Evolution and the common law

Evolution and the Common Law

Volumn 9780521849685, Issue , 2005, Pages 1-294

  Hutchinson, Allan C ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927113421     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511610394     Document Type: Book

References (590)

1. Roscoe Pound, Interpretations of Legal History 1 (1967)
2. J. Bentham, A Comment on the Commentaries 125 (J. Everett ed. 1925)
3. J. Austin, Lectures on Jurisprudence II, 634 (5th ed. 1885).
4. J. Bentham, Supplement to Papers Relative to Codification and Public Instruction, 29 Edinburgh Rev. 105–08 (1817)
5. M. Romilly, Review of Bentham’s Papers Relative to Codification, 29 Edinburgh Rev. 217 at 223 (1817)
6. P. Bobbitt, Constitutional Interpretation 24 (1991).
7. V. Curran, Romantic Common Law, Enlightened Civil Law: Legal Uniformity and the Homogenization of the European Union, 7 Colum. J. Eur. L. 63 (2001)
8. A. Scalia, A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law 25 (1997).
9. D. Sugarman, Legal Theory, the Common Law Mind and The Making of the Textbook Tradition, in Legal Theory and Common Law 26–61 (1986).
10. Jones v. DPP, [1962] AC 635 at 711 per Lord Devlin.
11. J. Newman, Between Legal Realism and Neutral Principles: The Legitimacy of Institutional Values, 72 Cal. L. Rev. 200 at 204 (1984)
12. R. L. Brown, Tradition and Insight, 103 Yale L. J. 177 (1993).
13. M. Krygier, Law As Tradition, 5 Law & Phil. 237 at 245 (1986).
14. M. Krygier, The Invention of Tradition (E. Hobsbawm and T. Ranger eds. 1983)
15. R. Williams, Keywords 320 (1981).
16. Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois, 497 US 62 (1990)
17. A. Kronman, Precedent and Tradition, 99 Yale L. J. 1029 at 1037 (1990).
18. E. Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France 85 (J. Pocock ed. 1987)
19. F. Hayek, Law, Legislation and Liberty: The Political Order of Free People 153–76 (1979).
20. C. Fried, The Artificial Reason of the Law; or What Lawyers Know, 60 Texas L. Rev.(1981)
21. A. Watson, The Evolution of Law (1985);
22. C. Fried, Constitutional Doctrine, 107 Harv. L. Rev. 1140 (1994).
23. Cassell & Co. Ltd. v. Bloom, [1972] AC 1027 at 1127 per Diplock LJ.
24. De Lasala v. De Lasala, [1980] AC 546 at 557.
25. F. Schauer, Precedent, 39 Stan L. Rev. 571 (1987)
26. E. Shils, Tradition (1981).
27. R. Cross and J.W. Harris, Precedent in English Law (4th ed. 1991);
28. J. Stone, Legal System and Lawyer’s Reasoning (1964);
29. R.W. M. Dias, Jurisprudence (5th ed. 1985);
30. M.D.A. Freeman, Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence (7th ed. 2001);
31. W. Huhn, The FiveTypes of Legal Argument (2002);
32. S.J. Burton, An Introduction to Law and Legal Reasoning (1995);
33. R. Case, Understanding Judicial Reasoning (1997);
34. M. Golding, Legal Reasoning (1984);
35. A. Halpin, Reasoning with Law (2001);
36. L. H. Carter and T. F. Burke, Reason in Law (6th ed. 2002).
37. J. Beatson, Has the Common Law a Future?, 56 Camb. L. J. 291 at 295 (1997).
38. Lord Goff, The Search For Principle, 50 Proc. Brit. Acad. 169 (1983).
39. Poe v. Ullman, 367 US 497 at 542 per Harlan J (1961).
40. J. Balkin, Tradition, Betrayal, and the Politics of Deconstruction, 11 Cardozo L Rev. 1612 (1990).
41. O. W. Holmes, Jr., The Common Law 5 (1881).
42. R. Wasserstrom, The Judicial Decision: Toward a Theory of Legal Justification 56–83 (1961);
43. P. Atiyah and R. Summers, Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law 116–20 (1987);
44. F. Schauer, Form and Substance in Anglo-American Law 116–20 at 595–602
45. McLoughlin v. O’Brian, [1983] AC410 at 430 per Lord Scarman.
46. Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen, 244 US 205 at 221 (1917).
47. Watkins v. Olafson, [1989] 2 SCR 750 at 760–61 per McLachlin J (as she then was).
48. T. S. Ulen, A Nobel Prize in Legal Science: Theory, Empirical Work, and The Scientific Method in the Study of Law, [2002] U. Ill. L. Rev. 875 at 877
49. H. Hovenkamp, Evolutionary Models in Jurisprudence, 64 Texas L. Rev. 645 (1984);
50. E. D. Elliot, The Evolutionary Tradition in Jurisprudence, 85 Columbia L. Rev. 38 (1985);
51. A. Watson, The Evolution of Law (1985).
52. Lord Woolf, Bringing Home the European Convention on Human Rights, [1997] Denning L. J. 1.
53. R. Dworkin, Law’s Empire 132, 134, 219, 239, and 413 (1986).
54. R. Dworkin, Freedom’s Law 35–38 (1996)
55. D. Kennedy, Adjudication Fin de Siècle (1997).
56. O. Kahn-Freund, Reflections of Legal Education in Selected Writings 364 (1978);
57. W. Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England IV, 371 (1768)
58. W. Blackstone, The Collected Papers of Frederic William Maitland vol. II, 483 (H. A. L. Fisher ed. 1911).
59. R. Rorty, Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth Century America 91 and 105 (1998).
60. R. Rorty, Philosophy and Social Hope 266 (1999).
61. A. Hutchinson, It’s All in the Game: A Nonfoundationalist Account of Law and Adjudication (2000).
62. H. Butterfield, The Whig Interpretation of History v (1931).
63. J. Elster, Ulysses and the Sirens 4 (1979).
64. C. Darwin, The Voyage of the Beagle 270 (1839; S. Jones ed. 2001).
65. E. Mayr, What Evolution Is 9 (2001).
66. J. Barzun, Darwin, Marx, Wagner 25 (1958).
67. S. Jones, Darwin’s Ghost: The Origin of the Species Updated 329 (1999).
68. R. Clark, The Survival of Charles Darwin: A Biography of a Man and an Idea 137–47 (1984);
69. M. White and J. Gribbin, Darwin: A Life in Science219–25 (1995);
70. C. Aydon, Charles Darwin: The Naturalist Who Started a Scientific Revolution216–23 (2002);
71. J. Browne, Charles Darwin: The Power of Place 113–28 (2002);
72. D. Knight, Ordering the World: A History of Classifying Man 167–71 (1981)
73. J. Lucas, Wilberforce and Huxley: A Legendary Encounter, 22 Historical Journa l313 (1979);
74. J. V. Jensen, Return to the Wilberforce-Huxley Debate, 21 Brit. J. for Hist. Sci. 161 (1988);
75. C. Gauld, The Huxley-Wilberforce Debate, 22 Res. in Sci. Educ. 149–56 (1992).
76. R. Levins and R. Lewontin, The Dialectical Biologist 9 (1985).
77. B. La Tour and S.Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts 237 (1979).
78. T. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (3rd ed. 1996).
79. G. Himmelfarb, Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution(1959)
80. J. Rifkin, The Biotech Century: Harnessing the Gene and Remaking the World 197–226 (1998).
81. C. Darwin, The Autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809–1882 (N. Barlow ed. 1958).
82. C. Darwin, The Descent of Man(1871).
83. G. Dover, Dear Mr. Darwin: Letters on the Evolution of Life and Human Nature 90 (2000).
84. R. Henig, The Monk in the Garden (2000).
85. C. Darwin, The Origin of the Species by Natural Selection (1859).
86. E. Harrison, The Masks of the Universe 115 (1985).
87. J. Horgan, The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age (1997).
88. H. Spencer, The Principles of Biology, vol. 1, 444 (1882).
89. H. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial 48 (3rd ed. 1996).
90. A. Somit and S. Petersen, The Dynamics of Evolution (1992)
91. S. J. Gould, Ontogeny and Phylogeny (1977).
92. S. J. Gould, Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History (1989).
93. R. Dawkins, The Extended Phenotype: The Long Reach of the Gene (1999)
94. R. Lewontin, S. Rose, and L. Kamin, Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology and Human Nature (1984).
