Back to the consideration of future consequences scale: Time to reconsider?

Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 149, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 562-584

  Rappange, David ^a   Brouwer, Werner ^a   Van Exel, N Job A ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Consideration of future consequences; Individual behavior; Time preference

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD BEHAVIOR; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; REPRODUCIBILITY; TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; CHILD; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; MALE; NETHERLANDS; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 73249152613     PISSN: 00224545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224540903232324     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology (Statistical Section), 3, 77-85.
2. Catell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
3. Cauffman, E., & Steinberg, L. (2000). (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 741-760.
4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Critchfield, T. S., & Atteberry, T. (2003). Temporal discounting predicts individual competitive success in a human analogue of group foraging. Behavioural Processes, 64, 315-331.
6. DeVolder, M. L., & Lens, W. (1982). Academic achievement and future time perspective as a cognitive-motivational concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 566-571.
7. DiClemente, D. F., & Hantula, D. A. (2003). Optimal foraging online: Increasing sensitivity to delay. Psychology and Marketing, 20, 785-809.
8. Dixon, M. R., Marley, J., & Jacobs, E. A. (2003). Delay discounting by pathological gamblers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36 449-458.
9. Dorr, N., Krueckeberg, S., Strathman, A., & Wood, M. D. (1999). Psychosocial correlates of voluntary HIV antibody testing in college students [Abstract]. AIDS Education and Prevention, 11, 14-27.
10. Essink-Bot, M. L., Krabbe, P. F. M., Bonsel, G. J., & Aaronson, N. K. (1997). An empirical comparison of four generic health measures: The Nottingham-Health Profile, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, the COOP/WONCA Charts, and the EuroQol Instrument. Medical Care, 35, 522-537.
11. Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
12. Fraisse, P. (1963). The psychology of time. (J. Leith, Trans.). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
13. Frank, L. K. (1939). Time perspectives. Journal of Social Philosophy, 4, 293-312.
14. Gerris, J. R. M., Houtmans, M. J. M, Kwaaital-Roosen, E. M. G., Schipper, J. C., Vermulst, A. A., & Janssens, J. M. A. M. (1998). Parents, adolescents and young adults in Dutch families: A longitudinal study. The Netherlands: University of Nijmegen, Institute of Family Studies.
15. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
16. Gonzalez, A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1985). Time in perspective: A Psychology Today survey report. Psychology Today, 19, 21-26.
17. Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 769-792. (Pubitemid 39216582)
18. Green, L., Myerson, J., & Ostaszewski, P. (1999). Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25 418-427.
19. Hofstede, G. H. (1991). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
20. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
21. Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Gaertner, L., Wildschut, T., Kozar, R., Pinter, B., et al. (2001). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity reduction through the anticipation of future interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 95-111.
22. Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Pemberton, M. B., Wieselquist, J., McIlraith, S. A., Currey, D. P., et al. (1998). Long-term outcome maximization and the reduction of interindividualintergroup discontinuity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 695-710.
23. Joireman, J. A. (1999). Additional evidence for validity of the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale in an academic setting. Psychological Reports, 84, 1171-1172.
24. Joireman, J., Anderson, J., & Strathman, A. (2003). The aggression paradox: Understanding links among aggression, sensation seeking, and the consideration of future consequences. (2003). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1287-1302.
25. Joireman, J. A., Lasane, T. P., Bennett, J., Richards, D., & Solaimani, S. (2001). Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of proenvironmental behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 133-155.
26. Joireman, J., Sprott, D. E., & Spangenberg, E. R. (2005). Fiscal responsibility and the consideration of future consequences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1159-1168.
27. Joireman, J. A., Van Lange, P. A. M., & Van Vugt, M. (2004). Who cares about the environmental impact of cars? Those with an eye toward the future. Environment and Behaviour, 36, 187-206.
28. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
29. Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401-415.
30. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
31. Kaser-Boyd, N., Adelman, H. S., & Taylor, L. (1985). Minors' ability to identify risks and benefits of therapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16, 411-417.
32. Kastenbaum, R. (1961). The dimension of future time perspective: An experimental analysis. Journal of General Psychology, 65, 203-1128
33. Lamm, H., Schmidt, R. W., & Trommsdorff, G. (1976). Sex and social class as determinants of future orientation in adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 314-326.
34. Lewin, K. (1942). Time perspective and morale. In G. Lewin (Ed.), Resolving social conflicts (pp. 103-124). New York: Harper.
35. Lewis, C. C. (1981). How adolescents approach decisions: Changes over grades seven to twelve and policy implications [Abstract]. Child Development, 52, 538-544.
36. Lindsay, J. J., & Strathman, A. (1997). Predictors of recycling behavior: An application of a modified health belief model [Abstract]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1799-1823.
37. Mann, L., Harmoni, R., & Power, C. (1989). Adolescent decision-making: The development of competence. Journal of Adolescence, 12, 265-278.
38. Myerson, J., Green, L., & Warusawitharana, M. (2001). Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76 235-243.
39. Nuttin, J. (1964). The future time perspective in human motivation and learning. Acta Psychologica, 23, 60-82.
40. Orbell, S., & Hagger, M. (2006). Temporal framing and the decision to take part in Type 2 diabetes screening: Effects of individual differences in consideration of future consequences on persuasion. Health Psychology, 25, 537-548.
41. Orbell, S., Perugini, M., & Rakow, T. (2004). Individual differences in sensitivity to health communications: Consideration of future consequences. Health Psychology, 23, 388-396.
42. Petrocelli, J. V. (2003). Factor validation of the Consideration of Future Consequences Scale: Evidence for a short version. Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 405-413.
43. Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
44. Quadrel, M. J., Fischhoff, B., & Davis, W. (1993). Adolescent (in)vulnerability. American Psychologist, 48, 102-116.
45. Rappange, D. R. (2005). Leefstijl van studenten: Een onderzoek naar leefstijlverschillen tussen thuiswonende en uitwonende studenten [Students' lifestyle: A study of lifestyle differences between students who live at home and students who live away from home]. Unpublished bachelor's thesis, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
46. Schoenfelder, T. E., & Hantula, D. A. (2003). A job with a future? Delay discounting, magnitude effects, and domain independence of utility for career decisions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 43-55.
47. Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (1996). Maturity of judgement in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision-making. Law and Human Behaviour, 20, 249-272.
48. Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighting immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742-752.
49. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.
50. Van Exel, N. J. A., De Graaf, G., & Brouwer, W. B. F. (2006). "Everyone dies, so you might as well have fun!" Attitudes of youths about their health lifestyle. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 2628-2639.
51. Van Exel, N. J. A., Koolman, X., De Graaf, G., & Brouwer, W. B. F. (2006). Overweight and obesity in Dutch adolescents: Associations with health lifestyle, personality, social context and future consequences: Methods & tables (Rep. No. 06.82). Retrieved October 2, 2006, from Erasmus MC, institute for Medical Technology Assessment Web site: http://www.imta.nl/publications/ 0682.pdf
52. Wallace, M. (1956). Future time perspective in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 240-245.
53. Watkins, M. W. (2000). Monte carlo PCA for parallel analysis [Computer software, available at http://www.personal.psu.edu/mww10/Watkins3.html]. State College, PA: Ed & Psych Associates.
54. Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel model. In D. R. Heise (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1977 (pp. 84-136). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55. Zimbardo, P. G. (1990). The Stanford time perspective inventory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
56. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271-1288.
57. Zimbardo, P. G., Keough, K. A., & Boyd, J. N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 1007-1023.
58. Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432-442.