Language evolution and syntactic theory

Language Evolution and Syntactic Theory

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-222

  Kinsella, Anna R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927103820     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511596919     Document Type: Book

References (330)

1. Abler, W. (1997), ‘Gene, language, number: The particulate principle in nature’, Evolutionary Theory 11, 237–248.
2. Adger, D. (2003), Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
3. Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E. (1998), ‘Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement, and EPP-checking’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 491–540.
4. Altenberg, L. (1994), ‘The evolution of evolvability in genetic programming’, in K. Kinnear (ed.), Advances in Genetic Programming, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 47–74.
5. Arnow, D. M. and Weiss, G. (1998), Introduction to Programming Using Java: An Object-Oriented Approach, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
6. Arthur, W. B. (1993), ‘Why do things become more complex?’, Scientific American 286(5), 144.
7. Baldwin, J. M. (1896), ‘A new factor in evolution’, American Naturalist 30, 441–451, 536–553.
8. Ball, P. (1999), The Self-Made Tapestry: Pattern Formation in Nature, Oxford University Press, New York.
9. Balter, M. (2002), ‘What made humans modern?’, Science 295(5558), 1219–1225.
10. Benedicto, E. (1997), ‘V-movement and its interpretational effects’, GLOW Newsletter 38, 14–15.
11. Bergman, T., Beehner, J., Cheney, D. and Seyfarth, R. (2003), ‘Hierarchical classification by rank and kinship in baboons’, Science 302, 1234–1236.
12. Berwick, R. (1998), ‘Language evolution and the minimalist program’, in J. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy and C. Knight (eds), Approaches to the Evolution of Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 320–340.
13. Bever, T. and Montalbetti, M. (2002), ‘Noam’s ark’, Science 298, 1565–1566.
14. Bickerton, D. (1990), Language and Species, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
15. Biederman, I. (1987), ‘Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding’, Psychological Review 94, 115–147.
16. Bloom, P. (1994), ‘Generativity within language and other cognitive domains’, Cognition 51(2), 177–189.
17. Bloomfield, L. (1917), ‘Tagalog texts with grammatical analysis’, in University of Illinois Studies in Language and Literature, Vol III, no. 2–4, pp. 165–564, University of Illinois, Urbana.
18. Bloomfield, L. (1930), Language, Holt, Rinehart, Winston, New York.
19. Boeckx, C. and Hornstein, N. (2007), ‘Les differents objectifs de la linguistique theorique’ [the varying aims of linguistic theory], in J. Franck and J. Bricmont (eds), Cahier Chomsky, L’Herne, Paris, pp. 61–77.
20. Boeckx, C. and Stjepanovic, S. (2001), ‘Heading toward PF’, Linguistic Inquiry 32(2), 345–355.
21. Bolker, J. A. (2001), ‘Modularity in development and why it matters to evo-devo’, American Zoologist 40, 770–776.
22. Bonner, J. T. (1988), The Evolution of Complexity, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
23. Brannon, E. and Terrace, H. (1998), ‘Ordering of the numerosities 1–9 by monkeys’, Science 282(5389), 746–749.
24. Brighton, H. (2003), ‘Simplicity as a Driving Force in Linguistic Evolution’, PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
25. Brighton, H., Kirby, S. and Smith, K. (2005), ‘Cultural selection for learnability: Three principles underlying the view that language adapts to be learnable’, in M. Tallerman (ed.), Language Origins: Perspectives on Evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 291–309.
26. Brody, M. (1995), Lexico-Logical Form: A Radically Minimalist Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
27. Brody, M. (1998), ‘The Minimalist Program and a perfect syntax: A critical note of Noam Chomsky’s The Minimalist Program’, Mind and Language 13(2), 205–214.
28. Brody, M. (2002), ‘On the status of representations and derivations’, in S. D. Epstein and T. D. Seely (eds), Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 19–41.
29. Broekhuis, H. and Dekkers, J. (2000), ‘The Minimalist Program and Optimality Theory: Derivations and evaluations’, in J. Dekkers, F. van der Leeuw and J. van de Weijer (eds), Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax and Acquisition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 386–422.
30. Byrne, R. W. (2002), ‘Imitations of novel complex actions: What does the evidence from animals mean?’, Advances in the Study of Behavior 31, 77–105.
31. Byrne, R. W. and Russon, A. E. (1998), ‘Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21, 667–721.
32. Byrne, R. W. and Whiten, A. (1991), ‘Computation and mindreading in primate tactical deception’, in A. Whiten (ed.), Natural Theories of Mind: Evolution, Development and Simulation of Everyday Mindreading, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 127–141.
33. Calabretta, R., Fernando, A. D., Wagner, G. and Parisi, D. (2003), ‘What does it take to evolve behaviourally complex organisms?’, BioSystems 69, 245–262.
34. Calabretta, R., Nolfi, S., Parisi, D. and Wagner, G. (1998), ‘A case study of the evolution of modularity: Towards a bridge between evolutionary biology, artificial life, neuro- and cognitive science’, in C. Adami, R. Belew, H. Kitano and C. Taylor (eds), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Life, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 275–284.
35. Calvin, W. J. and Bickerton, D. (eds) (2000), Lingua Ex Machina: Reconciling Darwin and Chomsky with the Human Brain, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
36. Campbell, L. (2001), ‘The history of linguistics’, in M. Aronoff and J. Rees-Miller (eds), The Handbook of Linguistics, Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp. 81–104.
37. Carruthers, P. (2003), ‘Moderately massive modularity’, in A. O’Hear (ed.), Minds and Persons, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 67–90.
38. Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1999), The Origins of Complex Language: An Inquiry into the Evolutionary Beginnings of Sentences, Syllables, and Truth, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
39. Caspi, A., Williams, B., Kim-Cohen, J., Craig, I., Milne, B., Poulton, R., Schalkwyk, L., Taylor, A., Werts, H. and Moffitt, T. (2007), ‘Moderation of breastfeeding effects on the IQ by genetic variation in fatty acid metabolism’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 18860–18865.
40. Chametzky, R. (2000), Phrase Structure: from GB to Minimalism, Blackwell, Malden, MA.
41. Chater, N. (1999), ‘The search for simplicity: A fundamental cognitive principle?’, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 52A(2), 273–302.
42. Cheney, D. L. and Seyfarth, R. M. (1990), How Monkeys See the World: Inside the Mind of Another Species, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
43. Chomsky, N. (1956), ‘Three models for the description of language’, IRE Transactions on Information Theory 2, 113–124.
44. Chomsky, N. (1957), Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.
45. Chomsky, N. (1959), ‘A review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior’, Language 35(1), 26–58.
46. Chomsky, N. (1965), Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
47. Chomsky, N. (1966), Cartesian Linguistics, Harper and Row, New York.
48. Chomsky, N. (1970), ‘Remarks on nominalization’, in R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn, Waltham, MA, pp. 184–221.
49. Chomsky, N. (1975a), The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory, Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL.
50. Chomsky, N. (1975b), Reflections on Language, Pantheon, New York.
51. Chomsky, N. (1981), Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures, Foris, Dordrecht.
52. Chomsky, N. (1986a), Barriers, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 13, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
53. Chomsky, N. (1986b), Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use, Praeger, New York.
54. Chomsky, N. (1988), Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
55. Chomsky, N. (1991a), ‘Linguistics and cognitive science: Problems and mysteries’, in A. Kasher (ed.), The Chomskyan Turn, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 26–53.
56. Chomsky, N. (1991b), ‘Some notes on economy of representation and derivation’, in R. Freidin (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 417–454.
57. Chomsky, N. (1993), ‘A Minimalist Program for linguistic theory’, in K. Hale and J. Keyser (eds), The View from Building20, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1–52.
58. Chomsky, N. (1995a), ‘Bare phrase structure’, in G. Webelhuth (ed.), Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 385–439.
59. Chomsky, N. (1995b), The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
60. Chomsky, N. (1998), ‘Some observations on economy in generative grammar’, in P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. McGinnis and D. Pesetsky (eds), Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 115–127.
61. Chomsky, N. (2000), New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
62. Chomsky, N. (2001), ‘Derivation by phase’, in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1–52.
63. Chomsky, N. (2002a), ‘Minimalist inquiries: The framework’, in R. Martin, D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka (eds), Step by Step, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 89–155.
64. Chomsky, N. (2002b), On Nature and Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
65. Chomsky, N. (2004), The Generative Enterprise Revisited: Discussions with Riny Huybregts, Henk van Riemsdijk, Naoki Fukui, and Mihoko Zushi, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin & New York.
66. Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. (1968), The Sound Pattern of English, Harper and Row, New York.
67. Christiansen, M. H. (1994), ‘Infinite Languages, Finite Minds: Connectionism, Learning and Linguistic Structure’, PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
68. Christiansen, M. H. and Devlin, J. T. (1997), ‘Recursive inconsistencies are hard to learn: A connectionist perspective on universal word order correlations’, in M. Shafto & P. Langley (eds), Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 113–118.
69. Clark, E. V. (1992), ‘Conventionality and contrast: Pragmatic principles with lexical consequences’, in A. Lehrer and E. F. Kittay (eds), Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 171–188.
70. Cohen, I. B. (1982), ‘The principia, universal gravitation, and the “Newtonian style” in relation to the Newtonian revolution in science’, in Z. Bechler (ed.), Contemporary Newtonian Research, Vol. 9 of Studies in the History of Modern Science, Kluwer Dordrecht, Boston, MA, pp. 21–108.
71. Coissac, E., Maillier, E. and Netter, P. (1997), ‘A comparative study of duplications in bacteria and eukaryotes: The importance of telomeres’, Molecular Biology and Evolution 14, 1062–1074.
72. Corballis, M. (2003), ‘From hand to mouth: The gestural origins of language’, in M. Christiansen and S. Kirby (eds), Language Evolution: The States of the Art, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 201–218.
73. Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (1997), ‘Evolutionary psychology: A primer’. Online at www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/primer.html.
74. Cramer, A. and Gallistel, C. R. (1997), ‘Vervet monkeys as travelling salesmen’, Nature 387(6632), 464.
75. Croft, W. (1990), Typology and Universals, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
76. Croft, W. (2001), Explaining Language Change, Longman, London.
77. Croft, W. and Cruse, A. (2004), Cognitive Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
78. Crombie, A. (1981), ‘Philosophical presuppositions and shifting interpretations of Galileo’, in J. Hintikka, D. Gruender and E. Agazzi (eds), Theory Change, Ancient Axiomatics, and Galileo’s Methodology, Vol. 1, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 271–86.
79. Cruse, D. A. (1986), Lexical Semantics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
80. Culicover, P. (1999), ‘Minimalist architectures. A review of The Architecture of the Language Faculty by R. Jackendoff’, Journal of Linguistics 35, 137–150.
81. Culicover, P. and Jackendoff, R. (2005), Simpler Syntax, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
82. Culicover, P. and Nowak, A. (2003), Dynamical Grammar, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
83. D’Arcy Thompson, W. (1961), On Growth and Form, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
84. Darwin, C. (1861), On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, third edn, John Murray, London.
85. Dawkins, R. (1982), The Extended Phenotype, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
86. Dawkins, R. (1983), ‘Universal Darwinism’, in D. Bendall (ed.), Evolution from Molecules to Man, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 403–425.