95. R. Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker 180 and 318 (1986).
96. R. Dawkins, The Selfish Gene (1976).
97. D. Dennett, Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life (1995).
98. S. Pinker, How the Mind Works 162 (1997).
99. S. J. Gould, The Structure of Evolutionary Theory (2002);
100. S.Rose, Lifelines: Biology, Freedom, Determinism (1997);
101. M. Rose, Darwin’s Spectre: Evolutionary Biology in the Modern World (1998).
102. A. Brown, The DarwinWars: The Scientific Battle for the Soul of Man 154 (1999).
103. M. Midgley, Why Memes? in Alas Poor Darwin: Arguments Against Evolutionary Psychology 67–84 (H. Rose and S. Rose eds. 2001).
104. S. J. Gould, Full House: The Spread of Excellence From Plato to Darwin 216 (1996).
105. K. Stern, The Genesis and Evolution of European-American Constitutionalism: Some Comments on Fundamental Aspects, 18 Comp. and Int. L. J. of S. A.187 (1985);
106. S. M. Mead, Evolution of the “Species of Tort Liability” Created by 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Can Constitutional Tort Be Saved from Extinction?, 55 Fordham L. Rev. 1(1986);
107. E. E. Sward, Values, Ideology, and the Evolution of the Adversary System, 64 Indiana L. J. 301 (1989).
108. L. J. Dhooge, From Scopes to Edwards: The 60 Year Evolution of Creationism in the Public School Classroom, 22 U. Rich. L. Rev. 187 (1988).
109. J. Wigmore, Planetary Theory of the Law’s Evolution in 3 Evolution of Law: Selected Readings on the Origin and Development of Legal Institutions 163 at 531 (A. Kocourek and J. H. Wigmore eds. 1915–18).
110. W. H. Rodgers, Where Environmental Law and Biology Meet: Of Panda’s Thumbs, Statutory Sleepers, and Effective Law, 65, U. Colo. L. Rev., 25 (1994).
111. C. Fried, The Evolution of Legal Concepts: The Mimetic Perspective, 39 Jurimetrics 291 at 304–07 (1999);
112. J. B. Ruhl, Fitness of Law: Using Complexity Theory to Describe the Evolution of Law and Society and Its Practical Meaning for Democracy, 49 Vand. L. Rev.1408 at 1419–37 (1996);
113. N. Luhmann, A Sociological Theory of Law (2nd ed. 1985);
114. S. J. Gould, The Panda’s Thumb: More Reflections in Natural History (1980)
115. S. J. Gould, Hens’ Teeth and Horses’ Toes: Further Reflections in Natural History (1983)
116. L. Tribe, The Curvature of Constitutional Space: What Lawyers Can Learn From Modern Physics, 103 Harv. L. Rev.1 (1989)
117. L. Tribe, Seven Deadly Sins of Straining the Constitution Through a Pseudo-Scientific Sieve, 36 Hastings L. J. 155 (1984).
118. Sinclair, Evolution in Law: Second Thoughts, 71 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 31 at 46 (1993).
119. M. Roe, Chaos and Evolution in Law and Economics, 109 Harv. L. Rev. 641 at 665 (1996)
120. L. Kruger, The Probabilistic Revolution (1987)
121. H. Arendt, The Human Condition 43–44 (1989).
122. S. J. Gould, Panda’s Thumb, supra, note 32 at 128 and 29 (1980).
123. S. J. Gould, Alas, Poor Darwin: Arguments Against Evolutionary Psychology (H. Rose and S. Rose eds. 2000)
124. R. Gordon, Critical Legal Histories, 36 Stan. L. Rev. 57 (1984).
125. R. Dworkin, Darwin’s New Bulldog, 111 Harv. L. Rev. 1718 at 1737, footnote 76 (1999).
126. M. Rose, Darwin’s Spectre: Evolutionary Biology in the Modern World 81 (1998).
127. Jacques Monod, Chance and Necessity 44 (1971).
128. F. Nietzsche, The Gay Science sec. 108 (W. Kaufmann trans. 1974).
129. O. W. Holmes, The Collected Papers 202 (1920).
130. W. Paley, Natural Theology 473 (1970); this is a reprint of W. Paley, Natural Theology: Or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature (1802).
131. M. Denton, Nature’s Destiny: How the Laws of Biology Reveal Purpose in the Universe 380 (1998).
132. M. Behe, Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution (1996);
133. P. Davies, The Cosmic Blueprint 203 (1987)
134. S. Kauffman, At Home in the Universe 112 (1995)
135. B. Goodwin, How the Leopard Changed Its Spots 168 (1995).
136. J. Horgan, The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age 44 (1997).
137. E. Larson, Evolution: The Remarkable History of a Scientific Theory 199–218 and 245–63 (2004).
138. R. T. Pennock, Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism (1999);
139. N. Eldredge, The Triumph of Evolution: And the Failure of Creationism (2000)
140. Pope John Paul II, Address to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences (1996).
141. N. Gillespie, Charles Darwin and the Problem of Creation (1979)
142. M. Ruse, Mystery of Mysteries: Is Evolution a Social Construction? (1999)
143. P. Johnson, Reason in the Balance 111 (1995).
144. P. Johnson, Darwin on Trial (1991).
145. R. Bork, Slouching Toward Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline 294–95 (1997)
146. S. Meacham, Lord Bishop: The Life of Samuel Wilberforce, 1805–1873 213–14 (1970).
147. S. Wilberforce, Sermons Preached on Various Occasions 184, 188, and 189 (1877).
148. J. Wu, Fountain of Justice 64–65 (1955)
149. P. Miller, The Life of the Mind in America 123–24 (1966)
150. A Dictionary of Modern Usage 109–10 (B. Garner 2nd ed. 1995).
151. Fisher v. Prince (1762), 3 Burr. 1363 per Lord Mansfield.
152. Jones v. Randall (1774), Cowp. 37 per Lord Mansfield (“precedents serve to)
153. M. Hale, History of the Common Law 67 (4th ed. 1739)
154. C. K. Allen, Law in the Making213 (6th ed. 1958).
155. J. Smith and B. Hogan, Criminal Law (8th ed. 1996).
156. E. H. Burn, Cheshire and Burn’s Modern Law of Real Property (15th ed. 1994)
157. G. Treitel, Law of Contract (9th ed. 1995);
158. J. Beatson, Anson’s Law of Contract (27th ed. 1998)
159. M. Brazier and J. Murphy, Street on Torts (10th ed. 1999).
160. P. Atiyah, An Introduction to the Law of Contract (5th ed. 1995);
161. J. Furmston, Cheshire, Fifoot and Furmston on Law of Contract (13th ed. 1996);
162. E. Dias and B. Markesinis, Tort Law (2nd ed. 1995).
163. Lord Goff, In Search of Principle, 69 Procs. of Brit Acad.169 (1983)
164. J. Beatson, Has the Common Law a Future?, 56 Camb. L. J. 291 (1998).
165. H. L. A. Hart, The Concept of Law (2nd ed. 1994).
166. A. C. Hutchinson, It’s All in the Game: A Nonfoundationalist Account of Law and Adjudication 54–85 (2000).
167. K. Llewellyn, Jurisprudence 372 (1962).
168. J. Boyle, The Politics of Reason: Critical Legal Theory and Local Social Thought, 133 U. Pa. L. Rev. 685 at 779 (1985).
