On the blurred methodological matrix of comparative constitutional law

The Migration of Constitutional Ideas

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 39-66

  Hirschl, Ran ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927020277     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511493683.002     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. V. Jackson and M. Tushnet (eds.), Defining the Field of Comparative Constitutional Law (Praeger, Westport, CT, 2002).
2. D. Kommers, The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany (2nd edn, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 1997)
3. L. Sólyom and G. Brunner, Constitutional Judiciary in a New Democracy: The Hungarian Constitutional Court (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 2000).
4. M. Tushnet, The Possibilities of Comparative Constitutional Law (1999) 108 Yale Law Journal 1225.
5. A. Reynolds (ed.), The Architecture of Democracy: Constitutional Design, Conflict Management, and Democracy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002).
6. A.-M. Slaughter, A Typology of Transjudicial Communication (1994) 29 University of Richmond Law Review 99
7. A.-M. Slaughter, A New World Order (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2004).
8. S. Choudhry, Globalization in Search of Justification: Toward a Theory of Comparative Constitutional Interpretation (1999) 74 Indiana Law Review 819 at 820.
9. D. Collier, The Comparative Method: Two Decades of Change in D. Rustow and K. Erickson (eds.), Comparative Political Dynamics: Global Research Perspectives (Harper Collins, New York, 1991), p. 105.
10. V. Jackson and M. Tushnet, Comparative Constitutional Law (Foundation Press, New York, 1999)
11. N. Dorsen et al., Comparative Constitutionalism: Cases and Materials (Thomson/West, St Paul, MN, 2003)
12. D. Kommers et al., American Constitutional Law: Essays, Cases, and Comparative Notes (2nd edn, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, 2004).
13. D. Beatty, The Ultimate Rule of Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004).
14. P. Russell and D. O'Brien (eds.), Judicial Independence in the Age of Democracy: Critical Perspectives from Around the World (University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, 2001).
15. B. Baines and R. Rubio-Marn (eds.), The Gender of Constitutional Jurisprudence (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005).
16. N. Brown, Constitutions in a Nonconstitutional World: Arab Basic Laws and the Prospects for Accountable Government (State University of New York Press, Albany, 2001).
17. W. Prillaman, The Judiciary and Democratic Decay in Latin America: Declining Confidence in the Rule of Law (Praeger, Westport, CT, 2000)
18. H. Schwartz, The Struggle for Constitutional Justice in Post-Communist Europe (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2000).
19. J. Hiebert, New Constitutional Ideas: Can New Parliamentary Models Resist Judicial Dominance When Interpreting Rights? (2004) 82 Texas Law Review 1963.
20. S. Choudhry, The Lochner Era and Comparative Constitutionalism (2004) 2 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1
21. K. Scheppele, Aspirational and Aversive Constitutionalism: The Case For Studying Cross-constitutional Influence Through Negative Models (2003) 1 International Journal of Constitutional Law 296.
22. M. Tushnet, Social Welfare Rights and the Forms of Judicial Review (2004) 82 Texas Law Review 1895.
23. G. King et al., Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1994).
24. H. Brady and D. Collier (eds.), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards (Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, 2004)
25. D. Laitin, The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science (2003) 31 Politics & Society 163
26. S. Tarrow, Bridging the Quantitative- Qualitative Divide in Political Science (1995) 89 American Political Science Review 471.
27. R. Cooter, The Strategic Constitution (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2000).
28. King et al., Designing Social Inquiry
29. Brady and Collier, Rethinking Social Inquiry
30. I. Shapiro et al. (eds.), Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004).
31. A. Przeworski and H. Teune, The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1970)
32. A. George and T. McKeown, Case Studies and Theories of Organizational Decision Making (1985) 2 Advances in Information Processing in Organizations 21
33. C. Ragin, The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1989)
34. A. Lijphart, Comparative Politics and Comparative Method (1971) 65 American Political Science Review 682
35. S. Verba, Some Dilemmas of Political Research (1967) 20 World Politics 111.
36. T. Ginsburg, Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003).
37. W. Eskridge, Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/President Civil Rights Game (1991) 79 California Law Review 613
38. C. Clayton and H. Gillman (eds.), Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1999)
39. L. Epstein and J. Knight, Towards a Strategic Revolution in Judicial Politics: A Look Back, A Look Ahead (2000) 53 Political Research Quarterly 625.
40. G. Helmke, The Logic of Strategic Defection: Court-Executive Relations in Argentina Under Dictatorship and Democracy (2002) 96 American Political Science Review 291.
41. G. Helmke, Courts under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005).
42. L. Epstein et al., The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government (2001) 35 Law & Society Review 117.
43. R. Hirschl, Constitutional Courts vs. Religious Fundamentalism: Three Middle Eastern Tales (2004) 82 Texas Law Review 1819.
44. G. Jacobsohn, The Wheel of Law: India's Secularism in Comparative Constitutional Context (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2003)
45. L. Goldstein, Constituting Federal Sovereignty: The European Union in Comparative Context (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2001).
46. S. Van Evera, Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1997), p. 84.
47. King et al., Designing Social Inquiry, pp. 209, 212.
48. H. Maine, Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1959)
49. E. Durkheim, The Division of Labor in Society (Free Press, Glencoe, IL, 1964)
50. M. Weber, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1978).
51. C. Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays (Basic, New York, 1973).
52. K. Scheppele, Constitutional Ethnography: An Introduction (2004) 38 Law & Society Review 389.
53. M. Shapiro, Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1981).
54. M. Lasser, Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004).
55. King et al., Designing Social Inquiry, p. 209.
56. H. Eckstein, Case Study and Theory in Political Science in F. Greenstein and N. Polsby (eds.), Handbook of Political Science vol. 7 (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975), p. 127.
57. G. Rosenberg, The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1991).
58. C. Epp, Do Bills of Rights Matter? The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1996) 90 American Journal of Political Science 765
59. C. Epp, The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1998).
60. Epp, The Rights Revolution, p. 95.
61. Van Evera, Guide to Methods, pp. 86-7.
62. J. Elster, Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality (rev. edn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988)
63. S. Holmes, Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1995).
64. A Bill of Rights for Britain: Why British Liberty Needs Protection (Chatto & Windus, London, 1990)
65. Freedom's Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MASS, 1996).
66. M. Shapiro, The Success of Judicial Review and Democracy in M. Shapiro and A. Sweet, On Law, Politics, and Judicialization (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002).
67. D. North and B. Weingast, Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth Century England (1989) 49 Journal of Economic History 803
68. B. Weingast, Constitutions as Governance Structures: The Political Foundations of Secure Markets (1993) 149 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 286.
69. R. Hirschl, Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MASS, 2004).
70. L. Goldstein, From Democracy to Juristocracy (2004) 38 Law & Society Review 611.
71. M. Graber, Constructing Judicial Review (2005) 8 Annual Review of Political Science 425.
72. J. Klabbers, Book Review: Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 160.
73. M. Rush, Review: Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (2004) 14 Law & Politics Book Review 552.
74. P. Stein, Legal Evolution: The Story of an Idea (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980).
75. M. Graziadei, The Functionalist Heritage in P. Legrand and R. Munday (eds.), Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003).