Eat now, exercise later: The relation between consideration of immediate and future consequences and healthy behavior

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 785-791

  van Beek, Jannette ^a   Antonides, Gerrit ^a   Handgraaf, Michel J J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Consideration of future consequences; Domains; Eating behavior; Exercise; Food; Time orientation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873523558     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.12.015     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adams J. Consideration of immediate and future consequences, smoking status, and body mass index. Health Psychology 2012, 31:260-263.
2. Antonides, G., & Nyhus, E. K. (in preparation). Time preference and household financial capability.
3. Chapman G.B. Time discounting of health outcomes. Time and decision. Economic and psychological perspectives on intertemporal choice 2003, 395-417. Russell Sage Foundation, New York. G. Loewenstein, D. Read, R.F. Baumeister (Eds.).
4. Cutler D.M., Glaeser E.L., Shapiro J.M. Why have Americans become more obese?. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2003, 17:93-118.
5. Fishbach A., Zhang Y. Together or apart: When goals and temptations complement versus compete. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008, 94:547-559.
6. Foxall G.R., Doyle J.R., Yani-de-Soriano M., Wells V.K. Contexts and individual differences as influences on consumers' delay discounting. The Psychological Record 2011, 61:599-612.
7. Frederick S., Loewenstein G., O'Donoghue T. Time discounting and time preference. A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature 2002, 40:351-401.
8. Hardisty D.J., Weber E.U. Discounting future green: Money versus the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 138:329-340.
9. Hepler J., Albarracin D., McCulloch K.C., Noguchi K. Being active and impulsive: The role of goals for action and inaction in self-control. Motivation and Emotion 2012, 36:416-424.
10. Joireman J., Balliet D., Sprott D., Spangenberg E., Schultz J. Consideration of future consequences, ego-depletion, and self-control: Support for distinguishing between CFC-Immediate and CFC-Future sub-scales. Personality and Individual Differences 2008, 45:15-21.
11. Joireman J., Shaffer M.J., Balliet D., Strathman A. Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: Evidence from the two-factor Consideration of Future Consequences-14 scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2012, 38:1272-1287.
12. Joireman J., Strathman A., Balliet D. Considering future consequences: An integrative model. Judgments over time: The interplay of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors 2006, 82-99. Oxford University Press, Oxford. L. Sanna, E. Chang (Eds.).
13. Petrocelli J.V. Factor validation of the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale: Evidence for a short version. The Journal of Social Psychology 2003, 143:405-413.
14. Rappange D.R., Brouwer W.B.F., van Exel N.J.A. Back to the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale: Time to reconsider. The Journal of Social Psychology 2009, 149:562-584.
15. Ryack K. Evidence that time perspective factors depend on the group: Factor analyses of the CFC and ZTPI scales with professional financial advisors. Personality and Individual Differences 2012, 52:723-727.
16. Strathman A., Gleicher F., Boninger D.S., Edwards C.S. The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 66:742-752.
17. Weatherly J.N., Terrell H.K., Derenne A. Delay discounting of different commodities. The Journal of General Psychology 2010, 137:273-286.
18. Zimbardo P.G., Boyd J.N. Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable, individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77:1271-1288.