169. R. Tur, Jurisprudence and Practice, 14 J. S. P. T. L. 38 (1976).
170. R. Tur, What is Jurisprudence?, 28 Phil. Q. 149 (1978).
171. R. Barnett, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined – Again!, 15 Legal Studies 88 (1995).
172. Omychund v. Barker(1744), 26 ER 15 at 23
173. R. Dworkin, A Matter of Principle 146 (1985).
174. E. Weinrib, The Idea of Private Law 3 and 13 (1995).
175. R. Dworkin, Law’s Empire 110, 113, 114, and 225 (1986).
176. R. Dworkin, Freedom’s Law 38 (1996).
177. R. Dworkin, In Praise of Theory, 29 Ariz. St. L. J. 353 at 359 and 376 (1997).
178. R. Rorty, Representation, Social Practice, and Truth in Philosophical Papers, vol. I, 154 (1991).
179. R. Rorty, Contingency, Irony, Solidarity 5–13 (1989).
180. F. Fernandez-Armesto, Truth: A History and a Guide for the Perplexed 216–20 (1997)
181. B. Leiter, Objectivity and the Problems of Jurisprudence, 72 Tex. L. Rev. 187 (1993)
182. J. Coleman and B. Leiter, Determinacy, Objectivity and Authority, 142 U. Pa. L. Rev. 549 at 600 (1993).
183. M. P. Hanen, Justification as Coherence, in Law, Morality and Rights 67 (M. A. Stewart ed. 1983);
184. J. Stick, Can Nihilism Be Pragmatic?, 100 Harv. L. Rev. 332 (1986);
185. R. Walker, The Coherence Theory of Truth (1990);
186. C. Wright, Truth and Objectivity (1992);
187. K. Kress, Coherence in A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory533–52 (D. Patterson ed. 1996).
188. M. Moore, The Interpretive Turn in Modern Theory: A Turn for the Worse, 41 Stan. L. Rev. 871 (1989);
189. M. Moore, A Natural Law Theory of Interpretation, 58 S. Cal. L. Rev. 277 (1985);
190. M. Moore Moral Reality Revisited, 90 Mich. L. Rev. 2424 (1992).
191. D. O. Brink, Legal Theory, Legal Interpretation and Judicial Review, 17 Phil. & Pub. Affs. 105 (1988).
192. R. Dworkin, supra, note 21 at 218–19
193. R. Dworkin, Pragmatism, Rights Answers and True Banality in Pragmatism in Law and Society 359 at 360 and generally 366–69 (M. Brint and W. Weaver eds. 1991)
194. R. Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously chaps. 4 and 13 (1978);
195. R. Rorty, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature 209 (1979).
196. R. Rorty, Texts and Lumps in Rorty, Philosophical Papers, vol. I, 81 (1991);
197. R. Rorty, Objectivity, Realism and Truth 22–24 (1991);
198. H. Putnam, Representation and Reality 115 (1988);
199. W. Quine, Two Dogmas of Empiricism in From a Logical Point of View 20–46 (1953).
200. F. Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man 48 (1992).
201. R. Dworkin, Objectivity and Truth: You’d Better Believe It, 25 Phil. & Pub. Affs. 87 at 133–34.
202. S. Hawking, A Brief History of Time 13 (1989)
203. W. Twining, Blackstone’s Tower: The English Law School 130–32 (1994)
204. D. Kennedy, The Structure of Blackstone’s Commentaries, 28 Buff. L. Rev. 205 (1979).
205. P. Schlag, The Enchantment of Reason 99 (1998).
206. O. W. Holmes, Law in Science and Science in Law, 12 Harv. L. Rev. 443 at 447 (1899).
207. Alexander Pope, An Essay on Man II, ll.15–18 (F. Brady ed. 1988).
208. S. Rushdie, Shame 116 (1995).
209. D. Adams, The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy: The Trilogy of Four587 (2002).
210. D. Hume, A Treatise on Human Nature bk. 3, pt. 1, sec. 1 (1739).
211. A. Rosenberg, The Biological Justification of Ethics: A Best-Case Scenario, in Darwinism in Philosophy, Social Science and Policy 118–36 (2000).
212. T. H. Huxley, On the Educational Value of the Natural History Sciences(1854)
213. T. H. Huxley, On the Cause of the Phenomena of Organic Nature(1863).
214. D. Lyons, Thomas Huxley: Fossils, Persistence and the Argument from Design, 26 Journal of the History of Biology 545 (1993).
215. T. H. Huxley, The Struggle for Existence in Human Society (1887)
216. T. H. Huxley, Ethics and Evolution (1893).
217. A. Desmond, Huxley; From Devil’s Disciple to Evolution’s High Priest (1997).
218. H. Spencer, Social Statics (1851);
219. P. Kropotkin, Mutual Aid (1902);
220. E. O. Wilson, Consilience (1998);
221. L. Arnhart, Darwinian Natural Right: The Biological Ethics of Human Nature (1998).
222. R. Hofstadter, Social Darwinism in American Thought (1955);
223. G. Himmelfarb, Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution (1959);
224. J. Rifkin, The Biotech Century: Harnessing the Gene and Remaking the World 197—226 (1998).
225. C. Murray and R. J. Herrnstein, The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life (1994).
226. W. G. Sumner, Rights, in Essays of William Graham Sumner vol. 1, 362 (1934).
227. N. Duxbury, Patterns of American Jurisprudence 25–32 (1995).
228. G. Priest, The Common Law Process and the Selection of Efficient Rules, 6 J. Legal Stud. 65 (1977);
229. P. H. Rubin, Why Is the Common Law Efficient?, 6 J. Legal Stud. 51 (1977);
230. M. Roe, Chaos and Evolution in Law and Economics, 109 Harv. L. Rev. 641 (1999).
231. J. E. Stake, Can Evolutionary Science Contribute to Discussions of Law?, 41 Jurimetrics 379 (2001).
232. J. Beckstrom, Sociobiology and the Law: The Biology of Altruism in the Courtroom of the Future (1985);
233. W. H. Rodgers, Where Environmental Law and Biology Meet: of Pandas’ Thumbs, Statutory Sleepers, and Effective Law, 65 U. Colo. L. Rev. 25 (1993);
234. J. B. Ruhl, The Fitness of Law: Using Complexity Theory to Describe the Evolution Of Law and Society and Its Practical Meaning for Democracy, 49 Vand. L. Rev. 1407 (1996);
235. E. D. Elliot, Law and Biology: The New Synthesis?, 41 St. Louis U.L. J. 595 (1997);
236. O. D. Jones, DNA: Lessons from The Past – Problems for the Future, 67 Brooklyn L. Rev. 207 (2001).
237. J. L. Casti, Complexification (1994)
238. S. Pinker, How the Mind Works (1997).
239. R. Dworkin, Pragmatism, Rights Answers and True Banality in Pragmatism in Lawand Society 359 at 360 (M. Brint and W. Weaver eds. 1991);
240. R. Dworkin, Posner’s Charges: What I Actually Said, http://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/philo/faculty/dworkin/papers/posner>;
241. D. Lyons, Thomas Huxley: Fossils, Persistence and the Argument from Design, 26 Journal of the History of Biology 545 (1993).