87. Dawkins, R. (1986), The Blind Watchmaker, W. W. Norton and Company, New York.
88. De Boer, B. (2001), The Origins of Vowel Systems, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
89. De Visser, J. A., Hermisson, J., Wagner, G. P., Ancel Meyers, L., Bagheri-Chaichian, H., Blanchard, J. L., Chao, L., Cheverud, J. M., Elena, S. F., Fontana, W., Gibson, G., Hansen, T. F., Krakauer, D., Lewontin, R. C., Ofria, C., Rice, S. H., von Dassow, G., Wagner, A. & Whitlock, M. C. (2003), ‘Perspective: Evolution and detection of genetic robustness’. Santa Fe Institute Working Paper 03-03-016.
90. Deacon, T. (1997), The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain, Allen Lane, London.
91. Dehaene, S. (1997), The Number Sense, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
92. Dennett, D. (1995), Darwin’s Dangerous Idea, Simon and Schuster, New York.
93. Dessalles, J. L. (1998), ‘Altruism, status, and the origin of relevance’, in J. R. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy and C. Knight (eds), Approaches to the Evolution of Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 130–147.
94. Dessalles, J. L. (2000), ‘Language and hominid politics’, in C. Knight, M. Studdert-Kennedy and J. R. Hurford (eds), The Evolutionary Emergence of Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 62–79.
95. Deutscher, G. (2000), Syntactic Change in Akkadian: The Evolution of Sentential Complementation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
96. Dik, S. (1989), The Theory of Functional Grammar; Part 1: The Structure of the Clause, Functional Grammar Series, 9, Foris, Dordrecht.
97. Dominey, P. F. and Reboul, A. (2004), ‘Putting all the strands together. Coevolution of language and theory of mind’, in ‘Issues in the Coevolution of Language and Theory of Mind’, Online at: www.interdisciplines.org/coevolution.
98. Douady, S. and Couder, Y. (1992), ‘Phyllotaxis as a physical self-organised growth process’, Physical Review Letters 68, 2098–2101.
99. Dougherty, R. (1969), ‘An interpretive theory of pronominal reference’, Foundations of Language 5, 488–519.
100. Dressler, W. U. (1977), Grundfragen der Morphonologie, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Vienna.
101. Dreyer, J. L. E. (1967), A History of Astronomy from Thales to Kepler, Dover Publications, New York.
102. Du Bois, J. (1987), ‘The discourse basis of ergativity’, Language 64, 805–855.
103. Dunbar, R. (1993), ‘Co-evolution of neocortical size, group size, and language in humans’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16(4), 681–735.
104. Ebner, M., Langguth, P., Albert, J., Shackleton, M. and Shipman, R. (2001), ‘On neutral networks and evolvability’, in Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, COEX, IEEE Press, Seoul, Korea, pp. 1–8.
105. Edelman, G. M. (1974), ‘Origins and mechanisms of specificity in clonal selection’, in G. M. Edelman (ed.), Cellular Selection and Regulation in the Immune System, Raven Press, New York, pp. 1–38.
106. Edelman, G. M. and Gally, J. (2001), ‘Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 98(24), 13763–13768.
107. Edelman, S. (1997), ‘Computational theories of object recognition’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1(8), 296–304.
108. Enard, W., Przeworski, M., Fisher, S., Lai, C., Wiebe, V., Kitano, T., Monaco, A. and Pääbo, S. (2002), ‘Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language’, Nature 418, 869–872.
109. Epstein, S. D., Groat, E. M., Kawashima, R. and Kitahara, H. (1998), A Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations, Oxford University Press, New York.
110. Evans, V. and Green, M. (2006), Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
111. Everett, D. L. (1986), ‘Pirahã’, in D. Derbyshire and G. Pullum (eds), Handbook of Amazonian Languages, Vol. 1, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 200–326.
112. Everett, D. L. (2005), ‘Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language’, Current Anthropology 46(4), 621–646.
113. Fitch, W. T. (2004), ‘Imitation, quoting and theory of mind’, in ‘Issues in the Coevolution of Language and Theory of Mind’. Online at www.interdisciplines. org/coevolution.
114. Fitch, W. T. and Hauser, M. D. (2004), ‘Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate’, Science 303, 377–380.
115. Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M. D. and Chomsky, N. (2005), ‘The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications’, Cognition 97(2), 179–210.
116. Fodor, J. (1983), The Modularity of Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
117. Freidin, R. (1992), Foundations of Generative Syntax, Current Studies in Linguistics Series 21, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
118. Gabelentz, G. v. d. (1901), Die Sprachwissenschaft, ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse, Weigel, Leipzig.
119. Gardner, R. A., Gardner, B. T. and van Cantfort, T. (1989), Teaching Sign Language to Chimpanzees, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
120. Gell-Mann, M. (1994), The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex, Little, Brown and Company, London.
121. Gell-Mann, M. (1995), ‘What is complexity?’, Complexity 1(1), 16–19.
122. Gentner, T., Fenn, K., Margoliash, D. and Nusbaum, H. (2006), ‘Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds’, Nature 440, 1204–1207.
123. Gerhart, J. C. and Kirschner, M. (1997), Cells, Embryos, and Evolution: Towards a Cellular and Developmental Understanding of Phenotypic Variation and Evolutionary Adaptability, Blackwell Science, Boston, MA.
124. Gibbons, A. (1997), ‘Paleoanthropology: Bone sizes trace the decline of man (and woman)’, Science 276(5314), 896–897.
125. Gilbert, S. F., Opitz, J. and Raff, R. A. (1996), ‘Resynthesizing evolutionary and developmental biology’, Developmental Biology 173, 357–372.
