Corrigendum to "Time orientation and eating behavior: Unhealthy eaters consider immediate consequences, while healthy eaters focus on future health" [Appetite 91 (2015) 13-19] DOI.10.1016/j.appet.2015.03.020;Time orientation and eating behavior: Unhealthy eaters consider immediate consequences, while healthy eaters focus on future health

Appetite

Volumn 91, Issue , 2015, Pages 13-19

  Dassen, Fania C M ^a   Houben, Katrijn ^a   Jansen, Anita ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Behavior specific measurements; Consideration of future consequences; Delay discounting; Healthy eating; Time orientation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; DELAY DISCOUNTING; FAST FOOD; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; MALE; SELF REPORT; TIME PERCEPTION; ADOLESCENT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIET; DIET THERAPY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH STATUS; INTERNET; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; OVERWEIGHT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; SELF CARE; SELF CONTROL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DELAY DISCOUNTING; DIET; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; NUTRITION POLICY; OVERWEIGHT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; SELF CARE; SELF REPORT; SELF-CONTROL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84927534181     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.12.028     Document Type: Erratum

References (51)

1. Adams J. Consideration of immediate and future consequences, smoking status, and body mass index. Health Psychology 2012, 31(2):260-263.
2. Adams J., Nettle D. Time perspective, personality and smoking, body mass, and physical activity. An empirical study. British Journal of Health Psychology 2009, 14(1):83-105.
3. Ainslie G. Specious reward. A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin 1975, 82(4):463-496.
4. Appelhans B.M., Woolf K., Pagoto S.L., Schneider K.L., Whited M.C., Liebman R. Inhibiting food reward. Delay discounting, food reward sensitivity, and palatable food intake in overweight and obese women. Obesity 2011, 19(11):2175-2182.
5. Arnocky S., Milfont T.L., Nicol J.R. Time perspective and sustainable behavior. Evidence for the distinction between consideration of immediate and future consequences. Environment and Behavior 2013, 46:556-582.
6. Baker C.W., Little T.D., Brownell K.D. Predicting adolescent eating and activity behaviors. The role of social norms and personal agency. Health Psychology 2003, 22(2):189-198.
7. Benoit R.G., Gilbert S.J., Burgess P.W. A neural mechanism mediating the impact of episodic prospection on farsighted decisions. The Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(18):6771-6779.
8. Daniel T.O., Stanton C.M., Epstein L.H. The future is now. Comparing the effect of episodic future thinking on impulsivity in lean and obese individuals. Appetite 2013, 71:120-125.
9. Daniel T.O., Stanton C.M., Epstein L.H. The future is now. Reducing impulsivity and energy intake using episodic future thinking. Psychological science 2013, 2339-2342.
10. Daugherty J.R., Brase G.L. Taking time to be healthy. Predicting health behaviors with delay discounting and time perspective. Personality and Individual Differences 2010, 48(2):202-207.
11. Epstein L.H., Salvy S.J., Carr K.A., Dearing K.K., Bickel W.K. Food reinforcement, delay discounting and obesity. Physiology & Behavior 2010, 100(5):438-445.
12. Field M., Santarcangelo M., Sumnall H., Goudie A., Cole J. Delay discounting and the behavioural economics of cigarette purchases in smokers. The effects of nicotine deprivation. Psychopharmacology 2006, 186(2):255-263.
13. Frederick S. Valuing future life and future lives. A framework for understanding discounting. Journal of Economic Psychology 2006, 27(5):667-680.
14. Green L., Myerson J. How many impulsivities? A discounting perspective. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 2013, 99(1):3-13.
15. Hall P.A., Fong G.T. The effects of a brief time perspective intervention for increasing physical activity among young adults. Psychology and Health 2003, 18(6):685-706.
16. Hall P.A., Fong G.T. Temporal self-regulation theory. A model for individual health behavior. Health Psychology Review 2007, 1(1):6-52.
17. Hall P.A., Fong G.T., Cheng A.Y. Time perspective and weight management behaviors in newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes. A mediational analysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2012, 35(6):569-580.
18. Jarmolowicz D.P., Cherry J.B.C., Reed D.D., Bruce J.M., Crespi J.M., Lusk J.L., et al. Robust relation between temporal discounting rates and body mass. Appetite 2014, 78:63-67.
19. Jimura K., Myerson J., Hilgard J., Keighley J., Braver T.S., Green L. Domain independence and stability in young and older adults' discounting of delayed rewards. Behavioural Processes 2011, 87(3):253-259.
20. Johnson M.W., Bickel W.K. Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 2002, 77(2):129-146.
21. Joireman J., Balliet D., Sprott D., Spangenberg E., Schultz J. Consideration of future consequences, ego-depletion, and self-control. Support for distinguishing between CFC-Immediate and CFC-Future sub-scales. Personality and Individual Differences 2008, 45(1):15-21.