242. T. H. Huxley, The Struggle for Existence in Human Society (1887)
243. T. H. Huxley, Ethics and Evolution (1893).
244. A. Desmond, Huxley; From Devil’s Disciple to Evolution’s High Priest (1997).
245. H. Spencer, Social Statics (1851);
246. P. Kropotkin, Mutual Aid (1902);
247. E. O. Wilson, Consilience (1998);
248. L. Arnhart, Darwinian Natural Right: The Biological Ethics of Human Nature (1998).
249. R. Hofstadter, Social Darwinism in American Thought (1955);
250. G. Himmelfarb, Darwin and the Darwinian Revolution (1959);
251. J. Rifkin, The Biotech Century: Harnessing the Gene and Remaking the World 197–226 (1998).
252. C. Murray and R. J. Herrnstein, The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life (1994).
253. W. G. Sumner, Rights, in Essays of William Graham Sumner vol. 1, 362 (1934).
254. N. Duxbury, Patterns of American Jurisprudence 25–32 (1995).
255. G. Priest, The Common Law Process and the Selection of Efficient Rules, 6 J. Legal Stud. 65 (1977);
256. P. H. Rubin, Why Is the Common Law Efficient?, 6 J. Legal Stud. 51 (1977);
257. M. Roe, Chaos and Evolution in Law and Economics, 109 Harv. L. Rev. 641 (1999).
258. J. E. Stake, Can Evolutionary Science Contribute to Discussions of Law?, 41 Jurimetrics 379 (2001).
259. J. Beckstrom, Sociobiology and the Law: The Biology of Altruism in the Courtroom of the Future (1985);
260. W. H. Rodgers, Where Environmental Law and Biology Meet: of Pandas’ Thumbs, Statutory Sleepers, and Effective Law, 65 U. Colo. L. Rev. 25 (1993);
261. J. B. Ruhl, The Fitness of Law: Using Complexity Theory to Describe the Evolution Of Law and Society and Its Practical Meaning for Democracy, 49 Vand. L. Rev. 1407 (1996);
262. E. D. Elliot, Law and Biology: The New Synthesis?, 41 St. Louis U.L. J. 595 (1997);
263. O. D. Jones, DNA: Lessons from The Past – Problems for the Future, 67 Brooklyn L. Rev. 207 (2001).
264. J. L. Casti, Complexification (1994)
265. S. Pinker, How the Mind Works (1997).
266. R. Posner, Dworkin, Polemics, and the Clinton Impeachment Controversy, 94 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1023 at 1046 (2000).
267. R. Posner, The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory, 111 Harv. L. Rev. 1637 at 1641 (1998).
268. R. Posner, The Path of the Law, 10 Harv. L. Rev. 457 (1897)
269. R. Posner, Law in Science and Science in Law, 12 Harv. L. Rev. 48 (1899).
270. R. Posner, Problematics, supra, note 11 at 133 and 227 (1999).
271. C. Sunstein, One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court (1999)
272. R. Posner, The Problems of Jurisprudence 129 (1990).
273. R. Dworkin, Darwin’s New Bulldog, 111 Harv. L. Rev. 1718 at 1738–39 (1998).
274. R. Dworkin, Objectivity and Truth: You’d Better Believe It, 25 Phil & Pub. Affs.87 at 92.
275. D. Farber and S. Sherry, Beyond all Reason: The Radical Assault on Truth in American Law 7, 22, 73, 119, and 133 (1997).
276. R. Rorty, Philosophy and Social Hope xxxii and xxix (1999).
277. D. Kennedy, A Critique of Adjudication Fin De Siècle (1998)
278. A. C. Hutchinson, Casaubon’s Ghosts: The Haunting of Legal Scholarship, 21 Legal Studies 65 (2001).
279. DiSanto v. Pennsylvania, 273 US 34 at 43 per Brandeis J dissenting (1927).
280. E. P. Thompson, Whigs and Hunters: The Origins of the Black Act 250 (1976).
281. R. Dworkin, In Praise of Theory, 29 Ariz. L. Rev. 353 at 375–76 (1997)
282. D. Roithmayr, Guerrillas in Our Midst: The Assault on Radicals in American Law, 96 Mich. L. Rev. 1658 (1998).
283. C. Sunstein, Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict (1996)
284. R. Posner, Problems, supra, note 14 and Overcoming Law (1995)
285. R. Rorty, Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth Century America 35 (1998)
286. C. Anderson, Pragmatic Liberalism (1990).
287. R. Rorty, Contingency, Irony, Solidarity 60 (1989).
288. D. Kennedy, A Cultural Pluralist Case for Affirmative Action in Legal Academia, 39 Duke L. J. 705 at 733 (1990).
289. J. C. Smith and B. Hogan, Criminal Law (9th ed. 1999);
290. N. Lacey and C. Wells, Reconstructing Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives on Crime and the Criminal Process (2nd ed. 1998);
291. J. Beatson and M. H. Matthews, Anson’s Law of Contract (J. Beatson 28th ed. 2002);
292. G. Treitel, The Law of Contract (10th ed. 1999);
293. W. Mansell, B. Meteyard, and A. Thomson, A Critical Introduction to Law (2nd ed. 1999).
294. O. W. Holmes, Jr., The Profession of the Law (Conclusion of a Lecture Delivered to Undergraduates of Harvard University, February 17, 1886)
295. The Essential Holmes: Selection from Letters, Speeches, Judicial Opinions, and Other Writing of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. 218 (Richard A. Posner ed. 1992).
296. A. Hutchinson, Waiting for Coraf: A Critique of Law and Rights 172–83 (1995).
297. R. Devlin, The Law and Politics of ‘Might’: An Internal Critique of Hutch’s Hopeful Hunch, 38 Osgoode Hall L. J. 545 (2000).
298. S. Fish, The Trouble with Principle 9 (1999).
299. M. Bastarache, The Role of Academics and Legal Theory in Judicial Decision-Making, 37 Alta L. Rev. 739 at 740 (1999).
300. H. T. Edwards, The Growing Disjunction Between Legal Education and the Legal Profession, 91 Mich. L. Rev. 34 (1992).
301. J. Langbein, Scholarly and Professional Objectives in Legal Education: American Trends and English Comparisons, in What Are Law Schools for? 1 at 6 (P. Birks ed. 1996).
302. J. Langbein, Law and Learning: Report to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (1983).
303. H. Hart, American Jurisprudence Through English Eyes: The Nightmare and The Noble Dream, 11 Geo. L. Rev. 969 at 989 (1977).