126. Goldberg, A. (1995), Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
127. Gopnik, M. and Crago, M. (1991), ‘Familial aggregation of a developmental language disorder’, Cognition 39, 1–50.
128. Gordon, P. (2004), ‘Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia’, Science 306, 496–499.
129. Gould, S. J. (1987), ‘The limits of adaptation: Is language a spandrel of the human brain?’ Paper presented to the Cognitive Science Seminar, Center for Cognitive Science, MIT, October 1987.
130. Gould, S. J. (1992), Bully for Brontosaurus: Reflections in Natural History, W. W. Norton, New York.
131. Gould, S. J. (1996), Life’s Grandeur, Jonathan Cape, London.
132. Gould, S. J. and Vrba, E. S. (1982), ‘Exaptation – a missing term in the science of form’, Paleobiology 8(1), 4–15.
133. Granadino, B., Perez-Sanchez, C. and Rey-Campos, J. (2000), ‘Fork head transcription factors’, Current Genomics 1(4), 353–382.
134. Gray, C. and Russell, P. (1998), ‘Theory of mind in nonhuman primates: A question of language?’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21, 121. [Commentary on C. M. Heyes Theory of Mind in Nonhuman Primates.]
135. Greenberg, S., Eyers, A. and Mackay, S. (2003), ‘Congenital absence of the vermiform appendix’, ANZ Journal of Surgery 73, 166–167.
136. Greenfield, P. M. and Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. (1994), ‘Grammatical combination in Pan paniscus: Processes of learning and invention in the evolution and development of language’, in S. T. Parker and K. Gibson (eds), ‘Language’ and Intelligence in Monkeys and Apes: Comparative Developmental Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 540–578.
137. Grimshaw, J. (2001), ‘Economy of structure in OT’. Available from Rutgers Optimality Archive, http://roa.rutgers.edu/view.php3?id=479.
138. Haiman, J. (1983), ‘Iconic and economic motivation’, Language 59, 781–819.
139. Haldane, J. (1955), ‘Population genetics’, New Biology 18, 34–51.
140. Hamilton, W. (1963), ‘The evolution of altruistic behavior’, American Naturalist 97, 354–356.
141. Hamilton, W. (1964), ‘The genetical evolution of social behavior’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 7, 1–52.
142. Hansen, T. (2003), ‘Is modularity necessary for evolvability? Remarks on the relationship between pleiotropy and evolvability’, BioSystems 69, 83–94.
143. Hare, B., Brown, M., Williamson, C. and Tomasello, M. (2002), ‘The domestication of social cognition in dogs’, Science 298, 1636–1639.
144. Harel, D. (1993), Algorithmics: The Spirit of Computing, second edn, Addison–Wesley, Reading, MA.
145. Haspelmath, M. (1999), ‘Optimality and diachronic adaptation’, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 18(2), 180–205.
146. Hauser, M., Chomsky, N. and Fitch, W. T. (2002), ‘The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?’, Science 298, 1569–1579.
147. Hendriks, P., De Hoop, H. and De Swart, H. (2000), ‘Guest editors’ introduction’, Journal of Semantics 17, 185–187.
148. Hertz-Pannier, L., Chiron, C., Jambaqué, I., Renaux-Kieffer, V., van de Moortele, P. F., Delalande, O., Fohlen, M., Brunelle, F. and Bihan, D. L. (2002), ‘Late plasticity for language in a child’s non-dominant hemisphere: a pre- and post-surgery fMRI study’, Brain 125(2), 361–372.
149. Heylighen, F. (1997), ‘The growth of structural and functional complexity during evolution’, in F. Heylighen and D. Aerts (eds), The Evolution of Complexity, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 17–41.
150. Hockett, C. (1960), ‘The origin of speech’, Scientific American 203(3), 88–96.
151. Hofstadter, D. R. (1980), Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid, Penguin, London.
152. Holmberg, A. (1986), ‘Word Order and Syntactic Features’, PhD thesis, University of Stockholm.
153. Holmberg, A. (1999), ‘Remarks on Holmberg’s Generalization’, Studia Linguistica 53, 1–39.
154. Holmberg, A. (2005), ‘Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish’, Linguistic Inquiry 36(4), 533–564.
155. Hopcroft, J. and Ullman, J. (1979), Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
156. Hornstein, N. (2001), Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
157. Hornstein, N., Nunes, J. and Grohmann, K. (2005), Understanding Minimalism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
158. Hoyle, F. and Wickramasinghe, N. C. (1981), Evolution from Space, J. M. Dent, London.
159. Huang, C-T. (1994), ‘More on Chinese word order and parametric theory’, in B. Lust, M. Suñer and J. Whitman (eds), Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 15–35.
160. Hughes, C. L. and Kaufman, T. C. (2002), ‘Hox genes and the evolution of the arthropod body plan’, Evolution and Development 4(6), 459.
161. Hume, D. H. (1841), The History of England: From the Invasion of Julius Caesar to the Revolution in 1688, T. Cadell, London. [Reprint of original 1778 edition by Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, 1983.]
162. Hurford, J. R. (1987), Language and Number: The Emergence of a Cognitive System, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
163. Hurford, J. R. (2003), ‘The language mosaic and its evolution’, in M. Christiansen and S. Kirby (eds), Language Evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 38–57.
164. Hurford, J. R. (2004), ‘Human uniqueness, learned symbols, and recursive thought’, European Review 12(4), 551–565.
165. Hurford, J. R. (2007), The Origins of Meaning: Language in the Light of Evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
166. Husserl, E. (1970), Logical Investigations, Humanities Press, New York. Translated by J. N. Findlay.
167. Jackendoff, R. (1972), Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
168. Jackendoff, R. (1975), ‘Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon’, Language 51, 639–671.
169. Jackendoff, R. (1977), X-Bar Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
170. Jackendoff, R. (1998), ‘The architecture of the language faculty: A neominimalist perspective’, in P. Culicover and L. McNally (eds), Syntax and Semantics: The Limits of Syntax, Vol. 29, Academic Press, New York, pp. 19–46.
