Patients' experiences with care for lung cancer and colorectal cancer: Findings from the cancer care outcomes research and surveillance consortium

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 28, Issue 27, 2010, Pages 4154-4161

  Ayanian, John Z ^a   Zaslavsky, Alan M ^a   Arora, Neeraj K ^a   Kahn, Katherine L ^a   Malin, Jennifer L ^a   Ganz, Patricia A ^a   Van Ryn, Michelle ^a   Hornbrook, Mark C ^a   Kiefe, Catarina I ^a   He, Yulei ^a   Urmie, Julie M ^a   Weeks, Jane C ^a   Harrington, David P ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SURGERY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLORECTAL CANCER; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LUNG CANCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NURSING CARE; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ASIAN AMERICAN; CAUCASIAN; COLORECTAL TUMOR; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ETHNOLOGY; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH DISPARITY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HISPANIC; LANGUAGE; LUNG TUMOR; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; AGED; ASIAN AMERICANS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COMMUNICATION; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEALTH STATUS DISPARITIES; HEALTHCARE DISPARITIES; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINEAR MODELS; LOGISTIC MODELS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENTS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957946655     PISSN: 0732183X     EISSN: 15277755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.3268     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Institute of Medicine: Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC, National Academies Press, 2001
2. Eisenberg L: Good technical outcome, poor service experience: A verdict on contemporary medical care? JAMA 285:2639-2641, 2001
3. Sherlaw-Johnson C, Datta P, McCarthy M: Hospital differences in patient satisfaction with care for breast, colorectal, lung and prostate cancers. Eur J Cancer 44:1559-1565, 2008
4. Jha AK, Orav EJ, Zheng J, et al: Patients' perception of hospital care in the United States. N Engl J Med 359:1921-1931, 2008
5. Hewitt M, Simone JV: National Cancer Policy Board: Ensuring Quality Cancer Care. Washington, DC, National Academies Press, 1999
6. President's Cancer Panel: Voices of a Broken System: Real People, Real Problems. Bethesda, MD, National Cancer Institute, 2001
7. Darby C: Measuring the patient's perspective on the interpersonal aspects of cancer care, in Lipscomb J, Gotay C, Snyder CF (eds): Outcomes Assessment in Cancer. Cambridge, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp 290-304
8. Ayanian JZ, Zaslavsky AM, Guadagnoli E, et al: Patients' perceptions of quality of care for colorectal cancer by race, ethnicity, and language. J Clin Oncol 23:6576-6586, 2005 (Pubitemid 46190251)
9. National Cancer Institute: The Nation's Investment in Cancer Research. Bethesda, MD, National Cancer Institute, NIH publication 03-4373, 2004
10. Lipscomb J, Snyder CF: The outcomes of cancer outcomes research: Focusing on the National Cancer Institute's quality-of-care initiative. Med Care 40:III3-III10, 2002 (suppl)
11. Ayanian JZ, Chrischilles EA, Fletcher RH, et al: Understanding cancer treatment and outcomes: The Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium. J Clin Oncol 22:2992-2996, 2004
12. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al: Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 58:71-96, 2008
13. Wagner EH, Greene SM, Hart G, et al: Building a research consortium of large health systems: The Cancer Research Network. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 35:3-11, 2005
14. Pearson ML, Ganz PA, McGuigan K, et al: The case identification challenge in measuring quality of cancer care. J Clin Oncol 20:4353-4360, 2002
15. American Association for Public Opinion Research: Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys, 2008. http://www.aapor.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Standard-Definitions&Template=/ CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=1273
16. Catalano PF, Ayanian JZ, Harrington DP, et al: Representativeness of the CanCORS participants relative to Surveillance, Epidemiology & End Results (SEER) Cancer Registries, AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting. http://bcb.dfci.harvard.edu/catalano/representativenessAHabstrac15jan08.pdf
17. Malin JL, Ko C, Ayanian JZ, et al: Understanding cancer patients' experience and outcomes: Development and pilot study of the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance patient survey. Support Care Cancer 14:837-848, 2006 (Pubitemid 44063448)
18. American Joint Committee on Cancer: AJCC Cancer Staging Atlas. Chicago, IL, Springerlink, 2006
19. Hays RD, Shaul JA, Williams VS, et al: Psychometric properties of the CAHPS 1.0 survey measures: Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study. Med Care 37:MS22-MS31, 1999
20. Arora NK, Weaver KE, Clayman ML, et al: Physicians' decision-making style and psychosocial outcomes among cancer survivors. Patient Educ Couns 77:404-412, 2009
21. Cureton EE, Mulaik SA: The weighted varimax rotation and the promax rotation. Psychometrika 40:183-195, 1975
22. He Y, Zaslavsky AM, Harrington DP, et al: Multiple imputation in a large-scale: A practical guide. Stat Methods Med Res [epub ahead of print on August 4, 2009]
23. Liu R, So L, Quan H: Chinese and white Canadian satisfaction and compliance with physicians. BMC Fam Pract 8:11, 2007
24. Ngo-Metzger Q, Legedza AT, Phillips RS: Asian Americans' reports of their health care experiences: Results of a national survey. J Gen Intern Med 19:111-119, 2004 (Pubitemid 38368459)
25. Green AR, Ngo-Metzger Q, Legedza AT, et al: Interpreter services, language concordance, and health care quality: Experiences of Asian Americans with limited English proficiency. J Gen Intern Med 20:1050-1056, 2005 (Pubitemid 41726662)
26. Ngo-Metzger Q, Sorkin DH, Phillips RS, et al: Providing high-quality care for limited English proficient patients: The importance of language concordance and interpreter use. J Gen Intern Med 22:324-330, 2007 (suppl 2) (Pubitemid 47632320)
27. Bickell NA, Shastri K, Fei K, et al: A tracking and feedback registry to reduce racial disparities in breast cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:1717-1723, 2008
28. Schrag D: Communication and coordination: The keys to quality. J Clin Oncol 23:6452-6455, 2005
29. Arora NK: Importance of patient-centered care in enhancing patient well-being: A cancer survivor's perspective. Qual Life Res 18:1-4, 2009
30. Ulmer C, McFadden B, Nerenz DR: Race, Ethnicity, and Language Data: Standardization for Health Care Quality Improvement. Washington, DC, National Academies Press, 2009