Quality of care in the oncology outpatient setting from patients' perspective: A systematic review of questionnaires' content and psychometric performance

Psycho-Oncology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 382-394

  Bredart A ^a,b   Kop, J L ^c   Efficace, F ^d,e   Beaudeau, A ^a   Brito, T ^b   Dolbeault, S ^a,f   Aaronson, N ^g  

^a INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^d Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases GIMEMA Data Center   (Italy)

^e Universite Paris Sud   (France)

^f UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^g NETHERLANDS CANCER INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

ambulatory care; cancer; cross cultural; patient experience; patient satisfaction; psychometrics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CHECKLIST; CINAHL; CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDLINE; ONCOLOGY; OUTPATIENT CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOMETRY; PSYCINFO; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; AMBULATORY CARE; NEOPLASMS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS; TRANSCULTURAL CARE;

AMBULATORY CARE; CULTURALLY COMPETENT CARE; HUMANS; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84926675948     PISSN: 10579249     EISSN: 10991611     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pon.3661     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. King M, Jones L, Richardson A, et al,. The relationship between patients' experiences of continuity of cancer care and health outcomes: a mixed methods study. Br J Cancer 2008; 98: 529-536.
2. Paul C, Carey M, Anderson A, et al,. Cancer patients' concerns regarding access to cancer care: perceived impact of waiting times along the diagnosis and treatment journey. Eur J Cancer Care 2012; 21: 321-329.
3. Young JM, Butow PN, Walsh J, et al,. Multicenter randomized trial of centralized nurse-led telephone-based care coordination to improve outcomes after surgical resection for colorectal cancer: the CONNECT intervention. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 3585-3591.
4. Harrison JD, Young JM, Price MA, Butow PN, Solomon MJ,. What are the unmet supportive care needs of people with cancer? A systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2009; 17 (8): 1117-1128.
5. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Committee of the Quality of Health Care in America. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2001.
6. Institute of Medicine. Delivering high-quality cancer care. Report brief. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2013.
7. Department of Health. Improving outcomes: a strategy for cancer. Department of Health, London, UK, 2011.
8. Department of Health and Ageing. National service improvement framework for cancer. National Health Priority Action Council, Canberra, Australia, 2005.
9. République Française. Plan Cancer 2014-2019: Guérir et prévenir les cancers: donnons les mêmes chances à tous, partout en France. Paris, France, 2014.
10. Pascoe GC,. Patient satisfaction in primary health care. Eval Program Plann 1983; 6: 185-210.
11. Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S, McMullen W, Delbanco TL,. The relationship between reported problems and patient summary evaluations of hospital care. QRB Qual Rev Bull 1992; 18: 53-59.
12. Donabedian A,. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q 1966; 44 (Suppl): 166-206.
13. Ware JE, Jr., Snyder MK, Wright WR, Davies AR,. Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval Program Plann 1983; 6: 247-263.
14. Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J,. Throught the Patient's Eyes. Understanding and Promoting Patient-Centered Care. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, 1993.
15. Ayanian JZ, Zaslavsky AM, Arora NK, et al,. Patients' experiences with care for lung cancer and colorectal cancer: findings from the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 4154-4161.
16. Hassett MJ, McNiff KK, Dicker AP, et al,. High-Priority topics for cancer quality measure development: results of the 2012 American Society of Clinical Oncology Collaborative Cancer Measure Summit. J Oncol Pract 2014; 10 (3): e160-e166.
17. Oberst MT,. Methodology in behavioral and psychosocial cancer research. Patients' perceptions of care. Measurement of quality and satisfaction. Cancer 1984; 53: 2366-2375.
18. Efficace F, Baccarani M, Rosti G, et al,. Investigating factors associated with adherence behaviour in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: an observational patient-centered outcome study. Br J Cancer 2012; 107: 904-909