171. Jackendoff, R. (1999), ‘The representational structures of the language faculty and their interactions’, in C. M. Brown and P. Hagoort (eds), The Neurocognition of Language, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 37–79.
172. Jackendoff, R. (2002), Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
173. Jackendoff, R. and Pinker, S. (2005), ‘The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky)’, Cognition 97, 211–225.
174. Jean, R. V. (1994), Phyllotaxis: A Systemic Study in Plant Morphogenesis, Cambridge University Press, New York.
175. Jeffery, W. R. and Martasian, D. P. (1998), ‘Evolution of eye regression in the cavefish astyanax: Apoptosis and the pax-6 gene’, American Zoologist 38(4), 685–696.
176. Johansson, S. (2005), Origins of Language: Constraints on Hypotheses, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
177. Johnson, D. and Lappin, S. (1997), ‘A critique of the Minimalist Program’, Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 272–333.
178. Johnson, D. and Lappin, S. (1999), Local Constraints versus Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
179. Kako, E. (1999), ‘Elements of syntax in the systems of three language-trained animals’, Animal Learning and Behavior 27(1), 1–14.
180. Kalmár, I. (1985), ‘Are there really no primitive languages?’, in D. R. Olson, N. Torrance and A. Hildyard (eds), Literacy, Language and Learning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 148–166.
181. Kawai, N. and Matsuzawa, T. (2000), ‘Numerical memory span in a chimpanzee’, Nature 403, 39–40.
182. Kay, P. and Fillmore, C. (1999), ‘Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The what’s x doing y? construction’, Language 75(1), 1–33.
183. Kayne, R. (1994), The Antisymmetry of Syntax, Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
184. King, A. S. and McLelland, J. (1984), Birds – Their Structure and Function, second edn, Bailliere Tindall, London.
185. Kirby, S. (1997), ‘Competing motivations and emergence: Explaining implicational hierarchies’, Language Typology 1(1), 5–32.
186. Kirby, S. (1999), Function, Selection and Innateness: the Emergence of Language Universals, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
187. Kirby, S. (2002), ‘Learning, bottlenecks and the evolution of recursive syntax’, in T. Briscoe (ed.), Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition: Formal and Computational Models, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 173–203.
188. Kirschner, M. and Gerhart, J. (1998), ‘Evolvability’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95(15), 8420–8427.
189. Kitano, H. (2001), Foundations of Systems Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
190. Krauss, L. (1989), The Fifth Essence: The Search for Dark Matter in the Universe, Basic Books, New York.
191. Kroch, A. (2001), ‘Syntactic change’, in M. Baltin and C. Collins (eds), Handbook of Syntax, Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp. 629–739.
192. Lai, C., Fisher, S., Hurst, J., Vargha-Khadem, F. and Monaco, A. (2001), ‘A novel forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder’, Nature 413, 519–523.
193. Lakoff, G. (1971), ‘On generative semantics’, in D. Steinberg and L. Jakobovits (eds), Semantics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 232–296.
194. Lakoff, G. (1987), Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind, CSLI, Chicago, IL.
195. Langacker, R. (1977), ‘Syntactic reanalysis’, in C. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, University of Texas Press, Austin, TX, pp. 57–139.
196. Langacker, R. (1987), Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
197. Lasnik, H. (2002a), ‘Feature movement or agreement at a distance?’, in A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou, S. Barbiers and H. M. Gaertner (eds), Dimensions of Movement: From Features to Remnants, Linguistik Aktuell, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 189–208.
198. Lasnik, H. (2002b), ‘The Minimalist Program in syntax’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(10), 432–437.
199. Lefebvre, C. (1982), ‘Qui qui vient? où Qui vient: Voila la question’, in C. Lefebvre (ed.), La Syntaxe Comparée du Français Standard et Populaire: Approches Formelles et Fonctionelle, Vol. 1: Langues et Sociétés, Office de la Langue Français, Québec, pp. 47–101.
200. Legendre, G., Grimshaw, J. and Vikner, S. (eds) (2001), Optimality-theoretic Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
201. Leitão, A. and Riebel, K. (2003), ‘Are good ornaments bad armaments? Male chaffinch perception of songs with varying flourish length’, Animal Behavior 66, 161–167.
202. Lerdahl, F. and Jackendoff, R. (1983), A Generative Theory of Tonal Music, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
203. Lewontin, R. C. (1990), ‘The evolution of cognition’, in E. E. Smith and D. N. Osherson (eds), Thinking: An Invitation to Cognitive Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 229–240.
204. Li, M. and Vitanyi, P. M. B. (1997), An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and its Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York.
205. Lieberman, P. (1984), The Biology and Evolution of Language, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
206. Lieberman, P. (1985), ‘On the evolution of human syntactic ability: Its pre-adaptive bases – motor control and speech’, Journal of Human Evolution 14, 657–666.
207. Liu, Y. and Stoller, S. (1999), ‘From recursion to iteration: What are the optimizations?’, ACM Sigplan Notices 34(11), 73–82.
208. Lobeck, A. C. (2000), Discovering Grammar: An Introduction to English Sentence Structure, Oxford University Press, New York.
209. Locke, J. (1689), An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, William Tegg, London.
210. Loeper, H., El Gabali, M. and Neubert, P. (1996), ‘Recursion and iteration in computer programming’, Kuwait Journal of Science and Engineering 23(2), 153–180.