304. M. Minow, Law and Social Change, 62 U. Mo. K. C. L. Rev. 171 at 173 (1993)
305. C. F. Sabel and W. Simon, Destabilization Rights: How Public Law Litigation Succeeds, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 1015 (2004).
306. J. Layton, Homelessness: The Making and Unmaking of a Crisis (2000).
307. J. Waldron, The Right to Private Property (1988);
308. J. Singer, The Reliance Interest in Property, 40 Stan. L. Rev. 611 (1988);
309. J. Singer, Symposium on Law and The Homeless, 45 U. Miami L. Rev. 387 (1991);
310. J. Singer, Housing and Hope Symposium, 29 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1461 (1999)
311. Lochner v. New York, 198 US 45 at 75 per Holmes J, dissenting (1905)
312. P. Singer, A Darwinian Left: Politics, Evolution, and Cooperation (1999).
313. Megarry & Wade’s The Law of Real Property (C. Harpum 6th ed. 2000)
314. Anger and Honsberger, Law of Real Property (A. H. Oosterhoff andW. B. Rayner eds. 2nd ed. 1985).
315. Canada, Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples: Gathering Strength vol. 3, Housing chap. 4, The Intolerable Housing and Living Conditions of Many Aboriginal People subchap. 1, Aboriginal and Canadian Housing Conditions subchap. 1.1 (1996).
316. Guerin v. The Queen, [1984] 2 SCR 335 at 376 per Dickson J.
317. Delgamuukw v. British Columbia, [1997] 3 SCR 1010.
318. K. McNeil, Common Law Aboriginal Title (1989)
319. P. Macklem, Indigenous Difference and the Constitution of Canada 76–106 (2001).
320. R. Lewontin, S. Rose, and L. Kamin, Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology and Human Nature (1984)
321. H. Rose and S. Rose, Alas, Poor Darwin: Arguments Against Evolutionary Psychology (2000).
322. G. Steiner, After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation xiv (2nd ed. 1992).
323. Northern Securities Co v. US, 193 US 197 at 400 per Holmes J (1904).
324. R. Wasserstrom, The Judicial Decision 46 (1961).
325. E. Levi, An Introduction to Legal Reasoning 1–27 (1948).
326. M. Nussbaum, The Use and Abuse of Philosophy in Legal Education, 45 Stan. L. Rev. 1627 at 1642 (1993).
327. Symposium, Do We Have A Legal Canon?, 43 J. Legal Educ. 1 (1993);
328. L. Levine, The Opening of the American Mind: Canons, Cultural, and History (1996)
329. J. Balkin and S. Levinson, The Canons of Constitutional Law, 111 Harv. L. Rev. 964 at 1003 (1998);
330. D. E. Marion, The State of the Canon in Constitutional Law: Lessons from the Jurisprudence of John Marshall, 89 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 385 (2001)
331. J. Mootz, Legal Classics: After Constructing the Legal Canon, 72 N. Car. L. Rev. 977 (1994).
332. A. Bloom, The Closing of the American Mind 22 (1987).
333. E. D. Hirsch, Jr., Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know 18 (1987).
334. R. Posner, Law And Literature: A Misunderstood Relation (1988).
335. S. Warren, A Popular and Practical Introduction to Law Studies 434 (1835)
336. G. Gilmore, The Death of Contract 83 (1974)
337. J. Stone, Precedent and Law: Dynamics of Common Law Growth 221 (1985);
338. A. W. B. Simpson, Leading Cases in the Common Law (1995);
339. C. Sunstein, Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict 82 and 85 (1996).
340. Lochner v. New York, 198 US 45 (1905) and infra, pp. 144–47.
341. R. A. Primus, Canon, Anti-Canon, and Judicial Dissent, 48 Duke L. J. 243 at 279 (1998)
342. Anns v. Merton Borough Council, [1977] 2 All ER 492 (HL)
343. Murphy v. Brentwood District Council, [1990] 2 All ER 908 (HL).
344. City of Kamloops v. Nielson, [1984] 2 SCR 2.
345. C. Sunstein, In Defense of Liberal Education, 43 J. Legal Educ. 22 at 36 (1993).
346. S. Levinson, The Rhetoric of Judicial Opinion, in Law’s Stories 187 (P. Brooks and P. Gewirtz eds. 1996).
347. S. Fish, Canon Busting: The Basic Issues, National Forum: Phi Cappa Phi J. 13 (1989).
348. D. Luban, Legal Traditionalism, in Legal Modernism 93–124 (1997).
349. Winterbottom v. Wright [1842], 152 ER 402.
350. Junior Books Ltd. v. Veitchi Co. [1983], 3 WLR 477 at 482 per Lord Fraser and 495 per Lord Roskill.
351. J. G. Starke, Comment, 56 Aust. L. J. 663 (1982).
352. Greater Nottingham Co-operative v. Cementation, [1988] 3 WLR 396 at 407 per Purchas J.
353. Muirhead v. Industrial Tank Specialities Ltd., [1985] 3 All ER 705
354. Caparo v. Dickman, [1990] 2 WLR 358 at 362–65 per Lord Bridges.
355. The Aliakmon, [1986] AC 785.
356. D. Beyleveld and R. Brownsword, Privity, Transivity and Rationality, 54 Mod L. Rev. 48 (1991)
357. J. G. Logie, The Final Demise of Junior Books?, [1989] Jur.Rev. 5.
358. Hedley Byrne & Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners, [1964] AC 467 at 482 per Lord Reid and 525 per Lord Devlin.
359. Donoghue v. Stevenson, [1932] All ER 1 at 5 per Lord Buckmaster and at 20–21 per Lord Tomlin.
360. R. Pound, Jurisprudence III, 565 (1959).
361. Moore v. City of East Cleveland, 431 US 494 at 513 (1977).
362. Lawrence v. Texas, 123 S. Ct. 2472 (2003).
363. A. Bickel, The Original Understanding and the Desegregation Decision, 69 Harv. L. Rev. 1 (1955);
364. H.Wechsler, Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law, 73 Harv. L. Rev. 1 (1959);
365. H.Wechsler, Learned Hand, The Bill of Rights 42 (1958);
366. J. Monaghan, Stare Decisis and Constitutional Adjudication, 88 Colum. L. Rev. 723 (1988);
367. R. Bork, The Tempting of America 74–83 (1990).
368. Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 US 393 at 426 per Taney CJ (1857).
369. J. H. Ely, Democracy and Distrust (1980).
370. R. Dworkin, Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution 38 (1996) (emphasis added) and infra, pp. 152–55.
371. McCullough v. Maryland, 17 US 316 at 415 per Marshall CJ (1819).
372. Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 US 479 (1965).
373. Roe v. Wade, 410 US 113 at 222 (1973) per White J.
374. Casey v. Planned Parenthood, 505 US 833 (1991).
375. Pearson v. Murray, 182 A. 590 (Md. 1936);
376. Missouri, ex rel. Gaines v. Canada, 305 US 337 (1938);
377. Sipuel v. Oklahoma, 332 US 631 (1948);
378. Sweatt v. Painter, 339 US 629 (1950);
379. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 US 637 (1950).
380. Briggs v. Elliott, 98 F. Supp. 529(1951);
381. Boor v. Garrett, 183 F. 2d (1950);
382. Corbin v. County School Board, 84 F. Supp. 253 (1949).
383. Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 at 559 (1896) per Harlan J.
