The functionalist heritage

Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 100-130

  Graziadei, Michele ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN PIEDMONT   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927083328     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511522260.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. John P. Dawson, The Oracles of the Law(Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Law School, 1968).
2. John H. Merryman, The Civil Law Tradition, 2d ed. (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1985).
3. René David, Les grands systèmes de droit contemporains, 11th ed. by Camille Jauffret-Spinosi (Paris: Dalloz, 2002).
4. René David and John E. C. Brierley, Major Legal Systems in the World Today, 3d ed. (London: Stevens, 1985).
5. Rudolf B. Schlesinger, Comparative Law: Cases-Text-Materials, 6th ed. by Hans W. Baade, Peter E. Herzog and Edward M. Wise (New York: Foundation Press, 1998).
6. Mary Ann Glendon, Michael W. Gordon and Christopher Osakwe, Comparative Legal Traditions, 2d ed. (St Paul: West, 1994), pp. 11–12
7. Arthur T. von Mehren, ‘An Academic Tradition for Comparative Law?’, (1971) 19 Am. J. Comp. L. 624.
8. David Kennedy, ‘New Approaches to Comparative Law: Comparativism and International Governance’, [1997] Utah L.R. 545
9. Jonathan Hill, ‘Comparative Law, Law Reform and Legal Theory’, (1989) 9 Oxford J. Leg. Stud. 101.
10. Konrad Zweigert, ‘Méthodologie du droit comparé’, in Mélanges offerts `a Jacques Maury, vol. I (Paris: Dalloz, 1960), pp. 579–96
11. Kurt Lipstein, ‘Characterization’, in Private International Law, in International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, vol. III, ch. 5 (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1999), pp. 5–8.
12. Ernst Rabel, The Conflict of Laws: A Comparative Study, 2d ed., vol. I (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1945), p. 46.
13. David J. Gerber, ‘Sculpting the Agenda of Comparative Law: Ernst Rabel and the Façade of Language’, in Annelise Riles (ed.), Rethinking the Masters of Comparative Law(Oxford: Hart, 2001), pp. 190–208.
14. Michael Martinek, ‘Wissenschaftsgeschichte der Rechtsvergleichung und des Internationalen Privatsrecht in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland’, in Dieter Simon (ed.), Rechtswissenschaft in der Bonner Republik(Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1994), pp. 539–41.
15. Manfred Wolf, Philipp Heck als Zivilrechtsdogmatiker: Studien zur dogmatischen Umsetzung seiner Methodenlehre(Ebelsbach: Aktiv, 1996).
16. Rudolf B. Schlesinger (ed.), Formation of Contracts: A Study of the Common Core of Legal Systems(Dobbs Ferry: Oceana, 1968), 2 vols.
17. John R. Searle, The Social Construction of Reality(NewYork: Free Press, 1995).
18. Kurt Nadelmann, Arthur T. von Mehren and John Hazard (eds.), XXth Century Comparative and Conflicts Law(Leiden: Sijthoff, 1961), pp. 65–79.
19. Mauro Cappelletti (ed.), Access to Justice (Milan: Giuffrè, 1978)
20. James Gordley and Earl Johnson, Toward Equal Justice: A Comparative Study of Legal Aid in Modern Societies(Milan: Giuffrè, 1975).
21. Reinhard Zimmermann and Simon Whittaker (eds.), Good Faith in European Contract Law(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)
22. Hein Kötz, ‘Towards a European Civil Code: The Duty of Good Faith’, in Peter Cane and Jane Stapleton (eds.), TheLaw of Obligations: Essays in Celebration of John Fleming(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 243–59.
23. Roger Cotterrell, Emile Durkheim: Law in a Moral Domain(Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999), pp. 50–5.
24. Jan G. Platvoet and Arie L. Molendijk (eds.), The Pragmatics of Defining Religion: Contexts, Concepts and Contests (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1999).