211. MacGregor, A. J. (1985), The Impacted Lower Wisdom Tooth, Oxford University Press, New York.
212. Manzini, M. R. and Roussou, A. (1999), ‘A minimalist theory of A-movement and control’, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 11, 403–440.
213. Manzini, M. R. and Savoia, L. (2002), ‘Parameters of subject inflection in Italian dialects’, in P. Svenonius (ed.), Subjects, Expletives, and the EPP, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 157–200.
214. Marcus, G. F. and Fisher, S. E. (2003), ‘FOXP2 in focus: What can genes tell us about speech and language?’, TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 7(6), 257–262.
215. Markman, E. M. (1989), Categorization and Naming in Children: Problems of Induc tion, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
216. Marler, P. (1977), ‘The structure of animal communication sounds’, in T. H. Bullock (ed.), Recognition of Complex Acoustic Signals (Report of the Dahlem Workshop), Dahlem Konferencen, Berlin, pp. 17–35.
217. Marr, D. (1976), ‘Early processing of visual information’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 275, 483–524.
218. Marr, D. (1982), Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information, W. H. Freemen and Company, New York.
219. Marr, D. and Nishihara, H. K. (1978), ‘Representation and recognition of the spatial organisation of three dimensional structure’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 200, 269–294.
220. Martinet, A. (1955), Économie des changements phonétiques, A. Francke, Bern.
221. Maynard Smith, J. (1994), ‘Optimization theory in evolution’, in E. Sober (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 91–114.
222. Maynard Smith, J. and Szathmáry, E. (1995), The Major Transitions in Evolution, W. H. Freeman and Company, Oxford.
223. McCawley, J. (1968a), ‘Concerning the base component of a transformational grammar’, Foundations of Language 4, 243–269.
224. McCawley, J. (1968b), ‘Lexical insertion in a transformational grammar without deep structure’, in B. Darden, C-J. N. Bailey and A. Davison (eds), Papers from the Fourth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago Department of Linguistics, Chicago, IL, pp. 71–80.
225. McCawley, J. (1968c), ‘The role of semantics in grammar’, in E. Bach and R. Harms (eds), Univer sals in Linguistic Theory, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 125–170.
226. Menzel, E. W. (1973), ‘Chimpanzee spatial memory organization’, Science 182, 943–945.
227. Meyers, L. A. (2004), ‘Life from repeated parts: A review of Modularity in Development and Evolution by Gerhard Schlosser and Günter Wagner (eds.)’, Science 306(5697), 814–815.
228. Mithun, M. (1984), ‘How to avoid subordination’, Proceedings of the tenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 10, 493–523.
229. Narins, P. M. and Capranica, R. R. (1978), ‘Communicative significance of the two-note call of the treefrog Eleutherodactylus coqui’, Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 127, 1–9.
230. Nash, D. (1999), ‘Neurogenetics: Mendelian genetics – single-gene effects and some of their complicating factors’, in B. Jones and P. Mormede (eds), Neurobehavioral Genetics: Methods and Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 59–66.
231. Needham, J. (1933), ‘On the dissociability of the fundamental processes in ontogenesis’, Biological Review 8, 180–223.
232. Nehaniv, C. (2003), ‘Evolvability’, BioSystems 69, 77–81.
233. Newmeyer, F. (1992), ‘Iconicity and generative grammar’, Language 68(4), 757–796.
234. Newmeyer, F. (2003), ‘Review article: On Nature and Language, by N. Chomsky, The Language Organ: Linguistics as Cognitive Physiology, by S. R. Anderson and D. W. Lightfoot, and Language in a Darwinian Perspective, by B. H. Bichakjian, Language 79(3), 583–599.
235. Newmeyer, F. (2004), ‘Cognitive and functional factors in the evolution of grammar’, in ‘Issues in the Coevolution of Language and Theory of Mind’. Online at www.interdisciplines.org/coevolution.
236. Newton, I. (1704), Opticks: or, a Treatise on the Reflexions, Refractions, Inflexions and Colours of Light, Printed for Smith and Walford, printers to the Royal Society.
237. Newton, P. E. and Reddy, V. (1997), ‘The basis for understanding belief’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 25, 343–355.
238. Okanoya, K. (2002), ‘Sexual display as a syntactic vehicle: The evolution of syntax in birdsong and human language through sexual selection’, in A. Wray (ed.), The Transition to Language, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 46–64.
239. Oliphant, M. (2002), ‘Rethinking the language bottleneck: Why don’t animals learn to communicate?’, in K. Dautenhahn and C. L. Nehaniv (eds), Imitation in Animals and Artifacts, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 311–325.
240. Orzack, S. H. and Sober, E. (1994), ‘Optimality models and the test of adaptationism’, The American Naturalist 143(3), 361–380.
241. Oudeyer, P-Y. (2006), Self-Organization in the Evolution of Speech, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
242. Ouhalla, J. (1999), Introducing Transformational Grammar: From Principles and Parameters to Minimalism, second edn, Arnold, London.
243. Peano, G. (1889), Arithmetices principia, nova methodo exposita, Technical report, Turin.
244. Perlmutter, D. (1993), ‘What happens when the language faculty encounters a nonnatural language?’ Paper presented at the Conference on the Robustness of the Language Faculty, Utrecht University.
245. Perruchet, P. and Rey, A. (2005), ‘Does the mastery of centre-embedded linguistic structures distinguish humans from nonhuman primates?’, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 12(2), 307–313.
246. Pinker, S. (1994), The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language, Penguin, New York.
247. Pinker, S. and Bloom, P. (1990), ‘Natural language and natural selection’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13(4), 707–784.