384. Wynehammer v. People and Allgeyer v. Louisiana, 165 US 578 (1897)
385. Bunting v. Oregon, 243 US 426 (1917)
386. Lincoln Federal Labor Union v. Northwestern Iron and Metal Co., 335 US 525 at 535 (1949)
387. West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 US 379 (1937)
388. Nollan v. California Coastal Commission, 483 US 825 (1987)
389. Dolan v. City of Tigard, 114 S. Ct. 2309 (1994)
390. Resurrecting Economic Rights: The Doctrine of Economic Due Process Reconsidered, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 1363 (1989)
391. J. E. Cohen, Lochner in Cyberspace: the New Economic Orthodoxy of “Rights Management,” 97 Mich. L. Rev. 462 (1999).
392. M. S. Paulsen, Abrogating Stare Decisis by Statute: May Congress Remove the Precedential Effect of Roe and Casey?, 109 Yale L. J. 1535 at 1538 and generally at 1551–66 (2000).
393. West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 US 379 (1937) (overruling the economic liberty doctrine)
394. Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954) (overruling the separate-but-equal doctrine).
395. Friedmann Equity Developments Inc. v. Final Note Ltd. [2000], 1 SCR 842 at 871.
396. M. S. Paulsen, Captain James T. Kirk and the Enterprise of Constitutional Interpretation: Some Modest Proposals from the Twenty-Third Century, 59 Alb. L. Rev. 671, 679–81 (1995).
397. H. J. Speath and J. A. Segal, Majority Rule or Minority Will: Adherence to Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court 287 (1999).
398. C. J. Peters, Foolish Consistency: On Equality, Integrity, and Justice in Stare Decisis, 105 Yale L.J. 2031 (1996).
399. TXO Products Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp., 113 S. Ct. 2711, 2742 (1993) (O’Connor J, dissenting).
400. R. Posner, The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory (1999).
401. R. Dworkin, Law’s Empire 413, 227–28 and 255 (1996)
402. R. Traynor, Comment, in S. Paulsen, Legal Institutions 52 (1959).
403. Vasquez v. Hillery, 474 US 254 at 265 per Marshall J (1986).
404. D. Hellman, The Importance of Appearing Principled, 37 Ariz. L. Rev. 1107 (1995).
405. O. A. Hathaway, Path Dependence in the Law: The Course and Pattern of Legal Change in a Common Law System, 86 Iowa L. Rev. 601 (2001).
406. Stone, The Common Law of the United States, 47 Yale L. J. 1351 at 1352 (1938).
407. K. Llewellyn, The Bramble Bush 156 (1930) (“constant movement, movement even in run-of the-mill cases”).
408. L. Fuller, The Law in Quest of Itself 40–41 (1940) (“the judge makes law even when he states that he is refusing to make it”).
409. S. E. Toulmin, Does the Distinction Between Normal and Revolutionary Science Hold Water?, in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge 39 at 115 (I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave eds.1970) and infra, chap. 8.
410. R. Lipkin, Constitutional Revolutions: Pragmatism and the Role of Judicial Review in American Constitutionalism26, 120, 125, 219, and 228 (2000).
411. W. Bogart, Consequences (2001).
412. C. Hutchinson, Waiting for Coraf: A Critique of Law and Rights 172–83 (1995).
413. O. W. Holmes, Collected Legal Papers 270 (P. Smith ed. 1920).
414. H.-G. Gadamer, Letter to Dallmayr, in Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer–Derrida Encounter 95 (D. Michelfelder and R. Palmer eds. 1989).
415. Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method 490–91 (J.Weinsheimer and D. Marshall trans. 2nd ed 1989);
416. F. Fernandez-Armesto, Truth: A History and a Guide for the Perplexed (1997).
417. A. C. Hutchinson, Casaubon’s Ghosts: The Haunting of Legal Scholarship, 21 Legal Studies 65 (2001).
418. R. Rorty, Philosophy and Social Hope (1999);
419. S. J. Gould, The Hedgehog, the Fox and the Magister’s Pox: Mending the Gap Between Science and the Humanities (2003);
420. Hans-Georg Gadamer, Philosophical Hermeneutics 90 (D. Linge ed. and trans. 1976);
421. A. C. Hutchinson, It’s All in the Game: A Nonfoundationalist Account of Law and Adjudication (2000).
422. R. Dworkin, Law’s Empire 62, 55, 225, 255, and 420 (1986)
423. C. Douzinas, S. McVeigh, and R. Warrington, Is Hermes Hercules’ Twin? in Reading Dworkin Critically 124–25 (A. Hunt ed. 1992).
424. J. Mootz, Rhetorical Knowledge in Legal Practice and Theory 6 S. Cal. Interdisciplinary L. J. 491 at 497 (1998).
425. G. Madison, The Hermeneutics of Postmodernity: Figures and Themes (1990).
426. G.Warnke, Gadamer; Hermeneutics, Tradition and Reason 79 (1987);
427. G.Warnke, Justice and Interpretation (1992);
428. G. Warnke, Law, Hermeneutics and Public Debate, 9 Yale J. L. & Human. 395 (1997).
429. J. Mootz, Law in Flux: Philosophical hermeneutics, Legal Argumentation, and the Natural Law Tradition, 11 Yale J. L. & Human. 311 at 313, 312, and 378 (1999).
430. J. M. Mootz, Law and Philosophy, Philosophy and Law, 26 U. Tol. L. Rev. 127 (1994)
431. J. Mootz, Is the Rule of Law Possible in a Postmodern World?, 68 Wash. L. Rev. 249 (1995)
432. L. Fuller, The Morality of Law (1969);
433. L.Weinreb, Natural Law and Justice (1987);
434. L.Weinreb, The Moral Point of View in Natural Law, Liberalism and Morality 195 (R. George ed. 1996).
435. H. Fairlamb, Critical Conditions: Postmodernity and the Question of Foundations (1994);
436. D. Couzens Hoy and T. McCarthy, Critical Theory 188––200 (1994);
437. J. Caputo, Gadamer’s Closet Essentialism: A Derridean Critique, in Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer–Derrida Encounter 258–64 (D. Michelfelder and R. Palmer eds. 1989).
438. T. Farrell, Norms of Rhetorical Culture (1993)
439. P. Goodrich, Legal Discourse: Studies in Linguistics, Rhetoric and Legal Analysis (1987).
440. T. Eagleton, Literary Theory: An Introduction 70–74 (1983).
441. E. Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France 85 (J. Pocock ed. 1987).
442. F. Hayek, Law, Legislation and Liberty: The Political Order of Free People 153–76 (1979);
443. A. Watson, The Evolution of Law (1985);
444. A. Kronman, Precedent and Tradition, 99 Yale L. J. 1029 at 1037 (1990).
445. K. Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte 13 and 16 (C. Dutt ed. 1957)
446. J. Pelikan, The Vindication of Tradition 65 (1984).
447. J. Derrida, Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International 54 (P. Kamuf trans. 1994).
448. E. Shils, Tradition 44 (1981).
449. J. Caputo, Deconstruction in a Nutshell: A Conversation with Jacques Derrida 6 (1997)
450. S. Feldman, American Legal Thought from Pre-Modernism to Postmodernism: An Intellectual Voyage 30–35 (2000).
451. T. S. Eliot, Tradition and the Individual Talent in The SacredWood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism (1920).