25. David Nelken (ed.), Comparing Legal Cultures(Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1997).
26. Manfred Rehbinder (eds.), Rechtssoziologie und Rechtsvergleichung(Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1977).
27. Israel Scheffler, Four Pragmatists: A Critical Introduction to Peirce, James, Mead and Dewey(London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974), p. 81.
28. Jean-Claude Gémar, ‘Seven Pillars for the Legal Translator: Knowledge, Know- How and Art’, in Susan Šarčević (ed.), Legal Translation: Preparation for Accession to the European Union(Rijeka: Faculty of Law, University of Rijeka, 2001), pp. 111
29. A. L. Becker, Beyond Translation(Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995).
30. Pierre Legrand, Le droit comparé(Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1999), pp. 32–49.
31. Hein Kötz, ‘The Trento Project and Its Contribution to the Europeanization of Private Law’, in Mauro Bussani and Ugo Mattei (eds.), Making European Law: Essays on the ‘Common Core’ Project(Trento: Universit`a degli Studi di Trento, 2000), p. 121.
32. A. R. Radcliffe-Brown, Structure and Function in Primitive Society(London: Cohen & West, 1952), p. 202
33. Rodolfo Sacco, ‘Langue et droit’, in Italian National Reports to the XVth International Congress of Comparative Law, Bristol 1998(Milan: Giuffrè, 1998), p. 20
34. Sebastian Poulter, Ethnicity, Law and Human Rights: The English Experience(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 4–9.
35. Rodolfo Sacco, Che cos’è il diritto comparato, ed. by Paolo Cendon (Milan: Giuffrè, 1992).
36. Ugo Mattei and Mauro Bussani, ‘The Common Core Approach to European Private Law’, (1997–8) 3 Columbia J. Eur. L. 339
37. James R. Gordley (ed.), The Enforceability of Promises(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).
38. Bernhard Großfeld, The Strength and Weakness of Comparative Law, transl. by Tony Weir (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990), p. 75.
39. Patrick Riley, The General Will Before Rousseau: The Transformation of the Divine into the Civic(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986), pp. 138–80.
40. Julian H. Franklin, Jean Bodin and the Sixteenth Century Revolution in the Methodology of Law and History(New York: Columbia University Press, 1962), pp. 46–7
41. James Q. Whitman, The Legacy of Roman Law in the German Romantic Era(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990), pp. 109–10.
42. David Nelken and Johannes Feest (eds.), Adapting Legal Cultures(Oxford: Hart, 2001)
43. Elisabetta Grande, Imitazione e diritto: ipotesi sullacircolazione dei modelli(Turin: Giappichelli, 2001)
44. Gianmaria Ajani, ‘By Chance and Prestige: Legal Transplants in Russia and Eastern Europe’, (1995) 43 Am. J. Comp. L. 93.
45. Ulf Hannerz, Cultural Complexity: Studies in the Sociological Organization of Meaning(New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).
46. Alan Watson, Roman Law and Comparative Law(Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press, 1991), p. 97.
47. Richard Abel, ‘Lawas Lag: Inertia as a Social Theory of Law’, (1982) 80 Michigan L.R. 785
48. Lawrence Friedman, ‘Book Review’, (1979) 6 Brit. J. L. & Society 127.
49. Oliver Wendell Holmes, The Common Law, ed. by Sheldon M. Novick (New York: Dover, 1991), pp. 5
50. John W. Burrow, ‘Holmes in His Intellectual Milieu’, in Robert W. Gordon (ed.), The Legacy of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992), pp. 17–26.
51. Alan Barnard, History and Theory in Anthropology(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 158–77
52. Adam Kuper, Culture: The Anthropologists’ Account (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999).
53. Masaji Chiba, Legal Pluralism: Toward a General Theory Through Japanese Legal Culture(Tokyo: Tokai University Press, 1989).
54. Albert O. Hirschman, The Passion and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism Before Its Triumph(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997).