248. Pinker, S. and Jackendoff, R. (2005), ‘The faculty of language: What’s special about it?’, Cognition 95(2), 201–236.
249. Pittendrigh, C. (1958), ‘Adaptation, natural selection, and behavior’, in A. Roe and G. G. Simpson (eds), Behavior and Evolution, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 390–419.
250. Platzack, C. (2003), ‘Agreement and null subjects’, Nordlyd. Tromsø University Working Papers on Language and Linguistics 31(1: Proceedings of SCL 19), 326–355.
251. Pollard, C. and Sag, I. (1994), Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
252. Pollock, J-Y. (1989), ‘Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20(3), 365–424.
253. Povinelli, D. J. and Eddy, T. J. (1996), ‘What young chimpanzees know about seeing’, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 61(3), 153–191.
254. Premack, D. (1983), Gavagai! or the Future History of the Animal Language Controversy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
255. Radford, A. (1997), Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: A Minimalist Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
256. Raff, E. C. and Raff, R. A. (2000), ‘Dissociability, modularity, evolvability’, Evolution and Development 2, 235–237.
257. Raff, R. A. (1996), The Shape of Life, Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL.
258. Rice, M. L., Tomblin, J. B., Hoffman, L., Richman, W. A. and Marquis, J. (2004), ‘Grammatical tense deficits in children with SLI and non specific language impairment: Relationships with non-verbal IQ over time’, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47, 816–834.
259. Ridley, M. (1996), Evolution, second edn, Blackwell Science, Cambridge, MA.
260. Riebel, K. and Slater, P. J. B. (1998), ‘Testing female chaffinch song preferences by operant conditioning’, Animal Behavior 56, 1443–1453.
261. Ritchie, G., Kirby, S. and Hawkey, D. (2008), ‘Song learning as an indicator mechanism: Modelling the developmental stress hypothesis’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 251(4), 570–583.
262. Rizzi, L. (1986), ‘Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro’, Linguistic Inquiry 17, 501–557.
263. Ross, J. R. (1967), ‘Constraints on Variables in Syntax’, PhD thesis, MIT.
264. Rueckl, J. G., Cave, K. R. and Kosslyn, S. M. (1989), ‘Why are “what” and “where” processed by separate cortical visual systems? A computational investigation’, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1, 171–186.
265. Saito, M. and Fukui, N. (1998), ‘Order in phrase structure and movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 29(3), 439–474.
266. Sampson, G. (2005), The ‘Language Instinct’ Debate, Continuum, London.
267. Samuels, R. (2000), ‘Massively modular minds: Evolutionary psychology and cognitive architecture’, in P. Carruthers (ed.), Evolution and the Human Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 13–46.
268. Saunders, P. T. and Ho, M. W. (1976), ‘On the increase of complexity in evolution’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 63, 375–384.
269. Schlosser, G. and Wagner, G. (eds) (2004), Modularity in Development and Evolution, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
270. Schreuder, R. and Baayen, H. (1995), ‘Modelling morphological processing’, in L. Feldman (ed.), Morphological Aspects of Language Processing, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 131–154.
271. Schwab, I., Colin, S. and Pettigrew, J. (2005), ‘Chameleon of the sea’, British Journal of Ophthalmology 89(1), 4.
272. Seuren, P. A. M. (2004), Chomsky’s Minimalism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
273. Seyfarth, R. M. and Cheney, D. L. (1986), ‘Vocal development in vervet monkeys’, Animal Behavior 34, 1640–1658.
274. Seyfarth, R. M. and Cheney, D. L. (1992), ‘Meaning and mind in monkeys’, Scientific American 267, 122–129.
275. Seyfarth, R. M. and Cheney, D. L. (2003), ‘Signalers and receivers in animal communication’, Annual Review of Psychology 54, 145–173.
276. Shapiro, M. (1973), ‘Review of R. Jakobson, Selected Writings, vol. 2’, Indogermanische Forschungen 78, 193–201.
277. Simon, H. A. (1957), Models of Man, Wiley, New York.
278. Simon, H. A. (1984), The Sciences of the Artificial, second edn, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
279. Skelton, P., ed. (1993), Evolution: A Biological and Palaeontological Approach, Addison Wesley, Harlow, pp. 1–23.
280. Skinner, B. F. (1957), Verbal Behavior, Appleton Century Crofts, New York.
281. Smith, K. C. (2001), ‘Appealing to ignorance behind the cloak of ambiguity’, in R. T. Pennock (ed.), Intelligent Design Creationism and its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 705–735.
282. Sober, E. (ed). (1984), The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
283. Solé, R., Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., Montoya, J. and Valverdi, S. (2003), ‘Selection, tinkering, and emergence in complex networks: Crossing the land of tinkering’, Complexity 8(1), 20–33.
284. Sperber, D. (2002), ‘In defense of massive modularity’, in E. Dupoux (ed.), Language, Brain and Cognitive Development: Essays in Honor of Jacques Mehler, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 47–57.
285. Sterelny, K. and Griffiths, P. E. (1999), Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
286. Sternberg, S. (1966), ‘High-speed scanning in human memory’, Science 153, 652–654.
287. Suzuki, D., Griffiths, T., Miller, J. and Lewontin, R. (1989), An Introduction to Genetic Analysis, fourth edn, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
288. Suzuki, R., Buck, J. R. and Tyack, P. L. (2006), ‘Information entropy of humpback whale songs’, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119(3), 1849–1866.
289. Symons, D. (1979), The Evolution of Human Sexuality, Oxford University Press, New York.
290. Tabin, C. J. (1992), ‘Why we have (only) five fingers per hand: Hox genes and the evolution of paired limbs’, Development 116, 289–296.