452. F. J. Mootz, Nietzschean Critique and Philosophical Hermeneutics, 20 Cardozo L. Rev. 101 (2003).
453. J. Derrida, Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority,’ 11 Cardozo L. Rev. 919 at 962 (1990).
454. O. W. Holmes, Jr., Collected Legal Papers 312 (P. Smith ed. 1921).
455. R. Dworkin, Objectivity and Truth: You’d Better Believe it, 25 Phil.& Pub. Affs. 87 (1996)
456. D. Farber and S. Sherry, Beyond All Reason: The Radical Assault on Truth in American Law 7, 22, 73, 119, and 133 (1997).
457. B. Simpson, The Common Law and Legal Theory in Legal Theory and Common Law 20 (W. Twining ed. 1986).
458. M. Hale, The History of the Common Law (2nd ed. 1716);
459. J.G.A. Pocock, The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law (1957);
460. M. Horwitz, The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1850 (1977).
461. E. Jenks, English Law: Sources and Judicial Organization 25 (1931)
462. A. Hogue, Origins of the Common Law (1966);
463. T. Plucknett, A Concise History of the Common Law (1981);
464. S. Milsom, Historical Foundations of the Common Law (1969).
465. J. W. Tubbs, The Common Law Mind: Medieval and Early Conceptions 194 (2000).
466. H. P. Glenn, Legal Traditions of the World 207 (2000).
467. M. Eisenberg, The Nature of the Common Law 126 and 19 (1988).
468. R. Posner, The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory 262 (1999)
469. P. Freund, On Law and Justice 23 (1968).
470. S. Burton, Critique And Comment: Determinacy, Indeterminacy and Rhetoric in a Pluralist World, 21 Melb. U. L. Rev. 544 at 582 (1997).
471. T. Eagleton, Ideology: An Introduction 3 (1991).
472. F. Bennion, Statutory Interpretation 618 (2nd ed. 1992).
473. J. Beatson, The Role of Statute in the Development of Common Law Doctrine, 117 L. Q. R. 247 (2001).
474. D. A. Strauss, The Irrelevance of Constitutional Amendments, 114 Harv. L. Rev. 1457 at 1458–59, 1505, and 1457 (2001).
475. P. Lewis, Rights Discourse and Assisted Suicide, 27 Am. J. L. And Med. 45 (2001).
476. R. Dworkin, Assisted Suicide: What the Court Really Said, 44 N.Y. Rev Books 42 (Sept. 25, 1997)
477. R. Dworkin, Darwin’s New Bulldog, 111 Harv. L. Rev. 1718 (1998).
478. R. Dworkin, The Philosophers’ Brief, N.Y. Rev. of Books 41–47 (March 27, 1997)
479. R. Dworkin et al., The Fifth Annual Fritz B. Burns Lecture: Euthanasia, Morality, and the Law, 30 Loy. L. A. L. Rev. 1465 (1997).
480. R. Dworkin, Reply, 29 Ariz. St. L. J. 431 (1997)
481. R. Posner, The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory 133 and 227 (1999).
482. J. Mikhail, Law, Science, and Morality: A Review of Richard Posner’s The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory, 54 Stan. L. Rev. 1057 at 1118–26 (2002).
483. J. Mootz, Law in Flux: Philosophical Hermeneutics, Legal Argumentation and the Natural Law Tradition, 11 Yale J. of Law & Human. 311 at 326, 377, and 381 (1999).
484. J. Mootz, Nietzschean Critique and Philosophical Hermeneutics, 20 Cardozo L. Rev. 101 (2003).
485. Moliere, Le Bourgeois Gentilhomme II, iv (1670).
486. L. Tribe and M. Dorf, On Reading the Constitution 65–120 (1991).
487. C. Sunstein, Against Tradition, 13 Soc. Phil.& Policy 207 (1996)
488. J. H. Ely, Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review 60–63 (1980)
489. R. Cover, Nomos and Narrative – Supreme Court Foreword, 97 Harv. L. Rev. 4 (1983).
490. H.-G. Gadamer, Truth and Method 358 and 379 (J. Weinsheimer and D. Marshall trans. 2nd ed. 1989).
491. H.-G. Gadamer, Philosophical Hermeneutics 90 (D. Linge ed. and trans. 1976).
492. H.-G. Gadamer, Philosophical Hermeneutics 90 (D. Linge ed. and trans. 1976) 34 at 490, 270, and 298–99
493. B. De Sousa Santos, Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition 34 (1995).
494. U. Beck, The Risk Society: Toward a New Modernity 204 (1992)
495. I. Illich, Limits to Medicine: Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health (1976).
496. P. King, Washington v. Glucksberg: Influence of the Court in Care of the Terminally Ill and Physician Assisted Suicide, 15 J. L. & Health 271 (2001).
497. S. Holmes, Precommitment and the Paradox of Democracy in Constitutionalism and Democracy 196–97 (J. Elster and R. Slagstad eds. 1988).
498. A. Bickel, The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics 14–18 (2nd ed. 1986).
499. E. Chemerinsky, Foreword: The Vanishing Constitution, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 43 (1989).
500. R. Teitel, Transitional Jurisprudence: The Role of Law in Political Transformation, 106 Yale L. J. 2009 at 2116 (1997).
501. S. De Smith, Constitutional and Administrative Law 68 (6th ed. 1989).
502. C. Zimmer, Evolution: The Triumph of an Idea 135 (2001).
503. R. Burns, Let Not Woman E’er Complain, in Poetical Works of Robert Burns 435 (W. Wallace ed. 1902).
504. Alpheus Hyatt, December 4A, 1872 in More Letters of Charles Darwin 344 (F. Darwin and A. C. Seward eds. 1903).
505. R. Richards, The Meaning of Evolution (1992).
506. R. Dawkins, Progress, in Keywords in Evolutionary Biology (E. Keller and E. Lloyd eds. 1992).
507. W. B. Arthur, On the Evolution of Complexity in Complexity: Metaphors, Models and Reality 71 (G. Cowan et al. eds. 1994).
508. E. Mayr, What Evolution Is 278 (2001).
509. J. Herschel, as quoted in Darwin, Letter to Charles Lyell, December 10, 1859 in Charles Darwin’s Letters: A Selection 1825–1859 208 (F. Burkhardt ed. 1996).
510. E. D. Elliott, Law and Biology: The New Synthesis?, 41 St. Louis U. L. J. 595 at 600 (1997).
511. Ruhl, Complexity Theory as a Paradigm for the Dynamical Law-and-Society System: A Wake-Up Call for Legal Reductionism and the Modern Administrative State, 45 Duke L. J. 849 (1996).
512. K. Popper, The Rationality of Scientific Revolutions in Scientific Revolutions 94 (I. Hacking ed. 1981).
513. K. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery 42 (1934).
514. T. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 3 and 16–17 (3rd ed. 1996).
515. P. D. Hutcheon, Popper and Kuhn on the Evolution of Science, 4 Brock Rev. 28 (1995)
516. S. Fuller, Kuhn vs. Popper: The Struggle for the Soul of Science (2003).
517. T. Kuhn, The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought 264–65 (1957).
518. N. Hanson, Patterns of Discovery (1958).
519. J. A. Harrington, ‘Red in Tooth and Claw’: The Idea of Progress in Medicine and The Common Law, 11 Soc.& Legal Stud. 211 (2002)
520. S. J. Gould, The Structure of Evolutionary Theory 966–72 (2002).
521. D. Roebuck, The Background of the Common Law 10 (1988).
522. R. Rorty, Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth Century America 28 (1998).
523. S. Fish, The Trouble With Principle (1999).
524. D. J. Ibbetson, A Historical Introduction to the Law of Obligations 294–95 and 299 (1999).
525. D. J. Ibbetson, Natural Law and Common Law, Edinburgh L. Rev. 4 (2001).
526. K. Popper, Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach 195 (rev. ed. 1979).
527. D. Kennedy, Legal Education as Training for Hierarchy in The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique 40 (D. Kairys ed. 1982).
