Application of Portsmouth modification of physiological and operative severity scoring system for enumeration of morbidity and mortality (P-POSSUM) in pancreatic surgery

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 6, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Tamijmarane, Appou ^a   Bhati, Chandra S ^a   Mirza, Darius F ^a   Bramhall, Simon R ^a   Mayer, David A ^a   Wigmore, Stephen J ^a   Buckels, John A C ^a  

^a QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PORTSMOUTH MODIFICATION OF PHYSIOLOGICAL AND OPERATIVE SEVERITY SCORING SYSTEM FOR ENUMERATION OF MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY; PREDICTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK REDUCTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL RISK; DATA BASE; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITALIZATION; MEDICAL AUDIT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS; PANCREAS DISEASE; PANCREAS TUMOR; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DATABASES AS TOPIC; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREAS; PANCREATIC DISEASES; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 42649142004     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14777819     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-6-39     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bramhall SR Allum WH Jones AG Allwood A Cummins C Neoptolemos JP Treatment and survival in 13,560 patients with pancreatic cancer, and incidence of the disease, in the West Midlands: An epidemiological study Br J Surg 1995, 82:111-115 10.1002/bjs.1800820137 7881926
2. Neoptolemos JP Russell RC Bramhall S Theis B Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. UK Pancreatic Cancer Group Br J Surg 1997, 84:1370-1376 10.1002/bjs.1800841010 9361591
3. Cameron JL Pitt HA Yeo CJ Lillemoe KD Kaufman HS Coleman J One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality Ann Surg 1993, 217:430-435 discussion 435-438 1242815 8098202 10.1097/ 00000658-199305010-00002
4. Fernandez-del Castillo C Rattner DW Warshaw AL Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s Arch Surg 1995, 130:295-299 discussion 299-300 7887797
5. Yeo CJ Cameron JL Sohn TA Lillemoe KD Pitt HA Talamini MA Hruban RH Ord SE Sauter PK Coleman J Zahurak ML Grochow LB Abrams RA Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: Pathology, complications, and outcomes Ann Surg 1997, 226:248-257 discussion 257-260 1191017 9339931 10.1097/00000658-199709000-00004
6. Sagar PM Hartley MN MacFie J Taylor BA Copeland GP Comparison of individual surgeon's performance. Risk-adjusted analysis with POSSUM scoring system Dis Colon Rectum 1996, 39:654-658 10.1007/BF02056945 8646952
7. Jones DR Copeland GP de Cossart L Comparison of POSSUM with APACHE II for prediction of outcome from a surgical high-dependency unit Br J Surg 1992, 79:1293-1296 10.1002/bjs.1800791216 1486421
8. Copeland GP Jones D Walters M POSSUM: A scoring system for surgical audit Br J Surg 1991, 78:355-360 10.1002/bjs.1800780327 2021856
9. Prytherch DR Whiteley MS Higgins B Weaver PC Prout WG Powell SJ POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity Br J Surg 1998, 85:1217-1220 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00840.x 9752863
10. Khan AW Shah SR Agarwal AK Davidson BR Evaluation of the POSSUM scoring system for comparative audit in pancreatic surgery Dig Surg 2003, 20:539-545 10.1159/000073701 14534377
11. Kocher HM Tekkis PP Gopal P Patel AG Cottam S Benjamin IS Risk-adjustment in hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery World J Gastroenterol 2005, 11:2450-2455 15832416
12. Risk prediction in surgery http://www.riskprediction.org.uk/pp-index.php [last accessed April 5, 2008]
13. Poon JT Chan B Law WL Evaluation of P-POSSUM in surgery for obstructing colorectal cancer and correlation of the predicted mortality with different surgical options Dis Colon Rectum 2005, 48:493-498 10.1007/ s10350-004-0766-x 15747084
14. Midwinter MJ Tytherleigh M Ashley S Estimation of mortality and morbidity risk in vascular surgery using POSSUM and the Portsmouth predictor equation Br J Surg 1999, 86:471-474 10.1046/ j.1365-2168.1999.01112.x 10215816
15. Brunelli A Fianchini A Gesuita R Carle F POSSUM scoring system as an instrument of audit in lung resection surgery. Physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity Ann Thorac Surg 1999, 67:329-331 10.1016/S0003-4975(98)00822-4 10197649
16. Neary WD Heather BP Earnshaw JJ The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) Br J Surg 2003, 90:157-165 10.1002/bjs.4041 12555290
17. Hosmer DW Hjort NL Goodness-of-fit processes for logistic regression: simulation results Stat Med 2002, 21:2723-2738 10.1002/sim.1200 12228887
18. Whiteley MS Prytherch DR Higgins B Weaver PC Prout WG An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system Br J Surg 1996, 83:812-815 10.1002/ bjs.1800830628 8696749
19. Whiteley MS Prytherch D Higgins B Weaver PC Prout WG Comparative audit of colorectal resection with the POSSUM scoring system Br J Surg 1995, 82:425-426 10.1002/bjs.1800820358 7796042
20. Deans GT Odling-Smee W McKelvey ST Parks GT Roy DA Auditing perioperative mortality Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1987, 69:185-187 3631878
21. Gough MH Kettlewell MG Marks CG Holmes SJ Holderness J Audit: An annual assessment of the work and performance of a surgical firm in a regional teaching hospital Br Med J 1980, 281:913-918 1714164 7427508