Item response theory analysis of the patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: A psychometric investigation in a multicultural sample of 1,296 participants

Supportive Care in Cancer

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 2229-2240

  Jean Pierre, Pascal ^a,b   Cheng, Ying ^a   Paskett, Electra ^c   Shao, Can ^a   Fiscella, Kevin ^d   Winters, Paul ^d   Raich, Peter C ^e   Roetzheim, Richard ^f   Rosen, Steve T ^g   Dudley, Donald J ^h   Freund, Karen M ⁱ   Warren Mears, Victoria ^j   Patierno, Steven R ^k  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b Harper Cancer Institute   (United States)

^c Ohio State Univ Research Foundation   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITAL AUTHORITY   (United States)

^f H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^g NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

ⁱ TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^j Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board   (United States)

^k DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Cancer Disparities; Item Response Theory; Measure development; Psychometric validation; Psychometrics; Race ethnicity

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; COLORECTAL CANCER; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SATISFACTION WITH CANCER RELATED CARE MEASURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PSYCHOMETRY; RASCH ANALYSIS; STANDARD; THEORY; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT NAVIGATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; UNITED STATES; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84905094765     PISSN: 09414355     EISSN: 14337339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2202-7     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bredart A, Razavi D, Roberson C et al (2001) Assessment of quality of care in an oncology institute using information on patients' satisfaction. Oncology 61:120-128 (Pubitemid 32786205)
2. Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J et al (2008) Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med 358:1250-1261 (Pubitemid 351439226)
3. Sitzia J, Wood N (1997) Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 45:1829-1843 (Pubitemid 27525984)
4. Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
5. Pascoe GC (1983) Patient satisfaction in primary health care: a literature review and analysis. Eval Program Plan 6:185-210
6. Cleary PD, McNeil BJ (1988) Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality of care. Inquiry 25:25-36
7. Lenderking WR (2005) Brief reflections on treatment satisfaction. Value Health 8:S2-S5
8. Saila T, Matilla E, Kaila M et al (2008) Measuring patient assessments of the quality of outpatient care: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract 14:148-154
9. Ware JE Jr, Snyder MK, Wright WR et al (1983) Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval Program Plan 6:247-263
10. Williams B (1994) Patient satisfaction: a valid concept? Soc Sci Med 38:509-516
11. Attkisson CC, Zwick R (1982) The client satisfaction questionnaire. Psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Program Plan 5:233-237
12. Chow A, Meyer E, Darzi A, Athanassion T (2009) Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery 146:435-443
13. Gold DT, McClung B (2006) Approaches to patient education: emphasizing the long-term value of compliance and persistence. Am J Med 119:S32-S37
14. Tomlinson JS (2006) Patient satisfaction: an increasingly important measure of quality. Ann Surg Oncol 13:764-765
15. Borras JM, Sanchez-Hernandez A, Navarro M et al (2001) Compliance, satisfaction, and quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer receiving home chemotherapy or outpatient treatment: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 322:826
16. Lipscomb J, Reeve BB, Clauser SB et al (2007) Patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer trials: taking stock, moving forward. J Clin Oncol 25:5133-5140 (Pubitemid 350232295)
17. Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Freund KM, Clark J, Darnell J, Holden A, Post D, Patierno SR, Winters PC, Patient Navigation Research Program Group (2011) Structural and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with cancer-related care measure: a multi-site patient navigation research program study. Cancer 117(4):854-861
18. Jean-Pierre, P, Fiscella, K, Winters, PC, Post, D, Wells, KJ, McKoy, JM, Battaglia, T, Simon, M, Kilbourn, K, Taylor, E, Roetzheim, RG, Patierno, SR, Dudley, DJ, Raich, PC, Freund, KM. (2011) Psychometric development and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with interpersonal relationship with navigator measure: a multi-site patient navigation research program study. Psycho-Oncol. [Epub ahead of print]. PMID: 21681995
19. Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Winters PC, Paskett E, Wells K, Battaglia T, Patient Navigation Research Program group (2011) Cross-cultural validation of the patient satisfaction with interpersonal relationship with navigator measure. Psycho-Oncol. doi:10.1002/pon.2018, [Epub ahead of print]. PMID 21726018
20. Baghaei P (2010) A comparison of three polychotomous Rasch models for super-item analysis. Psychol Test Assess Model 52:313-322
21. Bond TG, Fox CM(2007) Applying the Rasch Model - fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah
22. Samejima F (1996) The graded response model. In: van der Linden WJ, Hambleton R (eds) Handbook of modern item response theory. Springer, New York, pp 85-100
23. Embretson SE, Reise SP (2000) Item response theory for psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah
24. Cheng Y, Yuan K-H, Liu C (2012) Comparison of reliability measures under factor analysis and item response theory. Educ Psychol Meas 72:52-67
25. Engelhard G, Wilson M (eds) (1996) Objective measurement III: theory into practice. Ablex, Norwood
26. Santor DA, Ramsay JO, Zuroff DC (1994) Nonparametric item analyses of the Beck Depression Inventory: evaluating gender item bias and response option weights. Psych Assess 6:255-270 (Pubitemid 24309294)
27. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, Gershon R, Cook K, Reeve B, Ader D, Fries JF, Bruce B, Rose M, PROMIS Cooperative Group (2007) The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care 45(5 Suppl 1):S3-S11
28. Reeve BB (2003) Item response theory modeling in health outcomes measurement. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 3(2):131-145. doi:10.1586/14737167.3.2.131