528. S. O. Funtowicz and J. R. Ravetz, Three Types of Risk Assessment and the Emergence of Post-Normal Science in Social Theories of Risk 254 (S. Krimsky and D. Golding eds. 1992).
529. A. W. B. Simpson, The Common Law and Legal Theory in Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence 91 (A. W. B. Simpson ed. 1973).
530. T. Eisner, Chemical Ecology and Genetic Engineering in Symposium on Tropical Biology and Agriculture 47 (1985).
531. J. Huxley, Evolution in Action 31 (1953).
532. J. Rifkin, The Biotech Century: Harnessing the Gene and Remaking the World (1998)
533. F. Fukuyama, Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution 17 (2002).
534. P. Bowler, The Mendelian Revolution: The Emergence of Hereditarian Concepts in Modern Science and Society (1989).
535. I. Wilmut, K. Campbell, and C. Tudge, The Second Creation: The Age of Biological Control by the Scientists Who Cloned 303 (2002).
536. R. Lewontin, Inside and Outside: Gene, Environment and Organism (1994).
537. P. Ehrlich, Human Natures: Genes, Cultures and the Human Prospect (2000).
538. D. Kennedy, The Political Stakes in ‘Merely Technical’ Issues of Contract Law, 19 Eur. Rev. of Priv. Law 7 (2001).
539. M. Shelley, Frankenstein (1831).
540. M. Roe, Chaos and Evolution in Law and Economics, 109 Harv. L. Rev. 641 at 665 (1996).
541. M. Somerville, The Ethical Canary: Science, Society and the Human Spirit (2000).
542. A. Rosenberg, The Biological Justification of Ethics: A Best-Case Scenario in Darwinism in Philosophy, Social Science and Policy 125 (2000).
543. E. Weinrib, The Idea of Private Law (1995).
544. R. Epstein, The Static Conception of the Common Law, 9 J. Legal Studies 253 at 256 (1980).
545. R. Unger, Politics: False Necessity 583 (1989).
546. L. Silver, Remaking Eden: Cloning and Beyond in a Brave New World 257 (1998).
547. J. D. Hooker, July 13, 1856 in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin 178 (F. Burkhardt et al. eds 1990)
548. C. Darwin, The Origin of Species, 429 (6th ed. 1872).
549. R. Lewin, Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos 164 (2nd ed. 1999).
550. J. Donne, The Nursery of Music, Joy Life and Eternity: Elegie III ll.35–36, in The Complete Poetry and Selected Prose of John Donne 59 (C. Coffin ed. 2001).
551. W. Douglas, Stare Decisis, 49 Colum. L. Rev. 735 (1949).
552. L. Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus 6.521 (1922).
553. C. Moore, Darwin of Down: The Evolutionist as Squarson-Naturalist in The Darwinian Heritage 132 (D. Kohn ed. 1985).
554. T. Dobzhansky, Nothing Makes Sense in Biology Except in the Light of Evolution, 35 Am. Biol. Teacher 125 (1973).
555. T. Dobzhansky, Genetics and the Origins of Species (1937).
556. RWDSU, Local 558 v. Pepsi-Cola Canada Beverages (West) Ltd., [2002] 2 SCR 8.
557. O. W. Holmes, Jr., The Common Law 1 (1881).
558. Thomas Holland, cited by Norman Marsh, Book Review, 30 Int. & Comp. Law Q. 486 at 488 (1981).
559. Harold J. Spaeth and Jeffrey A. Segal, Majority Rule or Minority Will: Adherence to Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court 287 (1999).
560. J. Swift, Gulliver’s Travels iv, chap. 5, 296 (1967).
561. B. Slattery, The Organic Constitution: Aboriginal Peoples and the Evolution of Canada, 34 Osgoode Hall L. J. 101 at 110 (1996).
562. M. Rose, Darwin’s Spectre: Evolutionary Biology in the Modern World 81 (1998).
563. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505US833 at 844 (1991) (O’Connor, Kennedy, and Souter JJ, plurality opinion).
564. Smith v. Allwright, 321 US 649, 669 (1944) (Roberts J, dissenting).
565. Lawrence v. Texas, 123 S. Ct. 2472 (2003).
566. Payne v. Tennessee, 501 US 808, 828 (1991)
567. A. Scalia, A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law 38 (1997).
568. Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 US 702 at 721 (1997).
569. J Michaelson, On Listening to the Kulturkampf, Or, How America Overruled Bowers v. Hardwick, Even Though Romer v. Evans Didn’t, 49 Duke L. J. 1559 at 1612 (2000)
570. M. S. Paulsen, The Worst Constitutional Decision of All Time, 78 Notre Dame L. Rev. 995 (2003).
571. M. Tushnet, Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (1999)
572. M. Tushnet, Non-Judicial Review, 40 Harv. J. On Legis. 453 (2003).
573. W. Paley, Natural Theology 473 (1970), which is a reprint of W. Paley, Natural Theology: Or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected From the Appearances of Nature (1802).
574. R. Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker 5 (1986).
575. C. Darwin, The Origin of Species by Natural Selection 104–05 (6th ed. 1872).
576. M. Denton, Nature’s Destiny: How the Laws of Biology Reveal Purpose in the Universe 320 (1998)
577. V. G. Curran, Romantic Common Law, Enlightened Civil Law: Legal Uniformity and the Homogenization of the European Union, 7 Colum. J. Eur. L. 63 at 74 (2001).
578. Edwards v. Attorney General for Canada [1930], AC 124 at 136.
579. Reference Re Provincial Electoral Boundaries (Sask.) [1991], 2 SCR 158 at 180 per McLachlin J
580. McLachlin J and Gosselin v. Quebec (Attorney General) [2002], 4 SCR 429 at 491–92 per McLachlin CJ
581. A. Kavanagh, The Idea of a Living Constitution, 16 Can. J. L. & Juris. 55 (2003).
582. E. D. Elliott, Law and Biology: The New Synthesis?, 41 St. Louis U. L. J. 595 at 600.
583. J. B. Ruhl, Complexity Theory as a Paradigm for the Dynamical Law-and-Society System: A Wake-Up Call for Legal Reductionism and the Modern Administrative State, 45 Duke L. J. 849 (1996).
584. O. W. Holmes, The Path of the Law, 10 Harv. L. Rev 457 at 447 (1897).
585. L. L. Fuller, Anatomy of the Law 106 (1968).
586. S. J. Gould, Eight Little Piggies: Reflections in Natural History 152 (1993).
587. R. Rorty, Philosophy and Social Hope 266 (1999).
588. S. J. Gould, Leonardo’s Mountain of Clams and the Diet of Worms 282 (1998).
589. M. Ruse, Mystery of Mysteries: Is Evolution a Social Construction? (1999).
590. H.-G. Gadamer, Truth and Method xxv (J.Weinsheimer and D. Marshall trans. 2nd ed 1989).