19. Gupta D, Rodeghier M, Lis CG,. Patient satisfaction with service quality in an oncology setting: implications for prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Qual Health Care 2013; 25: 696-703
20. Reeve BB, Wyrwich KW, Wu AW, et al,. ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Qual Life Res 2013; 22 (8): 1889-1905.
21. Sitzia J,. How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. Int J Qual Health Care 1999; 11: 319-328.
22. Saila T, Mattila E, Kaila M, Aalto P, Kaunonen M,. Measuring patient assessments of the quality of outpatient care: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract 2008; 14: 148-154.
23. Bredart A, Razavi D, Delvaux N, Goodman V, Farvacques C, Van Heer C,. A comprehensive assessment of satisfaction with care for cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 1998; 6: 518-523.
24. Tzelepis F, Rose SK, Sanson-Fisher RW, Clinton-McHarg T, Carey ML, Paul CL,. Are we missing the Institute of Medicine's mark? A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures assessing quality of patient-centred cancer care. BMC Cancer 2014; 14: 41-73.
25. Lis CG, Rodeghier M, Gupta D,. Distribution and determinants of patient satisfaction in oncology: a review of the literature. Patient Prefer Adherence 2009; 3: 287-304.
26. Bredart A, Sultan S, Regnault A,. Patient satisfaction instruments for cancer clinical research or practice. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2010; 10: 129-141.
27. Darby C,. Measuring the patient's perspective on the interpersonal aspects of cancer care. In Outcomes Assessment in Cancer: Measures, Methods, and Applications, Lipscomb J, Gotay CC, Snyder C, (eds.), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2005; 290-304.
28. Arraras JI, Illarramendi JJ, Viudez A, et al,. The cancer outpatient satisfaction with care questionnaire for chemotherapy, OUT-PATSAT35 CT: a validation study for Spanish patients. Support Care Cancer 2012; 20: 3269-3278.
29. Kleeberg UR, Tews JT, Ruprecht T, Hoing M, Kuhlmann A, Runge C,. Patient satisfaction and quality of life in cancer outpatients: results of the PASQOC study. Support Care Cancer 2005; 13: 303-310.
30. Turhal NS, Efe B, Gumus M, Aliustaoglu M, Karamanoglu A, Sengoz M,. Patient satisfaction in the outpatients' chemotherapy unit of Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey: a staff survey. BMC Cancer 2002; 2: 30-35.
31. Watson DE, Mooney D, Peterson S,. Patients experiences with ambulatory cancer care in British Columbia, 2005/06. University of British Columbia Health Services and Policy Research, 2007.
32. Cancer Control New Zealand. The voice of experience: Part 2. Themes and results of New Zealand's first Cancer Care survey, July 2010.
33. Arraras JI, Rico M, Vila M, et al,. The EORTC cancer outpatient satisfaction with care questionnaire in ambulatory radiotherapy: EORTC OUT-PATSAT35 RT. Validation study for Spanish patients. Psycho-Oncology 2010; 19 (6): 657-664.
34. Mackenzie LJ, Sanson-Fisher RW, Carey ML, D'Este CA,. Radiation oncology outpatient perceptions of patient-centred care: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 2013; 3:e001265.
35. de Kok M, van der Weijden T, Kessels AG, et al,. Patients' opinions on quality of care before and after implementation of a short stay programme following breast cancer surgery. Breast 2010; 19 (5): 404-409.
36. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care [Internet], 2009.
37. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG,. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009; 339:b2535
38. Uijen AA, Heinst CW, Schellevis FG, et al,. Measurement properties of questionnaires measuring continuity of care: a systematic review. PLoS One 2012; 7:e42256.
39. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al,. COSMIN checklist manual. EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research. VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Anna Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands, 2010. Available from: www.cosmin.nl [January 2014].
40. Nunnally JC,. Psychometric Theory (2nd edn). Mc Graw-Hill: New York, 1994.
41. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al,. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60 (1): 34-42.
42. Sitzia J, Wood N,. Development and evaluation of a questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction with chemotherapy nursing care. Eur J Oncol Nurs 1999; 3: 126-140.
43. Booij JC, Zegers M, Evers PM, Hendriks M, Delnoij DM, Rademakers JJ,. Improving cancer patient care: development of a generic cancer consumer quality index questionnaire for cancer patients. BMC Cancer 2013; 13: 203.
