Preoperative pancreatic resection (PREPARE) Score: A prospective multicenter-based morbidity risk score

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 260, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 857-864

  Uzunoglu, Faik G ^a   Reeh, Matthias ^a   Vettorazzi, Eik ^a   Ruschke, Till ^a   Hannah, Philipp ^a   Nentwich, Michael F ^a   Vashist, Yogesh K ^a   Bogoevski, Dean ^a   König, Alexandra ^a   Janot, Monika ^b   Gavazzi, Francesca ^c   Zerbi, Alessandro ^c   Todaro, Valentina ^d   Malleo, Giuseppe ^d   Uhl, Waldemar ^b   Montorsi, Marco ^c   Bassi, Claudio ^d   Izbicki, Jakob R ^a   Bockhorn, Maximilian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b ST JOSEF HOSPITAL   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Morbidity risk score; Multicenter; Pancreatic surgery; Prepare score; Prospective

Indexed keywords

ALBUMIN; BILIRUBIN; C REACTIVE PROTEIN; CREATININE; HEMOGLOBIN; POTASSIUM; SODIUM; UREA;

ADULT; AGED; ALBUMIN BLOOD LEVEL; CANCER SURGERY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; LOW RISK PATIENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); PANCREAS CANCER; PANCREAS DISEASE; PANCREAS FISTULA; PANCREAS SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POTASSIUM BLOOD LEVEL; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PREOPERATIVE PANCREATIC RESECTION SCORE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCORING SYSTEM; SODIUM BLOOD LEVEL; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TREATMENT INDICATION; UREA BLOOD LEVEL; CLINICAL TRIAL; GERMANY; ITALY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PEROPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION STUDY; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; ITALY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC DISEASES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84927172264     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000946     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, et al. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: A single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1199-1210; discussion 1210-1211.
2. De Oliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, et al. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2006;244:931-937; discussion 937-939.
3. Reeh M, Nentwich MF, Bogoevski D, et al. High surgical morbidity following distal pancreatectomy: Still an unsolved problem. World J Surg. 2011;35:1110- 1117.
4. Buchler MW, Friess H, Wagner M, et al. Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg. 2000;87:883-889.
5. Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z'Graggen K, et al. Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 2007;245:573-582.
6. Hartwig W, Hackert T, Hinz U, et al. Pancreatic cancer surgery in the new millennium: better prediction of outcome. Ann Surg. 2011;254:311-319.
7. Yekebas EF, Wolfram L, Cataldegirmen G, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: diagnosis and treatment: An analysis in 1669 consecutive pancreatic resections. Ann Surg. 2007;246:269-280.
8. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205-213.
9. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187-196.
10. Tamijmarane A, Bhati CS, Mirza DF, et al. Application of Portsmouth modification of physiological and operative severity scoring system for enumeration of morbidity and mortality (P-POSSUM) in pancreatic surgery. World J Surg Oncol. 2008;6:39.
11. Brooks MJ, Sutton R, Sarin S. Comparison of Surgical Risk Score, POSSUM and p-POSSUM in higher-risk surgical patients. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1288- 1292.
12. Knight BC, Kausar A, Manu M, et al. Evaluation of surgical outcome scores according to ISGPS definitions in patients undergoing pancreatic resection. Dig Surg. 2010;27:367-374.
13. Braga M, Capretti G, Pecorelli N, et al. A prognostic score to predict major complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2011;254:702-707; discussion 707-708.
14. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8-13.
15. Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, et al. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: A suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007;142:761-768.
16. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): An International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. 2007;142:20-25.
17. Altman DG, Royston P. What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat Med. 2000;19:453-473.
18. Laupacis A, Sekar N, Stiell IG. Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA. 1997;277:488-494.
19. Puhan MA, Garcia-Aymerich J, Frey M, et al. Expansion of the prognostic assessment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: The updated BODE index and the ADO index. Lancet. 2009;374:704-711.
20. Steyerberg EW, Borsboom GJ, van Houwelingen HC, et al. Validation and updating of predictive logistic regression models: A study on sample size and shrinkage. Stat Med. 2004;23:2567-2586.
21. de la Fuente SG, Bennett KM, Pappas TN, et al. Pre- And intraoperative variables affecting early outcomes in elderly patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13:887-892.
22. Belyaev O, Herzog T, Kaya G, et al. Pancreatic surgery in the very old: Face to face with a challenge of the near future. World J Surg. 2013;37:1013-1020.
23. Seiler CA, Wagner M, Bachmann T, et al. Randomized clinical trial of pyloruspreserving duodenopancreatectomy versus classical Whipple resection-long term results. Br J Surg. 2005;92:547-556.
24. Balcom JH, IV, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, et al. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg. 2001;136:391-398.
25. Bozzetti F. Nutrition and gastrointestinal cancer. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2001;4:541-546.
26. Bozzetti F, Braga M, Gianotti L, et al. Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer: A randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2001;358:1487-1492.
27. Schiesser M, Muller S, Kirchhoff P, et al. Assessment of a novel screening score for nutritional risk in predicting complications in gastro-intestinal surgery. Clin Nutr. 2008;27:565-570.
28. La Torre M, Ziparo V, Nigri G, et al. Malnutrition and pancreatic surgery: Prevalence and outcomes. J Surg Oncol. 2013;107:702-708.
29. Greenblatt DY, Kelly KJ, Rajamanickam V, et al. Preoperative factors predict perioperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2126-2135.
30. Gebauer F, Kloth K, Tachezy M, et al. Options and limitations in applying the fistula classification by the International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula. Ann Surg. 2012;256:130-138.
31. Thorn CC, Chan M, Sinha N, et al. Utility of the surgical Apgar score in a district general hospital. World J Surg. 2012;36:1066-1073.
32. Assifi MM, Lindenmeyer J, Leiby BE, et al. Surgical Apgar score predicts perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at a high-volume center. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:275-281.
33. Breitenstein S, DeOliveira ML, Raptis DA, et al. Novel and simple preoperative score predicting complications after liver resection in noncirrhotic patients. Ann Surg. 2010;252:726-734.
34. Katz MH, Pisters PW, Evans DB, et al. Borderline resec table pancreatic cancer: The importance of this emerging stage of disease. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:833-846; discussion 846-848.