291. Terrace, H. S. (1979), Nim, Knopf, New York.
292. Terrace, H. S., Pettito, L. A., Sanders, R. J. and Bever, T. G. (1979), ‘Can an ape create a sentence?’, Science 206(4421), 891–902.
293. Theobald, D. (2003), ‘The vestigiality of the human vermiform appendix: A modern reappraisal’. Online at www.talkorigins.org/faqs/vestiges/appendix.html.
294. Tomasello, M. and Call, J. (1997), Primate Cognition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
295. Tomasello, M., Call, J. and Hare, B. (2003), ‘Chimpanzees understand psychological states – the question is which ones and to what extent?’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(4), 153–156.
296. Tononi, G., Sporns, O. and Edelman, G. (1999), ‘Measures of degeneracy and redundancy in biological networks’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 96, 3257–3262.
297. Travis, L. (1984), ‘Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation’, PhD thesis, MIT.
298. Treisman, A. (2004), ‘Psychological issues in selective attention’, in M. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences III, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 529–544.
299. Ujhelyi, M. (1998), ‘Long-call structure in apes as possible precursor for language’, in J. R. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy and C. Knight (eds), Approaches to the Evolution of Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 177–189.
300. Uriagereka, J. (1998), Rhyme and Reason: An Introduction to Minimalist Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
301. Uriagereka, J. (2000), ‘Comments on “Derivation by Phase”’. Unpublished ms., University of Maryland. Online at www.punksinscience.com/kleanthes/courses/UK03S/OSPS/NC_JU_DbP_1.pdf.
302. van der Lely, H. K. J. (2004), ‘Evidence for and implications of a domain-specific grammatical deficit’, in L. Jenkins (ed.), The Genetics of Language, Linguistic Variations series, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 117–145.
303. van der Lely, H. K. J. and Battell, J. (2003), ‘Wh-movement in children with grammatical SLI: A test of the RDDR hypothesis’, Language 79, 153–181.
304. van Valen, L. (1973), ‘A new evolutionary law’, Evolutionary Theory 1, 1–30.
305. von Frisch, K. (1966), The Dancing Bees: An Account of the Life and Senses of the Honey Bee, second edn, Methuen, London.
306. von Frisch, K. (1974), Animal Architecture, Hutchinson, London.
307. Wagner, A. (2000), ‘Robustness against mutations in genetic networks of yeast’, Nature Genetics 24, 355–361.
308. Wagner, A. (2004), ‘Robustness, evolvability, and neutrality.’ Santa Fe Institute Working Paper 04-12-030.
309. Wagner, G. P. (1995a), ‘Adaptation and the modular design of organisms’, in F. Morán, A. Moreno, J. J. Merelo & P. Chacón (eds), Advances in Artificial Life, 3rd European Conference on Artificial Life, Granada, Spain, pp. 317–328.
310. Wagner, G. P. (1995b), ‘Homologues, natural kinds, and the evolution of modularity.’ Online at www.cbc.yale.edu/old/cce/papers/HomNat/homnat.html.
311. Wagner, G. P. (1996), ‘Homologues, natural kinds, and the evolution of modularity’, American Zoology 36, 36–43.
312. Wagner, G. P. and Altenberg, L. (1996), ‘Perspective: Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability’, Evolution 50(3), 967–976.
313. Weinberg, S. (1976), ‘The forces of nature’, Bulletin of the American Society of Arts and Sciences 29(4), 28–29.
314. Wells, R. S. (1947), ‘Immediate constituents’, Language 23, 81–117.
315. West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003), Developmental Plasticity and Evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
316. Whiten, A. (2002), ‘Imitiation of sequential and hierarchical structure in action: Experimental studies with children and chimpanzees’, in K. Dautenhahn and C. Nehaniv (eds), Imitiation in Animals and Artifacts, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 191–209.
317. Whiten, A., Custance, D. M., Gomez, J. C., Teixidor, P. and Bard, K. A. (1996), ‘Imitative learning of artificial fruit processing in children and chimpanzees’, Journal of Comparative Psychology 110, 3–14.
318. Williams, G. C. (1966), Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
319. Williams, R. A. and Myers, P. (1994), The Pathology of the Appendix, Chapman and Hall Medical, New York.
320. Wisan, W. L. (1981), ‘Galileo and the emergence of a new scientific style’, in J. Hintikka, D. Gruender and E. Agazzi (eds), Theory Change, Ancient Axiomatics, and Galileo’s Methodology, Vol. 1, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 311–39.
321. Wolfram, S. (1982), ‘Cellular automata as simple self-organizing systems’, Caltech preprint CALT-68-938.
322. Worden, R. (1998), ‘The evolution of language from social intelligence’, in J. R. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy and C. Knight (eds), Approaches to the Evolution of Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 148–168.
323. Wright, S. (1932), ‘The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding, and selection in evolution’, Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Genetics, 1, 355–366.
324. Wynne-Edwards, V. (ed.) (1986), Evolution Through Group Selection, Blackwell, Oxford.
325. Yamamoto, Y. and Jeffery, W. R. (2000), ‘Central role for the lens in cave fish eye degeneration’, Science 289, 631–633.
326. Yamauchi, H. (2004), ‘Baldwinian Accounts of Language Evolution’, PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
327. Zeevat, H. (2000), ‘The asymmetry of optimality theoretic syntax and semantics’, Journal of Semantics 17, 243–262.
328. Zubay, G. L. (1998), Biochemistry, fourth edn, William C Brown, Dubuque, IA.
329. Zuberbühler, K. (2002), ‘A syntactic rule in forest monkey communication’, Animal Behaviour 63, 293–299.
330. Zuidema, W. H. (2004), ‘The Major Transitions in the Evolution of Language’, PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.