44. Bredart A, Razavi D, Robertson C, Didier F, Scaffidi E, de Haes JC,. A comprehensive assessment of satisfaction with care: preliminary psychometric analysis in an oncology institute in Italy. Ann Oncol 1999; 10: 839-846.
45. Bredart A, Razavi D, Robertson C, et al,. A comprehensive assessment of satisfaction with care: preliminary psychometric analysis in French, Polish, Swedish and Italian oncology patients. Patient Educ Couns 2001; 43: 243-252
46. Cheater FM, Preston C, Wynn A, Hearnshaw H, Baker R,. Patients' views of cancer services: development of a questionnaire for accreditation. Eur J Oncol Nurs 1999; 3 (2): 72-82.
47. Iversen HH, Holmboe O, Bjertnaes OA,. The Cancer Patient Experiences Questionnaire (CPEQ): reliability and construct validity following a national survey to assess hospital cancer care from the patient perspective. BMJ Open 2012;e001437.
48. Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Freund KM, et al,. Structural and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a multisite patient navigation research program study. Cancer 2012; 117: 854-861.
49. Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Winters PC, Paskett E, Wells K, Battaglia T,. Psychometric validation and reliability analysis of a Spanish version of the patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a patient navigation research program study. Support Care Cancer 2011; 20: 1949-1956.
50. Jean-Pierre P, Cheng Y, Paskett E, Shao C, Fiscella K, Winters P,. Item response theory analysis of the patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a psychometric investigation in a multicultural sample of 1,296 participants. Support Care Cancer 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2202-7
51. Peipert JD, Beaumont JL, Bode R, Cella D, Garcia SF, Hahn EA,. Development and validation of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy treatment satisfaction (FACIT TS) measures. Qual Life Res 2014; 23 (3): 815-824.
52. Poinsot R, Altmeyer A, Conroy T, et al,. Multisite validation study of questionnaire assessing out-patient satisfaction with care questionnaire in ambulatory chemotherapy or radiotherapy treatment. Bull Cancer 2006; 93: 315-327.
53. Panouilleres M, Anota A, Nguyen TV, et al,. Evaluation properties of the French version of the OUT-PATSAT35 satisfaction with care questionnaire according to classical and item response theory analyses. Qual Life Res 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0658-z
54. Defossez G, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Ingrand I, et al,. Satisfaction with care among patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: development and first steps of validation of the REPERES-60 questionnaire. BMC Cancer 2007; 7: 129-139.
55. de Kok M, Sixma HJ, van der Weijden T, et al,. A patient-centred instrument for assessment of quality of breast cancer care: results of a pilot questionnaire. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19:e40.
56. Lubeck DP, Litwin MS, Henning JM, Mathias SD, Bloor L, Carroll PR,. An instrument to measure patient satisfaction with healthcare in an observational database: results of a validation study using data from CaPSURE. Am J Manag Care 2000; 6: 70-76.
57. Tarrant C, Baker R, Colman AM, et al,. The prostate care questionnaire for patients (PCQ-P): reliability, validity and acceptability. BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9: 199.
58. Wong WS, Fielding R, Wong CM, Hedley AJ,. Psychometric properties of the Nine-Item Chinese Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (ChPSQ-9) in Chinese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Psycho-Oncology 2008; 17: 292-299.
59. Wong WS, Fielding R, Wong C, Hedley A,. Confirmatory factor analysis and sample invariance of the Chinese Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (ChPSQ-9) among patients with breast and lung cancer. Value Health 2009; 12: 597-605.
60. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4:79.
61. Johnson C, Aaronson NK, Blazeby JM, et al,. Guidelines for Developing Questionnaire Modules (4th edn). EORTC Quality of Life Group: Brussels, 2011.
62. Valderas JM, Ferrer M, Mendívil J, et al,. Development of EMPRO: a tool for the standardized assessment of patient-reported outcome measures. Value Health 2008; 11 (4): 700-708.
63. Higgins JPT, Green S, (eds). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. Chapter 17.6a, checklist for assessing and describing Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. (Available from: www.cochrane-handbook.org [July 2013].)
64. Marla S, Stallard S,. Systematic review of day surgery for breast cancer. Int J Surg 2009; 7: 318-323.