling Peer Assessment: Methodological, Functional, and Conceptual Developments.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 265–269. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.002.
-
(2010)
Learning and Instruction
, vol.20
, Issue.4
, pp. 265-269
-
-
Strijbos, J.1
Sluijsmans, D.2
-
20
-
-
0032285568
-
Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities
-
K.Topping, 1998. “Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities.” Review of Educational Research 68 (3): 249–276. doi:10.3102/00346543068003249.
-
(1998)
Review of Educational Research
, vol.68
, Issue.3
, pp. 249-276
-
-
Topping, K.1
-
21
-
-
77949876007
-
Methodological Quandaries in Studying Process and Outcomes in Peer Assessment
-
K.Topping, 2010. “Methodological Quandaries in Studying Process and Outcomes in Peer Assessment.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 339–343. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.003.
-
(2010)
Learning and Instruction
, vol.20
, Issue.4
, pp. 339-343
-
-
Topping, K.1
-
22
-
-
77949873808
-
Effective Peer Assessment Processes: Research Findings and Future Directions
-
M.Van Zundert,, D.Sluijsmans, and J.van Merriënboer. 2010. “Effective Peer Assessment Processes: Research Findings and Future Directions.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 270–279. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004.
-
(2010)
Learning and Instruction
, vol.20
, Issue.4
, pp. 270-279
-
-
Van Zundert, M.1
Sluijsmans, D.2
van Merriënboer, J.3
-
23
-
-
0346020682
-
Peer Evaluation: A Case Study
-
R.L.Weaver,, II, and H.W.Cotrell. 1986. “Peer Evaluation: A Case Study.” Innovative Higher Education 11 (1): 25–39. doi:10.1007/BF01100106.
-
(1986)
Innovative Higher Education
, vol.11
, Issue.1
, pp. 25-39
-
-
Weaver, R.L.1
Cotrell, H.W.2
|