Modeling of electrohydrodynamic drying process using response surface methodology

Food Science and Nutrition

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 200-209

  Dalvand, Mohammad Jafar ^a   Mohtasebi, Seyed Saeid ^a   Rafiee, Shahin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

Box Behnken; EHD drying; energy consumption; response surface methodology; solar energy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927175234     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20487177     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.96     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aghbashlo, M., M. H. Kianmehr, and H. Samimi-Akhijahani. 2008. Influence of drying conditions on the effective moisture diffusivity, energy of activation and energy consumption during the thin-layer drying of berberis fruit (Berberidaceae). Energy Convers. Manage. 49:2865–2871.
2. Aksu, Z., and F. Gönen. 2006. Binary biosorption of phenol and chromium (VI) onto immobilized activated sludge in a packed bed: prediction of kinetic parameters and breakthrough curves. Sep. Purif. Technol. 49:205–216.
3. Aksu, Z., F. Gönen, and Z. Demircan. 2002. Biosorption of chromium (VI) ions by Mow- ital B3OH resin immobilized activated sludge in a packed bed comparison with granular activated carbon. Process Biochem. 38:175–186.
4. Bai, Y., Y. Hu, and X. Li. 2011. Influence of operating parameters on energy consumption of electrohydrodynamic drying. Int. J. Appl. Electromagnet Mech 35:57–65.
5. Bai, Y., Y. Yang, and Q. Huang. 2012. Combined electrohydrodynamic (EHD) and vacuum freeze drying of sea cucumber. Drying Technol. 30:1051–1055.
6. Bajgai, T. R., G. V. Raghavan, F. Hashinaga, and M. O. Ngadi. 2006. Electrohydrodynamic drying—A concise overview. Drying Technol. 24:905–910.
7. Balcer, B., and F. Lai. 2004. EHD-enhanced drying with multiple-wire electrode. Drying Technol. 22:821–836.
8. Box, G. E., W. G. Hunter, and J. S. Hunter. 1978. Statistics for experimenters: an introduction to design, data analysis, and model building. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
9. Chaktranond, C., and P. Rattanadecho. 2010. Analysis of heat and mass transfer enhancement in porous material subjected to electric fields (effects of particle sizes and layered arrangement). Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 34:1049–1056.
10. De Coninck, J., S. Bouquelet, V. Dumortier, F. Duyme, and I. Verdier-Denantes. 2000. Industrial media and fermentation processes for improved growth and protease production by Tetrahymena thermophila BIII. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24:285–290.
11. Dutta, J. R., P. K. Dutta, and R. Banerjee. 2004. Optimization of culture parameters for extracellular protease production from a newly isolated Pseudomonas sp. using response surface and artificial neural network models. Process Biochem. 39:2193–2198.
12. Francis, F., A. Sabu, K. M. Nampoothiri, S. Ramachandran, S. Ghosh, G. Szakacs, et al. 2003. Use of response surface methodology for optimizing process parameters for the production of α-amylase by Aspergillus oryzae. Biochem. Eng. J. 15:107–115.
13. Gan, H., R. Karim, S. Muhammad, J. Bakar, D. Hashim, and R. A. Rahman. 2007. Optimization of the basic formulation of a traditional baked cassava cake using response surface methodology. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 40:611–618.
14. Göksungur, Y., S. Üren, and U. Güvenç. 2005. Biosorption of cadmium and lead ions by ethanol treated waste baker's yeast biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 96:103–109.
15. Goodenough, T. I., P. W. Goodenough, and S. M. Goodenough. 2007. The efficiency of corona wind drying and its application to the food industry. J. Food Eng. 80:1233–1238.
16. Hanrahan, G., and K. Lu. 2006. Application of factorial and response surface methodology in modern experimental design and optimization. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 36:141–151.
17. Iwe, M. O., and A. N. Agiriga. 2013. Production and evaluation of Ighu from selected cassava varieties using a motorized shredder: a response surface analysis. Food Sci. Nutr. 1:464–473.
18. Khuri, A. I., and J. A. Cornell. 1996. Response surfaces: designs and analyses. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
19. Lai, F., and R. Sharma. 2005. EHD-enhanced drying with multiple needle electrode. J. Electrostat. 63:223–237.
20. Lai, F., and D. Wong. 2003. EHD-enhanced drying with needle electrode. Drying Technol. 21:1291–1306.
21. Madamba, P. S. 2002. The response surface methodology: an application to optimize dehydration operations of selected agricultural crops. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 35:584–592.
22. Myers Raymond, H., and D. C. Montgomery. 2002. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiment. A Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York.
23. Namal Senanayake, S., and F. Shahidi. 2002. Lipase-catalyzed incorporation of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) into borage oil: optimization using response surface methodology. Food Chem. 77:115–123.
24. Singh, A., V. Orsat, and V. Raghavan. 2012. A comprehensive review on electrohydrodynamic drying and high-voltage electric field in the context of food and bioprocessing. Drying Technol. 30:1812–1820.
25. Standard ASABE. 1998. Compression test of food materials of convex shape. ASAE S368:554–556.
26. Tanyildizi, M. S., D. Özer, and M. Elibol. 2005. Optimization of α-amylase production by Bacillus sp. using response surface methodology. Process Biochem. 40:2291–2296.
27. Toğrul, İ. T., and D. Pehlivan. 2003. Modelling of drying kinetics of single apricot. J. Food Eng. 58:23–32.