Factor validation of the consideration of future consequences scale: Evidence for a short version

Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 143, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 405-413

  Petrocelli, John V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Consideration of future consequences

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHOMETRY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TIME PERCEPTION; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHOMETRICS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 0042884416     PISSN: 00224545     EISSN: 19401183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224540309598453     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
2. Bentler, P., & Bonett, D. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
3. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
4. Boninger, D. S., Gleicher, F., & Strathman, A. (1994). Counterfactual thinking: From what might have been to what may be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 297-307.
5. Carmines, E. G., & Mclver, J. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables. Analysis of covariance structures. In G. W. Bohmstedt and E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65-115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6. Comrey, A. L. (1973). A first course in factor analysis. New York: Academic Press.
7. DeVoider, M. L., & Lens, W. (1982). Academic achievement and future time perspective as a cognitive-motivational concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 566-571.
8. Fraisse, P. (1963). The psychology of time (J. Leith, Trans.). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
9. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763-775.
10. Halpem, D. F. (1992). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Gaertner, L., Wildshut, T., Kozar, R., Pinter, B., et al. (2001). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity reduction through the anticipation of future interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 95-111.
12. Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Pemberton, M. B., Wieselquist, J., Mcllraith, S. A., Currey, D. P., et al. (1998). Long-term outcome maximization and the reduction of interindividual-intergroup discontinuity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 695-710.
13. Joireman, J. A. (1999). Additional evidence for validity of the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale in an academic setting. Psychological Reports, 84, 1171-1172.
14. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1981). LISREL 5: Analysis of linear structural relations by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: International Educational Services.
15. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS.
16. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1998). LISREL 8.20. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
17. Kamiol, R., & Ross, M. (1996). The motivational impact of temporal focus: Thinking about the future and the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 593-620.
18. Kumar, A., & Sharma, S. (1999). A metric measure for direct comparison of competing models in covariance structure analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 169-197.
19. Lewin, K. (1942). Time perspective and morale. In G. Lewin (Ed.), Resolving social conflicts (pp. 103-124). New York: Harper.
20. Lindsay, J. J., & Strathman, A. (1997). Predictors of recycling behavior: An application of a modified health belief model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1799-1823.
21. Marsh, H., Balia, J., & McDonald, R. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
22. Nuttin, J. R. (1964). The future time perspective in human motivation and learning. Acta Psychologica, 23, 60-83.
23. Petrocelli, J. (1997). The role of temporal focus on risk behaviors in college students. Unpublished master’s thesis, Westminster College, New Wilmington, PA.
24. Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742-752.
25. Tanaka, J. (1987). How big is big enough? Sample size and goodness-of-fit indices in structural equation models with latent variables. Child Development, 58, 134-146.
26. Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In D. R. Heise (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1977 (pp. 84-136). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271-1288.
28. Zimbardo, P. G., Keough, K. A., & Boyd, J. N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 1007-1023.