22. Joireman J., Shaffer M.J., Balliet D., Strathman A. Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy. Evidence from the two-factor Consideration of Future Consequences-14 scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2012, 38(10):1272-1287.
23. Kirby K.N. Instructions for inferring discount rates from choices between immediate and delayed rewards 2000, Unpublished manuscript. Williams College. Williamstown.
24. Kirby K.N. One-year temporal stability of delay-discount rates. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16(3):457-462.
25. Kirby K.N., Petry N.M., Bickel W.K. Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 1999, 128(1):78-87.
26. Kober H., Kross E.F., Mischel W., Hart C.L., Ochsner K.N. Regulation of craving by cognitive strategies in cigarette smokers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2010, 106(1):52-55.
27. Kovač V.B., Rise J. The relation between past behavior, intention, planning, and quitting smoking. The moderating effect of future orientation. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research 2007, 12(2):82-100.
28. Kuijer R.G., Boyce J.A. Emotional eating and its effect on eating behaviour after a natural disaster. Appetite 2012, 58(3):936-939.
29. Kuijer R.G., Boyce J.A. Chocolate cake. Guilt or celebration? Associations with healthy eating attitudes, perceived behavioural control, intentions and weight-loss. Appetite 2014, 74:48-54.
30. Lagorio C.H., Madden G.J. Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards III. Steady-state assessments, forced-choice trials, and all real rewards. Behavioural Processes 2005, 69(2):173-187.
31. Liberman N., Trope Y. The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science 2008, 322(5905):1201-1205.
32. Lin H., Epstein L.H. Living in the moment. Effects of time perspective and emotional valence of episodic thinking on delay discounting. Behavioral Neuroscience 2014, 128(1):12-17.
33. Madden G.J., Begotka A.M., Raiff B.R., Kastern L.L. Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 2003, 11(2):139-145.
34. Nederkoorn C., Smulders F.T., Havermans R.C., Roefs A., Jansen A. Impulsivity in obese women. Appetite 2006, 47(2):253-256.
35. Odum A.L., Baumann A.A., Rimington D.D. Discounting of delayed hypothetical money and food. Effects of amount. Behavioural Processes 2006, 73(3):278-284.
36. Odum A.L., Rainaud C.P. Discounting of delayed hypothetical money, alcohol, and food. Behavioural Processes 2003, 64(3):305-313.
37. Peters J., Büchel C. Episodic future thinking reduces reward delay discounting through an enhancement of prefrontal-mediotemporal interactions. Neuron 2010, 66(1):138-148.
38. Petrocelli J.V. Factor validation of the consideration of future consequences scale. Evidence for a short version. The Journal of Social Psychology 2003, 143(4):405-413.
39. Petry N.M. Delay discounting of money and alcohol in actively using alcoholics, currently abstinent alcoholics, and controls. Psychopharmacology 2001, 154(3):243-250.
40. Piko B.F., Brassai L. The role of individual and familial protective factors in adolescents' diet control. Journal of Health Psychology 2009, 14(6):810-819.
41. Rappange D.R., Brouwer W.B., van Exel N.J.A. Back to the consideration of future consequences scale. Time to reconsider?. The Journal of Social Psychology 2009, 149(5):562-584.
42. Rasmussen E.B., Lawyer S.R., Reilly W. Percent body fat is related to delay and probability discounting for food in humans. Behavioural Processes 2010, 83(1):23-30.
43. Rollins B.Y., Dearing K.K., Epstein L.H. Delay discounting moderates the effect of food reinforcement on energy intake among non-obese women. Appetite 2010, 55(3):420-425.
44. Spencer E.A., Appleby P.N., Davey G.K., Key T.J. Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC-Oxford participants. Public Health Nutrition 2002, 5(04):561-565.
45. Strathman A., Gleicher F., Boninger D.S., Edwards C.S. The consideration of future consequences. Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 66(4):742-752.
46. Toepoel V. Is consideration of future consequences a changeable construct?. Personality and Individual Differences 2010, 48(8):951-956.
47. van Beek J., Antonides G., Handgraaf M.J. Eat now, exercise later. The relation between consideration of immediate and future consequences and healthy behavior. Personality and Individual Differences 2013, 54(6):785-791.
48. Weatherly J.N., Derenne A. Comparing delay discounting rates when using the fill-in-the-blank and multiple-choice methods. The Journal of General Psychology 2011, 138(4):300-318.
49. Weatherly J.N., Ferraro R.F. Executive functioning and delay discounting of four different outcomes in university students. Personality and Individual Differences 2011, 51(2):183-187.
50. Weatherly J.N., Terrell H.K. Delay discounting of different commodities II. Confirmatory analyses. The Journal of General Psychology 2010, 138(1):35-48.
51. Weller R.E., Cook III E.W., Avsar K.B., Cox J.E. Obese women show greater delay discounting than healthy-weight women. Appetite 2008, 51(3):563-569.